Influence of short day treatment on autumn fruit production of June-bearing strawberry cultivars

  • Jiwei Ruan
  • Young Hun Lee
  • Young Rog YeoungEmail author
  • Kirk D. Larson
Research Report


Short-day (SD) strawberry cultivars were grown in 2008 and 2009 fall each year to evaluate effects of short-day (SD) treatment on flowering and fall fruit production in the high elevation of South Korea. In 2008, daughter plants of six cultivars ‘Maehyang’, ‘Seolhyang’, ‘Keumhyang’ (Korean short-day cultivars), ‘Akihime’, ‘Red pearl’, and ‘Sachinoka’ (Japanese short-day cultivars) were exposed to short-day (10-h photoperiods) conditions at the high elevation (HE, 800 m elevation) for 35 days beginning in late June. On 31 July, plants were removed from the SD environment and established in a substrate system at the highland. In 2009, the ‘Akihime’ and ‘Seolhyang’ were examined again. In 2008, flower bud initiation rate was above 90.0% for all cultivars except for ‘Akihime’ (83.3%). Fruit harvest commenced 1st of October 2008 and average fruit weight was consistently > 20g except for ‘Sachinoka’ (18 g). By mid-November, plants of ‘Seolhyang’ and ‘Akihime’ produced 222–260 more grams of fruit compared to other cultivars, with ‘Seolhyang’ having the earliest production. In 2009 experiment, flower bud initiation rates of ‘Akihime’ and ‘Seolhyang’ plants were 85.4% and 82.4%. Due to the earlier planting in 2009, fruit harvest commenced on 8 September (one month earlier than in 2008) and extended over 10 weeks. Yield and fruit numbers of ‘Akihime’ and ‘Seolhyang’ were 397.7 g, 22.7 and 331.7 g, 19.8, respectively. Results of this study indicate that exposure to SD photoperiods and relatively cool temperatures at HE can increase autumn fruit production in SD strawberry cultivars ‘Akihime’ and ‘Seolhyang’.

Additional key words

autumn fruit production flower induction Fragaria high elevation short-day treatment 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Durner, E.F. and E.B. Poling. 1988. Strawberry developmental response to photoperiod and temperature: a review. Adv. Strawberry Prod 7:6–15.Google Scholar
  2. Fernandez, G. and J. Ballington. 2003. Double cropping of strawberries in an annual system using conditioned plug. Acta Hort. 614:547–552.Google Scholar
  3. Guttridge, C.G. 1985. Fragaria × ananassa, p. 16–33. In: A.H. Halevy (ed.). Handbook of flowering. Vol. 3. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
  4. Hytönen, T., P. Palonen, K. Mouhu, and O. Junttila. 2004. Crown branching and cropping potential in strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) can be enhanced by daylength treatments. J. Hort. Sci. Biot. 79:466–471.Google Scholar
  5. Larson, K.D. 1994. Strawberry. p. 271–297. In: B. Schaffer and P.C. Anderson (eds.). Handbook of environmental physiology of fruit crops. vol. 1, Temperate Crops. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
  6. Lieten, P. 1993. Methods and strategies of strawberry forcing in central Europe: historical perspectives and recent development. Acta Hort. 348:58–170.Google Scholar
  7. Serçe, S. and J.F. Hancock. 2005. The temperature and photoperiod regulation of flowering and runnering in the strawberries, Fragaria chiloensis, F. virginiana, and F. × ananassa. Sci. Hort. 103:167–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Sønsteby, A. and A. Nes. 1998. Short day and temperature effects on growth and flowering in strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.). J. Hort. Sci. Biot. 73:730–736.Google Scholar
  9. Sønstedy, A. and O.M. Heide. 2006. Dormancy relations and flowering of the strawberry cultivars Korona and Elsanta as influenced by photoperiod and temperature. Sci. Hort. 110:57–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sønstedy, A. and O.M. Heide. 2008. Temperature responses, flowering and fruit yield of the June-bearing strawberry cultivars Florence, Frida and Korona. Sci. Hort. 119:49–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Taylor, D.R. 2002. The physiology of flowering in strawberry. Acta Hort. 348:158–170.Google Scholar
  12. Tehranifar, A., P. Le Miere, and N.H. Battey. 1998. The effects of lifting date, chilling duration and forcing temperature on vegetative growth and fruit production in the June-bearing strawberry cultivar Elsanta. J. Hort. Sci. Biot. 73:453–460.Google Scholar
  13. Verheul, M.J., A. Sonsteby, and S.O. Grimstad. 2006. Interaction of photoperiod, temperature, duration of short-day treatment and plant age on flowering of Fragaria × ananassa Duch. Cv. Korona. Sci. Hortic. 107:164–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Verheul, M.J., A. Sonsteby, and S.O. Grimstad. 2007. Influences of day and night temperature on flowering of Fragaria × ananassa Duch. cv. Korona and Elsanta. Sci. Hortic. 112:200–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Yamasaki, A., T. Yano, and H. Sasaki. 2003. Out-of-season production of strawberry: effect of a short day treatment in summer. Acta Hort. 626:276–282.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society for Horticultural Science 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jiwei Ruan
    • 1
  • Young Hun Lee
    • 2
  • Young Rog Yeoung
    • 2
    Email author
  • Kirk D. Larson
    • 3
  1. 1.Research Institute of Tropical Eco-agricultural SciencesYunnan Academy of Agricultural SciencesYuanmou, YunnanChina
  2. 2.Department of Plant SciencesGangneung-Wonju National UniversityGangneungKorea
  3. 3.South Coast R.E.CUniversity of California-DavisIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations