Role of Barrier Modification and Inelastic Surface Excitations in Sub-Barrier Fusion of 16 32 S + 40 94 Zr Reaction
- 80 Downloads
- 5 Citations
Abstract
The fusion dynamics of 16 32 S + 40 94 Zr reaction at near and sub-barrier energies is investigated within the context of different theoretical approaches. The various theoretical models like one-dimensional Wong formula, ℓ-summed extended Wong formula, the energy-dependent Woods-Saxon potential model (EDWSP model), and coupled channel formulation have been used to address the impacts of nuclear structure degrees of freedom of the colliding pairs. The roles of different Skyrme forces along with Wong formalism are also tested in the analysis of the sub-barrier fusion dynamics of the 16 32 S + 40 94 Zr reaction. The influence of the low-lying surface vibrational states of the collision partners is investigated within the framework of coupled channel calculations performed by the code CCFULL. In the present work, it has been observed that the EDWSP model introduces barrier modification effects somewhat similar to those of the coupled channel approach, as well as those of using different Skyrme forces and hence it reasonably addresses the observed fusion data of 16 32 S + 40 94 Zr reaction in the close vicinity of the Coulomb barrier.
Keywords
Depth and diffuseness Woods-Saxon potential Heavy-ion collision Sub-barrier fusion reactions Coupled channel approach Skyrme forcesNotes
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by UGC in the form of Dr. D. S. Kothari Post-Doctoral Fellowship Scheme and CSIR major research project, grant No:03(1341)/15/EMR-11.
References
- 1.L.F. Canto, P.R.S. Gomes, R. Donangelo, M.S. Hussein, Phys. Rep. 424, 1 (2006)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.K. Hagino, N. Takigawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 128, 1061 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.B.B. Back, H. Esbensen, C.L. Jiang, K.E. Rehm, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 317 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.R.G. Stoksad et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 465 (1978)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.P.R.S. Gomes et al., Phys. Rev. C 49, 245 (1994)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.J.M.B. Shorto et al., Phys. Rev. C 81, 044601 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.H. Timmers et al., Nucl. Phys. A 633, 421 (1998)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.A.M. Stefanini et al., Phys. Rev. C 76, 014610 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.A.M. Stefanini et al., Phys. Rev. C 62, 014601 (2000)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.H.Q. Zhang et al., Phys. Rev. C 82, 054609 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.H.M. Jia et al., Phys. Rev. C 89, 064605 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.R.N. Sagaidak et al., Phys. Rev. C 76, 034605 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.N. Wang, W. Scheid, Phys. Rev. C 78, 014607 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.O.N. Ghodsi, R. Gharaei, Eur. Phys. J. A. 48, 21 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.D. Jain, R. Kumar, M.K. Sharma, Nucl. Phys. A 915, 106 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.J.O. Newton et al., Phys. Rev. C 70, 024605 (2004)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.M. Singh, Sukhvinder and R. Kharab, Nucl. Phys. A 897, 179 (2013)Google Scholar
- 18.M.S. Gautam, Phys. Rev. C 90, 024620 (2014)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.M.S. Gautam, Nucl. Phys. A 933, 272 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.M.S. Gautam, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 30, 1550013 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.M.S. Gautam, Phys. Scr. 90, 025301 (2015)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.L.C. Chamon et al., Phys. Rev. C 66, 014610 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.K. Washiyama, D. Lacroix, Phys. Rev. C 74, 024610 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.C.Y. Wong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 766 (1973)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.R. Kumar, M. Bansal, S.K. Arun, R.K. Gupta, Phys. Rev. C 80, 034618 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.R. Kumar, M.K. Sharma, R.K. Gupta, Nucl. Phys. A 870–871, 42 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.D. Jain, R. Kumar, M.K. Sharma, R.K. Gupta, Phys. Rev. C 85, 024615 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.D. Jain, R. Kumar, M.K. Sharma, Phys. Rev. C 87, 044612 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.M. Beiner, H. Flocard, N.V. Giai, P. Quentin, Nucl. Phys. A 238, 29 (1976)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.R.K. Puri, R.K. Gupta, Phys. Rev. C 51, 1568 (1995)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.D. Vautherin, D.M. Brink, Phys. Rev. C 5, 626 (1972)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.J. Bartel, K. Bencheikh, Eur. Phys. J. A 14, 179 (2002)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.M.K. Sharma, H. Kumar, R.K. Puri, R.K. Gupta, Phys. Rev. C 56, 1175 (1997)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.M.K. Sharma, R.K. Puri, R.K. Gupta, Eur. Phys. J. A 2, 69 (1998)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.D. Jain, M.K. Sharma, Rajni, R. Kumar, R.K. Gupta, Eur. Phys. J. A 50, 155 (2014)Google Scholar
- 36.Rajni, R. Kumar, M.K. Sharma, Phys. Rev. C 90, 044604 (2014)Google Scholar
- 37.B.K. Agrawal, S.K. Dhiman, K. Raj, Phys. Rev. C 73, 034319 (2006)ADSGoogle Scholar
- 38.K. Hagino, N. Rowley, A.T. Kruppa, Comput. Phys. Commun. 123, 143 (1999)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.D.L. Hill, J.A. Wheeler, Phys. Rev. 89, 1102 (1953)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.M. Liu, N. Wang, Z. Li, X. Wu, E. Zhao, Nucl. Phys. A 768, 80 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.H. Esbensen, S. Landowne, C. Price, Phys. Rev. C 36, 1216 (1987)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 42.K. Hagino, N. Takigawa, A.B. Balantekin, J.R. Bennett, Phys. Rev. C 52, 286 (1995)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 43.P. Moller, J. R. Nix, W. D. Myers and W. J. Swiatecki, Atomic data and nuclear data tables 59, 185 (1995)Google Scholar