Advertisement

Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology

, Volume 58, Issue 1, pp 38–47 | Cite as

Effects of simulated in-transit vibration on the vase life and post-harvest characteristics of cut rose flowers

  • Hossein Alizadeh Pouri
  • Abdolhossein Rezaei NejadEmail author
  • Feizollah Shahbazi
Research Report

Abstract

We examined whether exposure to vibration during transport affects the quality of cut roses. Using a laboratory vibration simulator, in-transit vibration of 7.5 or 10 Hz was applied to two cut rose cultivars (‘Polar Star’ and ‘Revival’) at three positions within a compartmented storage bin (top, middle, and bottom) for 10 or 15 min. Post-harvest characteristics of the cut flowers were measured in a test room. We observed that in both cultivars, vibration significantly reduced vase life (VL), decreased relative fresh weight (RFW), and increased flower opening rate (FOR). No significant differences were observed between vibration frequencies, positions, or durations in ‘Polar Star’ with respect to VL. Furthermore, we applied a simulated vibration of 10 Hz to three cut rose cultivars (‘Polar Star’, ‘Magic Red’, and ‘Full House’). We observed that ‘Polar Star’ was more sensitive to vibration damage than the other two cultivars. Pulse treatments coupled with the exogenous application of silver thiosulfate (STS), an ethylene action inhibitor, were applied to ‘Polar Star’ before and after vibration. Independent of the concentration used and time of application, STS significantly decreased FOR, water uptake, water loss, and increased RFW. However, only 1 mM STS applied before vibration extended VL compared to non-vibrated control VL. Thus, vibration during transport could shorten the VL of cut rose flowers. The amount of vibration damage in cut rose flowers is cultivar dependent. Taken together, our data suggest that ethylene underlies the negative impact of vibration on post-harvest characteristics of cut rose flowers. Application of ethylene action inhibitors before transit could reduce or prevent the vibration effects on the post-harvest quality of sensitive cut rose cultivars.

Additional key words

Cut flower Mechanical damage Silver thiosulfate Water relations 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Acican T, Alibas K, and Özelkök I (2007) Mechanical damage to apples during transport in wooden crates. Biosyst Eng 96: 239–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arditti J, Hogan NM, Chadwick AV (1973) Post-pollination phenomena in orchid flowers. IV. Effects of ethylene. Am J Bot 883–888Google Scholar
  3. Barchi G, Berardinelli A, Guarnieri A, Ragni L, Fila CT (2002) Postharvest technology: damage to loquats by vibration-simulating intra-state transport. Biosyst Eng 82: 305–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyer N, Desbiez MO, Hofinger M, Gaspar T (1983) Effect of lithium on thigmomorphogenesis in Bryonia dioica ethylene production and sensitivity. Plant Physiol 72: 522–525CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Çelikel FG, Cevallos JC, Reid MS (2010) Temperature, ethylene and the postharvest performance of cut snapdragons (Antirrhinum majus). Sci Hortic 125: 429–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Çelikel FG, Reid MS (2002a) Postharvest handling of stock (Matthiola incana). Hortscience 37: 144–147Google Scholar
  7. Çelikel FG, Reid MS (2002b) Storage temperature affects the quality of cut flowers from the Asteraceae. Hortscience 37: 148–150PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Çelikel FG, Reid MS (2004) Temperature and postharvest performance of rose (Rosa hybrida L. ‘First Red’) and gypsophila (Gypsophila paniculata L. ‘Bristol Fairy’) flowers. In V International Postharvest Symposium 1789-1794Google Scholar
  9. Cevallos JC, Reid MS (2001) Effect of dry and wet storage at different temperatures on the vase life of cut flowers. HortTechnology 11: 199–202Google Scholar
  10. Evans R, Reid MS (1988) Changes in carbohydrates and osmotic potential during rhythmic expansion of rose petals. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 113: 884–888Google Scholar
  11. Fanourakis D, Pieruschka R, Savvides A, Macnish AJ, Sarlikioti V, Woltering EJ (2013) Sources of vase life variation in cut roses: a review. Postharvest Biol Technol 78: 1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fischer D, Craig W, Ashby BH (1990) Reducing transportation damage to grapes and strawberries. J Food Dist Res 21: 193–202Google Scholar
  13. Fraysse LC, Wells B, McCann MC, Kjellbom P (2005) Specific plasma membrane aquaporins of the PIP1 subfamily are expressed in sieve elements and guard cells. Biol Cell 97: 519–534CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hutchinson M, Chebet D, Emongor V (2004) Effect of accel, sucrose and silver thiosulphate on the water relations and post harvest physiology of cut tuberose flowers. Afr Crop Sci J 11: 279–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ishikawa Y, Kitazawa H, Shiina T (2009) Vibration and shock analysis of fruit and vegetables transport -Cherry transport from Yamagata to Taipei. JARQ-JPN Agr Res Q 43: 129–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kamaluddin M, Zwiazek JJ (2002) Ethylene enhances water transport in hypoxic aspen. Plant Physiol 128: 962–969CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Khan NA (2006) Ethylene action in plants. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, NY. USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kumar N, Srivastava GC, Dixit K (2008) Effect of ethanol plus sucrose on the vase-life of cut rose (Rosa hybrida L.). J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 83: 749–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Le Masson B., Nowak J (1981) Cut-flower life of dry transported carnations as influenced by different silver form pre-treatments. Sci Hortic 15: 383–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Leonard RT, Alexander AM, Nell TA (2011) Postharvest performance of selected Colombian cut flowers after three transport systems to the United States. HortTechnology 21: 435–442Google Scholar
  21. Levitt LK, Stein DB, Rubinstein B (1987) Promotion of stomatal opening by indoleacetic acid and ethrel in epidermal strips of Vicia faba L. Plant Physiol 85: 318–321CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Lü P, Cao J, He S, Liu J, Li H, Cheng G, Ding Y, Joyce DC (2010) Nano-silver pulse treatments improve water relations of cut rose cv. Movie Star flowers. Postharvest Biol Technol 57: 196–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Macnish A, De Theije A, Reid MS, Jiang C (2009) An alternative postharvest handling strategy for cut flowers-dry handling after harvest. Acta Hortic 847: 215–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mayak S, Halevy A (1971) Water stress as the cause for failure of flower bud opening in iris. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 96: 482–483Google Scholar
  25. Merritt F, Kemper A, Tallman G (2001) Inhibitors of ethylene synthesis inhibit auxin-induced stomatal opening in epidermis detached from leaves of Vicia faba L. Plant Cell Physiol 42: 223–230CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Mitchell CA, Myers PN (1995) Mechanical stress regulation of plant growth and development. Hortic Rev 17: 1–42Google Scholar
  27. Nam SJ, Ho PC, Hwa KB (1997) Ethylene production of cut Cymbidium flowers as affected by temperature, vibration, and plant growth regulators. Hortic Environ Biotechnol 39: 103–106Google Scholar
  28. O’Brien M, Guillou R (1969) An in-transit vibration simulator for fruit-handling studies. Trans ASAE 12: 94–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Oeguet H, Peker A, Aydin C (1999) Simulated transit studies on peaches: effects of container, cushion materials and vibration on elasticity modulus. ANA-Agric Mech Asia Afr Lat A 30: 59–62Google Scholar
  30. Olorunda A, Tung M (1985) Simulated transit studies on tomatoes; effects of compressive load, container, vibration and maturity on mechanical damage. Int J Food Sci Technol 20: 669–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pompodakis NE, Joyce DC (2003) ABA analogue effects on vase-life and leaf crisping of cut ‘Baccara’ roses. Aust J Agric Res 43: 425428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reid MS (1999) Advances in shipping and handling of ornamentals. Acta Hortic 543: 277–284Google Scholar
  33. Reid MS, Evans R, Dodge L, Mor Y (1989) Ethylene and silver thiosulfate influence opening of cut rose flowers. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 114: 436–440Google Scholar
  34. Reid MS, Jiang C (2012) Postharvest biology and technology of cut flowers and potted plants. Hortic Rev 40: 1–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Reid MS, Wu MJ (1992) Ethylene and flower senescence. Plant Growth Regul 11: 37–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rudnicki RM, Nowak J, Goszczynska DM (1991) Cold storage and transportation conditions for cut flowers cuttings and potted plants. Acta Hortic 298: 225–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sarda X, Tousch D, Ferrare K, Legrand E, Dupuis J, Casse-Delbart F, Lamaze T (1997) Two TIP-like genes encoding aquaporins are expressed in sunflower guard cells. Plant J 12: 1103–1111CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Scariot V, Paradiso R, Rogers H, De Pascale S (2014) Ethylene control in cut flowers: Classical and innovative approaches. Postharvest Biol Technol 97: 83–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shahbazi F, Rajabipour A, Mohtasebi S, Rafie S (2010) Simulated in-transit vibration damage to watermelons. J Agric Sci Technol 12: 23–34Google Scholar
  40. Tan H, Liu X, Ma N, Xue J, Lu W, Bai J, Gao J (2006) Ethyleneinfluenced flower opening and expression of genes encoding ETRs, CTRs, and EIN3s in two cut rose cultivars. Postharvest Biol Technol 40: 97–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tanaka Y, Sano T, Tamaoki M, Nakajima N, Kondo N, Hasezawa S (2005) Ethylene inhibits abscisic acid-induced stomatal closure in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 138: 2337–2343CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Tanaka Y, Sano T, Tamaoki M, Nakajima N, Kondo N, Hasezawa S (2006) Cytokinin and auxin inhibit abscisic acid-induced stomatal closure by enhancing ethylene production in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot 57: 2259–2266CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. van Doorn WG (2012) Water relations of cut flowers: an update. Hortic Rev 40: 55–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. van Zeebroeck M, Ramon H, De Baerdemaeker J, Nicolaï B, Tijskens E (2007) Impact damage of apples during transport and handling. Postharvest Biol Technol 45: 157–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vursavus KK, ÖzgÜven F (2004) Determining the effects of vibration parameters and packaging method on mechanical damage in golden delicious apples. Turk J Agric For 28: 311–320Google Scholar
  46. Woltering EJ (1990) Interorgan translocation of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid and ethylene coordinates senescence in emasculated Cymbidium flowers. Plant Physiol 92: 837–845CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Xue J, Li Y, Tan H, Yang F, Ma N, Gao J (2008) Expression of ethylene biosynthetic and receptor genes in rose floral tissues during ethylene-enhanced flower opening. J Exp Bot 59: 2161–2169CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Yamamoto K, Komatsu Y, Yokoo Y, Furukawa T (1994) Delaying flower opening of cut roses by cis-propenylphosphonic acid. J JPN Soc Hortic Sci 63: 159–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society for Horticultural Science and Springer-Verlag GmbH 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hossein Alizadeh Pouri
    • 1
  • Abdolhossein Rezaei Nejad
    • 1
    Email author
  • Feizollah Shahbazi
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Horticultural Sciences, Faculty of AgricultureLorestan UniversityKorramabadIran
  2. 2.Department of Biosystem Engineering, Faculty of AgricultureLorestan UniversityKorramabadIran

Personalised recommendations