Toxicology and Environmental Health Sciences

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 189–196 | Cite as

Somatotype analysis of elite Taekwondo athletes compared to non-athletes for sports health sciences

  • Ji-Woong Noh
  • Ju-Hyun Kim
  • Junghwan KimEmail author
Research Article


The purpose of this study was to show somatotype and physical characteristic differences between elite taekwondo (TKD) athletes and non-athletes. Differences between weight divisions for Gyorugi and Poomsae athletes were also examined. In this study, we first observed 51 elite TKD athletes and 30 non-athletes. The participants were measured with the modified somatotype method of Heath-Carter, resulting in three kinds of somatotypes (endomorph, mesomorph, and ectomorph) and a balanced type (central type). The non-athletes consisted of eight endomorphic, eight mesomorphic, seven ectomorphic, and seven central types. The TKD athletes consisted of 26 ectomorphic, 14 mesomorphic, six central type, and four endomorphs. Subdividing the Gyorugi athletes somatotypes resulted in seven mesomorphectomorph, five balanced ectomorph, four mesomorphic ectomorph, four endomorphic ectomorph, three central types, two endomorphic mesomorph, two ectomorphic mesomorph, two balanced endomorph, one mesomorphic endomorph, and one mesomorphendomorph, And poomse athletes resulted in four balanced ectomorph, four balanced mesomorph, three central type, three mesomorph-endomorph, two endomorphic ectomorph, one mesomorph-ectomorph, one mesomorphic ectomorph, one endomorphic mesomorph, and one balanced endomorph, respectively. TKD athletes had tall, higher ectomorphic component values than the non-athletes. However, the athletes’ endomorphic and mesomorphic components were lower than in the non-athletes. Furthermore, Gyorugi athletes are taller and more frequently ectomorphic than Poomsae athletes. A lower weight division in Gyorugi athletes was positively correlated with a higher ectomorphic component, but negatively correlated with the endomorphic and mesomorphic components. The −80 kg class had the highest mesomorphic component value and the lowest endomorphic component value. Our study provides, in part, physical characteristics of TKD athletes to establish a reference for the study of sports health sciences.


Somatotype analysis Taekwondo athletes Sports health sciences 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Cular, D., Munivrana, G. & Katić, R. Anthropological analysis of taekwondo-new methodological approach. Coll. Antropol. 37, 9–18 (2013).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ziaee, V., Rahmani, S. H. & Rostami, M. Injury rates in Iranian taekwondo athletes; a prospective study. Asian J. Sports Med. 1, 23–28 (2010).PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lee, K. T. et al. Extensor hallucis longus tendon injury in taekwondo athletes. Phys. Ther. Sport. 10, 101–104 (2009).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kazemi, M. et al. A profile of Olympic taekwondo competitors. J. Sports Sci. Med. 5, 114–121 (2006).PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cular, D., Krstulovic, S. & Janovic, M. The differences between medalists and non-medalists at the 2008 Olympic games taekwondo tournament. Hum. Mov. 12, 165–170 (2011).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Estevan, I. et al. Effect of Olympic weight category on performance in the roundhouse kick to the head in taekwondo. J. Hum. Kinet. 31, 37–43 (2012).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Noh, J. W., Kim, J. H. & Kim, J. Somatotype analysis of Korean wrestling athletes compared with non-athletes for sports health sciences. Toxicol. Environ. Health Sci. 5, 163–168 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Heath, B. H. & Carter, J. E. A comparison of somatotype methods. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 24, 87–99 (1966).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heath, B. H. & Carter, J. E. A modified somatotype method. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 27, 57–74 (1967).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heath, B. H. & Carter, J. E. Growth and somatotype patterns of Manus children, territory of Papua and New Guinea: application of a modified somatotype method to the study of growth patterns. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 35, 49–67 (1971).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Charzewski, J., Glaz, A. & Kuzmicki, S. Somatotype characteristics of elite European wrestlers. Biol. Sport. 8, 213–221 (1991).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Krawczyk, B., Sklad, M. & Jackiewicz, A. Heath-carter somatotypes of athletes representing various sports. Biol. Sport. 14, 243–250 (1997).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fong, S. S. & Ng, G. Y. Does taekwondo training improve physical fitness? Phys. Ther. Sport. 12, 100–106 (2011).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sadowski, J. et al. Success factors in elite WTF taekwondo competitors. Arch. Budo. 3, 141–146 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chaabène, H. et al. Physical and physiological profile of elite karate athletes. Sports Med. 42, 829–843 (2012).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fritzsche, J. & Raschka, C. Sports anthropological investigations on somatotypology of elite karateka. Anthropol. Anz. 65, 317–329 (2007).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Koropanovski, N. et al. Anthropometric and physical performance profiles of elite karate kumite and kata competitors. J. Hum. Kinet. 30, 107–114 (2011).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lewandowska, J. et al. Somatotype variables related to muscle torque and power in judoists. J. Hum. Kinet. 30, 21–28 (2011).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sterkowicz-Przybycień, K. L., Sterkowicz, S. & Zarów, R. T. Somatotype, body composition and proportionality in polish top greco-roman wrestlers. J. Hum. Kinet. 28, 141–154 (2011).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Andreato, L. V. et al. Morphological profile of Brazilian jiu-jitsu elite athletes. Rev. Bras. Med. Esporte. 8, 46–50 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kanehisa, H., Kondo, M., Ikegawa, S. & Fukunaga, T. Body composition and isokinetic strength of professional Sumo wrestlers. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 77, 352–359 (1998).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee, W. D., Lee, L. K., Kim, B. & Kim, J. Differences in body components and the significance of rehabilitation for taekwondo athletes compared to nonathletes. Toxicol. Environ. Health. Sci. 4, 203–208 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yang, S. M. et al. Differences in body components and electrical characteristics between youth soccer players and non-athletes. Health. 5, 1010–1015 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kim, J. H. et al. Change of muscular activity and dynamic stability of the knee joint due to excessive and repetitive jumping or cutting by female athletes. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 24, 715–719 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Environmental Risk Assessment and Health Science and Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Health Science & Nanophysiotherapy, Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate SchoolYongin UniversityYonginKorea
  2. 2.Department of Physical Therapy, College of Public Health & WelfareYongin UniversityYonginKorea

Personalised recommendations