Agronomy for Sustainable Development

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 621–633 | Cite as

Novel methods to assess environmental, economic, and social sustainability of main agricultural regions in China

Research Article
First Online:
Accepted:

Abstract

In China, dramatic changes of land use since 1980 have induced environmental and socioeconomic problems threatening food security. Therefore, improving sustainability of land use in China is of utmost importance, especially in agricultural regions. So far, few investigations have analyzed sustainability at small scales in China. Here, we propose a methodological framework for assessing the sustainability level of main agricultural regions in China on regional and county levels. We distinguish four sustainability categories: environmental, economic, social, and comprehensive sustainability. Two methods of measuring sustainability were used: (1) the balanced performance method that measures balanced performance among different aspects and (2) the aggregate achievement method that measures aggregate achievement of all aspects. Spatial variation maps of sustainability across counties were produced using a geographic information system, and the limiting factors in each region were identified. Results show that the two methods give highly different values of sustainability levels. The balanced performance method yields lower sustainability values ranging from 0.06 to 0.57, whereas the aggregate achievement method yields higher sustainability values ranging from 0.11 to 0.87. Such differences have not been addressed in previous studies. Using the balanced performance method, the Sichuan Basin is the most comprehensive sustainability region with a 0.05 level, while Xinjiang is the least comprehensive sustainability region with a 0.01 level. Using the aggregate achievement method, the middle reaches of the Yangtze River and Jianghuai region is the most comprehensive sustainability area with a 0.46 level, whereas South China is the least comprehensive sustainability area with a 0.31 level. Sensitivity analysis showed that Songnen and Sanjiang Plains were more sensitive to the indicator selection and aggregation rules. Scale effects were not observed for sustainability assessment at the regional level.

Keywords

Sustainability assessment Land use Geographic information system Agricultural regions China 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study has been funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 41071065). The authors thank Lanhai Li Professor and Yang Yang for their valuable and constructive comments on the manuscript.

References

  1. Andreoli M, Tellarini V (2000) Farm sustainability evaluation: methodology and practice. Agric Ecosyst Environ 77:43–52. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00091-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrett CB (2010) Measuring food insecurity. Science 327:825–828. doi: 10.1126/science.1182768 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell S, Morse S (2008) Sustainability indicators: measuring the immeasurable? Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Bockstaller C, Girardin P (2003) How to validate environmental indicators. Agric Syst 76:639–653. doi: 10.1016/S0308-521X(02)00053-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyd DR (2001) Canada vs. the OECD: An Environmental Comparison. EcoResearch Law and Policy. University of Victoria, http://www.environmentalindicators.com/htdocs/PDF/CanadavsOECD.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2012
  6. Cai Y, Barry S (1994) Sustainability in agriculture: a general review. Agric Ecosyst Environ 49:299–307. doi: 10.1016/0167-8809(94)90059-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dantsis T, Douma C, Giourga C et al (2010) A methodological approach to assess and compare the sustainability level of agricultural plant production systems. Ecol Indic 10:256–263. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2009.05.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Godfray HCJ, Beddington JR, Crute IR et al (2010) Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327:812–818. doi: 10.1126/science.1185383 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gómez-Limón JA, Riesgo L (2009) Alternative approaches to the construction of a comprehensive indicator of agricultural sustainability: an application to irrigated agriculture in the Duero basin in Spain. J Environ Manag 90:3345–3362. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.05.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Guitouni A, Martel JM (1998) Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method. Eur J Oper Res 109:501–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jiang L, Tong Y, Zhao Z et al. (2003) Impacts of population migration on land degradation in Tarim River Basin, Xinjiang of China. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, May 1–3, Minneapolis, USGoogle Scholar
  12. Jin S (1983) The application of regression equation in the determination of reasonable fertilizer application amount. Gansu Agric Sci Technol 11:9–13 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  13. Kong W, Ou M (2006) Study on the state of cultivated land and its sustainable use in Shandong province. China Popul, Resour Environ 16:44–48 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  14. Liu J, Liu M, Tian H et al (2005) Spatial and temporal patterns of China’s cropland during 1990–2000: an analysis based on Landsat TM data. Remote Sens Environ 98:442–456. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2005.08.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu D, Wang Z, Song K et al (2009) Land use/cover changes and environmental consequences in Songnen Plain, Northeast China. Chinese Geogr Sci 19:299–305. doi: 10.1007/s11769-009-0299-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Malczewski J (2006) GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 20:703–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Meul M, Van Passel S, Nevens F et al (2008) MOTIFS: a monitoring tool for integrated farm sustainability. Agron Sustain Dev 28:321–332. doi: 10.1051/agro:2008001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Meul M, Nevens F, Reheul D (2009) Validating sustainability indicators: focus on ecological aspects of Flemish dairy farms. Ecol Indic 9:284–295. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.05.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nardo M, Saisana M, Saltelli A et al. (2008) Handbook on constructing comprehensive indicators: methodology and user guide. OECD Statistics Working Paper 2005/3, OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/18152031
  20. National Agricultural Regionalization Commission (1981) China’s comprehensive agricultural regionalization. Agricultural Press, Beijing, in ChineseGoogle Scholar
  21. Roy R, Chan NW (2012) An assessment of agricultural sustainability indicators in Bangladesh: review and synthesis. Environmentalist 32:99–110. doi: 10.1007/s10669-011-9364-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shu G, Zhou YX, Zhang MH et al (2001) A sustainable agro-ecological solution to water shortage in the North China Plain (Huabei Plain). J Environ Plan Manage 44:345–355. doi: 10.1080/09640560120046106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tao F, Yokozawa M, Liu J et al (2009) Climate change, land use change, and China’s food security in the twenty-first century: an integrated perspective. Clim Chang 93:433–445. doi: 10.1007/s10584-008-9491-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. TexaSoft (2011) WINKS SDA Software, vol 7. TexaSoft, Cedar HillGoogle Scholar
  25. Van Cauwenbergh N, Biala K, Bielders C et al (2007) SAFE—a hierarchical framework for assessing the sustainability of agricultural systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 120:229–242. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2006.09.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Van Passel S, Nevens F, Mathijs E et al (2007) Measuring farm sustainability and explaining differences in sustainable efficiency. Ecol Econ 62:149–161. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.06.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wu K, Huang R (2001) The sustainable evaluations, the development potentialities and the countermeasures of water and land resources use in the Huang-Huai-Hai Plain. Sci Geogr Sin 21:390–395 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  28. Yang G (2001) The process and driving forces of change in arable-land area in the Yangtze River Delta during the past 50 years. J Nat Resour 16:121–127 (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© INRA and Springer-Verlag France 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources ResearchChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations