Advertisement

Mineral Economics

, Volume 24, Issue 2–3, pp 145–154 | Cite as

Modeling green growth and resource efficiency: new results

  • Bernd MeyerEmail author
  • Mark Meyer
  • Martin Distelkamp
Original Paper

Abstract

Green growth is an environmental policy strategy that aims at an absolute decoupling between economic growth and resource consumption. As far as the applied policy measures focus on direct enhancements of economy-wide resource efficiency levels, their overall achievements might however be weakened by their induced rebound effects. This paper seeks to investigate the nature and significance of such trade-off interrelationships with regards to material efficiency improvements within the German economy. To this, we present the outcomes of individual policy simulations by means of the PANTA RHEI model. Taxes, information, and regulation activities are considered as policy instruments. Our overall empirical findings cannot falsify the green growth paradigm as the observed magnitude of economy-wide rebound effects appears unable to inhibit future absolute decoupling trends.

Keywords

Green growth Economic-environmental modeling Resource policy modeling Resource efficiency Rebound effect Recycling 

JEL Classification

C51 C54 C63 C67 Q31 Q32 Q38 

References

  1. Acosta-Fernandez J (2008) Zur Messung der Ressourcenproduktivität von Wirtschaftseinheiten. In: Hartard S (ed) Ressourceneffizienz im Kontext der Nachhaltigkeitsdebatte. Baden-Baden, Nomos-Verl.-GesGoogle Scholar
  2. Binswanger M (2001) Technological progress and sustainable development: what about the rebound effect? Ecol Econ 36(1):119–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barker T, Lutz C, Meyer B, Pollitt H (2011) Models for projecting the impacts of ETR. In: Ekins P, Speck S (eds) Environmental Tax Reform (ETR)—A Policy for Green Growth. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 175–203Google Scholar
  4. Distelkamp M, Meyer B, Wolter MI (2005a) Wirkung einer Materialinputsteuer auf Ressourcenbedarf, Wachstum und Beschäftigung. In: Aachener Stiftung Kathy Beys (Hrsg.): Ressourcenproduktivität als Chance - Ein langfristiges Konjunkturprogramm für Deutschland. Aachen, S. 63–130Google Scholar
  5. Distelkamp M, Meyer B, Wolter MI (2005b) Wachstums- und Beschäftigungswirkungen einer Veränderung des Mehrwertsteuersystems. In: Aachener Stiftung Kathy Beys (Hrsg.): Ressourcenproduktivität als Chance - Ein langfristiges Konjunkturprogramm für Deutschland. Aachen, S. 131–142Google Scholar
  6. Distelkamp M, Meyer B, Wolter MI (2005c) Der Einfluss von Endnachfrage und der Technologie auf die Ressourcenverbräuche in Deutschland. In: Aachener Stiftung Kathy Beys (Hrsg.): Ressourcenproduktivität als Chance - Ein langfristiges Konjunkturprogramm für Deutschland. Aachen, S. 143–170Google Scholar
  7. Distelkamp, Meyer B, Meyer M (2010) Quantitative und qualitative Analyse der ökonomischen Effekte einer forcierten Ressourceneffizienzstrategie Abschlussbericht zu AS5.2 und AS5.3 des Arbeitspakets 5 des Projekts “Materialeffizienz und Ressourcenschonung”(MaRess)Google Scholar
  8. Ekins P, Speck S (eds) (2011) Environmental Tax Reform (ETR). A policy for Green Growth. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Fischer H, Lichtblau K, Meyer B, Scheelhaase J (2004) Wachstums- und Beschäftigungs-impulse rentabler Materialeinsparungen. Wirtschaftsdienst 2004, Heft Nr. 4, 247–254Google Scholar
  10. Giljum S, Behrens A, Hinterberger F, Lutz C, Meyer B (2008) Modelling scenarios towards a sustainable use of natural resources in Europe. Environ Sci Policy 11:204–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Greening LA, Green DL, Difiglio C (2000) Energy efficiency and consumption—the rebound effect—a survey. Energy Policy 28(6–7):389–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Guerra AI, Sancho F (2010) Rethinking economy-wide rebound measures: an unbiased proposal. Energy Policy 38:6684–6694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jackson T (2009a) Prosperity without growth. Economics for a Finite Planet, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Jackson T (2009b) Beyond the growth economy. J Ind Ecol 13(4):487–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lindenberger D, Lutz C, Schlesinger M (2010) Energieszenarien für ein Energiekonzept der Bundesregierung. Projekt Nr. 12/10. Basel, Köln, OsnabrückGoogle Scholar
  16. Lutz C, Meyer B, Wolter MI (2010) The global multisector/multicountry 3E-model GINFORS. A description of the model and a baseline forecast for global energy demand and CO2-emissions. Int J Glob Environ Issues 10(1–2):25–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Meyer B, Distelkamp M, Wolter MI (2007) Material efficiency and economic-environmental sustainability. Results of simulations for Germany with the model PANTA RHEI. Ecol Econ 63(1):192–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schipper L (2000) Editorial. Energy Policy 28(6–7)Google Scholar
  19. Sorrell S (2007a) The rebound effect: an assessment of the evidence for economy-wide energy savings from improved energy efficiency. UK Energy Research Centre, UKGoogle Scholar
  20. Sorrell S (2007b) Improving the evidence base for energy policy: the role of systematic reviews. Energy Policy 35(3):1858–1871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sorrell S (2009) Jevons' paradox revisited: the evidence for backfire from improved energy efficiency. Energy Policy 37:1456–1469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sorrell S (2010) Energy, economic growth and environmental sustainability: five propositions. Sustainability 2:1784–1809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Suh S (ed) (2009) Handbook of input-output economics in industrial ecology. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  24. Umweltbundesamt (2009) Politikszenarien für den Klimaschutz V – auf dem Weg zum Strukturwandel. Treibhausgas- Emissionsszenarien bis zum Jahr 2030. Dessau-RoßlauGoogle Scholar
  25. Van den Bergh JCJM, Janssen MA (2004) Introduction ans overview. In: Van den Bergh JCJM, Janssen MA (eds) Economics and industrial ecology. materials, structural change, and spatial scales. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of OsnabrückOsnabrückGermany
  2. 2.Institute for Economic Structures Research (GWS mbH)OsnabrückGermany

Personalised recommendations