Advertisement

Dermatology and Therapy

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 355–367 | Cite as

Skin Bleaching Among African and Afro-Caribbean Women in New York City: Primary Findings from a P30 Pilot Study

  • Emma K. T. BennEmail author
  • Richa Deshpande
  • Ogonnaya Dotson-Newman
  • Sharon Gordon
  • Marian Scott
  • Chitra Amarasiriwardena
  • Ikhlas A. Khan
  • Yan-Hong Wang
  • Andrew Alexis
  • Bridget Kaufman
  • Hector Moran
  • Chi Wen
  • Christopher A. D. Charles
  • Novie O. M. Younger
  • Nihal Mohamed
  • Bian Liu
Open Access
Brief Report

Abstract

Introduction

The application of skin bleaching products to inhibit melanogenesis is a common practice within the African diaspora. Despite the adverse health effects of skin bleaching, rigorous studies investigating skin bleaching behavior among these populations in the United States are limited. In our P30 pilot study, we explored predictors of skin bleaching practice intensity among African and Afro-Caribbean women.

Methods

In collaboration with our Community Engagement Core, we conducted a cross-sectional study to investigate the relationship between demographic and psychosocial predictors and skin-bleaching-related practice patterns among African and Afro-Caribbean women in New York City.

Results

Among the 76 participants recruited, the median age at the initiation of skin bleaching was 19.5 (16–25) years, yielding a median duration of 13.5 (6–23) years. Although pregnant women were not actively recruited for the study, 13.2% (n = 10) of the participants used skin bleaching products while pregnant or possibly breastfeeding. Nativeness and education were associated with various components of skin bleaching practice intensity, including duration of skin bleaching, daily use of products, and bleaching of the entire body. Participants’ perceived skin-color-related quality of life was not associated with skin bleaching practice intensity.

Conclusion

Skin bleaching is a habitual practice that likely requires culturally sensitive interventions to promote behavioral change. The existence of prenatal and postnatal exposure to mercury, hydroquinone, and other potentially harmful chemicals in skin bleaching products highlights an urgent need to explore the adverse effects of skin bleaching practices on birth outcomes and the growth and neurodevelopment of young babies.

Keywords

African health Caribbean health Environmental health Immigrant health Skin bleaching Women’s health 

Introduction

The act of toning, lightening, whitening, or bleaching one’s skin through the use of creams, soaps, pills, injections, and other melanin-inhibiting mechanisms is a global phenomenon among non-white populations [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. There are many reasons why individuals attempt to cosmetically alter their skin complexion, ranging from unjust racial and economic oppression of poorer, darker-skinned populations [1] to reflections of modern blackness [6, 7, 8] and fashionable, ungendered expressions of beauty [3, 9]. While these studies have provided explanations for the practice, none of them have examined its prevalence [1, 10, 11]. Information regarding the exact prevalence of skin bleaching among African diasporic populations is scarce. Prior research has shown high prevalences in sub-Saharan Africa, ranging from 25% based on an epidemiologic survey conducted among women in Mali to 67% among patients in clinical settings in Senegal [6, 12, 13, 14]. Moreover, studies examining both the prevalence of skin bleaching and resulting physical and mental health outcomes are also limited [12, 15, 16, 17]. New and broader research directions are therefore necessary that are culturally sensitive, methodologically rigorous, and multidisciplinary [18].

Common active ingredients in skin bleaching products, such as mercury (Hg), hydroquinone (HQ), and corticosteroids, have been linked to a variety of adverse health outcomes, ranging from dermatitis and exogenous ochronosis to mercury poisoning and renal damage [2, 4, 13, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27]. In animal models, researchers have identified mechanisms by which HQ exposure from skin bleaching products could result in bone-marrow-related malignancies [28, 29]. In addition to the impact on physical health, studies have also observed an association between skin bleaching and psychosocial health [11, 30]. The combined physical and mental health effects associated with skin bleaching deserve further investigation.

While much of the focus on the ramifications of skin bleaching has centered on Africans and African immigrant communities abroad, this topic has not gained much attention among clinical and translational researchers in the United States (US) beyond investigations of Hg-poisoning-related outbreaks resulting from skin bleaching products [27, 31, 32]. Yet, there is little evidence to suggest that skin bleaching is not practiced by African and Afro-Caribbean populations in the US. For example, in New York City (NYC), elevated urine Hg concentrations among Caribbean-born blacks and Dominicans were linked with skin lightening product use [14]. Nationally, state and local health departments have issued multiple advisories and/or initiated public health campaigns to educate consumers about harmful levels of Hg in skin bleaching products [33, 34, 35, 36].

In an effort to shed more light on the health effects of skin bleaching among African diasporic populations in the US, we conducted a pilot study to investigate the demographics, behavioral patterns, and psychosocial motivations of African and Afro-Caribbean women in NYC. The objective of this paper is to discuss, share, and disseminate our primary findings around skin bleaching practice intensity to assist other researchers with hypothesis generation for future studies and/or identify effective strategies for interventions among similar populations in the US.

