Stable reference genes for the measurement of transcript abundance during larval caste development in the honeybee
- 365 Downloads
Many genes are differentially regulated by caste development in the honeybee. Identifying and understanding these differences is key to discovering the mechanisms underlying this process. To identify these gene expression differences requires robust methods to measure transcript abundance. RT-qPCR is currently the gold standard to measure gene expression, but requires stable reference genes to compare gene expression changes. Such reference genes have not been established for honeybee caste development. Here, we identify and test potential reference genes that have stable expression throughout larval development between the two female castes. In this study, 15 candidate reference genes were examined to identify the most stable reference genes. Three algorithms (GeNorm, Bestkeeper and NormFinder) were used to rank the candidate reference genes based on their stability between the castes throughout larval development. Of these genes Ndufa8 (the orthologue of a component of complex one of the mitochondrial electron transport chain) and Pros54 (orthologous to a component of the 26S proteasome) were identified as being the most stable. When these two genes were used to normalise expression of two target genes (previously found to be differentially expressed between queen and worker larvae by microarray analysis) they were able to more accurately detect differential expression than two previously used reference genes (awd and RpL12). The identification of these novel reference genes will be of benefit to future studies of caste development in the honeybee.
Keywordscaste development larval development gene expression
RCC would like to thank Caroline Walker for advice and discussion that led to the development of this study. All authors would like to thank Frans Laas and Bettabees for help obtaining larval samples. This work was funded by the Royal Society of New Zealand Marsden Fund Grant (UOO0707) to P.K.D.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
- Andersen, C.L., Jensen, J.L., Orntoft, T.F. (2004) Normalization of real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR data: a model-based variance estimation approach to identify genes suited for normalization, applied to bladder and colon cancer data sets. Cancer Res. 64(15), 5245–5250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lix, L.M., Keselman, J.C., Keselman, H.J. (1996) Consequences of Assumption Violations Revisited: a Quantitative Review of Alternatives to the One-Way Analysis of Variance F Test. Rev. Educ. Res. 66(4), 579–619Google Scholar
- Pfaffl, M.W. (2001) A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 29(9)Google Scholar
- Stabe, H. (1930) The rate of growth of worker, drone and queen larvae of the honeybee Apis mellifera Linn. J. Econ. Entomol. 23(2), 447–453Google Scholar
- Taylor, S., Wakem, M., Dijkman, G., Alsarraj, M., Nguyen, M. (2010) A practical approach to RT-qPCR—publishing data that conform to the MIQE guidelines. Methods. 50(4), S1–S5Google Scholar