Advertisement

Demography

, Volume 56, Issue 4, pp 1463–1493 | Cite as

Beyond the Great Recession: Labor Market Polarization and Ongoing Fertility Decline in the United States

  • Nathan SeltzerEmail author
Article

Abstract

In the years since the Great Recession, social scientists have anticipated that economic recovery in the United States, characterized by gains in employment and median household income, would augur a reversal of declining fertility trends. However, the expected post-recession rebound in fertility rates has yet to materialize. In this study, I propose an economic explanation for why fertility rates have continued to decline regardless of improvements in conventional economic indicators. I argue that ongoing structural changes in U.S. labor markets have prolonged the financial uncertainty that leads women and couples to delay or forgo childbearing. Combining statistical and survey data with restricted-use vital registration records, I examine how cyclical and structural changes in metropolitan-area labor markets were associated with changes in total fertility rates (TFRs) across racial/ethnic groups from the early 1990s to the present day, with a particular focus on the 2006–2014 period. The findings suggest that changes in industry composition—specifically, the loss of manufacturing and other goods-producing businesses—have a larger effect on TFRs than changes in the unemployment rate for all racial/ethnic groups. Because structural changes in labor markets are more likely to be sustained over time—in contrast to unemployment rates, which fluctuate with economic cycles—further reductions in unemployment are unlikely to reverse declining fertility trends.

Keywords

Fertility Great recession Labor market polarization Unemployment 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful for feedback from Jenna Nobles, Myra Marx Ferree, Marcy Carlson, Christine Schwartz, and Jennifer Laird. This research was supported by a core grant to the Center for Demography and Ecology at University of Wisconsin–Madison (P2C HD047873) as well as support from a training grant awarded to the Center for Demography and Ecology (T32 HD007014). All errors are the author’s own.

Supplementary material

13524_2019_790_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (300 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 300 kb)

