A review of methods for the study of bumble bee movement
Understanding animal movement is critical for conservation planning, habitat management, and ecological study. However, our understanding is often limited by methodological constraints. These limitations can be especially problematic in the study of ecologically and economically important pollinators like bumble bees, where several aspects of their biology limit the feasibility of landscape-scale studies. We review the methods available for the study of bumble bee movement ecology, discussing common limitations and tradeoffs among several frequent data sources. We provide recommendations on appropriate use for different life stages and castes, emphasizing where recent methodological advances can help reveal key components of understudied parts of the bumble bee life cycle such as queen movement and dispersal. We emphasize that there is no one correct method and encourage researchers planning studies to carefully consider the data requirements to best address questions of interest.
Keywordsforaging dispersal mark-recapture radio-tracking sibship assignment
We thank H. Woodard, C. Stuligross, E. E. Crone, and N. Pope for helpful comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript. JMM was supported by NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Award 1049702. NMW and JMM were supported by NSF DEB 1354022.
JMM and NMW conceived and developed this review; JMM wrote the initial draft, and NMW participated in the revisions. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Aizen, M. A., C. Smith-Ramírez, C. L. Morales, L. Vieli, A. Sáez, R. M. Barahona-Segovia, M. P. Arbetman, J. Montalva, L. A. Garibaldi, D. W. Inouye, and L. D. Harder. 2019. Coordinated species importation policies are needed to reduce serious invasions globally: The case of alien bumblebees in South America. J. Appl. Ecol. 56:100–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Allen, A. M., and N. J. Singh. 2016. Linking Movement Ecology with Wildlife Management and Conservation. Front. Ecol. Evol. 3 Google Scholar
- Boyle, N. K., A. D. Tripodi, S. A. Machtley, J. P. Strange, T. L. Pitts-Singer, and J. R. Hagler. 2018. A Nonlethal Method to Examine Non-Apis Bees for Mark-Capture Research. J. Insect Sci. 18.Google Scholar
- Crall, J. D., C. M. Switzer, R. L. Oppenheimer, A. N. F. Versypt, B. Dey, A. Brown, M. Eyster, C. Guérin, N. E. Pierce, S. A. Combes, and B. L. de Bivort. 2018. Neonicotinoid exposure disrupts bumblebee nest behavior, social networks, and thermoregulation. Science 362:683–686.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fabre, J.-H. 1918. The mason-bees. Dodd, Mead.Google Scholar
- Free, J. B. 1993. Insect pollination of crops. 2nd Edition. Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
- Goulson, D. 2009. Bumblebees: Behaviour, Ecology, and Conservation. 2 edition. Oxford University Press, Oxford; New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Hemberger, J., and C. Gratton. 2018. Floral resource pulse decreases bumble bee foraging trip duration in central Wisconsin agroecosystem. Ecol. Entomol. 43.Google Scholar
- Ims, R. A., and N. G. Yoccoz. 1997. Studying transfer processes in metapopulations: emigration, migration, and colonization. Pages 247–265 Metapopulation biology. Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Kerr, J. T., A. Pindar, P. Galpern, L. Packer, S. G. Potts, S. M. Roberts, P. Rasmont, O. Schweiger, S. R. Colla, L. L. Richardson, D. L. Wagner, L. F. Gall, D. S. Sikes, and A. Pantoja. 2015. Climate change impacts on bumblebees converge across continents. Science 349:177–180.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kremen, C., N. M. Williams, M. A. Aizen, B. Gemmill-Herren, G. LeBuhn, R. Minckley, L. Packer, S. G. Potts, T. Roulston, I. Steffan-Dewenter, D. P. Vázquez, R. Winfree, L. Adams, E. E. Crone, S. S. Greenleaf, T. H. Keitt, A.-M. Klein, J. Regetz, and T. H. Ricketts. 2007. Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change. Ecol. Lett. 10:299–314.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lihoreau, M., N. E. Raine, A. M. Reynolds, R. J. Stelzer, K. S. Lim, A. D. Smith, J. L. Osborne, and L. Chittka. 2012. Radar Tracking and Motion-Sensitive Cameras on Flowers Reveal the Development of Pollinator Multi-Destination Routes over Large Spatial Scales. PLoS Biol. 10:e1001392.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- O’Connor, S. A. 2013. The Nesting Ecology of Bumblebees. PhD Thesis, University of Stirling.Google Scholar
- Papi, F. 2012. Animal homing. Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
- Pasquet, R. S., A. Peltier, M. B. Hufford, E. Oudin, J. Saulnier, L. Paul, J. T. Knudsen, H. R. Herren, and P. Gepts. 2008. Long-distance pollen flow assessment through evaluation of pollinator foraging range suggests transgene escape distances. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105(36):13456-13461CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Plischuk, S., R. Martín-Hernández, L. Prieto, M. Lucía, C. Botías, A. Meana, A. H. Abrahamovich, C. Lange, and M. Higes. 2009. South American native bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) infected by Nosema ceranae (Microsporidia), an emerging pathogen of honeybees (Apis mellifera). Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 1:131–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rao, S., G. Hoffman, J. Kirby, and D. Horne. 2019. Remarkable long-distance returns to a forage patch by artificially displaced wild bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). J. Apic. Res. 0:1–9.Google Scholar
- Rathcke, B. J., and E. S. Jules. 1993. Habitat fragmentation and plant–pollinator interactions. Curr. Sci. 65:273–277.Google Scholar
- Rundlöf, M., G. K. S. Andersson, R. Bommarco, I. Fries, V. Hederström, L. Herbertsson, O. Jonsson, B. K. Klatt, T. R. Pedersen, J. Yourstone, and H. G. Smith. 2015. Seed coating with a neonicotinoid insecticide negatively affects wild bees. Nature.Google Scholar
- White, G. C., and R. A. Garrott. 2012. Analysis of wildlife radio-tracking data. Elsevier.Google Scholar