Advertisement

Toxicology and Environmental Health Sciences

, Volume 10, Issue 5, pp 245–252 | Cite as

A Comparative Study of Physical Health among Office and Technical Workers in Y Combined Cycle Power Plant in Korea

  • Lim-Kyu Lee
  • Seung-Min Yang
  • Jaehong Park
  • Junghwan KimEmail author
Original article
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

Objective

It is well known that workers’ health conditions are affected by their job characteristics and working environments. The objective of this study was to compare the physical health characteristics of office workers, day shift technical workers, and night shift technical workers.

Methods

Risk of cardiovascular disease was evaluated in three stages according to main risk factors for all 100 participants. Various health measures were analyzed across the three groups. Physical examinations and personal surveys were used to improve the reliability of data. The body composition of a subset of 34 workers was analyzed using the InBody instrument.

Results

There was a statistically significant difference in triglyceride levels among the three types of workers (office: 130 mg/dL vs. technical day: 123 mg/dL vs. technical night: 166 mg/dL). Most workers scored a normal cardiovascular risk grade (office: 86% vs. technical day: 91% vs. technical night: 92%). Mean body mass index was consistent across the three groups, at 24 for office and technical day workers and 25 for technical night workers. In correlation analysis of select body composition measures, soft lean mass and skeletal muscle mass were positively correlated. Body fat mass and physical development score were negatively correlated.

Conclusion

Even though Y plant has made efforts to improve workers’ health, these study results suggest that additional approaches are important to improve health and safety in the future.