Methods

Study Design

Working closely with a three-member (S.G., M.S., and O.D.) community engagement core (CEC), the research team designed, developed, and implemented the administration of a pilot study questionnaire via the research electronic data capture system, REDCap [37]. In designing the study questionnaire, we took advantage of established survey instruments [38, 39, 40, 41, 42] that were validated questionnaires from prior studies. Modifications were made to reflect questions about skin color rather than about melasma. The study questionnaire took approximately 20 min to complete. Upon completion, participants received a $20 VISA gift card for their time spent participating in the study. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.

Study Population

We enrolled a total of 76 participants between 04/04/2017 and 05/17/2018. Our inclusion criteria required participants to be: (1) female and ≥ 18 years old; (2) self-identified as being of African or Afro-Caribbean descent; (3) using skin bleaching products for at least 1 year; and (4) living in NYC, defined as within the boundaries of five municipal boroughs (Manhattan, Queens, Brooklyn, Bronx, and Staten Island).

A variety of recruitment efforts were made to ensure the visibility of the study in the targeted communities, including distributing recruitment information in local shops (e.g., beauty supply stores, hair salons, pharmacies, restaurants, etc.), via various community or organization listserves, and through social media platforms such as Twitter and Facebook. Given the extensive networks of the CEC, the project PIs and CEC members had the opportunity to discuss the study on local television and internet radio programs. We also mailed out invitation letters to potential participants of Caribbean descent (n = 102) who had participated in a previous study and had expressed interest in participating in other studies. Patients who had been diagnosed with exogenous ochronosis, a condition that has been associated with the long-term use of products with HQ [22, 26], were identified through a retrospective review of the Mount Sinai Health System pathology database between 2008 and 2017 (n = 6), and invitations to participate in our study were subsequently mailed to them. Moreover, the research team conducted regular recruitment in local hair and beauty salons, where participants were able to complete the survey on-site using a study computer and with help from the research assistants. The majority of our participants (79.0%, n = 60) were recruited in-person at hair salons in NYC, and filled out the study questionnaire with the assistance of the study coordinators. About 8.0% (n = 6) were assisted by study coordinators to fill out the questionnaires by phone. The remaining 13.0% (n = 10) heard about the study either through social media, radio broadcasts, study flyers, word of mouth, or local hair salons, and filled out the questionnaires themselves online without the assistance of a study coordinator. Apart from the 76 participants who were recruited, 59 other responses were recorded in REDCap. Of these, 25.4% (n = 15) met the criteria but were excluded because they failed to fully complete the questionnaire. The remaining 74.6% (n = 44) of the participants either did not meet the criteria or had merely clicked on the questionnaire link and left it blank.

Main Predictors

Demographics

Demographics included each participant’s age in years at time of interview, self-reported ethnicity (Afro-Caribbean, African, or Other), educational attainment (primary school, high school, or post high school), marital status (married vs single/widowed/divorced), pregnant or had given birth within the past year (yes vs no), nativeness (US born vs non-US born), employment (employed vs unemployed/retired), and health insurance (yes vs no). With respect to self-reported ethnicity, all participants self-identified more broadly as being of Afro-Caribbean or African descent, but some participants additionally categorized themselves as African American, Afro-Hispanic, or Hispanic. This smaller subgroup was categorized as Other in order to take into account this additional specificity in identity without creating cell sizes that were too small or potentially identifiable for analysis. Additionally, we asked participants to self-report any skin-related health symptoms that they might have experienced.

Psychosocial Motivation

Our primary measure of participants’ psychosocial motivation for skin bleaching was a modified version of the MELASQOL, a measure originally developed by Balkrishnan and colleagues [43] to examine the psychosocial impact of melasma on quality of life for female study participants. The MELASQOL consists of a total of ten questions that examine how bothered (i.e., ranging from not bothered at all to bothered all the time) a woman feels about the effects of her skin condition. Scores can range from 7 to 70, with higher scores indicating worse quality of life [43, 44]. We modified the MELASQOL by replacing the terms “skin condition” or “skin discoloration” with “skin color.” For example, instead of asking a woman how she felt about the appearance of her skin condition, we inquired how she felt about the appearance of her skin color. The domains that contributed to this included general emotions like embarrassment, depression, and frustration about one’s skin color, along with how much their skin color impacted relations with other people and whether skin color hindered their sense of freedom or importance. The internal stability of the modified MELASQOL scale was high (Cronbach’s α = 0.91). In an exploratory fashion, we also examined what factors, ranging from aesthetics to upward mobility to peer/family influences, motivated our participants to initiate the practice of skin bleaching.

