Storage and growth temperatures affect growth, flower quality, and bulb quality of Hippeastrum

  • Chaiartid Inkham
  • Prae Piriyapongpitak
  • Soraya RuamrungsriEmail author
Research Report


The effects of storage and growth temperatures on growth, flower quality, and bulb quality of Hippeastrum sp. were studied. Bulbs of Hippeastrum sp. ‘Apple Blossom’ with circumferences in the range of 22–24 cm were selected and stored for 12 weeks at one of three different temperatures (i.e., room temperature [RT: 30 ± 2 °C], 13 ± 2 °C, and 15 ± 2 °C). After storage, the bulbs were grown in a growth chamber at one of three growth temperatures—that is, RT (30 ± 2 °C), 15 ± 2 °C, and 25 ± 2 °C. The results showed that storing bulbs at RT for 12 weeks reduced their quality in terms of fresh weight, diameter, and firmness, whereas storing bulbs at 13 °C or 15 °C retained their quality in terms of fresh weight and firmness. Electron scanning imaging of the starch granules in the bulb scales showed that prior to storage, the leaf base cells were filled with large starch granules of either lenticular shape or spherical shape. After storing for 12 weeks at RT, the starch granules in the bulb scales were sharply reduced in number and were predominantly of the small, spherical form. A growing temperature of 25 °C could stimulate better growth with respect to plant height, flower diameter, bulb diameter, bulb fresh weight, and bulb dry weight, compared with RT (30 °C). A significant interaction between storage and growing temperatures was found for all parameters except for stalk length. A bulb storage temperature of 15 ± 2 °C for 12 weeks combined with a growing temperature of 25 ± 2 °C produced the best results for both flower and bulb production.


Amaryllis Day to flowering Bulb firmness Starch granules Respiration rate 



This research was supported by Chiang Mai University Research Fund. Thanks to H. M. The King’s Initiative Centre for Flower and Fruit Propagation for plant materials.


  1. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (A.O.A.C.) (1990) Official methods of analytical. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Inc, Verginia, p 1289Google Scholar
  2. Balk PA, de Boer AD (1999) Rapid stalk elongation in tulip (Tulipa gesneriana L. cv. Apeldoorn) and the combined action of cold-induced invertase and the water-channel protein γTIP. Planta 209:346–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bose T, Jana KBK, Makhpadhyay TP (1979) Effect of temperature and duration of storage of bulbs on growth and flowering of Hippeastrum. Punjab Hortc J 19:205–207Google Scholar
  4. Cabálková J, Přibyl J, Skládal P, Kulich P, Chmelík J (2008) Size, shape and surface morphology of starch granules from Norway spruce needles revealed by transmission electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy: effects of elevated CO2 concentration. Tree Physiol 28:1593–1599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Charles-Edwards DA, Rees AR (1974) A simple model for the cold requirement of the tulip. Ann Bot 38:401–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Charles-Edwards DA, Rees AR (1975) Tulip forcing: model and reality. Acta Hortic 47:365–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohat J (1993) Gladiolus. In: De Hertogh A, Le Nard M (eds) The physiology of flower bulbs. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 297–320Google Scholar
  8. Davies JN, Kempton RJ (1975) Carbohydrate changes in tulip bulbs during storage and forcing. Acta Hortic 47:353–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Doorduin JC, Verkerke W (2002) Effect of bulb temperature on development of Hippeastrum. Acta Hortic 570:313–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ehlert C, Maurel C, Tardieu F, Simonneau T (2009) Aquaporin-mediated reduction in maize root hydraulic conductivity impacts cell turgor and leaf elongation even without changing transpiration. Plant Physiol 150:1093–1104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eisenbarth D, Weig AR (2005) Dynamics of aquaporins and water relations during hypocotyl elongation in Ricinus communis L. seedlings. J Exp Bot 56:1831–1842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Epharath JE, Ben-Asher J, Alekparov C, Silberbush M, Wolf S, Dayan E (2001) The effect of temperature on the development of Hippeastrum: a phytotron study. Biotronics 30:51–62Google Scholar
  13. Haaland E, Wickstrom A (1975) The effect of storage temperature on carbohydrate interconversion in tulip bulbs. Acta Hortic 47:371–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ijira Y, Ogata R (1997) Effect of ambient temperature on the growth and development of Amaryllis (Hippeastrum hybridum hort.) bulbs. J Jpn Soc Hortic Sci 66:575–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kuehny JS, Miller WB (2008) Storage duration and temperature affect dormancy of Hippeastrum. Acta Hortic 766:169–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mizukoshi K, Nishiwaki T, Ohtake N, Minagawa R, Kobayashi K, Ikarashi T, Ohyama T (1994) Determination of tungstate concentration in plant materials by HNO3-HClO4 digestion and colorimetric method using thiocyanate. Bull Fac Agric Niigata Univ 46:51–56Google Scholar
  17. Moe R, Wickstrom A (1973) The effect of storage temperature on shoot growth, flowering and carbohydrate metabolism in tulip bulbs. Physiol Plant 28:81–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Moe R, Wickstrom A (1979) Effect of precooling at 5 or −1°C on shoot growth, flowering and carbohydrate metabolism in tulip bulbs. Sci Hortic 10:187–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ohyama T, Ikarashi T, Baba A (1986) Analysis of the reserve carbohydrate in bulb scales of autumn planting bulb plant. Jpn J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 57:119-125Google Scholar
  20. Ohyama T, Ikarashi T, Matsubara T, Baba A (1988) Behavior of carbohydrates in mother and daughter bulbs of tulips (Tulipa gesneriana). Soil Sci Plant Nutr 34:405–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ohyama T, Ito M, Kobayashi K, Araki S, Yasuyoshi S, Sasaki O, Yamazaki T, Sayama K, Tamemura R, Izuno Y, Ikarashi T (1991) Analytical procedures of N,P,K content in plant and manure materials using H2SO4-H2O2 Kjeldahl digestion method. Bull Fac Agric Niigata Univ 43:111–120Google Scholar
  22. Okubo H (1993) Hippeastrum (Amaryllis). In: De Hertogh A, Le Nard M (eds) The physiology of flower bulbs. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam, pp 321–334Google Scholar
  23. Platenius H (1942) Effect of temperature on the respiration rate and the respiratory quotient of some vegetables. Plant Physiol 17:179–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rattanapanone N, Boonyakiat D (2005) The postharvest of fruit and vegetable. Odeon Store, Bangkok, p 236Google Scholar
  25. Roberts AN, Blaney LT (1996) Growth and development of Easter lily bulb Lilium longiflorum Thunb., ‘Croft’ Proc. Am Soc Hortic Sci 89:643–650Google Scholar
  26. Smith D, Paulsen GM, Raguse CA (1964) Extraction of total available carbohydrates from grass and legume tissue. Plant Physiol 39:960–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tombolato AFC, Uzzo RP, Junqueira AH, Peetz MS, Stancato GC (2013) Geophyte research and production in Brazil. In: Kamenetsky R, Okubo H (eds) Ornamental geophytes: from basic science to sustainable production. CRC Press, New York, pp 435–447Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society for Horticultural Science 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chaiartid Inkham
    • 1
    • 3
  • Prae Piriyapongpitak
    • 2
  • Soraya Ruamrungsri
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Science and Technology Research InstituteChiang Mai UniversityChiang MaiThailand
  2. 2.Department of Plant and Soil Science, Faculty of AgricultureChiang Mai UniversityChiang MaiThailand
  3. 3.H.M. The King’s Initiative Center for Flower and Fruit PropagationChiang MaiThailand

Personalised recommendations