Differences in amplitude of functional electrical stimulation between the paretic and nonparetic sides of hemiplegic stroke patients

Research article

Abstract

There is a need for an objective clinical analysis of the electrical response of the muscles of stroke patients’ paretic side and nonparetic side using functional electrical stimulation (FES) with an alternating current to confirm the degree of muscle degeneration. The subjects were ten stroke patients (five male and five female). The pad of an electrical stimulator was applied to the vastus lateralis and the vastus medialis regions to measure the amplitude of FES until the contractive muscle response to the electrical stimulation became visible. The amplitude of FES was significantly increased on the paretic side compared to that of the nonparetic side of hemiplegic stroke patients. Furthermore, the amplitude of paretic sides was significantly higher than that for nonparetic sides in female groups. This result suggests that stroke affects muscle contraction. When performing rehabilitation, the appropriate input for each stroke patient needs to be carefully considered.

Keywords

Functional electrical stimulation Paretic and nonparetic side Stroke patients 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Jeon, H. J., Kim, J. H., Kim, B. & Kim, J. Analysis of high-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation-induced sensory threshold from the elderly people for healthy life. Toxicol. Environ. Health Sci. 4, 167–172, 2012a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jeon, H. J. et al. Changing the sensory threshold of elderly people through low-frequency, high-voltage acupoint electrical stimulation. Toxicol. Environ. Health Sci. 4, 277–283, 2012b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kim, J. H. et al. Noxiousness of hypertension-related norepinephrine and upregulation of norepinephrine induced by high intensity electrical stimulation in healthy volunteers. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 24, 795–800, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee, L. K. et al. Change in the interferential current therapy-induced sensory threshold on the bodies of elderly people. Toxicol. Environ. Health Sci. 5, 41–47, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hamid, S. & Hayek, R. Role of electrical stimulation for rehabilitation and regeneration after spinal cord injury: an overview. Eur. Spine J. 17, 1256–1269, 2008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Harrington, A. T., McRae, C. G. & Lee, S. C. Evaluation of functional electrical stimulation to assist cycling in four adolescents with spastic cerebral palsy. Int. J. Pediatr. 2012, 1–11, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim, M. Y. et al. The effects of functional electrical stimulation on balance of stroke patients in the standing posture. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 24, 77–81, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kim, J. H. et al. A pilot study on the effect of functional electrical stimulation of stroke patients in a sitting position on balance and activities of daily living. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 25, 2013. (in press)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim, M. Y. et al. The effect of low frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with range of motion exercise on paretic hand function in female patients after stroke. Neurosci. Med. 4, 77–83, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wu, C. W., Seo, H. J. & Cohen, L. G. Influence of electric somatosensory stimulation on paretic-hand in chronic stroke. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 87, 351–357, 2006.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Santos, M. et al. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation improves severe hand dysfunction for individuals with chronic stroke: a pilot study. J. Neurol. Phys. Ther. 30, 175–183, 2006.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yan, T., Hui-Chan, C. W. & Li, L. S. Functional electrical stimulation improves motor recovery of the lower extremity and walking ability of subjects with first acute stroke: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Stroke 36, 80–85, 2005.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee, W. D. et al. Differences in rheobase and chronaxie between the paretic and non-paretic sides of hemiplegic stroke patients: a pilot study. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 25, 717–719, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yang, S. M. et al. Differences in body components and electrical characteristics between youth soccer players and non-athletes. Health 5, 1010–1015, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Takahashi, M. et al. Event related desynchronization-modulated functional electrical stimulation system for stroke rehabilitation: a feasibility study. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 9, 56, 2012.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim, J. H. et al. The effects of symmetrical self-performed facial muscle exercises on the neuromuscular facilitation of patients with facial palsy. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 23, 543–547, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lamontagne, A., Malouin, F., Richards, C. L. & Dumas, F. Mechanisms of disturbed motor control in ankle weakness during gait after stroke. Gait Posture 15, 244–255, 2002PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jeon, H. J. et al. Analysis of the sensory threshold between paretic and nonparetic sides for healthy rehabilitation in hemiplegic patients after stroke. Health 4, 1241–1246, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pomeroy, V. M. et al. Electrostimulation for promoting recovery of movement or functional ability after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2, CD003241, 2006.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Peckham, P. H. & Knutson, J. S. Functional electrical stimulation for neuromuscular applications. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 7, 327–360, 2005.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bohannon, R. W. Muscle strength and muscle training after stroke. J. Rehabil. Med. 39, 14–20, 2007.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Patten, C., Lexell, J. & Brown, H. E. Weakness and strength training in persons with post stroke hemiplegia: rationale, method, and efficacy. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 41, 293–312, 2004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rantanen, T. et al. Association of muscle strength with maximum walking speed in disabled older women. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 77, 299–305, 1998.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Environmental Risk Assessment and Health Science and Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Health Science & Nanophysiotherapy, Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate SchoolYongin UniversityYonginKorea
  2. 2.Department of Physical Therapy, College of Public Health & WelfareYongin UniversityYonginKorea

Personalised recommendations