Sankhya B

pp 1–33 | Cite as

Progressively Censored Reliability Sampling Plans Based on Mean Product Lifetime

  • Maram Salem
  • Zeinab AminEmail author
  • Moshira Ismail


Reliability sampling plans are often used to determine the compliance of the product with relevant quality standards and customers’ expectations and needs. This paper presents a proposed design of reliability sampling plans when the underlying lifetime model is Weibull based on progressively Type-II censored data in the presence of binomial removals. We employ Bayesian decision theory using the Bayes estimator of the mean product lifetime. When both parameters are unknown, the closed-form expressions of the Bayes estimators cannot be obtained. The Bayes estimators of the mean lifetime are evaluated using the Metropolis-within-Gibbs algorithm, under the assumption of mean squared error loss as well as the linear-exponential (LINEX) loss commonly used in the literature on asymmetric loss. The corresponding probability density functions are estimated using kernel density estimation. A cost function which includes the sampling cost, the cost of the testing time, as well as acceptance and rejection costs is proposed to determine the Bayes risk and the corresponding optimal sampling plan. We illustrate, through simulation studies as well as a real life data set, the application of the proposed method. Sensitivity of the proposed plans is performed.

Keywords and phrases.

Bayesian decision theory Metropolis-within-Gibbs algorithm progressive type-II censoring reliability sampling plans sensitivity analysis Weibull distribution 

AMS (2000) subject classification.

Primary 62C10 62N01 62N05 Secondary 62N02 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ahmadi, J. and Doostparast, M. (2006). Bayesian estimation and prediction for some life distributions based on record values. Stat. Pap. 47, 373–392.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. AL-Hussaini, E.K. (1999). Predicting observations from a general class of distributions. Journal of Planning and Statistical Inference 79, 79–91.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Attia, A.F. and Assar, S.M. (2012). Optimal progressive group-censoring plans for Weibull distribution in presence of cost constraint. International Journal of Contemporary Mathematical Sciences 7, 1337–1349.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Balakrishnan, N. (2007). Progressive censoring methodology: an appraisal. Test 16, 211–259.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Balakrishnan, N. and Sandhu, R.A. (1995). A simple simulation algorithm for generating progressively type-II censored samples. Am. Stat. 49, 229–230.Google Scholar
  6. Balakrishnan, N and Cramer, E. (2014). The Art of Progressive Censoring: Applications to Reliability and Quality. Birkhäuser, New York.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Balasooriya, U., Saw, S.L.C. and Gadag, V. (2000). Progressively censored reliability sampling plans for the Weibull distribution. Technometrics 42, 160–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brooks, S., Gelman, A., Meng, X. and Jones, G. (2011). Handbook of Markov Chain Monte Carlo. Chapman and Hall, New York.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Chambers, J.M., Cleveland, W.S., Kleiner, B. and Tukey, PA (1983). Graphical Methods for Data Analysis. Wadsworth International Press, Belmont.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen, J. and Lam, Y. (1999). Bayesian variable sampling plan for the Weibull distribution with Type-I censoring. ACTA Mathematicae Applicatae Sinica 15, 269–280.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen, J., Li, K.H. and Lam, Y. (2007). Bayesian single and double variable sampling plans for the Weibull distribution with censoring. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 177, 1062–1073.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen, A.C. (1963). Progressively censored samples in life testing. Technometrics 5, 327–329.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. D’Agostino, R.B. and Stephens, M.A. (1986). Goodness-Of-Fit Techniques. Marcel Dekker, New York.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Dilip, R. (2003). The discrete normal distribution. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods 32, 1871–1883.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Fernández, A.J., Pérez-González, C.J., Aslam, M. and Jun, C.H. (2011). Design of progressively censored group sampling plans for Weibull distributions: an optimization problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 211, 525–532.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. Fertig, K.W. and Mann, NR (1980). Life tests sampling plans for two parameter Weibull populations. Technometrics 22, 165–177.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Hammond, R.K. and Bickel, J.E. (2013). Approximating continuous probability distributions using the 10th, 50th, and 90th percentiles. Eng. Econ. 58, 189–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hastings, W.K. (1970). Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika 57, 97–109.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Huang, S.R. and Wu, S.J. (2012). Bayesian estimation and prediction for Weibull model with progressive censoring. J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 82, 1607–1620.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Kachitvichyanukul, V and Schmeiser, B.W. (1988). Binomial random variate generation. Commun. ACM 31, 216–222.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Klugman, S.A., Panjer, H.H. and Willmot, G.E. (2012). Loss Models: From Data to Decisions, 4th edn. Wiley, NewYork.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Kundu, D. (2008). Bayesian inference and life testing plan for the Weibull distribution in presence of progressive censoring. Technometrics 50, 144–154.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kundu, D. and Raqab, M.Z. (2012). Bayesian inference and prediction of order statistics for a type-II censored Weibull distribution. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 142, 41–47.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Kwon, Y.I. (1996). A Bayesian life test sampling plan for products with Weibull lifetime distribution sold under warranty. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 53, 61–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A., Rosenbluth, M., Teller, A. and Teller, E. (1953). Equations of state calculations by fast computing machines. J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1087–1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nakagawa, T. and Osaki, S. (1975). The discrete Weibull distribution. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 24, 300–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nelson, W. (1982). Applied Life Data Analysis. Wiley, New York.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Ng, H.K.T., Chan, P.S. and Balakrishnan, N. (2004). Optimal progressive censoring plans for the Weibull distribution. Technometrics 46, 470–481.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nigm, A.M. (1989). An informative Bayesian prediction for the Weibull lifetime distribution. Communication in Statistics- Theory and Methods 18, 897–911.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. Silverman, B.W. (1986). Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Chapman and Hall, London.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. Stein, W.E. and Dattero, R. (1984). A new discrete Weibull distribution. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 33, 196–197.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. Tierney, L. (1994). Markov chains for exploring posterior distributions. Ann. Stat. 22, 1701–1728.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. Tsai, T.R., Lu, Y.T. and Wu, S.J. (2008). Reliability sampling plans for Weibull distribution with limited capacity of test facility. Comput. Ind. Eng. 55, 721–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tse, S.K. and Yang, C. (2003). Reliability sampling plans for the Weibull distribution under Type-II progressive censoring with binomial removals. J. Appl. Stat. 30, 709–718.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. Tse, S.K. and Yuen, H.K. (1998). Expected experiment times for the Weibull distribution under progressive censoring with random removals. J. Appl. Stat. 25, 75–83.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. Varian, H.R. (1975). A bayesian approach to real estate assessment. American Elsevier, North Holland, Fienberg, S.E. and Zellner, A. (eds.),.Google Scholar
  37. Wu, S.J. and Huang, S.R. (2012). Progressively first-failure censored reliability sampling plans with cost constraint. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 56, 2018–2030.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. Yang, C. and Tse, S. (2005). Planning accelerated life tests under progressive type I interval censoring with random removals. Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput. 34, 1001–1025.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang, Y. and Meeker, W.Q. (2005). Bayesian life test planning for the Weibull distribution with given shape parameter. Metrika 61, 237–249.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Statistical Institute 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Statistics, Faculty of Economics and Political ScienceCairo UniversityGizaEgypt
  2. 2.Department of Mathematics and Actuarial ScienceThe American University in CairoNew CairoEgypt

Personalised recommendations