References

  1. Abel, J. R., & Deitz, R. (2012). Job polarization and rising inequality in the nation and the New York–Northern New Jersey region. Current Issues in Economics and Finance (Second District Highlights), 18(7), 1–7.Google Scholar
  2. Acemoglu, D., & Autor, D. (2011). Skills, tasks and technologies: Implications for employment and earnings. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 4B, pp. 1043–1171). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  3. Allison, P. D. (2009). Fixed effects regression models (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series No. 07-160). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Arai, L. (2007). Peer and neighbourhood influences on teenage pregnancy and fertility: Qualitative findings from research in English communities. Health & Place, 13, 87–98.Google Scholar
  5. Autor, D. (2010). The polarization of job opportunities in the U.S. labor market: Implications for employment and earnings (Joint report for the Center for American Progress and the Hamilton Project). Retrieved from https://economics.mit.edu/files/5554
  6. Autor, D. H., & Dorn, D. (2013). The growth of low-skill service jobs and the polarization of the US labor market. American Economic Review, 103, 1553–1597.Google Scholar
  7. Autor, D. H., Dorn, D., & Hanson, G. H. (2017). When work disappears: Manufacturing decline and the falling marriage-market value of men (NBER Working Paper 23173). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  8. Autor, D. H., Katz, L. F., & Kearney, M. S. (2006). The polarization of the U.S. labor market. American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings, 96, 189–194.Google Scholar
  9. Balbo, N., & Barban, N. (2014). Does fertility behavior spread among friends? American Sociological Review, 79, 412–431.Google Scholar
  10. Balbo, N., Billari, F. C., & Mills, M. (2013). Fertility in advanced societies: A review of research. European Journal of Population/Revue Européenne de Démographie, 29, 1–38.Google Scholar
  11. Becker, G. S. (1960). An economic analysis of fertility. In Universities-National Bureau (Ed.), Demographic and economic change in developed countries: A conference of the Universities-National Bureau Commitee for Economic Research (pp. 209–240). New York, NY: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  12. Bernardi, L., & Klärner, A. (2014). Social networks and fertility. Demographic Research, 30, 641–670.  https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2014.30.22 Google Scholar
  13. Bongaarts, J. (1978). A framework for analyzing the proximate determinants of fertility. Population and Development Review, 4, 105–132.Google Scholar
  14. Bongaarts, J., & Feeney, G. (1998). On the quantum and tempo of fertility. Population and Development Review, 24, 271–291.Google Scholar
  15. Boonstra, H. D. (2014). What is behind the declines in teen pregnancy rates? Guttmacher Policy Review, 17(3), 15–21.Google Scholar
  16. Bound, J., & Dresser, L. (1999). Losing ground: The erosion of the relative earnings of African American women during the 1980s. In I. Browne (Ed.), Latinas and African American women at work: Race, gender, and economic inequality (pp. 61–104). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  17. Brand, J. E., & Davis, D. (2012). The impact of college education on fertility: Evidence for heterogeneous effects. Demography, 48, 863–887.Google Scholar
  18. Branum, A. M., & Jones, J. (2015). Trends in long-acting reversible contraception use among U.S. women aged 15–44 (NCHS Data Brief No. 188). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
  19. Brauner-Otto, S. R., & Geist, C. (2018). Uncertainty, doubts, and delays: Economic circumstances and childbearing expectations among emerging adults. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 39, 88–102.Google Scholar
  20. Browne, I. (2000). Opportunities lost? Race, industrial restructuring, and employment among young women heading households. Social Forces, 78, 907–929.Google Scholar
  21. Buckles, K., Hungerman, D., & Lugauer, S. (2018). Is fertility a leading economic indicator? (NBER Working Paper 24355). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  22. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). (2008). Labor force characteristics by race and ethnicity, 2007 (Report No. 1005). Washington, DC: BLS.Google Scholar
  23. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). (2012). The recession of 2007–2009 (BLS Spotlight on Statistics). Washington, DC: BLS.Google Scholar
  24. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). (2017). LNS14000000: Labor force statistics from the Current Population Survey [Data set]. Washington, DC: BLS.Google Scholar
  25. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), & U.S. Department of Labor. (2016, July 12). Number of people working part time for economic reasons falls in June 2016. TED: The Economics Daily. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2016/number-of-people-working-part-time-for-economic-reasons-falls-in-june-2016.htm
  26. Butz, W. P., & Ward, M. P. (1979). The emergence of countercyclical U.S. fertility. American Economic Review, 69, 318–328.Google Scholar
  27. Cadena, B. C., & Kovak, B. K. (2016). Immigrants equilibrate local labor markets: Evidence from the Great Recession. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 8(1), 257–290.Google Scholar
  28. Calnan, R., & Painter, G. (2017). The response of Latino immigrants to the Great Recession: Occupational and residential (im)mobility. Urban Studies, 54, 2561–2291.Google Scholar
