Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology

, Volume 56, Issue 6, pp 740–748 | Cite as

Effects of summer pruning combined with winter pruning on bush growth, yields, and fruit quality of ‘Misty’ southern highbush blueberry for two years after planting

  • Soo Gyeong Lee
  • Jung Gun Cho
  • Mi Hee Shin
  • Sung Bok Oh
  • Hong Lim Kim
  • Jin Gook KimEmail author
Research Report


The effects of winter pruning severity and the date of summer pruning on growth, yields, and fruit quality of ‘Misty’ southern highbush blueberry were studied. The pruning treatments were as follows: 1) winter pruning severity [unpruned control, conventional pruning (30% removed), and severe pruning (50% removed)] and 2) winter pruning (conventional pruning) + summer pruning date (June 20, July 20, and August 20). The number of buds was highest (894.6) with conventional winter pruning (CWP) + summer pruning (SP) on July 20, followed by conventional pruning (CP) (784.4), then no pruning (NP) (712.2), severe winter pruning (SWP) (656), CWP + SP on June 20 (540), and finally CWP + SP on August 20 (333.4). In general, the improvement in light penetration to the canopy, shaping of bearing shoots, and strengthened cane were observed in the treatment of winter pruning combined with summer pruning on July 20. In the following year, total yields were highest with NP (1,648 g), followed by CWP + SP on July 20 (1,364 g), then CWP + SP on August 20 (962 g), CWP + SP on June 20 (859 g), SWP (844 g), and CWP (762 g). Fruit weight results were as follows: CWP + SP on June 20 (1.53 g) > SWP (1.50 g) > CWP + SP on August 20 (1.48 g) > CWP + SP on July 20 (1.44 g) > CWP (1.40 g) > NP (1.10 g), but there was no statistical difference between the fruit weight results except compared to no pruning treatment. Fruit (berries) were used to investigate SSC, TA, total sugar, firmness, total phenolic content, and anthocyanin content, and no significant differences were found among the treatments.

Additional key words

flower bud pruning intensity pruning timing secondary shoot 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Bañados, P., P. Uribe, and D. Donnay. 2009. The effect of summer pruning date in ‘Star’, ‘O’Neal’ and ‘Elliott’. Acta Hortic. 810:501–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brightwell, W.T. and S. Johnston. 1944. Pruning the highbush blueberry. Mich. State Coll. Agric. Exp. Stn. Tech. Bull. 192.Google Scholar
  3. Demirtas, M.N., I. Bolat, S. Ercisli, A. Ikinci, H. Olmez, M. Sahin, M. Altindag, and B. Celik. 2010. The effects of different pruning treatments on seasonal variation of carbohydrates in ‘Hacihaliloglu’ apricot cultivar. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj-Napoca 38:223–227.Google Scholar
  4. Dubois, M., K.A. Gilles, J.K. Hamilton, P. Rebers, and F. Smith. 1956. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal. Chem. 28:350–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gough, R.E. 1983. Time of pruning and bloom date in cultivated highbush blueberry. HortScience 18:934–935.Google Scholar
  6. Gough, R.E. 1994. The highbush blueberry and its management, p. 137–149. The Haworth Press, Binghamton, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  7. Guerra, M and P.A. Casquero. 2010. Summer pruning: An ecological alternative to postharvest calcium treatment to improve storability of high quality apple cv. ‘Reinette du Canada’. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 16:343–350PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Guimond, C.M., G.A. Lang, and P.K. Andrews. 1998. Timing and severity of summer pruning affects flower initiation and shoot regrowth in sweet cherry. HortScience 33:647–649.Google Scholar
  9. Hancock, J.F. and J.W. Nelson. 1985. Factors influencing yields of Vaccinium corymbosum L. in Michigan. Acta Hortic. 165:107–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hanson, E., J. Hancock, D.C. Ramsdell, A. Schilder, G. VanEe, and R. Ledebuhr. 2000. Sprayer type and pruning affect the incidence of blueberry fruit rots. HortScience 35:235–238.Google Scholar
  11. Kappel, F., M. Bouthillier, and R. Brownlee. 1997. Summer pruning young ‘Sweetheart’ sweet cherry trees affects yield and tree size. HortScience 32:1034–1036.Google Scholar
  12. Kim, J.G., H.L. Kim, S.J. Kim and K.S. Park. 2013. Fruit quality, anthocyanin and total phenolic contents, and antioxidant activities of 45 blueberry cultivars grown in Suwon, Korea. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 14:793–799.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mainland, C.M. 1993. Blueberry production strategies. Acta Hortic. 346:111–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Marini, R.P. and M.C. Marini. 1983. Seasonal changes in specific leaf weight, net photosynthesis, and chlorophyll content of peach leaves as affected by light penetration and canopy position. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 108:600–605.Google Scholar
  15. Morales, P. and F.S. Davies. 2000. Pruning and skirting affect canopy microclimate, yields, and fruit quality of ‘Orlando’ tangelo. HortScience 35:30–35.Google Scholar
  16. Müller, J.L. 2011. Pruning and pollination studies on southern highbush blueberries (V. corymbosum L. interspecific hybrids). Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch, South Africa.Google Scholar
  17. Nieuwenhuis, J.C. 1993. Pruning systems in highbush blueberries. Acta Hortic. 346:173–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Retamales, J.B. and J.F. Hancock. 2012. Blueberries. p. 172–177. CABI Publishing, Wallingford. UK.Google Scholar
  19. Siefker, J.A. and J.F. Hancock. 1987. Pruning effects on productivity and vegetative growth in the highbush blueberry. HortScience 22:210–211.Google Scholar
  20. Strik, B. and G. Buller. 2005. The impact of early cropping on subsequent growth and yield of highbush blueberry in the establishment years at two planting densities is cultivar dependant. HortScience 40:1998–2001.Google Scholar
  21. Strik, B., G. Buller, and E. Hellman. 2003. Pruning severity affects yield, berry weight, and hand harvest efficiency of highbush blueberry. HortScience 38:196–199.Google Scholar
  22. Usenik, V., A. Solar, D. Meolic, and F. Stampar. 2008. Effects of summer pruning on vegetative growth, fruit quality and carbohydrates of ‘Regina’ and ‘Kordia’ sweet cherry trees on ‘Gisela 5’. Eur. J. Hortic. Sci. 73:62–68.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society for Horticultural Science and Springer-Verlag GmbH 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Soo Gyeong Lee
    • 1
  • Jung Gun Cho
    • 2
  • Mi Hee Shin
    • 1
  • Sung Bok Oh
    • 1
  • Hong Lim Kim
    • 3
  • Jin Gook Kim
    • 1
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture and Life SciencesGyeongsang National UniversityJinjuKorea
  2. 2.Department of Horticulture and Landscape ArchitectureColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA
  3. 3.Namhae Sub-Station, National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal ScienceRural Development AdministrationNamhaeKorea
  4. 4.Institute of Agriculture and Life ScienceGyeongsang National UniversityJinjuKorea

Personalised recommendations