Primary Outcomes

Our primary outcome for this pilot study was skin bleaching practice intensity, which we assessed in the following ways: (1) participant-reported duration of skin bleaching (in years); (2) number of skin bleaching products used by participants at the time of survey completion (1 vs ≥ 2); (3) whether participants bleached their entire body (which included all of the following parts: face, neck, chest, arms, hands, legs, and feet) vs other parts (which included either one or more of the above body parts, but not all); and (4) skin bleaching product use frequency (daily vs weekly/monthly).

Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables were summarized as medians and interquartile ranges (IQR), whereas categorical variables were summarized as frequencies with proportions. Bivariate hypothesis tests to examine associations between demographics, psychosocial motivation, and skin bleaching practice intensity were conducted using Wilcoxon rank sum or Kruskal–Wallis tests, chi-squared or Fisher’s exact tests, and Spearman correlations. Statistical significance was assessed at the α = 0.05 level. All data analyses were conducted using SAS 9.4 and R 3.3.2.

Results

Demographics

The sample characteristics of the 76 participants are described in Table 1. The median (IQR) age of the 76 participants was 35.5 (30–45) years (Table 1). The majority of the participants were foreign-born (80.3%, n = 61). Almost one-half of the participants identified as African (47.4%, n = 36), and one-third (32.9%, n = 25) identified as Afro-Caribbean. Among the African subgroup, almost three-quarters were from Ivory Coast (47.2%, n = 17) or Mali (25.0%, n = 9). Among the Afro-Caribbean subgroup, an overwhelming majority were Jamaican (84.0%, n = 21). Educational attainment was approximately equally distributed in the sample, with 30.3% (n = 23) of the participants having a primary school education at most, 34.2% (n = 26) having a high-school degree, and 35.5% (n = 27) having a post-high-school education. While pregnant women were not actively sought out for our study, 13.2% (n = 10) of participants reported being pregnant at the time of interview or having given birth to a child within the last year. We observed that about 13.0% (n = 10) complained of stubborn acne, about 9.0% (n = 7) experienced blue-black darkening of skin, and 35.5% (n = 27) complained of stretch marks, while a small number (24.5%, n = 11) stated that they experienced other skin problems, such as skin irritation or skin that bruised when touched.
Table 1

Distribution of sample characteristics (n = 76)

 

Total (n = 76)

Age (years)

35 (30–45)

Age at which participants first started bleaching (years)

19.5 (16–25)

Duration of skin bleaching (years)

13.5 (6–23)

Educational attainment

 Primary school

23 (30.3%)

 High school

26 (34.2%)

 Post high school

27 (35.5%)

Nativeness

 US

15 (19.7%)

 Non-US

61 (80.3%)

Ethnicity

 African

36 (47.4%)

 Afro-Caribbean

25 (32.9%)

 Other

15 (19.7%)

Pregnant or had given birth

 Yes

10 (13.2%)

 No

66 (86.8%)

Marital status

 Married

32 (42.1%)

 Single

44 (57.9%)

Employment status

 Employed

66 (86.8%)

 Unemployed

10 (13.2%)

Health insurance

 Yes

54 (71.1%)

 No

22 (28.9%)

 Modified MELASQOL

14 (10–26%)

Frequency of use

 Daily

59 (77.6%)

 Other

17 (22.4%)

Number of products used

 1 product

50 (65.8%)

 ≥ 2 products

26 (34.2%)

Number of body parts bleached

 Whole body

34 (44.7%)

 Other parts

42 (55.3%)

Data are summarized as median (IQR) or frequency (%)

Psychosocial Motivation

The modified MELASQOL scores ranged from a minimum of 10 to a maximum of 64. The median score was 14 (10–26). Participants with only a primary school education had the highest median score of 20 (12–30), followed by 14 (10–38) and 10 (10–22) for those who had high school and post-high-school educations, respectively. The most noteworthy responses for the MELASQOL—that bothered participants sometimes, most of the time, or all the time—were in relation to the appearance of skin color (34.3%, n = 26), frustration about skin color (26.4%, n = 20), embarrassment about skin color (24.0%, n = 18), and a restricted sense of freedom (24.0%, n = 18). Slightly under one-tenth (9.2%, n = 7) of participants also said that they had feelings of not being attractive, which bothered them all the time. Additionally, while exploring the motivations behind skin bleaching, we found that 10.5% (n = 8) of participants initiated the practice based on the recommendation of a family member or friend, which points to the fact that social networks are an important consideration.

Skin Bleaching Practice Intensity

The median age at which the participants first started bleaching their skin was 19.5 (16–25) years, yielding a median duration of skin bleaching of 13.5 (6–23) years (Table 1). About two-thirds (65.8%, n = 50) of the participants reported using only one skin bleaching product, as compared to at least two products. Nearly half (44.7%, n = 34) of the participants reported bleaching their entire body, whereas the remaining participants (55.3%, n = 42) were found to be bleaching the other parts of their body, such as their face, neck, arms, legs, etc., in different combinations. More than three-quarters (77.6%, n = 59) of the participants applied skin bleaching products to their skin on a daily basis.

