Advertisement

Sankhya B

, Volume 81, Issue 1, pp 133–184 | Cite as

Pair-Wise Family-Based Correlation Model for Spatial Count Data

  • Pushpakanthie Wijekoon
  • Alwell Oyet
  • Brajendra C. SutradharEmail author
Article

Abstract

When linear, binary or count responses are collected from a series of (spatial) locations, the responses from adjacent/neighboring locations are likely to be correlated. To model the correlation between the responses from two adjacent locations, many existing studies assume that the two locations belong to a family and their responses are correlated through the random effects of common locations shared by them. In developing a correlation model for similar spatial responses, a recent study, however, used a much broader concept that the two selected neighboring locations have their own family and the correlation between the responses from these two locations are formulated by exploiting the correlations among the random effects belonging to both families. But, this study was confined to the linear spatial responses only. In this paper, we consider spatial count responses such as the number of lip cancer cases collected from a series of (spatial) locations, and develop a correlation model for spatial counts by following the recent pair-wise family-based spatial correlation model for the linear data. The correlation models for spatial linear and count responses are generally different. As far as the estimation of the parameters of the proposed correlation model for spatial counts is concerned, we develop a second-order moments-based GQL (generalized quasi-likelihood) approach for the estimation of the regression parameters, and a fourth-order moments-based GQL approach for the estimation of both variance and correlation of the random effects. It is demonstrated through an intensive simulation study that the proposed GQL approach works quite well in estimating all parameters of the underlying correlation model developed for spatial counts. The proposed model and the estimation methodology have been illustrated through an analysis of the well-known Scottish lip cancer data.

Keywords and phrases

Correlated random effects Count responses from correlated locations Family-based spatial correlations: Joint generalized quasi-likelihood estimation Normality-based higher order moments Random effects, their variance and correlations Spatial counts 

AMS (2000) subject classification

Primary 62H11, 62H12 Secondary 62H20 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the reviewers for their comments and suggestions leading to the improvement of the paper.

Funding

This research was partially supported by a grant from the Natural Sciences and the Engineering Research Council of Canada.

References

  1. Besag, J. (1974). Spatial interaction and the statistical analysis of lattice systems. J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B36, 192–236.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Breslow, N.E. and Clayton, D.G. (1993). Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc.88, 9–25.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Clayton, D. and Kaldor, J. (1987). Empirical Bayes estimates of age-standardized relative risks for use in disease mapping. Biometrics43, 671–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cressie, N. (1993). Statistics for Spatial Data, Revised ed. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Cressie, N. and Read, T.R.C. (1989). Spatial data analysis of regional counts. Biometric. J.31, 699–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davis, R.A., Dunsmuir, W.T.M. and Wang, Y. (2000). On autocorrelation in a Poisson regression model. Biometrika87, 491–505.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ferrandiz, J., Lopez, A., Llopis, A., Morales, M. and Tejerizo, M.L. (1995). Spatial interaction between neighboring counties: cancer mortality data in Valencia (Spain). Biometrics51, 665–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kaiser, M.S. and Cressie, N. (1997). Modeling poisson variables with positive spatial dependence. Stat. Probab. Lett.35, 423–432.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kang, E.L., Cressie, N. and Shi, T. (2010). Using temporal variability to improve spatial mapping with application to satellite data. In: Sutradhar, B. C. (ed.) Special Issue, Canadian Journal of Statistics, pp 271–289.Google Scholar
  10. Mallick, T.S. and Sutradhar, B.C. (2008). GQL versus conditional inferences for non-stationary time series of counts with overdispersion. J. Time Series Anal.29, 402–420.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mariathas, H.H. and Sutradhar, B.C. (2016). Variable family size based spatial moving correlations model. Sankhya B78, 1–38.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McCullah, P. and Nelder, J.A. (1989). Generalized Linear Models. Chapman and Hall, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Osei, P.P. (2010). Statistical methods for disease mapping: an unpublished post graduate diploma essay. AIMS (African Institute of Mathematical Sciences).Google Scholar
  14. Rathbun, S. and Cressie, N.A. (1994). A space-time survival point process for a longleaf pine forest in Southern Georgia. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc.89, 1164–1174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sutradhar, B.C. (2003). An overview on regression models for discrete longitudinal responses. Stat. Sci.18, 377–393.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sutradhar, B.C. (2004). On exact quasi-likelihood inference in generalized linear mixed models. Sankhya B66, 261–289.Google Scholar
  17. Sutradhar, B.C. (2011). Dynamic Mixed Models for Familial Longitudinal Data. Springer, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sutradhar, B.C. and QU, Z. (1998). On approximate likelihood inference in a poisson mixed model. Canad. J. Stat.26, 169–86.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Waclawiw, M.A. and Liang, K.-Y. (1993). Prediction of random effects in the generalized linear model. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc.88, 171–178.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Yasui, Y. and Lele, S. (1997). A regression method for spatial disease rates: an estimating function approach. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc.92, 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Zeger, S.L. (1988). A regression model for time series of counts. Biometrika75, 621–629.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhao, L.P. and Prentice, R.L. (1990). Correlated binary regression using a quadratic exponential model. Biometrika77, 642–648.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Statistical Institute 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pushpakanthie Wijekoon
    • 1
  • Alwell Oyet
    • 2
  • Brajendra C. Sutradhar
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.University of PeradeniyaPeradeniyaSri Lanka
  2. 2.Memorial UniversitySt. John’sCanada
  3. 3.Carleton UniversityOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations