Biomedical Engineering Letters

, Volume 4, Issue 4, pp 338–346 | Cite as

Constructing 5D developing gene expression patterns without live animal imaging

  • Hanchuan PengEmail author
  • Eugene W. Myers
Original Article



There are five intrinsic dimensions for spatiotemporally developing patterns of gene expression, i.e. three spatial dimensions X, Y, and Z, the time, and the co-localized developing expression of multiple genes. Observing the formation of these patterns shed new light in understanding basic cellular processes and the genetic regulatory/signaling network. Ideally one would like to image this five-dimensional process in vivo, but most of current live animal imaging studies limit one to narrow time windows or small volumes or a small number of co-stained genes of interest.


Here we demonstrate reconstructing this developing pattern computationally without live imaging. For Drosophila embryos with labeled mRNA gene expression, we have reconstructed developmental time series of co-localized gene expression patterns by automatically sorting three-dimensional in situ images of late blastoderm Drosophila embryos sampled randomly from the desired time interval.


Specifically, we have developed a computational method to reconstruct such a developmental time series of the expression of a gene using 3D in situ images of a large number of Drosophila embryos sampled randomly from the desired time interval. Each sampled embryo in a data series has its nuclei labeled and two or more selected mRNA targets labeled via hybridization with probes of a different color. The multi-color images in such a series are automatically sorted into their temporal order by our new computational approach. We formulate this problem as that of learning a manifold, and solve it by first registering or aligning the images and then sorting them temporally by minimizing the alignment differences between adjacent images in a putative order. We present two approaches for ordering the data, the first based on minimum spanning trees and the second based on finding a principal curve through the data.


We have applied this computational approach to reconstruct the developmental time series of the expression of several genes in late blastoderm fly embryos.


Gene expression Manifold Image analysis Drosophila Live imaging Registration 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

13534_2014_167_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (926 kb)
Supplementary material, approximately 943 KB.

Supplementary material, approximately 2.61 MB.

Supplementary material, approximately 1.80 MB.


  1. [1]
    Tautz D, Pfeifle C. A non-radioactive in situ hybridization method for the localization of specific RNAs in Drosophila embryos reveals a translational control of the segmentation gene hunchback. Chromosoma. 1989; 98(2):81–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Jiang J, Kosman D, Ip YT, Levine M. The dorsal morphogen gradient regulates the mesoderm determinant twist in early Drosophila embryos. Gene Dev. 1991; 5(10):1881–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Lehmann R, Tautz D. In Situ Hybridization to RNA. Goldstein LSB, Fryberg EA, Wilson L, Matsudaira PT, editors. Methods in Cell Biology. Academic Press; 1994. pp. 575–98.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    O’Neill JW, Bier E. Double-label in situ hybridization using biotin and digoxigenin-tagged RNA probes. Biotechniques. 1994; 17(5):870–5.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Kosman D, Small S. Concentration-dependent patterning by an ectopic expression domain of the Drosophila gap gene knirps. Development. 1997; 124(7):1343–54.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Peng H, Myers EW. Comparing in situ mRNA expression patterns of Drosophila embryos. Conf Proc 8th Ann Int Conf Res Comp Mol Bio. 2004; 1:157–66.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Peng H, Long F, Zhou J, Leung G, Eisen MB, Myers EW. Automatic image analysis for gene expression patterns of fly embryos. BMC Cell Biology. 2007; doi:  10.1186/1471-2121-8-S1-S7.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Vermot J, Fraser SE, Liebling M. Fast fluorescence microscopy for imaging the dynamics of embryonic development. HFSP J. 2008; 2(3):143–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Prim RC. Shortest connection networks and some generalizations. Bell Syst Tech J. 1957; 36(6):1389–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Hastie T. Principal curves and surfaces. Ph.D. Thesis; Stanford University; USA; 19–4.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Audette MA, Ferrie FP, Peters TM. An algorithmic overview of surface registration techniques for medical imaging. Med Image Anal. 2000; 4(3):201–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Friston KJ, Ashburner J, Frith CD, Poline JB, Heather JD, Frackowiak RSJ. Spatial registration and normalization of images. Hum Brain Mapp. 1995; 3(3):165–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Peng H. Bioimage informatics: a new area of engineering biology. Bioinformatics. 2008; 24(17):1827–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Comaniciu D, Meer P. Mean shift: a robust approach toward feature space analysis. IEEE T Pattern Anal. 2002; 24(5):603–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Peng H, Long F, Liu X, Kim SK, Myers EW. Straightening Caenorhabditis elegans images. Bioinformatics. 2008; 24(2):234–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Medical and Biological Engineering and Springer 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Allen Institute for Brain ScienceSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and GeneticsDresdenGermany

Personalised recommendations