Duration of skin bleaching was significantly associated with educational attainment, age, nativeness, and ethnicity (Table 2). The median (IQR) duration of skin bleaching was longest, at 24 (19–28) years, for those with a primary school education at most, compared to 10.5 (4–18) years and 8 (5–17; p < 0.001) years for those with high-school and post-high-school educations, respectively. There was a moderately positive correlation between age and duration of skin bleaching (Spearman r = 0.55; p < 0.001). The median (IQR) duration of skin bleaching was almost threefold longer for non-US-born participants, at 17 (8–24) years, than for US-born participants, at 6 (4–13; p = 0.016) years. With respect to ethnicity, the median duration of skin bleaching was longest for African participants, at 20 (9–26) years, and shortest for those in the Other group, at 6 (5–16) years. A median duration of skin bleaching of 12 (8–21) years was observed for Afro-Caribbean participants (p = 0.046). Since duration of skin bleaching was correlated with age, we conducted a post hoc assessment to determine whether the observed associations between educational attainment, nativeness, and ethnicity could be explained by differential distributions in age. Educational attainment was negatively associated with age (p = 0.02), with a median age of 42 (38–47) years among those with a primary school education, and 33.5 (28–39) years and 33 (28–44) years, respectively, for those with high-school and post-high-school educations, respectively.
Table 2

Bivariate assessment of the relationships between the predictors and duration of skin bleaching (n = 76)

  

p value

Age

r = 0.55

< 0.001

Educational attainment

 Primary school

24 (19–28)

< 0.001

 High school

10.5 (4–18)

 Post high school

8 (5–17)

Nativeness

 US

6 (4–13)

0.016

 Non-US

17 (8–24)

Ethnicity

 African

20 (9–26)

0.046

 Afro-Caribbean

12 (8–21)

 Other

6 (5–16)

Pregnant or had given birth

 Yes

14 (6–23)

0.6

 No

10 (6–18)

Marital status

 Married

17.5 (9–26)

0.09

 Single

11.5 (5–23)

Employment status

 Employed

14.5 (8–23)

0.17

 Unemployed

6.5 (2–22)

Health insurance

 Yes

13 (5–25)

0.79

 No

14.5 (8–23)

Modified MELASQOL

r = 0.05

0.7

Data are summarized as median (IQR) or Spearman correlation

Pregnancy status and ethnicity were the only risk factors associated with the number of skin bleaching products used by participants (Table 3). None of the women who were pregnant at the time of interview or who had given birth within the last year had used ≥ 2 products, compared to 39.4% (n = 26; p = 0.013) of the other women. Less than two-thirds (60.0%, n = 15) of Afro-Caribbean participants used ≥ 2 products, compared to 16.7% (n = 6) among Africans and one-third (33.3%, n = 5; p = 0.002) among the Other group.
Table 3

Bivariate assessment of the relationships between the predictors and the number of skin bleaching products used (n = 76)

 

1 Product

≥ 2 Products

p value

Age

36 (31–46)

35 (29–41)

0.53

Educational attainment

 Primary school

18 (78.3%)

5 (21.7%)

0.32

 High school

15 (57.7%)

11 (42.3%)

 Post high school

17 (63.0%)

10 (37.0%)

Nativeness

 US

10 (66.7%)

5 (33.3%)

1.00

 Non-US

40 (65.6%)

21 (34.4%)

Ethnicity

 African

30 (83.3%)

6 (16.7%)

0.002

 Afro-Caribbean

10 (40.0%)

15 (60.0%)

 Other

10 (66.7%)

5 (33.3%)

Pregnant or had given birth

 Yes

10 (100.0%)

0 (0.0%)

0.013

 No

40 (60.6%)

26 (39.4%)

Marital status

 Married

24 (75.0%)

8 (25.0%)

0.22

 Single

26 (59.1%)

18 (40.9%)

Employment status

 Employed

44 (66.7%)

22 (33.3%)

0.73

 Unemployed

6 (60.0%)

4 (40.0%)

Health insurance

 Yes

40 (74.1%)

14 (25.9%)

0.031

 No

10 (45.5%)

12 (54.5%)

Modified MELASQOL

14 (10–30)

14.5 (10–22)

0.66

Data are summarized as median (IQR) or frequency (%)

We observed statistically significant associations between educational attainment, nativeness, and daily use of skin bleaching products (Table 4). More specifically, higher proportions of those with a primary school education (82.6%, n = 19) or a high school education (92.3%, n = 24) than those with a post-high-school education (59.3%, n = 16; p = 0.0038) used skin bleaching products daily. The proportion of foreign-born participants (85.2%, n = 52) who used skin bleaching products daily was almost twofold higher than that of US-born participants (46.7%, n = 7; p = 0.003).
Table 4

