U-net based metal segmentation on projection domain for metal artifact reduction in dental CT
- 86 Downloads
Unlike medical computed tomography (CT), dental CT often suffers from severe metal artifacts stemming from high-density materials employed for dental prostheses. Despite the many metal artifact reduction (MAR) methods available for medical CT, those methods do not sufficiently reduce metal artifacts in dental CT images because MAR performance is often compromised by the enamel layer of teeth, whose X-ray attenuation coefficient is not so different from that of prosthetic materials. We propose a deep learning-based metal segmentation method on the projection domain to improve MAR performance in dental CT. We adopted a simplified U-net for metal segmentation on the projection domain without using any information from the metal-artifacts-corrupted CT images. After training the network with the projection data of five patients, we segmented the metal objects on the projection data of other patients using the trained network parameters. With the segmentation results, we corrected the projection data by applying region filling inside the segmented region. We fused two CT images, one from the corrected projection data and the other from the original raw projection data, and then we forward-projected the fused CT image to get the fused projection data. To get the final corrected projection data, we replaced the metal regions in the original projection data with the ones in the fused projection data. To evaluate the efficacy of the proposed segmentation method on MAR, we compared the MAR performance of the proposed segmentation method with a conventional MAR method based on metal segmentation on the CT image domain. For the MAR performance evaluation, we considered the three primary MAR performance metrics: the relative error (REL), the sum of square difference (SSD), and the normalized absolute difference (NAD). The proposed segmentation method improved MAR performances by around 5.7% for REL, 6.8% for SSD, and 8.2% for NAD. The proposed metal segmentation method on the projection domain showed better MAR performance than the conventional segmentation on the CT image domain. We expect that the proposed segmentation method can improve the performance of the existing MAR methods that are based on metal segmentation on the CT image domain.
KeywordsMetal artifact reduction Metal segmentation Deep learning U-net Dental CT
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea funded by the Korean government (No: 2015M2A2A7A03043177).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors. (The IRB has reviewed that this work is not applicable to the IRB’ review).
- 2.De Mm B, Nuyts J, Dupont P, Marchai G, Suetttis P. Metal streak artifacts in x-ray computed tomography: a simulation study. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1999;46(3 part 2):691–6.Google Scholar
- 10.Jeong KY, Ra JB. Metal artifact reduction based on sinogram correction in CT. IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec. 2009;4:3480–3.Google Scholar
- 26.Chen H, Zhang Y, Zhang W, Liao P, Li K, Zhou J, et al. Low-dose CT denoising with convolutional neural network. In: IEEE 14th international symposium on biomedical imaging (ISBI 2017). Melbourne: IEEE; 2017, p. 143–6.Google Scholar
- 28.Zhang C, Xing Y, Spie P. CT artifact reduction via U-net CNN. Proc SPIE. 2018;10574:62.Google Scholar
- 29.Gjesteby L, Yang Q, Xi Y, Claus B, Jin Y, Man B De, et al. Reducing metal streak artifacts in CT images via deep learning: pilot results. In: 14th International meeting on fully three-dimensional image reconstruction in radiology and nuclear medicine, vol. 14. 2017. p. 611–4.Google Scholar
- 30.Zhang H, Li L, Qiao K, Wang L, Yan B, Li L, et al. Image prediction for limited-angle tomography via deep learning with convolutional neural network. CoRR. 2016. abs/1607.0.Google Scholar
- 32.Çiçek Ö, Abdulkadir A, Lienkamp SS, Brox T, Ronneberger O. 3D U-net: learning dense volumetric segmentation from sparse annotation. In: International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention (MICCAI 2016). 2016. p. 424–32.Google Scholar
- 33.Zhu Q, Du B, Turkbey B, Choyke PL, Yan P. Deeply-supervised CNN for prostate segmentation. In: International joint conference on neural networks. Anchorage; 2017. p. 178–84.Google Scholar
- 34.Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T. U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Search results lecture notes in computer science (including subseries Lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics), vol. 9351. 2015. p. 234–41.Google Scholar
- 36.Kingma DP, Ba J. ADAM: a method for stochastic optimization. In: International conference for learning representations (ICLR 2015). 2015.Google Scholar
- 37.Nasr G, Badr E, Joun C. Cross entropy error function in neural networks: forecasting gasoline demand. In: FLAIRS conference. 2002. p. 381–4.Google Scholar
- 39.Jaccard P. Distribution de la flore alpine dans le bassin des Dranses et dans quelques régions voisines. Bull Soc Vaud Des Sci Nat. 1901;37:241–72.Google Scholar
- 42.Abadi M, Agarwal A, Barham P, Brevdo E, Chen Z, Citro C, et al. TensorFlow: large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous distributed systems. 2015.Google Scholar