Physical and compositional characteristics of ‘mitsuko’ and local hardy kiwifruits in Japan

Research Report Cultivation Physiology

Abstract

The fruit characteristics of hardy kiwifruit (Actinidia arguta) in Japan were investigated at several growth stages. Fruit weight of A. arguta ‘Mitsuko’ increased showing a double sigmoid curve. After fruit set, starch accumulated gradually and reached maximum concentration 90 days after full bloom (DAFB). Along with the reduction of the starch, sugar contents increased. Sucrose was a major sugar component in mature fruit. At the early stage of fruit development, myo-inositol was predominant. Quinic acid was prevalent in the young fruit. The amount of quinic acid decreased once in mid-season, and then increased slightly again. Citric acid increased gradually with maturation. The amount of malic acid and soluble oxalic acid was little affected by fruit maturity. The concentration of ascorbic acid was relatively high at the early stage of fruit development. It decreased in mid-season and then remained constant. Among the 2 cultivars and 14 local collections, the fruit shape varied being obovate, oblate, ellipsoid, and clavate. The fresh weight of 16 collected fruits ranged from 3.6 to 25.1 g. Fruit skin was glabrous and the surface color varied from green to dark green. Flesh color was basically green or dark green. Soluble solids content (SSC) of juice ranged from 10.2 to 17.0%. Sugar content varied from 4.1 to 9.5 mg · 100 g−1 FW. Myo-inositol content ranged from 266.4 to 771.1 mg · 100 g−1 FW. Major organic acids were quinic, citric, and malic acid, and citric acid was predominant. Total acid content ranged from 1.4 to 2.1 mg · 100 g−1 FW. Total ascorbic acid content ranged from 22.8 to 222.1 mg · 100 g−1 FW. Protease activity in the juice was generally high and varied from 6.1 to 92.6 nmol ρNA released · min−1, among the cultivars and local collections.