Keywords

Physical health Workers Y combined cycle power plants 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sookoian, S. et al. Effects of rotating shift work on biomarkers of metabolic syndrome and inflammation. J. Intern. Med. 261, 285–292 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Esquirol, Y. et al. Shift work and cardiovascular risk factors: new knowledge from the past decade. Arch. Cardiovasc. Dis. 104, 636–668 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Theorell, T. & Akerstedt, T. Day and night work: changes in cholesterol, uric acid, glucose and potassium in serum and in circadian patterns of urinary catecholamine excretion. A longitudinal cross–over study of railway workers. Acta. Med. Scand. 200, 47–53 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Van Amelsvoort, L. G., Schouten, E. G. & Kok, F. J. Duration of shiftwork related to body mass index and waist to hip ratio. Int. J. Obesit. 23, 973–978 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lorenzo, L. D. et al. Effect of shift work on body mass index: results of a study performed in 319 glucose–tolerant men working in a Southern Italian industry. Int. J. Obesit. 27, 1353–1358 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Karlsson, B., Knutsson, A. & Lindahl, B. Is there an association between shift work and having a metabolic syndrome? Results from a population based study of 27 485 people. Occup. Environ. Med. 58, 747–752 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Manenschijin, L. et al. Shift work at young age is associated with elevated long–term cortisol levels and body mass index. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 96, 1862–1865 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee, L. K. et al. The effort of health management for workers in Y combined cycle power plant in Korea. Toxicol. Environ. Health Sci. 10, 42–48 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ogawa, H. et al. InBody 720 as a new method of evaluating visceral obesity. Hepatogastroenterolog. 58, 42–44 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim, M. & Kim, H. Accuracy of segmental multi–frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis for assessing whole–body and appendicular fat mass and lean soft tissue mass in frail women aged 75 years and older. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 67, 395–400 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Morikawa, Y. et al. Effect of shift work on body mass index and metabolic parameters. Scand. J. Work. Environ. Healt. 33, 45–50 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dochi, M. et al. Shift work is a risk factor for increased total cholesterol level: a 14–year prospective cohort study in 6886 male workers. Occup. Environ. Med. 66, 592–597 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Niedhammer, I., Lert, F. & Marne, M. J. Prevalence of overweight and weight gain in relation to night work in a nurses’ cohort. Int. J. Obes. Relat. Metab. Disord. 20, 625–633 (1996).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Biggi, N. et al. Metabolic syndrome in permanent night workers. Chronobiol. Int. 25, 443–454 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ye, H. et al. The association between shift work and the metabolic syndrome in female workers. Ann. Occup. Environ. Med. 25, doi: 10.1186/2052–4374–25–33 (2013).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Karlsson, B. H. et al. Metabolic disturbances in male workers with rotating three–shift work. Results of the WOLF study. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Healt. 76, 424–430 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ghiasvand, M. et al. Shift working and risk of lipid disorders: a cross–sectional study. Lipids Health Dis. 5, doi: 10.1186/1476–511X–5–9 (2006).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Marqueze, E. C., Ulhôa, M. A. & Moreno, C. R. Effects of irregular–shift work and physical activity on cardiovascular risk factors in truck drivers. Rev. Saúde Públ. 47, 497–505 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Roman, M. et al. Increased triglyceride levels in shift workers. Am. J. Med. 93, 259–262 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    van Amelsvoort, L. G., Schouten, E. G. & Kok, F. J. Impact of one year of shift work on cardiovascular disease risk factors. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 46, 699–706 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pan, A. et al. Rotating night shift work and risk of type 2 diabetes: two prospective cohort studies in women. PLoS Med. 8, 1–8 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Morikawa, Y., Nakagawa, H. & Miura, K. Shift work and the risk of diabetes mellitus among Japanese male factory workers. Scand. J. Work. Environ. Healt. 31, 179–183 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Attarchi, M. et al. Effect of exposure to occupational noise and shift working on blood pressure in rubber manufacturing company workers. Ind. Healt. 50, 205–213 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Asfaw, H. A., Gebrehiwot, E. M. & Shiferaw, S. Effect of shift–work on hypertension among factory workers in Ethiopia. Am. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 3, 142–148 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ghazanfari, E. et al. Blood pressure modifications during shift work among workers in Isfahan city, Iran. Iran. Red. Crescent. Med. J. 18, doi: 10.5812/ircmj.30092 (2015).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Salis, J. F. et al. Relation of cardiovascular fitness and physical activity to cardiovascular disease risk factors in children and adults. Am. J. Epidemiol. 127, 933–941 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Andersen, L. B. et al. Physical activity and clustered cardiovascular risk in children: a cross–sectional study (The European Youth Heart Study). Lance. 368, 299–304 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bassuk, S. S. & Manson, J. E. Epidemiological evidence for the role of physical activity in reducing risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. J. Appl. Physiol. 99, 1193–1204 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gibson, A. L. et al. Ability of new octapolar bioimpedance spectroscopy analyzers to predict 4–component–model percentage body fat in Hispanic, black, and white adults. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 87, 332–338 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gába, A. & Pridalová, M. Age–related changes in body composition in a sample of Czech women aged 18–89 years: a cross–sectional study. Eur. J. Nutr. 53, 167–176 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Spent, L. F. et al. Muscle mass of competitive male athletes. J. Sports Sci. 11, 3–8 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Svedenhag, J. et al. Increased left ventricular muscle mass after long–term altitude training in athletes. Acta Physiol. Scand. 161, 63–70 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sallinen, J. et al. Muscle mass and strength, body composition and dietary intake in master strength athletes vs untrained men of different ages. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fitnes. 48, 190–196 (2008).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Andreoli, A. et al. Effects of different sports on bone density and muscle mass in highly trained athletes. Med. Sci. 33, 507–511 (2001).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lorenzo, L. D. et al. Effect of shift work on body mass index: results of a study performed in 319 glucose–tolerant men working in a Southern Italian industry. Int. J. Obes. 27, 1353–1358 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Inomoto, A. et al. Relation between respiratory function and arterial stiffness assessed using brachial–ankle pulse wave velocity in healthy workers. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 29, 1664–1669 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Camhi, S. C. et al. The relationship of waist circumference and BMI to visceral, subcutaneous, and total body fat: sex and race differences. Obesit. 19, 402–408 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Deurenberg, P., Yap, M. & van Staveren, W. A. Body mass index and percent body fat: a meta analysis among different ethnic groups. Int. J. Obesit. 22, 1164–1171 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    WHO. International Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension, http://www. besancon–cardio.org/recommandations/who_ht.htm (1999).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Occupational Safety and Health Standards, https:// www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document? p_table=standards&p_id=10099 (2012).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    World Health Organization/International Society of Hypertension guidelines, http://www.who.int/entity/ cardiovascular_diseases/guidelines/hypertension_ guidelines.pdf?ua=1 (2003).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Environmental Risk Assessment and Health Science and Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lim-Kyu Lee
    • 1
    • 2
  • Seung-Min Yang
    • 1
  • Jaehong Park
    • 3
  • Junghwan Kim
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Laboratory of Health Science & Nanophysiotherapy, Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate SchoolYongin UniversityYonginRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.The Team of Safety and Quality ManagementYeongwol Combined Cycle Power Plant Division, Korea Southern Power PlantYeongwolRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.Department of Social Welfare, College of Public Health & WelfareYongin UniversityYonginRepublic of Korea
  4. 4.Department of Physical Therapy, College of Public Health & WelfareYongin UniversityYonginRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations