Apidologie

, Volume 46, Issue 3, pp 346–358 | Cite as

Mitochondrial DNA of Euglossa iopoecila (Apidae, Euglossini) reveals two distinct lineages for this orchid bee species endemic to the Atlantic Forest

  • Rafael E. S. Penha
  • Maria C. Gaglianone
  • Fernanda S. Almeida
  • Samuel V. Boff
  • Silvia H. Sofia
Original article

Abstract

This study analysed the population genetic structure of Euglossa iopoecila, an orchid bee species endemic to the Atlantic Forest which shows a variation in the colour of its metallic integument across its distribution. Our analyses were based on microsatellite and mitochondrial markers. From ten microsatellite loci surveyed, six are described herein for the first time. Mitochondrial markers were obtained by sequencing 651 bp of Cytb gene. Bees were collected from six Atlantic Forest remnants distributed along the Serra do Mar Biodiversity Corridor, which is one of the largest remnants of dense forest within the Atlantic Forest of southern and south-eastern Brazil. The microsatellite markers showed lower levels of genetic structure than those found for mitochondrial markers. Our findings based on mitochondrial markers indicate the existence of at least two different evolutionarily significant units of E. iopoecila populations along the Serra do Mar Biodiversity Corridor.

Keywords

euglossine genetic diversity microsatellite markers mtDNA evolutionarily significant units 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank CNPq, CAPES/Procad (158/2007), Fundação Araucária and FBPN for financial support; CAPES for a scholarship awarded to R.E.S. Penha; Maria C. Arias and Elaine Françoso (USP) for the valuable support in constructing the microsatellite-enriched library; ICMBio and IAP, Salto Morato Reserve and IF-São Paulo for the collecting permits; the staff of the State Parks of São Sebastião, Ilhabela and UB (Picinguaba) and the Salto Morato Reserve for providing infrastructure and for their assistance during sampling. Silvia H. Sofia and Maria C. Gaglianone are research fellows from CNPq. Finally, the authors would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions.

Supplementary material

13592_2014_329_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (519 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 519 kb)

