Dosimetric evaluation of the dose calculation accuracy of different algorithms for two different treatment techniques during whole breast irradiation
In-field, partially in-field, and out-of-field organ doses calculated by the Acuros XB (AXB) and analytical anisotropic algorithm (AAA) were compared with experimentally measured data for two different techniques of whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT).
The field-in-field conformal radiotherapy (FIF) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans were calculated by AAA and dose-to-water (Dw) and dose-to-medium (Dm) options used by AXB. In field (planning target volume (PTV)), partially in-field (ipsilateral lung, heart, left ascending coronary artery (LAD)), and out-of-field (contralateral lung and contralateral breast) organ at risk (OAR) doses were measured using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) and EBT3 films in an anthropomorphic phantom. Furthermore, target dose differences between AAA and AXB were analyzed for the corresponding real patients.
For the verification of planar dose distribution in PTV, the percentages of pixels that passed the gamma analysis with the ± 3%/3mm criteria were 93.5%, 93.9%, and 99.0% for AAA, AXB_Dm, and AXB_Dw, respectively, averaged over all IMRT and FIF plans. For the verification of point doses within the target using TLD in the randophantom, the max percentage deviations between the calculated and measured data when averaged over all IMRT and FIF plans were 6.8%, 4.7%, and 3.9% for AAA, AXB_Dm, and AXB_Dw, respectively.
When using the Eclipse TPS for breast cancer, AXB should be used instead of the AAA algorithm, bearing in mind that the AXB may still overestimate all OARs doses.
KeywordsAAA AXB FIF IMRT TLD EBT3
There is no funding for this study.
Compliance wıth ethical standards
Conflict of interest
None of the authors has conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 5.International Atomic Energy Agency (2004) Commissioning and quality assurance of computerized planning systems for radiation treatment of cancer. TRS Report Number 430. Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
- 6.Sievinen J, Ulmer W, Kaissl W (2005) AAA photon dose calculation model in Eclipse. RAD #7170B:Varian Medical SystemsGoogle Scholar
- 8.Varian Medical Systems I (2008) Eclipse algorithms reference guide, version 86; Varian Medical SystemsGoogle Scholar
- 15.Papanikolaou N, Battista JJ, Pooger AL et al (2004) Tissue inhomogeneity corrections for megavoltage photon beams. AAPM report no. 85. Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, pp 1–135Google Scholar