Brazilian Journal of Physics

, Volume 45, Issue 1, pp 138–146 | Cite as

Study of Reaction Cross Section of Light Mass Nuclei Using Glauber Formalisms

  • Mahesh K. Sharma
  • R. N. Panda
  • Manoj K. Sharma
  • S. K. Patra
Nuclear Physics

Abstract

We study the reaction dynamics of some light mass nuclei (Be-Ar isotopes). We use the well-known Glauber formalism with densities obtained from a recently developed simple effective interaction, in the frameword of the microscopic non-relativistic Hartree–Fock formalisms. For comparison, we used also densities from the relativistic mean field formalism. In general, the study of the reaction dynamics suggests that both formalisms reproduce well the experimental data, with a slight superiority of the relativistic mean field densities over those of non-relativistic Hartree–Fock. This is so for the majority of the chosen cases, except for a few nuclear halo systems.

Keywords

Reaction cross section Densities Glauber model and RMF and non RMF models 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Mahesh K. Sharma highly thankful to the institute of Physics, Bhubaneswar for their kind hospitality.

References

  1. 1.
    F.G. Brickwedde, J.R. Dunning, H.J. Hoge, J.H. Manley, Phys. Rev. 54, 15 (1938)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    H.A. Bethe, Phys. Rev. 57, 15 (1940)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    F.C. Nix, G.F. Clement, Phys. Rev. 68, 7 (1945)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    K.M. Watson, Phys. Rev. 88, 5 (1952)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R.J. Glauber, Phys. Rev. 100, 1 (1955)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M.S. Hussein, R.A. Rego, C.A. Berrtulani, Phys. Rep. 201, 279 (1991)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    C.P. Swann, F.R. Metzer, Phys. Rev. 100, 15 (1955)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    W.L. Wong, R.G. Lipes, Phys. Rev. C. 9, 3 (1974)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J.S. Eck, J.R. Leigh, T.R. Ophel, P.D. Clark, Phys. Rev. C. 21, 6 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    H.A. Khan, I.E. Qureshi, W. Westmeier, R. Brandt, P.A. Gottschalk, Phys. Rev. C. 32, 5 (1985)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    I. Tanihata, et al., Phys. Lett. B. 287, 307 (1992)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. Abu-ibrahim, Y. Ogawa, Y. Suzuki, I. Tanihata, Comp. Phys. Commun. 151, 369 (2003)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Shukla, B.K. Sharma, R. Chandra, P. Arumugam, S.K. Patra, Phys. Rev. C. 76, 034601 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    S.K. Patra, R.N. Panda, P. Arumugam, R.K. Gupta, Phys. Rev. C. 80, 064602 (2009)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    W. Horiuchi, Y. Suzuki, P. Capel, D. Baye, Phys. Rev. C. 81, 024606 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    K. Minomo et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 052503 (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    K. Wimmer, et al., Phys. Rev. C. 85, 051603 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    S.K. Patra, C.R. Praharaj, arXiv:1002.0654 [Nucl. th] (2010)
  19. 19.
    G. Saxena, D. Singh, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E. 22, 1350025 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    S.K. Singh, S. Mahapatra, R.N. Mishra, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E. 22, 1350018 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    C. Caesar, et al., Phys. Rev. C. 88, 034313 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    T. Baumann, et al., Nature. 449, 1022 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    A. Ozawa, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 24 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    C.R. Hoffman, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 152502 (2008)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    T. Otsuka, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 082502 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    I. Hamamoto, Phys. Rev. C. 81, 021304(R) (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Y. Urata, K. Hagino, H. Sagawa, Phys. Rev. C. 83, 04130 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    K. Minomo, T. Sumi, M. Kimura, K. Ogata, Y.R. Shimizu, M. Yahiro, Phys. Rev. C. 84, 034602 (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    M. Takechi, et al., Phys. Lett. B. 707, 357 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    E.K. Warburton, et al., Phys. Rev. C. 41, 1147 (1990)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    K. Tanaka, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 062701 (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    N. Kobayshi, et al., arXiv:1111.7196 [Nucl. ex] (2011)
  33. 33.
    I. Tanihata, et al., Nucl. Phys. A. 682, 114c (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    L. Gaudefray, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 202503 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    M.K. Sharma, S.K. Patra, Phys. Rev. C. 87, 044606 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    B. Behera, X. Viñas, M. Bhuyan, T.R. Routray, B.K. Sharma, S.K. Patra, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 40, 095105 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    T.R. Routray, X. Viñas, S.K. Tripathy, M. Bhuyan, S.K. Patra, B. Behera, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 420, 012114 (2013)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    J. Boguta, A.R. Bodmer, Nucl. Phys. A. 292, 413 (1977)ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    W. Pannert, P. Ring, J. Boguta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2420 (1987)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    S.K. Patra, C.R. Praharaj, Phys. Rev. C. 44, 2552 (1991)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    M. Del Estal, M. Centelles, X. Vinas, S.K. Patra, Phys. Rev. C. 63, 024314 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    P. Ring, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 37, 193 (1996)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    R.J. Glauber, Phys. Rev. 100, 242 (1955)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    R.J. Glauber, in ibid, Lectures on Theoretical Physics, ed. by W.E. Brittin, L.C. Dunham. Int. Sc., vol. 1 (New York, 1959), p. 315Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    P.J. Karol, Phys. Rev. C. 11, 1203 (1975)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    J. Chauvin, et al., Phys. Rev. C. 28, 1970 (1983)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    B. Abu-Ibrahim, et al., Nucl. Phys. A. 657, 391 (1999)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    C.A. Bertulani, A. Gade, Comp. Phys. Comm. 175, 372 (2006)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    M. Buenerd, et al., Nucl. Phys. A. 424, 313 (1948)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    M.K. Sharma, M.S. Mehta, S.K. Patra, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E. 22, 135005 (2013)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    G.A. Lalazissis, J. König, P. Ring, Phys. Rev. C. 55, 540 (1997)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    L. Ray, Phys. Rev. C. 20, 1957 (1979)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    W. Horiuchi, Y. Suzuki, B. Abu Ibrahim, A. Kohama, Phys. Rev. C. 75, 044607 (2007)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    A. Ozawa, et al., Nucl. Phys. A. 693, 32 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    R. Kanungo, et al., Phys. Rev. C. 84, 061304(R) (2011)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    W. Horiuchi, T. Inakura, T. Nakatsukasa, Y. Suzuki, Phys. Rev. C. 86, 024614 (2012)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    M. Fukuda, et al., Phys. Lett. B. 208, 339 (1991)ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    T. Kobayashi, et al., Phys. Lett. B. 232, 51 (1989)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    I. Tanihata, et al., Phys. Lett. B. 206, 592 (1988)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    M. Takachi, et al., Nucl. Phys. A. 834, 412c (2010)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sociedade Brasileira de Física 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mahesh K. Sharma
    • 1
  • R. N. Panda
    • 2
  • Manoj K. Sharma
    • 1
  • S. K. Patra
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Physics and Materials ScienceThapar UniversityPunjabIndia
  2. 2.Department of Physics, ITERSiksha O Anusandhan UniversityBhubaneswarIndia
  3. 3.Institute of Physics, Sachivalaya MargBhubaneswarIndia

Personalised recommendations