Bivariate assessment of the relationships between the predictors and frequency of use of skin bleaching products (n = 76)

 

Daily use

Other

p value

Age

38 (30–46)

33 (29–42)

0.5

Educational attainment

 Primary school

19 (82.6%)

4 (17.4%)

0.0038

 High school

24 (92.3%)

2 (7.7%)

 Post high school

16 (59.3%)

11 (40.7%)

Nativeness

 US

7 (46.7%)

8 (53.3%)

0.003

 Non-US

52 (85.2%)

9 (14.8%)

Ethnicity

 African

30 (83.3%)

6 (16.7%)

0.42

 Afro-Caribbean

19 (76.0%)

6 (24.0%)

 Other

10 (66.7%)

5 (33.3%)

Pregnant or had given birth

 Yes

7 (70.0%)

3 (30.0%)

0.7

 No

52 (78.8%)

14 (21.2%)

Marital status

 Married

24 (75.0%)

8 (25.0%)

0.8

 Single

35 (79.6%)

9 (20.5%)

Employment status

 Employed

50 (75.8%)

16 (24.2%)

0.44

 Unemployed

9 (90.0%)

1 (10.0%)

Health insurance

 Yes

42 (77.8%)

12 (22.2%)

1.00

 No

17 (77.3%)

5 (22.7%)

Modified MELASQOL

14 (10–26)

14 (10–26)

0.55

Data are summarized as median (IQR) or frequency (%)

Lastly, we observed a significant statistical association between nativeness and whether participants bleached their entire body (Table 5). Half of those who were foreign-born (50.8%, n = 31) reported bleaching their entire body, compared with one-fifth of US-born participants (20.0%, n = 3, p = 0.032).
Table 5

Bivariate assessment of the relationships between the predictors and the number of body parts bleached (n = 76)

 

Whole body

Other parts

p value

Age

34.5 (30–41)

37 (30–46)

0.6

Educational attainment

 Primary school

7 (30.4%)

16 (69.6%)

0.13

 High school

16 (61.5%)

10 (38.5%)

 Post high school

11 (40.7%)

16 (59.3%)

Nativeness

 US

3 (20.0%)

12 (80.0%)

 0.032

 Non-US

31 (50.8%)

30 (49.2%)

Ethnicity

 African

17 (47.2%)

19 (52.8%)

0.23

 Afro-Caribbean

13 (52.0%)

12 (48.0%)

 Other

4 (26.7%)

11 (73.3%)

Pregnant or had given birth

 Yes

3 (30.0%)

7 (70.0%)

0.5

 No

31 (47.0%)

35 (53.0%)

Marital status

 Married

13 (40.6%)

19 (59.4%)

0.64

 Single

21 (47.7%)

23 (52.3%)

Employment status

 Employed

28 (42.4%)

38 (57.6%)

0.33

 Unemployed

6 (60.0%)

4 (40.0%)

Health insurance

 Yes

23 (42.6%)

31 (57.4%)

0.62

 No

11 (50.0%)

11 (50.0%)

Modified MELASQOL

13 (10–25)

16.5 (10–28)

0.24

Data are summarized as median (IQR) or frequency (%)

Discussion

We have presented the primary findings of a pilot study examining skin bleaching among African and Afro-Caribbean women in NYC. Of primary concern is the fact that 13% of our participants used skin bleaching products while pregnant and/or possibly breastfeeding. This finding is consistent with prior studies [6, 45, 46] and highlights the existence of prenatal and postnatal exposure to Hg, HQ, and other potentially harmful chemicals in skin bleaching products [27, 31, 32, 47, 48, 49], for which the neurodevelopmental and other effects on offspring remain understudied. The vulnerability of the fetus and young offspring to the adverse health effects of skin bleaching during such a sensitive period of their growth and development deserves urgent attention from the public health community, especially given the rising global incidence and prevalence of this practice.

Secondly, while higher educational attainment does not necessarily prevent the uptake of this practice, we did find that those with lower educational attainment had a more intensive skin bleaching regimen with respect to daily use and had been bleaching for a longer duration. However, the positive correlation observed between age and duration along with the fact that the oldest study participants had the least education suggest that the latter finding was most likely due to sample selection.

Third, our findings suggest that nativeness is an important risk factor to examine with respect to vulnerability to the most harmful effects of skin bleaching. To our knowledge, our study is the first to observe greater skin bleaching practice intensity among foreign-born women than US-born women in the African and Afro-Caribbean population. Not only did we observe a longer duration of skin bleaching among foreign-born women, but they also were more likely to follow a daily skin bleaching regimen and apply skin bleaching products to their entire body. This is particularly concerning since the intersection of being immigrants and women of color in the US may complicate access to quality care if they were to experience negative health effects from skin bleaching due to language, health literacy, and medical insurance barriers [50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55]. The observed relationship between ethnicity and skin bleaching practice intensity also presented an interesting conundrum suggesting a moderation by other factors such as subgroups’ common beliefs and social network norms. While African women had been bleaching for a longer duration, Afro-Caribbean women were more likely to use at least two skin bleaching products simultaneously. Further research is needed to explore the unique cultural, social, behavioral, and health-related risk profiles that this variability in skin bleaching practice habits might induce for these different ethnic groups in the US.

