Apidologie

, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 201–211 | Cite as

Ontogeny and morphology of the bulbus, part of the male reproductive organ in Apis mellifera carnica (Hymenoptera, Apidae)

Original article

Abstract

The bulbus is a part of the unique functional penis (endophallus) in the genus Apis and was studied in Apis mellifera drones. The bulbus consists of a thin cuticular membrane, covered by four different epithelia (dorsal epithelium, anterior epithelium, ventral epithelium I and ventral epithelium II). One day before eclosion, pupae have no sclerotised plates in the bulbus lumen. In emerging drones, however, the lumen contains tanned plate-like structures, the chitin plates, subjacent are small droplets. The chitin plates are connected to each other by a transparent matrix. They consist of globular sclerotized structures which are connected by a network of fibrils. In young adult drones, the dorsal and lateral epithelia consist of highly columnar gland cells which decrease in thickness from the age of 6–12 days from 140 to 20 μm. The ultrastructural analysis combined with histochemistry shows that the gland cells secrete proteinaceous droplets towards the lumen which pass through the cuticle and the pores of the chitin plates and accumulate in the matrix. In sexually mature drones, all secretions have merged to a rigid connective substance, which extends laterally as a thin tapering membrane. The ventral epithelia I and II have no secretory function. The ventral epithelium II has a mucus-like content and several invaginations towards the lumen of the bulbus which enables widening of the bulbus orifice to discharge the bulbus secretions filled with viscous mucus via the cervix into the queen during the mating process.

Keywords

morphology ontogeny ultrastructure bulbus endophallus honeybees drones 

References

  1. Bancroft, J.D., Gamble, M. (2008) Theory and practice of histological techniques, 6th edn. Churchill Livingstone, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  2. Colonello, N.A., Hartfelder, K. (2003) Protein content and pattern during mucus gland maturation and its ecdysteroid control in honeybee drones. Apidologie 34, 1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Colonello, N.A., Hartfelder, K. (2005) She’s my girl—male accessory gland products and their function in the reproductive biology of social bees. Apidologie 36, 231–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gary N.E. (1969) Mating behaviour of the honeybee. Proc. XXII Int. Beekeep. Congr., 413–414Google Scholar
  5. Gillott, C. (1988) Arthropoda–Insecta. In: Adiyodi, K.G., Adiyodi, R.G. (eds.) Reproductive biology of invertebrates, vol. 3, pp. 319–471. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  6. Gillott, C. (1996) Male insect accessory glands: functions and control of secretory activity. Invertebr. Repr. Dev. 30, 199–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gillott, C. (2003) Male accessory gland secretions: modulators of female reproductive physiology and behavior. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 48, 163–184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Koeniger, G. (1984) Funktionsmorphologische Befunde bei der Kopulation der Honigbiene (Apis mellifera L.). Apidologie 15, 189–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Koeniger, G. (1986) Mating sign and multiple mating in the honeybee. Bee World 67, 141–150Google Scholar
  10. Koeniger, G. (1990) The role of the mating sign in honeybees Apis mellifera L.: does it hinder or promote multiple mating? Anim. Behav. 39, 444–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Koeniger, G., Hänel, H. (1996) The bulbus gland of drones (Apis mellifera L.). Pszcz. Zesz. Nauk. 2, 45–54Google Scholar
  12. Koeniger, G., Hänel, H., Wissel, M., Herth, W. (1996) Cornual gland in the honeybee drone (Apis mellifera L.): structure and secretion. Apidologie 27, 145–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Koeniger, G., Koeniger, N., Mardan, M., Otis, G., Wongsiri, S. (1991) Comparative anatomy of male genital organs in the genus Apis. Apidologie 22, 539–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Leopold, R.A. (1976) The role of male accessory glands in insect reproduction. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 21, 199–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Moors, L., Billen, J. (2009) Age-dependent morphology and ultrastructure of the cornua glands in drones of Apis mellifera. Apidologie 40, 600–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Moors, L., Spaas, O., Koeniger, G., Billen, J. (2005) Morphological and ultrastructural changes in the mucus glands of Apis mellifera drones during pupal development and sexual maturation. Apidologie 36, 245–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Patinawin, S., Wongsiri, S. (1993) Male genitalia of honeybees in Asian apiculture. Proc. 1st Int. Conf. Asian Honeybees and Bee Mites, Bangkok, Thailand. Wicwas Press, Cherhire, CT, USA, pp. 110–116Google Scholar
  18. Snodgrass, R.E. (1941) The male genitalia of Hymeno-ptera. Smithsonian Institution, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  19. Snodgrass, R.E. (1956) Anatomy of the honey bee. Comstock Publ. Assoc. Cornell. Univ. Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  20. Winston, M.L. (1987) The biology of the honey bee. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Wolfner, M.F. (1997) Tokens of love: functions and regulation of Drosophila melanogaster male accessory gland products. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 27, 179–192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Woyke, J. (1956) Anatomo-physiological changes in queen-bees returning from mating flights and the process of multiple mating. Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci. 4, 81–87Google Scholar
  23. Woyke, J. (1958a) The process of mating in the honeybee. Pszcz. Zesz. Nauk. 2, 1–42Google Scholar
  24. Woyke, J. (1958b) The histological structure of the reproductive organs of the drone. Publ. Sect. Agr. Sylv. 19, 38–50Google Scholar
  25. Woyke, J., Ruttner, F. (1958) An anatomical study of the mating process in the honeybee. Bee World 39, 3–18Google Scholar
  26. Woyke, J. (2008) Why the eversion of the endophallus of honey bee drone stops at the partly everted stage and significance of this. Apidologie 39, 627–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zander, E. (1916) Die postembryonale Entwicklung des Geschlechtsapparates der Drohne (Apis mellifica L.). Z. Angew. Ent. 3, 7–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zander, E. (1922) Der Bau der Biene. E. Ulmer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© INRA, DIB-AGIB and Springer-Verlag, France 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Zoological InstituteUniversity of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.Institut für Bienenkunde (Polytechnische Gesellschaft), Fachbereich BiowissenschaftenGoethe Universität, Frankfurt am MainOberurselGermany

Personalised recommendations