REFERENCES

  1. Archie, J.W. (1985) Statistical analysis of heterozygosity data: independent sample comparisons. Evolution 39, 623–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Augusto, S.C., Garófalo, C.A. (2004). Nesting biology and social structure of Euglossa (Euglossa) townsendi Cockerell (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Euglossini). Insect. Soc. 51, 400–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Avise, J.C. (2004). Molecular Markers, Natural History and Evolution. 2nd edn., Sinauer: SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandelt, H.-J., Forster, P., Röhl, A. (1999). Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 37–48CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bawa, K.S., Seidler, R .(1998). Natural forest management and conservation of biodiversity in tropical forests. Conserv. Biol 12, 46–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Billotte, N., Lagoda, P., Risterucci, A.M., Baurens, F.-C. (1999). Microsatellite-enriched libraries: applied methodology for the development of SSR markers in tropical crops. Fruits 54, 277–288Google Scholar
  7. Boff, S., Soro, A., Paxton, R.J., Alves-dos-Santos, I. (2014). Island isolation reduces genetic diversity and connectivity but does not significantly elevate diploid male production in a neotropical orchid bee. Conserv. Genet. doi: 10.1007/s10592-014-0605-0 Google Scholar
  8. Brown, M.J.F., Paxton, R.J. (2009). The conservation of bees: a global perspective. Apidologie 40, 410416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cerântola, N.C.M., Oi, C.A., Cervini, M., Del Lama, M.A. (2011). Genetic differentiation of urban populations of Euglossa cordata from the state of São Paulo, Brazil. Apidologie 42, 214–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Corander, J., Marttinen, P., Siren, J., Tang, J. (2008). Enhanced Bayesian modelling in BAPS software for learning genetic structures of populations. BMC Bioinform. 9, 539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DaSilva, M.B., Pinto-da-Rocha, R. (2011). História biogeográfica da Mata Atlântica: opiliões (Arachnida) como modelo para sua inferência. In: Carvalho, C.J.B., Almeida, E.A.B... (eds.), Biogeografia da América do Sul-Padrões e Processos. Editora Roca: São Paulo. pp. 221–238Google Scholar
  12. Excoffier, L., Lischer, H.E.L. (2010). Arlequin suite v. 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 10, 564–567CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Excoffier, L., Smouse, P.E., Quattro, J.M. (1992). Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131, 479–491PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Faria Jr., L.R.R., Melo, G.A.R. (2007). Species of Euglossa (Glossura) in the Brazilian Atlantic forest, with taxonomic notes on Euglossa stellfeldi Moure (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Euglossina). Rev. Bras. Entomol. 51, 275–284Google Scholar
  15. Ferrari, B.R., Melo, G.A.R. (2014) Deceiving colors: recognition of color morphs as separatespecies in orchid bees is not supported by molecular evidence. Apidologie doi: 10.1007/s13592-014-0280-7 Google Scholar
  16. Frankham, R., Ballou, J.D., Briscoe, D.A. (2010). Introduction to Conservation Genetics, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press: CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Freiria, G.A., Ruim, J.B., Souza, R.F., Sofia, S.H. (2012). Population structure and genetic diversity of the orchid bee Eufriesea violacea (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Euglossini) from Atlantic Forest remnants in southern and southeastern Brazil. Apidologie 43, 392–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Freitas B.M., Imperatriz-Fonseca V.L., Medina L.M., Kleinert A.M.P., Galetto L., Nates-Parra G., Quezada-Euán J.J.G. (2009). Diversity, threats and conservation of native bees in the Neotropics, Apidologie 40, 332–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Galindo-Leal, C., Câmara, I.G. (2003). Atlantic Forest hotspot status: an overview. In: Galindo-Leal, C., Câmara, I.G. (eds.), The Atlantic Forest of South America: Biodiversity Status, Threats, and Outlook. Center for Applied Biodiversity Science and Island Press: Washington DC. pp. 3–11Google Scholar
  20. Giangarelli, D.C., Freiria, G.A., Collatreli, O.P., Suzuki, K.M., Sofia, S.H. (2009). Eufriesea violacea (Blanchard) (Hymenoptera: Apidae): an orchid bee apparently sensitive to size reduction in forest patches. Neotrop. Entomol. 38, 610–615CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hall, T.A. (1999). BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl. Acids Symp. Ser. 41, 95–98Google Scholar
  22. Harrison, R.G. (1993). Hybrid Zones and the Evolutionary Process. Oxford University Press: New York.Google Scholar
  23. Janzen, D.H. (1971). Euglossine bees as long-distance pollinators of tropical plants. Science 171, 203–205CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Jost, L. (2008). GST and its relatives do not measure differentiation. Mol. Ecol. 17, 4015–4026CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kalinowski, S.T. (2005). Hp-rare 1.0: a computer program for performing rarefaction on rarefaction on measures of allelic richness. Mol. Ecol. Notes 5, 187–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kimura, M., Weiss, G.H. (1964). The stepping stone model of population structure and the decrease of genetic correlation with distance. Genetics 49, 561–576PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Librado, P., Rozas, J. (2009). DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25, 1451–1452CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. López-Uribe, M.M., Zamudio, K.R., Cardoso, C.F., Danforth, B.N. (2014). Climate, physiological tolerance and sex-biased dispersal shape genetic structure of Neotropical orchid bees. Mol. Ecol. doi: 10.1111/mec.12689 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Moritz, C. (1999). Conservation units and translocations: strategies for conserving evolutionary processes. Hereditas 130, 217–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nemésio, A. (2009). Orchid bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) of the Brazilian Atlantic forest. Zootaxa 2041, 1–242Google Scholar
