Advertisement

Mineral Economics

, Volume 32, Issue 3, pp 323–335 | Cite as

Exploration economics: taking opportunities and the risk of double-counting risk

  • Babak JafarizadehEmail author
  • Reidar B. Bratvold
Original Paper
  • 79 Downloads

Abstract

When investing in projects with uncertain outcomes, most companies use a discount rate that reflects their perception of risk and reward. This rate is used in decision tree models that once again represent opportunities and risks, usually with little attention to what was already included in the discount rates. Besides, capital asset pricing models lead to discount rates as “average measures” that do not often represent individual project’s risk. Such inconsistent treatments of risk could distort valuation and ultimately destroy shareholder value. In this paper, we use twelve years of monthly return data for major upstream petroleum companies in the U.S. market, and suggest an industry-wide beta, stripped of the blurring effects of corporate debt and embedded real options. In addition, for each project we separately account for systematic and project-specific risks. This provides a more consistent guideline for valuation of exploration and development projects, particularly in the petroleum and mineral industries.

Keywords

Exploration economics Real options analysis Decision analysis CAPM 

Notes

References

  1. Arnold T, Shockley RL Jr (2002) Real options, corporate finance, and the foundations of value maximization. J Appl Corp Financ 15(2):82–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banz RW (1981) The relationship between return and market value of common stocks. J Financ Econ 9(1):3–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Basu S (1983) The relationship between earnings’ yield, market value and return for NYSE common stocks: further evidence. J Financ Econ 12(1):129–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berk JB, Green RC, Naik V (1999) Optimal investment, growth options, and security returns. J Financ 54(5):1553–1607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernardo AE, Chowdhry B, Goyal A (2007) Growth options, beta, and the cost of capital. Financ Manag 36(2):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernardo AE, Chowdhry B, Goyal A (2012) Assessing project risk. J Appl Corp Financ 24(3):94–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brandão LE, Dyer JS (2005) Decision analysis and real options: a discrete time approach to real option valuation. Ann Oper Res 135(1):21–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brandão LE, Dyer JS, Hahn WJ (2005) Using binomial decision trees to solve real-option valuation problems. Decis Anal 2(2):69–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brealey, R.A., Myers, S.C., Allen, F. and Mohanty, P., 2012. Principles of corporate finance. Tata McGraw-Hill EducationGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen, L., Novy-Marx, R. and Zhang, L., 2011. An alternative three-factor model. University of OhioGoogle Scholar
  11. Copeland T, Antikarov V (2001) Real options: a Practitioner’s guide. TEXERE, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Da Z, Guo RJ, Jagannathan R (2012) CAPM for estimating the cost of equity capital: interpreting the empirical evidence. J Financ Econ 103(1):204–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Damodaran, A., 2012. Investment valuation: tools and techniques for determining the value of any asset. John Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
  14. Davis GA, & Lund D (2018). Taxation and investment decisions in petroleum. Energy J, 39(6)Google Scholar
  15. Dechow PM, Sloan RG, Soliman MT (2004) Implied equity duration: a new measure of equity risk. Rev Acc Stud 9(2–3):197–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fama EF, French KR (1992) The cross-section of expected stock returns. J Financ 47(2):427–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fama EF, French KR (1996) The CAPM is wanted, dead or alive. J Financ 51(5):1947–1958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fama EF, French KR (1997) Industry costs of equity. J Financ Econ 43(2):153–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fama EF, French KR (1999) The corporate cost of capital and the return on corporate investment. J Financ 54(6):1939–1967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fama EF, French KR (2004) The capital asset pricing model: theory and evidence. J Econ Perspect 18(3):25–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fama EF, MacBeth JD (1973) Risk, return, and equilibrium: empirical tests. J Polit Econ 81(3):607–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Graham JR, Harvey CR (2001) The theory and practice of corporate finance: evidence from the field. J Financ Econ 60(2–3):187–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Guedes J, Santos P (2016) Valuing an offshore oil exploration and production project through real options analysis. Energy Econ 60:377–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. International Valuation Standard Council (2012) Valuation in the extractive industries. Retrieved from https://www.ivsc.org/standards/international-valuation-standards. Accessed 1 Dec 2016
  25. Jafarizadeh B, Bratvold R (2012) Two-factor oil-price model and real option valuation: an example of oilfield abandonment. SPE Economics & Management 4(03):158–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jafarizadeh B, Bratvold RB (2015) Oil and gas exploration valuation and the value of waiting. Eng Econ 60(4):245–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kaplan PD, Peterson JD (1998) Full-information industry betas. Financ Manag 27:85–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kothari SP, Shanken J, Sloan RG (1995) Another look at the cross-section of expected stock returns. J Financ 50(1):185–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Laughton D, Guerrero R, Lessard D (2008) Real asset valuation: a back-to-basics approach. J Appl Corp Financ 20(2):46–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Levy H (2010) The CAPM is alive and well: a review and synthesis. Eur Financ Manag 16(1):43–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lintner J (1965) Security prices, risk, and maximal gains from diversification. J Financ 20(4):587–615Google Scholar
  32. Lund D (2014) How taxes on firms reduce the risk of after-tax cash flows. FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis 70(4):567–598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Merrow EW (2012) Oil and gas industry megaprojects: our recent track record. Oil and Gas Facilities 1(02):38–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Modigliani F, Miller MH (1958) The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. Am Econ Rev 48(3):261–297Google Scholar
  35. Ross SA (1976) The arbitrage theory of capital asset pricing. J Econ Theory 13(3):341–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sharpe WF (1964) Capital asset prices: a theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. J Financ 19(3):425–442Google Scholar
  37. Smith JE (2005) Alternative approaches for solving real-options problems: (Comment on Brandão et al. 2005). Decis Anal 2(2):89–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Smith JE, McCardle KF (1999) Options in the real world: lessons learned in evaluating oil and gas investments. Oper Res 47(1):1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Smith JE, Nau RF (1995) Valuing risky projects: option pricing theory and decision analysis. Manag Sci 41(5):795–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Society of Petroleum Evaluation Engineers (2018) Annual SPEE Survey. Retrieved from https://secure.spee.org/resources/annual-spee-survey. Accessed 1 Dec 2018
  41. Topal E (2008) Evaluation of a mining project using discounted cash flow analysis, decision tree analysis, Monte Carlo simulation and real options using an example. International Journal of Mining and Mineral Engineering 1(1):62–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Willigers BJ, Jones B, Bratvold RB (2017) The net-present-value paradox: criticized by many, applied by all. SPE Economics & Management 9(4):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Heriot-Watt UniversityEdinburghUK
  2. 2.University of StavangerStavangerNorway

Personalised recommendations