Advertisement

Apidologie

, Volume 49, Issue 5, pp 637–646 | Cite as

Plant guttation water as a potential route for pesticide exposure in honey bees: a review of recent literature

  • Amelie SchmolkeEmail author
  • Brian Kearns
  • Bridget O’Neill
Review article

Abstract

Because honey bees periodically collect water, guttation water from treated crops has been suggested as a potential exposure route to systemic pesticides. We reviewed studies that were published in the scientific literature since a previous review of the topic. We identified several studies that reported residue levels of pesticides in guttation water. However, few studies addressed guttation water as a potential exposure route to honey bees. In these studies, no significant effects on honey bee colony health or overwintering survival were observed when colonies were located within fields of treated crops during guttation periods. The previous and current review suggests that exposure to pesticides via guttation water alone is unlikely to negatively affect honey bee colonies. A better understanding of water foraging by honey bees would be needed to address whether guttation water could represent a relevant exposure route of honey bees to systemic pesticides.

Keywords

guttation honey bees pesticide risk assessment neonicotinoids 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We want to thank Gregg Hancock, members of the Pollinator Research Task Force and a reviewer for comments on a previous version of the manuscript, and Jennifer Jackson for manuscript formatting.

Authors’ contribution

AS and BO developed the review goals; AS and BK contributed equally to the literature review and manuscript preparation; all authors contributed to read and approved the final version.

FUNDING INFORMATION

Funding for the work on this review and the preparation of the manuscript was provided by the Pollinator Research Task Force (PRTF).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the work on the review was funded by the Pollinator Research Task Force (PRTF), an industry interest group of crop protection companies.

References

  1. Balfour N. J., Al Toufailia H., Scandian L., Blanchard H. E., Jesse M. P., Carreck N. L., Ratnieks W. (2017) Landscape scale study of the net effect of proximity to a neonicotinoid-treated crop on bee colony health. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51 (18), 10825–10833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blacquière, T., Smagghe, G., van Gestel, C. A. M., Mommaerts, V. (2012) Neonicotinoids in bees: a review on concentrations, side-effects and risk assessment. Ecotoxicology 21 (4), 973–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonmatin, JM., Giorio, C., Girolami, V., Goulson, D, Kreutzweiser, D. P., et al. (2015) Environmental fate and exposure; neonicotinoids and fipronil. Environ. Sci. Pollut. R. 22 (1), 35–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonoan, R. E., Tai, T. M., Tagle Rodriguez, M., Feller, L., Daddario, S. R., Czaja, R. A., O’Connor, L. D., Burruss, G., Starks, P. T. (2017) Seasonality of salt foraging in honey bees (Apis mellifera). J. Ecol. Entomol. 42, 195–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clermont, A., Eickermann, M., Kraus, F., Hoffmann, L., Beyer, M. (2015) Correlations between land covers and honey bee colony losses in a country with industrialized and rural regions. Sci. Total Environ. 532, 1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Codling, G., Al Naggar, Y., Giesy, J.P., Robertson, A.J. (2016) Concentrations of neonicotinoid insecticides in honey, pollen and honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) in central Saskatchewan, Canada. Chemosphere 144, 2321–2328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cutler, G. C., Scott-Dupree, C. D., Sultan, M., McFarlane, A. D., Brewer, L. (2014) A large-scale field study examining effects of exposure to clothianidin seed-treated canola on honey bee colony health, development, and overwintering success. Peer J, DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.652 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). (2013) EFSA guidance document on the risk assessment of plant protection products on bees (Apis mellifera, Bombus spp. and solitary bees). EFSA Journal, 11 (7): 268–3295. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2013.3295 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fairbrother, A., Purdy, J., Anderson, T., Fell, R. (2014) Risks of neonicotinoid insecticides to honeybees. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 33 (4), 719–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Girolami, V., Mazzon, L., Squartini, A., Mori, N., Marzaro, M., Bernardo, A. D., Greatti, M., Giorio, C., Tapparo, A. (2009) Translocation of neonicotinoid insecticides from coated seeds to seedling guttation drops: a novel way of intoxication for bees. J. Econ. Entomol. 102 (5), 1808–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hoffmann, E. J., Castle, S. J. (2012) Imidacloprid in melon guttation fluid: a potential mode of exposure for pest and beneficial organisms. J. Econ. Entomol. 105 (1), 67–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Joachimsmeier, I., Pistorius, J., Heimbach, U., Schenke, D., Kirchner, W. (2011a) Water collection by honey bees–how far will foragers fly to use water sources like guttation drops? a first distance trial using cereals and oilseed rape, in: 11th International Symposium of the ICP-BR Bee Protection Group, Wageningen (The Netherlands), 2-4 November, 2011, Julius-Kühn-Archiv, 437, 82–86Google Scholar
  13. Joachimsmeier I., Pistorius, J., Heimbach, U., Schenke, D., Zwerger P., Kirchner, W. (2011b) Frequency and intensity of guttation events in different crops in Germany, in: 11th International Symposium of the ICP-BR Bee Protection Group, Wageningen (The Netherlands), 2-4 November, 2011, Julius-Kühn-Archiv, 437, 87–90.Google Scholar
  14. Kovac H., Stabentheiner, A., Schmaranzer, S. (2010) Thermoregulation of water foraging honeybees – balancing of endothermic activity with radiative heat gain and functional requirements. J. Insect Physiol. 56 (12), 1834–1845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Krupke, C. H., Long, E. Y. (2015) Intersections between neonicotinoid seed treatments and honey bees. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 10, 8–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kühnholz, S., Seeley, T. D. (1997) The control of water collection in honey bee colonies. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41 (6), 407–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Larson, J. L., Redmond, C. T., Potter, D. A. (2015) Mowing mitigates bioactivity of neonicotinoid insecticides in nectar of flowering lawn weeds and turfgrass guttation. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 34 (1), 127–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lawrence, T. J., Culbert, E. M., Felsot, A. S., Hebert, V. R., Sheppard, W. S. (2016) Survey and risk assessment of Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae) exposure to neonicotinoid pesticides in urban, rural, and agricultural settings, J. Econ. Entomol. 109 (2), 520–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lindauer, M. (1955) The water economy and temperature regulation of the honeybee colony. Bee World 36 (5), 81–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lundin, O., M. Rundlof, Smith, H. G., Fries, I., Bommarco, R. (2015) Neonicotinoid insecticides and their impacts on bees: a systematic review of research approaches and identification of knowledge gaps. PLoS ONE, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136928 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Marzaro, M., Vivan, L., Targa, A., Mazzon, L., Mori, N., et al. (2011) Lethal aerial powdering of honey bees with neonicotinoids from fragments of maize seed coat. B. Insectol. 64 (1), 119–126Google Scholar
  22. McCurdy, J.D., Held, D.W., Gunn, J.M., Barickman, T.C. (2017) Dew from warm-season turfgrasses as a possible route for pollinator exposure to lawn-applied imidacloprid. Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management 3, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2134/cftm2016.09.0063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Neumann, P., Carreck, N. L. (2010) Honey bee colony losses. J. Apicult. Res. 49 (1), 1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nikolakis, A., Keppler, J., Miles, M., Schoening, R. (2014) Neonicotinoid seed treatment products – occurrence and relevance of guttation for honeybee colonies, in: 12th International Symposium of the ICP-PR Bee Protection Group, Ghent (Belgium), 15-17 September, 2014, Julius-Kühn-Archiv, 450, 160–167.Google Scholar
  25. Ostwald M. M., Smith, M. L., Seeley T. D. (2016) The behavioral regulation of thirst, water collection and water storage in honey bee colonies. J. Exp. Biol. 219, 2156–2165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pilling E., Campbell, P., Coulson, M., Ruddle, N., Tornier, I. (2013) A four-year field program investigating long-term effects of repeated exposure of honey bee colonies to flowering crops treated with thiamethoxam. PLoS ONE, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077193 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pistorius, J., Brobyn, T., Campbell, P., Forster, R., Lortsch, J-A., et al. (2011) Assessment of risks to honey bees posed by guttation, in: 11th International Symposium of the ICP-BR Bee Protection Group, Wageningen (The Netherlands), 2-4 November, 2011, Julius-Kühn-Archiv, 437, 199–208Google Scholar
  28. Reetz, J.E., Zühlke, S., Spiteller, M., Wallner, K. (2012) A method for identifying water foraging bees by refractometer analysis: a spotlight on daily and seasonal water collecting activities of Apis mellifera L. J. Verbrauch. Lebensm. 7 (4), 283–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Reetz, J. E., Schulz, W., Seitz, W., Spiteller, M., Zühlke, S., Armbruster, W., Wallner, K. (2015) Uptake of neonicotinoid insecticides by water-foraging honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) through guttation fluid of winter oilseed rape. J. Econ. Entomol. 109 (1), 31–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rortais, A., Arnold, G., Dorne, J-L., More, S. J., Sperandio, G., Streissl, F., Szentes, C., Verdonck, F. (2017) Risk assessment of pesticides and other stressors in bees: Principles, data gaps and perspectives from the European Food Safety Authority. Sci. Total Environ. 587–588, 524–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sanchez-Bayo, F., Goka, K. (2014) Pesticide residues and bees - a risk assessment. PLoS ONE, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094482 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Seeley, T. D. (1995) The Wisdom of the Hive: The Social Physiology of Honey Bee Colonies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  33. Seitz, N., Traynor, K. S., Steinhauer, N., Rennich, K., Wilson, M. E., Ellis, J. D., Rose, R., Tarpy, D. R., Sagili, R. R., Caron, D. M., Delaplane, K. S., Rangel, J., Lee, K., Baylis, K., Wilkes, J. T., Skinner, J. A., Pettis, J. S., vanEngelsdorp, D. (2015) A national survey of managed honey bee 2014–2015 annual colony losses in the USA. J. Apicult. Research 54, 292–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Singh, S. (2013) Guttation: path, principles and functions. Aust. J. Bot. 61, 497–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sponsler, D. B., Johnson, R. M. (2015) Honey bee success predicted by landscape composition in Ohio, USA. PeerJ, DOI: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.838 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tapparo, A., Giorio, C., Marzaro, M., Marton, D., Soldà, L., Girolami, V. (2011) Rapid analysis of neonicotinoid insecticides in guttation drops of corn seedlings obtained from coated seeds. J. Environ. Monit. 13 (6), 1564–1568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Thompson, H. M. (2010) Risk Assessment for Honey Bees and Pesticides-Rrecent Developments and ‘new Issues.’ Pest Manag. Sci. 66 (11), 1157–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2012) White paper in support of the proposed risk assessment process for bees. Environmental Fate and Effects Division. Office of Pesticide Program. Washington, D.C. [online] http://www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/emon/surfwtr/presentations/epa_whitepaper.pdf (accessed on 1 May 2017)
  39. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2014) Guidance for assessing pesticide risks to bees. Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention Office of Pesticide Programs Environmental Fate and Effects Division, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC; Health Canada Pest Management Regulatory Agency, Ottawa, CN; California Department of Pesticide Regulation, Sacramento, CA.Google Scholar
  40. Wirtz, I. P., Hauer-Jákli, M., Schenke, D., Ladewig, E., Märländer, B., Heimbach, U., Pistorius, J. (2018) Investigations on neonicotinoids in guttation fluid of seed treated sugar beet: Frequency, residue levels and discussion of the potential risk to honey bees. Crop Prot. 105, 28–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wood, T. J., Goulson, D. (2017) The environmental risks of neonicotinoid pesticides: a review of the evidence post 2013. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 24 (21), 17285–17325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Woodcock, B. A., Bullock, J. M., Shore, R. F., Heard, M. S., Pereira, M. G., et al. (2017) Country-specific effects of neonicotinoid pesticides on honey bees and wild bees. Science 356, 1393–1395CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© INRA, DIB and Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Waterborne Environmental Inc.LeesburgUSA
  2. 2.DuPont Crop ProtectionWilmingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations