Advertisement

Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology

, Volume 56, Issue 4, pp 462–471 | Cite as

Air anions improve growth and mineral content of kale in plant factories

  • So-Ra Lee
  • Tae-Hwan Kang
  • Chung-Su Han
  • Myung-Min OhEmail author
Research Report Protected Horticulture

Abstract

Air anions affect plant growth by stimulating various biological mechanisms. We investigated the effect of atmospheric anion concentrations on plant growth and mineral concentration in kale (Brassica oleracea var. acephala cv. TBC) plants cultivated in a plant factory. Kale seedlings grown under normal growth conditions for two weeks were transplanted to a nutrient film technique (NFT) system in a plant factory equipped with light-emitting diodes (LEDs) [red:white:blue (RWB) = 8:1:1 and red:green:blue (RGB) = 8:1:1, 181 ± 4.0 µmol·m−2·s−1, 12 h photoperiod]. Three concentrations of air anions (low, 2.9 × 105 ions·cm−3; medium, 5.4 × 105 ions·cm−3; and high, 7.8 × 105 ions·cm−3) were applied to the kale seedlings for four weeks using high voltage air anion generators. The medium and high levels of air anions increased shoot fresh weight to approximately 1.5-fold compared to the control after four weeks. Medium and high-level air anion treatments led to significantly higher leaf area than the control. The medium level of air anions improved the photosynthetic rate at four weeks of treatment although there was no significant difference between air anion treatments and the control. In addition, transpiration rate and stomatal conductance were significantly increased in the low and medium levels of air anion treatments, which likely supported biomass accumulation. Air anions also increased mineral uptake. The content of macroelements (P, K, Ca, Mg, and S) was at least 1.5-fold higher for plants exposed to RGB LEDs and 1.3-fold higher under RWB LEDs exposure. Microelements (Fe, Mn, and Zn) were increased at least 1.6- and 1.3-fold in kale shoots treated with air anions under RGB and RWB LEDs, respectively. In conclusion, air anions had a positive effect on kale growth and air anion generators could be used as a new technology for enhancing plant growth in plant factories and greenhouses.