Similar to prior studies, we found that skin bleaching tends to be a habitual practice initiated in the late teenage or early adult years [11]. Charles [1] has postulated that the early initiation of skin bleaching may stem from identity development occurring during the adolescence period. Given that 50% of our participants had been bleaching for at least 13 years, and 78% of the participants applied skin bleaching products to their skin daily, our pilot study findings provide convincing evidence to support the potential for serious adverse health effects in this population resulting from long-term, potentially harmful, exposure to chemicals in these products. The chronic, habitual nature of skin bleaching in this population may make it a difficult behavior to change. Further studies are needed on how to successfully change the bleaching behavior, disrupt the skin bleaching habits, or reduce practice intensity through means such as changing attitudes or subjective norms (e.g., changing beliefs and expectations about the consequences of skin bleaching) [56, 57] and by increasing risk perception, through conscious cognitive deliberation about the perceived benefits and risks of the skin lightening products, and by reducing the influence of the relevant social network on the individual’s behavior [58].

The limitations of this pilot study include a reliance on self-reported measures, a small sample size, and a lack of exposure biomarker data. The study results may not be generalizable to women who are not of African or Afro-Caribbean descent. Our findings may also be geographically restricted in that women of similar ethnicities in other regions of the US may exhibit different skin bleaching practice intensity patterns, or they may be related to a distinct set of risk factors.

Conclusions

Our study showed that skin bleaching is a habitual practice that is influenced by numerous factors such as ethnicity, nativeness, and educational attainment, and most likely requires culturally sensitive interventions to promote behavioral change. The existence of prenatal and postnatal exposure to mercury, hydroquinone, and other harmful chemicals in skin bleaching products highlights an urgent need for investigations of the adverse effects of skin bleaching practices on young babies during a sensitive period of their growth and neurodevelopment.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all the participants who agreed to join the study.

Funding

This study was funded by a pilot grant from the Transdisciplinary Center on Health Effects of Early Environmental Exposures P30 Core Center (P30ES023515) at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai. Article processing charges were funded by the authors.

Authorship

All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for this article, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given their approval for this version to be published.

Disclosures

Emma K. T. Benn, Richa Deshpande, Ogonnaya Dotson-Newman, Sharon Gordon, Marian Scott, Chitra Amarasiriwardena, Ikhlas A. Khan, Yan-Hong Wang, Andrew Alexis, Bridget Kaufman, Hector Moran, Chi Wen, Christopher A. D. Charles, Novie O. M. Younger, Nihal Mohamed, and Bian Liu have nothing to disclose.

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai.