  31. Nemésio, A. (2011). Euglossa marianae sp. n. (Hymenoptera: Apidae): a new orchid bee from the Brazilian Atlantic forest and the possible first documented local extinction of a forest-dependent orchid bee. Zootaxa 2892, 59–68Google Scholar
  32. Oliveira, P.E., Behling, H., Ledru, M.-P., Barberi, M., Bush, M. (2005). Paleovegetação e paleoclimas do Quartenário do Brasil. In: Souza, C.R.G., Suguio, K., Santos, A.M., Oliveira, P.E. (eds.), Quaternário do Brasil. Editora Holos: Ribeirão Preto. pp. 52–74Google Scholar
  33. Paxton, R.J., Zobel, M.U., Steiner, J., Zillikens, A. (2009). Microsatellite loci for Euglossa annectans (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and their variability in other orchid bees. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 9, 1221–1223CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Peakall, R., Smouse, P.E. (2012). GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research an update. Bioinformatics 28, 2537–2539CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Ramalho, A.V., Gaglianone, M.C., Oliveira, M.L. (2009). Comunidades de abelhas Euglossina (Hymenoptera, Apidae) em fragmentos de Mata Atlântica no Sudeste do Brasil. Rev. Bras. Entomol. 53, 95–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Raymond, M., Rousset, F. (1995). GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J. Heredity 86, 248–249Google Scholar
  37. Rocha-Filho, L.C., Cerântola, N.C.M., Garófalo, C.A., Imperatriz-Fonseca, V.L., Del Lama, M.A. (2013). Genetic differentiation of the Euglossini (Hymenoptera, Apidae) populations on a mainland coastal plain and an island in southeastern Brazil. Genetica 141, 65–74CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Rousset, F. (2008). Genepop’007: a complete reimplementation of the Genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol. Ecol. Resources 8, 103–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rozen, S., Skaletsky, H.J. (2000). Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers In: Krawetz, S., Misener, S. (eds.), Bioinformatics Methods and Protocols: Methods in Molecular Biology. Humana Press: Totowa. pp. 361–386Google Scholar
  40. Schuelke, M. (2000). An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments: a poor man’s approach to genotyping for research and high-throughput diagnostics. Nature Biotechnol. 18, 232–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Simon, C., Frati, F., Beckenbach, A., Crespi, B., Liu, H., Flook, P. (1994). Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 87, 652–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Souza, R.O., Cervini, M., Del Lama, M.A., Paxton, R.J. (2007). Microsatellite loci for euglossine bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Mol. Ecol. Resour. 7, 1352–1356Google Scholar
  43. Suni, S.S., Brosi, B.J. (2011). Population genetics of orchid bees in a fragmented tropical landscape. Conserv. Genet. 13, 323–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Suni, S.S., Bronstein, J.L., Brosi, B.J. (2014). Spatio-temporal genetic structure of a tropical bee species suggests high dispersal over a fragmented landscape. Biotropica 46, 202209CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Vallone, P.M., Butler, J.M. (2004). AutoDimer: a screening tool for primer-dimer and hairpin structures. BioTechniques 37, 226–31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Wang, I.J. (2010). Recognizing the temporal distinctions between landscape genetics and phylogeography. Mol. Ecol. 19, 2605–2608CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Wright, S. (1978). Evolution and genetics of populations. Vol. 4. Variation within and among natural populations. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  48. Zimmermann, Y., Schorkopf, D.L.P., Moritz, R.F., Pemberton, R.W., Quezada-Euán, J.J.G., Eltz, T. (2011). Population genetic structure of orchid bees (Euglossini) in anthropogenically altered landscapes. Conserv. Genet 12, 1183–1194CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© INRA, DIB and Springer-Verlag France 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rafael E. S. Penha
    • 1
    • 2
  • Maria C. Gaglianone
    • 3
  • Fernanda S. Almeida
    • 1
  • Samuel V. Boff
    • 4
  • Silvia H. Sofia
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratório de Genética e Ecologia Animal, Departamento de Biologia GeralUniversidade Estadual de LondrinaLondrinaBrazil
  2. 2.Programa de Pós-Graduação em Genética e Biologia MolecularUniversidade Estadual de LondrinaLondrinaBrazil
  3. 3.Laboratório de Ciências Ambientais, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia e Recursos NaturaisUniversidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy RibeiroCampos dos GoytacazesBrazil
  4. 4.General ZoologyMartin-Luther-Universität Halle-WittenbergHalleGermany

Personalised recommendations