  29. Catanzarite, L., & Aguilera, M. B. (2002). Working with co-ethnics: Earnings penalties for Latino immigrants at Latino jobsites. Social Problems, 49, 101–127.Google Scholar
  30. Cherlin, A., Cumberworth, E., Morgan, S. P., & Wimer, C. (2013). The Effects of the Great Recession on family structure and fertility. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 650, 214–231.Google Scholar
  31. Choi, K. (2014). Fertility in the context of Mexican migration to the United States: A case for incorporating the pre-migration fertility of immigrants. Demographic Research, 30, 703–738.  https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2014.30.24 Google Scholar
  32. Cohen, P. N. (2014). Recession and divorce in the United States, 2008–2011. Population Research and Policy Review, 33, 615–628.Google Scholar
  33. Cohen, P. N., & Huffman, M. L. (2007). Black under-representation in management across U.S. labor markets. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 609, 181–199.Google Scholar
  34. Couch, K. A., & Fairlie, R. (2010). Last hired, first fired? Black-white unemployment and the business cycle. Demography, 47, 227–247.Google Scholar
  35. Cunningham, E. (2018). Great recession, great recovery? Trends from the Current Population Survey. Monthly Labor Review, April, 1–27.Google Scholar
  36. Currie, J., & Schwandt, H. (2014). Short- and long-term effects of unemployment on fertility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 14734–14739.Google Scholar
  37. Ermisch, J. (1988). Economic influences on birth rates. National Institute Economic Review, 126, 71–92.Google Scholar
  38. Finer, L. B., Jerman, J., & Kavanaugh, M. L. (2012). Changes in use of long-acting contraceptive methods in the United States, 2007–2009. Fertility and Sterility, 98, 893–897.Google Scholar
  39. Finer, L. B., & Zolna, M. R. (2016). Declines in unintended pregnancy in the United States, 2008–2011. New England Journal of Medicine, 374, 843–852.Google Scholar
  40. Flanagan, C., & Wilson, E. (2013). Home value and homeownership rates: Recession and post-recession comparisons from 2007–2009 to 2010–2012 (Amercian Community Survey Briefs Report Number ACSBR/12-20). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  41. Fletcher, J. M., & Polos, J. (2017). Nonmarital and teen fertility (IZA Discussion Papers No. 10833). Bonn, Germany: Institute of Labor Economics.Google Scholar
  42. Goodman, C. J., & Mance, S. M. (2011). Employment loss and the 2007–09 recession: An overview. Monthly Labor Review, April, 3–12.Google Scholar
  43. Hall, M., Crowder, K., & Spring, A. (2015). Neighborhood foreclosures, racial/ethnic transitions, and residential segregation. American Sociological Review, 80, 526–549.Google Scholar
  44. Hamilton, B. E., & Kirmeyer, S. E. (2017). Trends and variations in reproduction and intrinsic rates: United States, 1990–2014 (National Vital Statistics Reports Vol. 66, No. 2). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
  45. Hamilton, B. E., Martin, J. A., Osterman, M. J. K., Driscoll, A. K., & Rossen, L. M. (2017). Births: Provisional data for 2016 (Vital Statistics Rapid Release No. 2). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
  46. Hamilton, B. E., Martin, J. A., Osterman, M. J. K., Driscoll, A. K., & Rossen, L. M. (2019). Births: Provisional data for 2017b (Vital Statistics Rapid Release No. 004). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
  47. Hamilton, B. E., & Sutton, P. D. (2012). Recent trends in births and fertility rates through June 2012 (Heath E-Stats). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hestat/births_fertility_june_2012/births_june_2012.html
  48. Hartmann, H., English, A., & Hayes, J. (2010). Women and men’s employment and unemployment in the Great Recession (IWPR Publication No. C373). Washington, DC: Institute for Women’s Policy Research.Google Scholar
  49. Holder, M. (2017). African American men and the labor market during the Great Recession. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  50. Holder, M. (2018). Revisiting Bergmann’s occupational crowding model. Review of Radical Political Economics, 50, 683–690.Google Scholar
  51. Hout, M., & Cumberworth, E. (2012). The labor force and the Great Recession. Stanford, CA: Stanford Center on Poverty and Inequality.Google Scholar
  52. Jaimovich, N., & Siu, H. E. (2012). The trend is the cycle: Job polarization and jobless recoveries (NBER Working Paper No. 18334). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  53. Janoski, T., Luke, D., & Oliver, C. (2014). The causes of structural unemployment: Four factors that keep people from the jobs they deserve. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  54. Jaret, C., Reid, L. W., & Adelman, R. M. (2003). Black-white income inequality and metropolitan socioeconomic structure. Journal of Urban Affairs, 25, 305–334.Google Scholar
  55. Kalleberg, A. L. (2009). Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition. American Sociological Review, 74, 1–22.Google Scholar
  56. Kearney, M. S., & Wilson, R. (2018). Male earnings, marriageable men, and nonmarital fertility: Evidence from the fracking boom. Review of Economics and Statistics, 100, 678–690.Google Scholar
  57. Kennedy, S., & Fitch, C. A. (2012). Measuring cohabitation and family structure in the United States: Assessing the impact of new data from the Current Population Survey. Demography, 49, 1479–1498.Google Scholar
  58. Kmec, J. A. (2003). Minority job concentration and wages. Social Problems, 50, 38–59.Google Scholar