Additional key words

greenhouse photosynthesis stomatal conductance transpiration 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Bachman, C.H., D.G. Hademenos, and L.S. Underwood. 1971. Ozone and air ions accompanying biological applications of electric fields. J. Atmosph. Terr. Phys. 33:497–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Black, J.D., F.R. Forsyth, D.S. Fensom, and R.B. Ross. 1971. Electrical stimulation and its effects on growth and ion accumulation in tomato plants. Canad. J. Bot. 49:1809–1815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blackman, V.H. and A.T. Legg. 1924. Pot-culture experiments with an electric discharge. J. Agric. Sci. 14:268–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blinks, L.R. 1949. The source of the bioelectric potentials in large plant cells. PNAS USA. 35:566–575.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Chee, C.K. 2009. Effect of negative ion. 2nd ed. Living books, Seoul, Korea.Google Scholar
  6. Clarkson, D.T. 1985. Factors affecting mineral nutrient acquisition by plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 36:77–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cramariuc, R., V. Donescu, M. Popa, and B. Cramariuc. 2005. The biological effect of the electrical field treatment on the potato seed: agronomic evaluation. J. Electrostat. 63:837–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Evans, H.J. and G.J. Sorger. 1966. Role of mineral elements with emphasis on the univalent cations. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 17: 47–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Feder, W.A. and F. Sullivan. 1969. Ozone; depression of frond multiplication and floral production in duckweed. Science 165: 1373–1374.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Friml, J. 2003. Auxin transport–shaping the plant. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 6:7–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Havlin, J.L. and P.N. Soltanpour. 1980. A nitric acid plant tissue digest method for use with inductively coupled plasma spectrometry. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 11:969–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hoagland, D.R. and D.I. Arnon. 1950. The water-culture method for growing plants without soil. Calif. Agr. Expt. Sta. Circ. 347:1–32.Google Scholar
  13. Homan, C. 1937. Effects of ionized air and ozone on plants. Plant Physiol. 12:957–978.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Jarrell, W.M. and R.B. Beverly. 1981. The dilution effect in plant nutrition studies. Adv. Agron. 34:197–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kjeldahl, J. 1883. A new method for the determination of nitrogen in organic matter. Z. Anal. Chem. 22:366–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kotaka, S., A.P. Krueger, K. Nishizawa, T. Ohuchi, M. Takenobu, Y. Kogure, and P.C. Andriese. 1965. Air ion effects on the oxygen consumption of barley seedlings. Nature 208:1112–1113.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kotaka, S. and A.P. Krueger. 1978. Effects of air ions on microorganisms and other biological materials. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 6:109–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Krueger, A.P., S. Kotaka, and P.C. Andriese. 1962a. Some observations on the physiological effects of gaseous ions. Intl. J. Biometeor. 6:33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Krueger, A.P., S. Kotaka, and P.C. Andriese. 1962b. Studies on the effects of gaseous ions on plant growth. J. Gen. Physiol. 45:879–895.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Krueger, A.P., S. Kotaka, and P.C. Andriese. 1964. Studies on air-ion-enhanced iron chlorosis, I. Active and residual iron. Int. J. Biometeor. 8:5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lemström, S. 1904. Electricity in agriculture and horticulture. Electrician Publication. London, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marino, A.A., F.X. Hart, and M. Reichmanis. 1983. Weak electric fields affect plant development. IEEE Trans. Bio-Med. Eng. 30: 833–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Maw, M.G. 1967. Periodicities in the influences of air ions on the growth of garden cress, Lepidium sativum. Canad. J. Plant Sci. 47:499–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Murr, L.E. 1964. Mechanism of plant-cell damage in an electrostatic field. Nature 201:1305–1306.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Murr, L.E. 1965. Biophysics of plant growth in an electrostatic field. Nature 206:467–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Murr, L.E. 1966. Physiological stimulation of plants using delayed and regulated electric field environments. Int. J. Biometeor. 10: 147–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pohl, H.A. 1977. Electroculture. J. Biol. Phys. 5:3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pohl, H.A. and G.W. Todd. 1981. Electroculture for crop enhancement by air anions. Int. J. Biometeor. 25:309–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Robinson, K.R. 1985. The responses of cells to electrical fields: a review. J. Cell Biol. 101:2023–2027.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Scott, B.I.H. 1966. Electric fields in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 18:409–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sidaway, G.H. and G.F. Asprey. 1968. Influence of electrostatic fields on plant respiration. Int. J. Biometeor. 12:321–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith, R.F. and W.H. Fuller. 1961. Identification and mode of action of a component of positively-ionized air causing enhanced growth in plants. Plant Physiol. 36:747–751.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Song, M.J., T.H. Kang, C.S. Han, and M.M. Oh. 2014. Air anions enhance lettuce growth in a plant factory. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 55:293–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Taiz, L. and E. Zeiger. 2006. Plant physiology. 4th ed. Sinauer Associates. Sunderland, MA, USA.Google Scholar
  35. Veen, B.W. 1981. Relation between root respiration and root activity, p. 277–280. In: R. Brouwer, O. Gašparíková, J. Kolek, and B. C. Loughman (eds.). Structure and Function of Plant Roots. Martinus Nijhoff Publisher. Leiden, Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Went, F.W. 1932. Eine botanische polarisationstheorie. Jb. Wiss. Bot. 76:528–557.Google Scholar
  37. Wong, S.C., I.R. Cowan, and G.D. Farquhar. 1979. Stomatal conductance correlates with photosynthetic capacity. Nature 282:424–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yamaguchi, F.M. and A.P. Krueger. 1983. Electroculture of tomato plants in a commercial hydroponics greenhouse. J. Biol. Phys. 11:5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society for Horticultural Science and Springer-Verlag GmbH 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • So-Ra Lee
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tae-Hwan Kang
    • 3
  • Chung-Su Han
    • 4
  • Myung-Min Oh
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Division of Animal, Horticultural and Food SciencesChungbuk National UniversityCheongjuKorea
  2. 2.Brain Korea 21 Center for Bio-Resource DevelopmentChungbuk National UniversityCheongjuKorea
  3. 3.Department of Bio-industry Mechanical EngineeringKongju National UniversityYesanKorea
  4. 4.Department of Bio-systems EngineeringChungbuk National UniversityCheonjuKorea

Personalised recommendations