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

References

  1. 1.
    Charles CAD. Skin bleaching, self-hate, and black identity in Jamaica. J Black Stud. 2003;33(6):711–28.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dadzie OE, Petit A. Skin bleaching: highlighting the misuse of cutaneous depigmenting agents. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2009;23(7):741–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hope DP. From browning to cake soap: popular debates on skin bleaching in the Jamaican Dancehall. J Pan Afr Stud. 2011;4(4):165–94.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ladizinski B, Mistry N, Kundu RV. Widespread use of toxic skin lightening compounds: medical and psychosocial aspects. Dermatol Clin. 2011;29(1):111–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Michalek I, Benn E, Caetano dos Santos F, Gordon S, Wen C, Liu B. A systematic review of global legal regulations on the permissible level of heavy metals in cosmetics with particular emphasis on skin lightening products. Environ Res. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.12.029.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mahe A, Perret JL, Ly F, Fall F, Rault JP, Dumont A. The cosmetic use of skin-lightening products during pregnancy in Dakar, Senegal: a common and potentially hazardous practice. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2007;101(2):183–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brown-Glaude W. The fact of blackness? The bleached body in contemporary Jamaica. Small Axe. 2007;11(3):34–51.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Thomas DA. Modern blackness: nationalism, globalization, and the politics of culture in Jamaica. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 2004.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hope DP. Fashion ova style: contemporary notions of skin bleaching in Jamaican dancehall culture. JENdA. 2009;14:101–26.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Charles CAD. Skin bleachers’ representations of skin color in Jamaica. J Black Stud. 2009;40(2):153–70.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Charles CAD, McLean SK. Body image disturbance and skin bleaching. Br J Psychol. 2017;108(4):783–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mahe A, Ly F, Aymard G, Dangou JM. Skin diseases associated with the cosmetic use of bleaching products in women from Dakar, Senegal. Br J Dermatol. 2003;148(3):493–500.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mahe A. The practice of skin-bleaching for a cosmetic purpose in immigrant communities. J Travel Med. 2014;21(4):282–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McKelvey W, Jeffery N, Clark N, Kass D, Parsons PJ. Population-based inorganic mercury biomonitoring and the identification of skin care products as a source of exposure in New York City. Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119(2):203–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Adebajo SB. An epidemiological survey of the use of cosmetic skin lightening cosmetics among traders in Lagos, Nigeria. West Afr J Med. 2002;21(1):51–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pitche P, Afanou A, Amanga Y, Tchangai-Walla K. Prevalence of skin disorders associated with the use of bleaching cosmetics by Lome women. Sante. 1997;7(3):161–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hamed SH, Tayyem R, Nimer N, AlKhatib HS. Skin-lightening practice among women living in Jordan: prevalence, determinants, and user’s awareness. Int J Dermatol. 2010;49(4):414–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Benn EKT, Alexis A, Mohamed N, Wang YH, Khan IA, Liu B. Skin bleaching and dermatologic health of African and Afro-Caribbean populations in the US: new directions for methodologically rigorous, multidisciplinary, and culturally sensitive research. Dermatol Ther. 2016;6(4):453–9.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Barr RD, Rees PH, Cordy PE, Kungu A, Woodger BA, Cameron HM. Nephrotic syndrome in adult Africans in Nairobi. Br Med J. 1972;2(5806):131–4.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chan TYK. Inorganic mercury poisoning associated with skin-lightening cosmetic products. Clin Toxicol. 2011;49(10):886–91.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cristaudo A, Dllio S, Gallinella B, Mosca A, Majorani C, Violante N, et al. Use of potentially harmful skin-lightening products among immigrant women in Rome, Italy: a pilot study. Dermatology. 2013;226(3):200–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lawrence N, Bligard CA, Reed R, Perret WJ. Exogenous ochronosis in the United-States. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1988;18(5):1207–11.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Levin CY, Maibach H. Exogenous ochronosis. An update on clinical features, causative agents and treatment options. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2001;2(4):213–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Maneli MH, Wiesner L, Tinguely C, Davids LM, Spengane Z, Smith P, et al. Combinations of potent topical steroids, mercury and hydroquinone are common in internationally manufactured skin-lightening products: a spectroscopic study. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2016;41(2):196–201.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Olumide YM, Akinkugbe AO, Altraide D, Mohammed T, Ahamefule N, Ayanlowo S, et al. Complications of chronic use of skin lightening cosmetics. Int J Dermatol. 2008;47(4):344–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Simmons BJ, Griffith RD, Bray FN, Falto-Aizpurua LA, Nouri K. Exogenous ochronosis: a comprehensive review of the diagnosis, epidemiology, causes, and treatments. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2015;16(3):205–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Weldon MM, Smolinski MS, Maroufi A, Hasty BW, Gilliss DL, Boulanger LL, et al. Mercury poisoning associated with a Mexican beauty cream. West J Med. 2000;173(1):15–8.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    O’Donoghue JL. Hydroquinone and its analogues in dermatology—a risk-benefit viewpoint. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2006;5(3):196–203.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
  30. 30.
    Blay YA. Yellow fever: skin bleaching and the politics of skin color in Ghana. Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest Dissertations Publishing; 2007.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Mercury poisoning associated with beauty cream—Texas, New Mexico, and California, 1995–1996. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1996;45(19):400–3.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Mercury exposure among household users and nonusers of skin-lightening creams produced in Mexico—California and Virginia, 2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012;61(2):33–6.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene. 2018 health advisory #6: elevated levels of mercury in certain skin-lightening creams and medicated soaps. 2018 https://www1.nyc.gov/assets/doh/downloads/pdf/han/advisory/2018/advisory-6-skin-lightening-creams.pdf.
  34. 34.
    California Department of Public Health. Warning: dangerous skin-lightening creams found in SF Bay Area stores. 2014. https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CCDPHP/DEODC/EHIB/CPE/CDPH%20Document%20Library/Comm_MercuryFaceCreams_5_1_14ENG.pdf.
  35. 35.
    Minnesota Department of Health. Skin-lightening products found to contain mercury. 2016. http://www.health.state.mn.us/topics/skin/testedprds.pdf.
  36. 36.
    Virginia Department of Health. Mercury poisoning linked to skin lightening creams: FAQ for health care providers May 2010. 2010. https://www.vdh.virginia.gov/news/PressReleases/PDFs/2010/052710MercuryFAQ_Clinician.pdf.
  37. 37.
    Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–81.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Cash TF. MBSRQ users’ manual, 3rd revision. 2000. http://www.body-images.com.
  39. 39.
    CDC. 1999–2000 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES): Dermatology—DEQ. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/spq-de.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2016.
  40. 40.
    Harris SM. Family, self, and sociocultural contributions to body-image attitudes of African–American women. Psychol Women Q. 1995;19(1):129–45.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rosenberg M. Determinants of self-esteem—a citation classic commentary on society and the adolescent self-image by Rosenberg, M. Curr Cont Soc Behav Sci. 1989;(11):16.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Lowe B. An ultra-brief screening scale for anxiety and depression: the PHQ-4. Psychosomatics. 2009;50(6):613–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Balkrishnan R, McMichael A, Camacho F, Saltzberg F, Housman T, Grummer S, et al. Development and validation of a health-related quality of life instrument for women with melasma. Br J Dermatol. 2003;149(3):572–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Lieu T, Pandya A. Melasma quality of life measures. Dermatol Clin. 2012;30(2):269–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Al-Saleh I. Potential health consequences of applying mercury-containing skin-lightening creams during pregnancy and lactation periods. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2016;219(4–5):468–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Bozzo P, Chua-Gocheco A, Einarson A. Safety of skin care products during pregnancy. Can Fam Physician. 2011;57(6):665–7.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Dyallsmith DJ, Scurry JP. Mercury pigmentation and high mercury levels from the use of a cosmetic cream. Med J Aust. 1990;153(7):409–10.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Counter SA, Buchanan LH. Mercury exposure in children: a review. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2004;198(2):209–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    del Giudice P, Yves P. The widespread use of skin lightening creams in Senegal: a persistent public health problem in West Africa. Int J Dermatol. 2002;41(2):69–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Nadeem E, Lange J, Edge D, Fongwa M, Belin T, Miranda J. Does stigma keep poor young immigrant and U.S.-born Black and Latina women from seeking mental health care? Psychiatr Serv. 2007;58(12):1547–54.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Marshall K, Urrutia-Rojas X, Soto Mas F, Coggin C. Health status and access to health care of documented immigrant Latino women. Health Care Women Int. 2005;26(10):916–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Ku L, Matani S. Left out: immigrants’ access to health care and insurance. Health Afr. 2001;20(1):247–56.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Pitkin Derose K, Bahney B, Lurie N, Escarce J. Immigrants and health care access, quality, and cost. Med Care Res Rev. 2009;66(4):355–408.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Consedine N, Tuck N, Ragin C, Spencer B. Beyond the black box: a systematic review of beast, prostate, colorectal, and cervical screening among native and immigrant African-descent Caribbean populations. J Immigr Minor Health. 2015;17(3):905–24.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Adunlin G, Cyrus J, Asare M, Sabik L. Barriers and facilitators to breast and cervical cancer screening among immigrants in the United States. J Immigr Minor Health. 2019;21(3):606–658.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-018-0794-6.
  56. 56.
    Verplanken B, Wood W. Interventions to break and create consumer habits. J Public Policy Market. 2006;25(1):90–103.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ouellette JA, Wood W. Habit and intention in everyday life: the multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychol Bull. 1998;124(1):54–74.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Nilsen P, Roback K, Brostrom A, Ellstrom PE. Creatures of habit: accounting for the role of habit in implementation research on clinical behaviour change. Implement Sci. 2012;7:53.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emma K. T. Benn
    • 1
    Email author
  • Richa Deshpande
    • 1
  • Ogonnaya Dotson-Newman
    • 2
    • 3
  • Sharon Gordon
    • 2
    • 3
  • Marian Scott
    • 2
    • 3
  • Chitra Amarasiriwardena
    • 4
  • Ikhlas A. Khan
    • 5
  • Yan-Hong Wang
    • 5
  • Andrew Alexis
    • 6
  • Bridget Kaufman
    • 6
  • Hector Moran
    • 7
  • Chi Wen
    • 4
  • Christopher A. D. Charles
    • 8
    • 9
  • Novie O. M. Younger
    • 10
  • Nihal Mohamed
    • 11
  • Bian Liu
    • 4
    • 12
  1. 1.Department of Population Health Science and Policy and Center for BiostatisticsIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Community Engagement Core (CEC), Mount Sinai Skin Bleaching P30 Pilot StudyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Department of Population Health Science and PolicyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkUSA
  4. 4.Department of Environmental Medicine and Public HealthIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkUSA
  5. 5.National Center for Natural Products Research, School of PharmacyUniversity of MississippiOxfordUSA
  6. 6.Department of DermatologyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkUSA
  7. 7.Hunter CollegeCity University of New YorkNew YorkUSA
  8. 8.Department of GovernmentUniversity of the West IndiesKingston 7Jamaica
  9. 9.Psychology Department, The Graduate CenterCity University of New YorkNew YorkUSA
  10. 10.Epidemiology Research Unit, Tropical Medicine Research InstituteUniversity of the West IndiesKingston 7Jamaica
  11. 11.Department of UrologyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkUSA
  12. 12.Department of Population Health Science and Policy and Institute for Translational EpidemiologyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations