Brazilian Journal of Physics

, Volume 46, Issue 2, pp 133–142 | Cite as

Role of Barrier Modification and Inelastic Surface Excitations in Sub-Barrier Fusion of 16 32 S +  40 94 Zr Reaction

Nuclear Physics

Abstract

The fusion dynamics of 16 32 S +  40 94 Zr reaction at near and sub-barrier energies is investigated within the context of different theoretical approaches. The various theoretical models like one-dimensional Wong formula, -summed extended Wong formula, the energy-dependent Woods-Saxon potential model (EDWSP model), and coupled channel formulation have been used to address the impacts of nuclear structure degrees of freedom of the colliding pairs. The roles of different Skyrme forces along with Wong formalism are also tested in the analysis of the sub-barrier fusion dynamics of the 16 32 S +  40 94 Zr reaction. The influence of the low-lying surface vibrational states of the collision partners is investigated within the framework of coupled channel calculations performed by the code CCFULL. In the present work, it has been observed that the EDWSP model introduces barrier modification effects somewhat similar to those of the coupled channel approach, as well as those of using different Skyrme forces and hence it reasonably addresses the observed fusion data of 16 32 S +  40 94 Zr reaction in the close vicinity of the Coulomb barrier.

Keywords

Depth and diffuseness Woods-Saxon potential Heavy-ion collision Sub-barrier fusion reactions Coupled channel approach Skyrme forces 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by UGC in the form of Dr. D. S. Kothari Post-Doctoral Fellowship Scheme and CSIR major research project, grant No:03(1341)/15/EMR-11.

References

  1. 1.
    L.F. Canto, P.R.S. Gomes, R. Donangelo, M.S. Hussein, Phys. Rep. 424, 1 (2006)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. Hagino, N. Takigawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 128, 1061 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    B.B. Back, H. Esbensen, C.L. Jiang, K.E. Rehm, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 317 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    R.G. Stoksad et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 465 (1978)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    P.R.S. Gomes et al., Phys. Rev. C 49, 245 (1994)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.M.B. Shorto et al., Phys. Rev. C 81, 044601 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    H. Timmers et al., Nucl. Phys. A 633, 421 (1998)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A.M. Stefanini et al., Phys. Rev. C 76, 014610 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A.M. Stefanini et al., Phys. Rev. C 62, 014601 (2000)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    H.Q. Zhang et al., Phys. Rev. C 82, 054609 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    H.M. Jia et al., Phys. Rev. C 89, 064605 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    R.N. Sagaidak et al., Phys. Rev. C 76, 034605 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    N. Wang, W. Scheid, Phys. Rev. C 78, 014607 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    O.N. Ghodsi, R. Gharaei, Eur. Phys. J. A. 48, 21 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. Jain, R. Kumar, M.K. Sharma, Nucl. Phys. A 915, 106 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    J.O. Newton et al., Phys. Rev. C 70, 024605 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. Singh, Sukhvinder and R. Kharab, Nucl. Phys. A 897, 179 (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    M.S. Gautam, Phys. Rev. C 90, 024620 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    M.S. Gautam, Nucl. Phys. A 933, 272 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    M.S. Gautam, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 30, 1550013 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    M.S. Gautam, Phys. Scr. 90, 025301 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    L.C. Chamon et al., Phys. Rev. C 66, 014610 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    K. Washiyama, D. Lacroix, Phys. Rev. C 74, 024610 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    C.Y. Wong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 766 (1973)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    R. Kumar, M. Bansal, S.K. Arun, R.K. Gupta, Phys. Rev. C 80, 034618 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    R. Kumar, M.K. Sharma, R.K. Gupta, Nucl. Phys. A 870–871, 42 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    D. Jain, R. Kumar, M.K. Sharma, R.K. Gupta, Phys. Rev. C 85, 024615 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    D. Jain, R. Kumar, M.K. Sharma, Phys. Rev. C 87, 044612 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    M. Beiner, H. Flocard, N.V. Giai, P. Quentin, Nucl. Phys. A 238, 29 (1976)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    R.K. Puri, R.K. Gupta, Phys. Rev. C 51, 1568 (1995)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    D. Vautherin, D.M. Brink, Phys. Rev. C 5, 626 (1972)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    J. Bartel, K. Bencheikh, Eur. Phys. J. A 14, 179 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    M.K. Sharma, H. Kumar, R.K. Puri, R.K. Gupta, Phys. Rev. C 56, 1175 (1997)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    M.K. Sharma, R.K. Puri, R.K. Gupta, Eur. Phys. J. A 2, 69 (1998)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    D. Jain, M.K. Sharma, Rajni, R. Kumar, R.K. Gupta, Eur. Phys. J. A 50, 155 (2014)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rajni, R. Kumar, M.K. Sharma, Phys. Rev. C 90, 044604 (2014)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    B.K. Agrawal, S.K. Dhiman, K. Raj, Phys. Rev. C 73, 034319 (2006)ADSGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    K. Hagino, N. Rowley, A.T. Kruppa, Comput. Phys. Commun. 123, 143 (1999)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    D.L. Hill, J.A. Wheeler, Phys. Rev. 89, 1102 (1953)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    M. Liu, N. Wang, Z. Li, X. Wu, E. Zhao, Nucl. Phys. A 768, 80 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    H. Esbensen, S. Landowne, C. Price, Phys. Rev. C 36, 1216 (1987)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    K. Hagino, N. Takigawa, A.B. Balantekin, J.R. Bennett, Phys. Rev. C 52, 286 (1995)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    P. Moller, J. R. Nix, W. D. Myers and W. J. Swiatecki, Atomic data and nuclear data tables 59, 185 (1995)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sociedade Brasileira de Física 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Physics and Material ScienceThapar UniversityPatialaIndia

Personalised recommendations