Additional key words

actinidin fruit development organic acids sugars vitamin C 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Boldingh, H., G.S. Smith, and K. Klages. 2000. Seasonal concentrations of non-structural carbohydrates of five Actinidia species in fruit, leaf and fine root tissue. Ann. Bot. 85:469–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chat, J., P.Y. Dumoulin, Y. Bastard, and R. Monet. 1996. Cytometric and morphometric identification of diploid, tetraploid and pentaploid plants derived from Actinidia arguta (2n = 4x) crossed with A. deliciosa (2n = 6x). Plant Breeding 115:378–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chávez-Servín, J.L., A.I. Castellote, and M.C. López-Sabater. 2004. Analysis of mono- and disaccharides in milk-based formulae by high-performance liquid chromatography with refractive index detection. J. Chromatogr. A. 1043:211–215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clements, R.S. and B. Darnell. 1980. Myo-inositol content of common foods: development of a high-myo-inositol diet. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 33:1954–1967.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dubois, M., K.A. Gilles, J.K. Hamilton, P.A. Rebers, and F. Smith. 1956. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal. Chem. 28:350–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ferguson, A.R. 2007. The need for characterisation and evaluation of germplasm: Kiwifruit as an example. Euphytica 154:371–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ferguson, A.R. and H. Huang. 2007. Genetic resources of kiwifruit: Domestication and breeding. Hort. Rev. 33:1–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fiocchi, A., P. Restani, L. Bernardo, A. Martelli, C. Ballabio, E. D’Auria, and E. Riva. 2004. Tolerance of heat-treated kiwi by children with kiwifruit allergy. Pediatr. Allergy Immunol. 15:454–458.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hopping, M.E. 1976. Structure and development of fruit and seeds in Chinese gooseberry (Actinidia chinensis Planch.). N. Z. J. Bot. 14:63–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hubbard, N.L., D.M. Pharr, and S.C. Huber. 1990. Role of sucrose phosphate synthase in sucrose biosynthesis in ripening bananas and its relationship to the respiratory climacteric. Plant Physiol. 94:201–208.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jang, D.S., G.Y. Lee, J. Kim, Y.M. Lee, J.M. Kim, Y.S. Kim, and J.S. Kim. 2008. A new pancreatic lipase inhibitor isolated from the roots of Actinidia arguta. Arch. Pharm. Res. 31:666–670.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kataoka, I., T. Mizugami, J.G. Kim, K. Beppu, T. Fukuda, K. Suezawa, H. Konno, S. Sugahara, K. Tanaka, H. Satoh, and K. Tozawa. 2006. Distribution and character of ploidy variance in Actinidia arguta. Hort. Res. (Japan) 75(Suppl. 2):121.Google Scholar
  13. Kataoka, I., T. Mizugami, J.G. Kim, K. Beppu, T. Fukuda, S. Sugahara, K. Tanaka., H. Satoh, and K. Tozawa. 2010. Ploidy variation of hardy kiwifruit (Actinidia arguta) resources and geographic distribution in Japan. Sci. Hort. 124:409–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Klages, K., H. Donnison, H. Boldingh, and E. MacRae. 1998. myo-Inositol is the major sugar in Actinidia arguta during early fruit development. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 25:61–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lim, H.W., J.G. Shim, H.K. Choi, and M.W. Lee. 2005. Phenolic compounds from barks of Actinidia arguta planchon growing in Korea and its anti-oxidative and nitric oxide production inhibitory activities. Kor. J. Pharmacogn. 36:245–251.Google Scholar
  16. Lykkesfeldt, J. 2000. Determination of ascorbic acid and dehydroascorbic acid in biological samples by high-performance liquid chromatography using subtraction methods: Reliable reduction with tris[2-carboxyethyl] phosphine hydrochloride. Anal. Biochem. 282:89–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. MacRae, E.A., J.H. Bowen, and M.G.H. Stec. 1989. Maturation of kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa cv Hayward) from two orchards: Differences in composition of the tissue zones. J. Sci. Food Agric. 47:401–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Marsh, K., S. Attanayake, S. Walker, A. Gunson, H. Boldingh, and E. MacRae. 2004. Acidity and taste in kiwifruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 32:159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Marsh, K.B., H.L. Boldingh, and C.H. Cheng. 2007. Quinic acid and composition in Actinidia. Acta Hort. 753:447–452.Google Scholar
  20. Nishino, H. 2008. Cancer prevention by functional foods. Int. J. Canc. Prev. 2:323–325.Google Scholar
  21. Nishiyama, I. 2007. Fruits of the Actinidia genus. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 52:293–324.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nishiyama, I., T. Fukuda, and T. Oota. 2005. Genotypic differences in chlorophyll, lutein, and -carotene contents in the fruits of Actinidia species. J. Agric. Food Chem. 53:6403–6407.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nishiyama, I., T. Fukuda, A. Shimohashi, and T. Oota. 2008. Sugar and organic acid composition in the fruit juice of different Actinidia varieties. Food Sci. Technol. Res. 14:67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nishiyama, I., T. Fukuda, and T. Oota. 2004a. Varietal differences in actinidin concentration and protease activity in the fruit juice of Actinidia arguta and Actinidia rufa. J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci. 73:157–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nishiyama, I., Y. Yamashita, M. Yamanaka, A. Shimohashi, T. Fukuda, and T. Oota. 2004b. Varietal difference in vitamin C content in the fruit of kiwifruit and other Actinidia species. J. Agric. Food Chem. 52:5472–5475.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Okamoto, G. and S. Goto. 2005. Juice constituents in Actinidia arguta fruits produced in Shinjo, Okayama. Sci. Rep. Fac. Agr. Okayama Univ. 94:9–13.Google Scholar
  27. Okuse, I. and K. Ryugo. 1981. Compositional changes in the developing ‘Hayward’ kiwi fruit in California. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 106:73–76.Google Scholar
  28. Park, J.H., Y.J. Lee, and J.K. Choi. 2005. Pharmacognostical study on the Korean folk medicine “Da Rae Ip”. Kor. J. Pharmacogn. 36:26–33.Google Scholar
  29. Perera, C.O., I.C. Hallett, T.T. Nguyen, and J.C. Charles. 1990. Calcium oxalate crystals: The irritant factor in kiwifruit. J. Food Sci. 55:1066–1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Phivnil, K. 2005. Evaluation of characteristics of native and introduced resources of Actinidia in Japan. PhD Diss., Ehime Univ., Ehime, Japan.Google Scholar
  31. Phivnil, K., K. Beppu, T. Takamura, T. Fukuda, and I. Kataoka. 2005. Flow cytometric assessment of ploidy in native resources of Actinidia in Japan. J. Amer. Pomo. Soc. 59:44–49.Google Scholar
  32. Préstamo, G. 1995. Actinidin in kiwifruit cultivars. Z Lebensm Unters Forsch. 200:64–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reid, M.S., D.A. Heatherbell, and H.K. Pratt. 1982. Seasonal patterns in chemical composition of the fruit of Actinidia chinensis. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 107:316–319.Google Scholar
  34. Richardson, A.C., K.B. Marsh, H.L. Boldingh, A.H. Pickering, S.M. Bulley, N.J. Frearson, A.R. Ferguson, S.E. Thornber, K.M. Bolitho, and E.A. MacRae. 2004. High growing temperatures reduce fruit carbohydrate and vitamin C in kiwifruit. Plant Cell Environ. 27:423–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rush, E.C., M. Patel, L.D. Plank, and L.R. Ferguson. 2002. Kiwifruit promotes laxation in the elderly. Asia Pacific J. Clin. Nutr. 11:164–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sanz, M.L., M. Villamiel, and I. Martínez-Castro. 2004. Inositols and carbohydrates in different fresh fruit juices. Food Chem. 87:325–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Taguchi, H., S. Watanabe, T. Hirao, H. Akiyama, S. Sakai, T. Watanabe, R. Matsuda, A. Urisu, and T. Maitani. 2007. Specific detection of potentially allergenic kiwifruit in foods using polymerase chain reaction. J. Agric. Food Chem. 55:1649–1655.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Watanabe, K. and B. Takahashi. 1998. Determination of soluble and insoluble oxalate contents in kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa) and related species. J. Japan. Soc. Hort. Sci. 67:299–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Whang, J.I., H.I. Moon, and O.P. Zee. 2000. Phytochemical constituents of Actinidia arguta. Kor. J. Pharmacong. 31:357–363.Google Scholar
  40. Williams, M.H., L.M. Boyd, M.A. McNeilage, E.A. MacRae, A.R. Ferguson, R.A. Beatson, and P.J. Martin. 2003. Development and commercialization of ‘Baby Kiwi’ (Actinidia arguta Planch.). Acta Hort. 610:81–86.Google Scholar
  41. Yelle, S., J.D. Hewitt, N.L. Robinson, S. Damon, and A.B. Bennett. 1988. Sink metabolism in tomato fruit III. Analysis of carbohydrate assimilation in a wild species. Plant Physiol. 87:737–740.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society for Horticultural Science 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of AgricultureKagawa UniversityMiki, KagawaJapan

Personalised recommendations