  59. Kochhar, R. (2011). In two years of economic recovery, women lost jobs, men found them (Social and Demographic Trends report). Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
  60. Kothari, S., Saporta-Eksten, I., & Yu, E. (2013). The (un)importance of geographical mobility in the Great Recession. Review of Economic Dynamics, 16, 553–563.Google Scholar
  61. Levine, M. V. (2012). Race and male employment in the wake of the great recession: Black male employment rates in Milwaukee and the nation’s largest metro areas 2010 (CED Publications No. 20). Milwaukee: Center for Economic Development, University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  62. Lim, S. (2017). “Bad jobs” for marriage: Precarious work and the transition to first marriage. In A. L. Kalleberg & S. P. Vallas (Eds.), Precarious work (Research in the Sociology of Work Series) (Vol. 31, pp. 399–427). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  63. Lindberg, L., Santelli, J., & Desai, S. (2016). Understanding the decline in adolescent fertility in the United States, 2007–2012. Journal of Adolescent Health, 59, 577–583.Google Scholar
  64. Low, S. (2017, September 12). Manufacturing is relatively more important to the rural economy than the urban economy [Web blog]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture. Retrieved from https://www.usda.gov/media/blog/2017/09/12/manufacturing-relatively-more-important-rural-economy-urban-economy
  65. Martin, J. A., Hamilton, B. E., & Osterman, M. J. K. (2018). Births in the United States, 2017 (NCHS Data Brief No. 318). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
  66. Martin, J. A., Hamilton, B. E., Osterman, M. J. K. S., Driscoll, A. K., & Mathews, T. J. (2017). Births: Final data for 2015 (National Vital Statistics Reports Vol. 66, No. 1). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
  67. Martin, S. P., Astone, N. M., & Peters, H. E. (2014). Fewer marriages, more divergence: Marriage projections for millennials to age 40 (Urban Institute Research Report). Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
  68. Matysiak, A., Sobotka, T., & Vignoli, D. (2014). The Great Recession and fertility in Europe: A sub-national anlaysis (Vienna Institute of Demography Working Paper). Vienna, Austria: Vienna Institute of Demography.Google Scholar
  69. McConnell, S., Fortson, K., Rotz, D., Schochet, P., Burkander, P., Rosenberg, L., . . . D’Amico, R. (2016). Providing pubic workforce services to job seekers: 15-month impact findings on the WIA Adult and Dislocated Worker programs (Report). Washington, DC: Mathematica Policy Research.Google Scholar
  70. McKernan, S.-M., Ratcliffe, C., Steuerle, E., & Zhang, S. (2014). Disparities in wealth accumulation and loss from the Great Recession and beyond. American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings, 104, 240–244.Google Scholar
  71. Modena, F., & Sabatini, F. (2012). I would if I could: Precarious employment and childbearing intentions in Italy. Review of Economics of the Household, 10, 77–97.Google Scholar
  72. Moore, T. S. (2010). The locus of racial disadvantage in the labor market. American Journal of Sociology, 116, 909–942.Google Scholar
  73. Moretti, E. (2012). The new geography of jobs. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
  74. Morgan, S. P. (2003). Is low fertility a twenty-first-century demographic crisis? Demography, 40, 589–603.Google Scholar
  75. Morgan, S. P., Cumberworth, E., & Wimer, C. (2011). The Great Recession’s influence on fertility, marriage, divorce, and cohabitation. In D. B. Grusky, B. Western, & C. Wimer (Eds.), The Great Recession (pp. 220–245). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  76. Morgan, S. P., Cumberworth, E., & Wimer, C. (2012). Family, the lifecourse, and the Great Recession (A Great Recession brief). New York, NY, and Stanford, CA: Russell Sage Foundation, and Stanford Center on Poverty and Inequality.Google Scholar
  77. National Center for Health Statistics. (2016). Natality detail data set, 2000–2014 [Restricted-use data file and documentation]. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Google Scholar
  78. Newman, K. S., & Winston, H. (2016). Reskilling America: Learning to labor in the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.Google Scholar
  79. Office of Management and Budget. (2013). Revised delineations of metropolitan statistical areas, micropolitan statistical areas, and combined statistical areas, and guidance on uses of the delineations of these areas (OMB Bulletin No. 13-01). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, Office of Management and Budget.Google Scholar
  80. O’Hare, W. P., Jensen, E., & O’Hare, B. (2013, May). Potential explanations for the high net undercount rate of young children in the U.S. decennial census. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  81. Pager, D., Bonikowski, B., & Western, B. (2009). Discrimination in a low-wage labor market. American Sociological Review, 74, 777–799.Google Scholar
  82. Pager, D., & Pedulla, D. S. (2015). Race, self-selection, and the job search process. American Journal of Sociology, 120, 1005–1054.Google Scholar
  83. Parrado, E. A. (2011). How high is Hispanic/Mexican fertility in the United States? Immigration and tempo considerations. Demography, 48, 1059–1080.Google Scholar
  84. Pattillo, M. (2013). Black picket fences: Privilege and peril among the black middle class (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  85. Percheski, C., & Kimbro, R. (2014). How did the Great Recession affect fertility? Focus, 30(2), 26–30. Retrieved from https://www.irp.wisc.edu/publications/focus/pdfs/foc302g.pdf
