Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology

, Volume 57, Issue 4, pp 364–370 | Cite as

The influence of elevated CO2 on the photosynthesis, carbohydrate status, and plastochron of young peach (Prunuspersica) trees

  • Anna M. Davidson
  • David Da Silva
  • Sebastian Saa
  • Phillip Mann
  • Theodore M. DeJong
Research Report Cultivation Physiology


The plastochron, defined as the time interval between the initiations of two successive leaves, can also indicate the development of successive phytomers along a shoot. Previous work has shown that crop load impacts the plastochron in field-grown peach (Prunuspersica) trees, which led us to hypothesize that the plastochron of peach trees may be sensitive to the carbon status of the tree. To testthis hypothesis, a 38-day growth chamber study was conducted to determine if elevated CO2 (800 μmol·mol-1) speeds up the plastochron of young peach trees relative to their growth in ambient (400 μmol·mol-1) CO2. The leaf lamina lengths were measured every other day to generate leaf growth rate curves that were fitted against a classic Gompertz growth curve to estimate the time of the initiation of each leaf, which in turn, was used to estimate the plastochron. Additionally, in order to non-destructively gauge the effects of CO2 concentration on plant performance during the experiment, net leaf CO2 assimilation and stomatal conductance measurements were taken approximately half way through and at the end of the 38-day experiment. Doubling the ambient CO2 concentration had no effect on the plastochron, even though the leaf CO2 assimilation rates, leaf starch and total nonstructural carbohydrate concentrations were greater in trees grown in elevated CO2. In addition, there were no significant treatment differences in incremental shoot growth or the number of lateral syleptic shoots.

Additional key words

carbon assimilation rate leaf appearance rate metamer phyllochron 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Ackerly DD, Coleman JS, Morse SR, Bazzaz F (1992) CO2 and temperature effects on leaf area production in two annual plant species. Ecology 73:1260–1269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen MT, Prusinkiewicz P, DeJong TM (2005) Using L-systems for modeling source-sink interactions, architecture and physiology of growing trees: the L-PEACH model. New Phytol 166:869–880CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Askenasy E (1880) Uber eineneuemethode, um die ver-theilung der wachsthumsintensitatwachsendentheilenzubestimmen. VerHeidelb 2:70–153Google Scholar
  4. Baker JT, Allen LH, Boote KJ, Jones P, Jones JW (1989) Response of soybean to air temperature and carbon dioxide concentration. Crop Sci 29:98–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berman, ME, DeJong TM (2003) Seasonal patterns of vegetative growth and competition with reproducitve sinks in peach (Prunuspersica). J HorticSciBiotechnol 78:303–309Google Scholar
  6. Bertero H (2001) Effects of photoperiod, temperature and radiation on the rate of leaf appearance in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd.) under field conditions. Ann Bot 87:495–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cao W, Moss DN (1989) Temperature effect on leaf emergence and phyllochron in wheat and barley. Crop Sci 29:1018–1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Centritto M (2002) The effects of elevated CO2 and water availability on growth and physiology of peach (Prunuspersica) plants. Plant Biosyst 136:177–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Contador ML, Comas LH, Metcalf SG, Stewart WL, Gomez IP, Negron C, Lampinen BD (2015) Root growth dynamics linked to above-ground growth in walnut (Juglansregia). Ann Bot 116:49–60CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Da Silva D, Favreau R, Auzmendi I, Dejong TM (2011) Linking water stress effects on carbon partitioning by introducing a xylem circuit into L-PEACH. Ann Bot 41:433–447Google Scholar
  11. Davidson AM (2014) Ph.D. Dissertation, Understanding the regulatory effects of temperature, water, shoot type, and carbon availability on the phyllochron of Prunuspersica. University of California, DavisGoogle Scholar
  12. DeJong TM, Doyle JF (1985) Seasonal relationships between leaf nitrogen content (photosynthetic capacity) and leaf canopy light exposure in peach (Prunuspersica). Plant Cell Environ 8:701–706Google Scholar
  13. De Jong TM, Day KR (1991) Relationships between shoot productivity and leaf characteristics in peach canopies. HortScience 26:1271–1273Google Scholar
  14. Drake BG, Gonzalez-Meller MA, Long SP (1997) More efficient plants: a consequence of rising atmospheric CO2? Annual Review Plant PhysiolMol Bio 48:607–637Google Scholar
  15. Erickson RO, Michelini FJ (1957) Theplastochron index. Am J Bot 44:297–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Farage PK, McKee I, Long SP (1998) Does a low nitrogen supply necessarily lead to acclimation of photosynthesis to elevated CO2? Plant Physiol 118:573–580CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Frank AB, Bauer F (1996) Temperature, nitrogen, and carbon dioxide effects on spring wheat development and spikelet numbers. Crop Sci 36:659–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gompertz B (1825) On the nature of the function expressive of the law of human mortality, and on a new method of determining the value of life contigencies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 115:513–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grossman YL, DeJong TM (1994) PEACH: A simulation model of reproductive and vegetative growth in peach trees. Tree Physiol 14:329–345CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Grossman YL, DeJong TM (1995) Maximum vegetative growth potential and seasonal patterns of resource dynamics during peach growth. Ann Bot 76:473–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grossman YL, DeJong TM (1998) Training and pruning system effectson vegetative growth potential, light interception, and cropping efciency in peach. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 123:1058–1064Google Scholar
  22. Hofstra G, Hesketh JD (1975) The effects of temperature and CO2 enrichment on photosynthesis in soybean. In Marcelle, R. eds. Environmental and Biological control of photosynthesis. The Netherlands Springer 71–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kervella J, Pagès L, Genard M (1995) Growth context and fate of axillary meristems of young peach trees. Influence of parent shoot growth characteristics and of emergence date. Ann Bot 76:559–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Longnecker N, Robson A (1994) Leaf emergence of spring wheat receiving varying nitrogen supply at different stages of development. Ann Bot 74:1–7CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lopez G, Favreau RR, Smith C, Costes E, Prusinkiewicz P, DeJong TM (2008) Integrating simulation of architectural development and sourcesink behaviour of peach trees by incorporating Markov chains and physiological organ function submodels into L-PEACH. Funct Plant Bio 35:761–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rogers HH, Cure JD, Thomas JF, Smith JM (1984) Influence of elevated CO2 on growth of soybean plants. Crop Sci 24:361–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rosati A, Esparza G, DeJong TM, Pearcy RW (1999) Influence of canopy light environment and nitrogen availability on leaf photosynthetic characteristics and photosynthetic nitrogen-use-efficiency of field grown nectarine trees. Tree Physiol 20: 271–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sanchez B, Rasmussen A, Porter JR. (2014). Temperatures and the growth and development of maize and rice: a review. Glob Chang Biol 20:408–417CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Shöenfield M., Johnson R, Ferris D (1989) Development of winter wheat under increased atmospheric CO2 and water limitation at tillering. Crop Sci 29:1083–1086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Silk WK (1980) Plastochron indices in cantaloupe grown on an irrigation line source. Botanical Gazete 141:73–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Slafer G, Rawson HM (1997) CO2 effects on phasic development, leaf number and rate of leaf appearance in wheat. Ann Bot 79:75–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith D (1969) Removing and analyzing total nonstructural carbohydrates from plant tissue. Wisconsin Agricultural Experiment Station Research Report 41Google Scholar
  33. Tremmel DC, Patterson DT (1994) Effects of elevated CO2 and temperature on development in soybean and five weeds. Can J Plant Sci 74:43–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wheeler T, Von Braun J (2013) Climate Change Impacts on Global Food Security. Science 341:508–513CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. White J (1979) The plant as a metapopulation. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 10:109–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society for Horticultural Science and Springer-Verlag GmbH 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna M. Davidson
    • 1
  • David Da Silva
    • 1
  • Sebastian Saa
    • 2
  • Phillip Mann
    • 1
  • Theodore M. DeJong
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant Sciences University of California, One Shields AvenueDavisUSA
  2. 2.Escuela de AgronomíaPontificia Universidad Católica de ValparaísoQuillotaChile

Personalised recommendations