  86. Pfeffer, F. T., Schoeni, R. F., Kennickell, A., & Andreski, P. (2016). Measuring wealth and wealth inequality: Comparing two U.S. surveys. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, 41, 103–120.Google Scholar
  87. Piotrowski, M., Kalleberg, A., & Rindfuss, R. R. (2015). Contingent work rising: Implications for the timing of marriage in Japan. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77, 1039–1056.Google Scholar
  88. Preston, S. H., Heuveline, P., & Guillot, M. (2000). Demography: Measuring and modeling population processes. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  89. Rindfuss, R. R., Morgan, S. P., & Offutt, K. (1996). Education and the changing age pattern of American fertility: 1963–1989. Demography, 33, 277–290.Google Scholar
  90. Royster, D. A. (2003). Race and the invisible hand: How white networks exclude black men from blue-collar jobs. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  91. Ruggles, S., Genadek, K., Goeken, R., Grover, J., & Sobek, M. (2017). Integrated Public Use Microdata Series: Version 7.0 [Machine-readable database]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.  https://doi.org/10.18128/D010.V7.0
  92. Rugh, J. S. (2015). Double jeopardy: Why Latinos were hit hardest by the U.S. foreclosure crisis. Social Forces, 93, 1139–1184.Google Scholar
  93. Ryder, N. B. (1980). Components of temporal variations in American fertility. In R. W. Hiorns (Ed.), Demographic patterns in developed societies (pp. 15–54). London, UK: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  94. Sahin, A., Song, J., & Hobijn, B. (2010). The unemployment gender gap during the 2007 recession (Current Issues in Economics and Finance, Vol. 16 No. 2). New York, NY: Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Retrieved from https://www.newyorkfed.org/research/current_issues/ci16-2.html
  95. Sawhill, I. V. (1977). Economic perspectives on the family. Daedalus, 106(2), 115–125.Google Scholar
  96. Sawhill, I. V., & Venator, J. (2015). Is there a shortage of marriageable men? (CCF Brief No. 56). Washington, DC: Center on Children and Families, Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  97. Schneider, D. (2015). The Great Recession, fertility, and uncertainty: Evidence from the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77, 1144–1156.Google Scholar
  98. Schneider, D. (2017). The effects of the Great Recession on American families. Sociology Compass, 11(4), 1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12463 Google Scholar
  99. Schneider, D., & Gemmill, A. (2016). The surprising decline in the non-marital fertility rate in the United States. Population and Development Review, 42, 627–649.Google Scholar
  100. Schneider, D., & Hastings, O. P. (2015). Socioeconomic variation in the effect of economic conditions on marriage and nonmarital fertility in the United States: Evidence from the Great Recession. Demography, 52, 1893–1915.Google Scholar
  101. Semega, J. L., Fontenot, K. R., & Kollar, M. A. (2017). Income and poverty in the United States: 2016 (Current Population Reports, No. P60-259). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  102. Sobotka, T., Skirbekk, V., & Philipov, D. (2011). Economic recession and fertility in the developed world. Population and Development Review, 37, 267–306.Google Scholar
  103. Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2007). Marriage and divorce: Changes and their driving forces. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 27–52.Google Scholar
  104. U.S. Census Bureau. (2016). 2020 census research and testing: Investigating the 2010 undercount of young children—Examining the coverage of young mothers. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, Decennial Statistical Studies Division.Google Scholar
  105. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2008). American Community Survey: New survey questions enable measurement of marital transitions. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
  106. U.S. Department of Labor. (2012). The African-American labor force in the recovery. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.Google Scholar
  107. U.S. Department of the Treasury. (2012, April). The financial crisis response in charts (Presentation). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Treasury.Google Scholar
  108. Valletta, R. G., & van der List, C. (2015). Involuntary part-time work: Here to stay? (FRBSF Economic Letter 2015-19). San Francisco, CA: Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco.Google Scholar
  109. Villarreal, A. (2014). Explaining the decline in Mexico-U.S. migration: The effect of the Great Recession. Demography, 51, 2203–2228.Google Scholar
  110. White, L., & Rogers, S. J. (2000). Economic circumstances and family outcomes: A review of the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1035–1051.Google Scholar
  111. Wood, C. (2014). The rise in women’s share of nonfarm employment during the 2007–2009 recession: A historical perspective. Monthly Labor Review, April, 1–21.Google Scholar
  112. Yu, W.-h., & Sun, S. (2018). Fertility responses to individual and contextual unemployment: Differences by socioeconomic background. Demographic Research, 39, 927–962.  https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2018.39.35 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of Wisconsin–MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations