Advertisement

Demography

pp 1–8 | Cite as

A Note on the Effect of Religiosity on Fertility

  • Dierk HerzerEmail author
Article
  • 55 Downloads

Abstract

Very few studies have examined the effect of religiosity on fertility at the macro level. This note extends these studies by using a larger data set and more advanced econometric techniques. In addition, this note estimates the macro-level effect of religiosity on fertility both for a total sample of 25 Christian countries between 1925 and 2000 and for three subsamples: Catholic, Protestant, and mixed Catholic-Protestant countries. Results show that religiosity, in general, has a positive long-run effect on fertility. However, this effect is not significant for Catholic countries.

Keywords

Fertility Religiosity Macro-level Panel data Panel cointegration 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I thank four anonymous referees for their comments.

Supplementary material

13524_2019_774_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (518 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 518 kb)

References

  1. Berman, E., Iannaccone, L. R., & Ragusa, G. (2018). From empty pews to empty cradles: Fertility decline among European Catholics. Journal of Demographic Economics, 84, 149–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Engle, R. E., & Granger, C. W. J. (1987). Cointegration and error-correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55, 251–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Feyrer, J., Sacerdote, B., & Stern, A. D. (2008). Will the stork return to Europe and Japan? Understanding fertility within developed nations. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(3), 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Frejka, T., & Westoff, C. F. (2008). Religion, religiousness and fertility in the U.S. and in Europe. European Journal of Population, 24, 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Goldscheider, C., & Uhlenberg, P. R. (1969). Group status and fertility. American Journal of Sociology, 74, 361–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Guetto, R., Luijkx, R., & Scherer, S. (2015). Religiosity, gender attitudes and women’s labour market participation and fertility decisions in Europe. Acta Sociologica, 58, 155–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hayford, S. R., & Morgan, S. P. (2008). Religiosity and fertility in the United States: The role of fertility intentions. Social Forces, 86, 1163–1188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Iannaccone, L. (2003). Looking backward: A cross-national study of religious trends. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University.Google Scholar
  9. ISSP Research Group. (2018). International Social Survey Programme: Religion III—ISSP 2008 [Data file version 2.3.0]. Cologne, Germany: GESIS Data Archive.  https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13161
  10. Kao, C. (1999). Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 90, 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kao, C., & Chiang, M.-H. (2000). On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated regression in panel data. In B. H. Baltagi, T. B. Fomby, & R. C. Hill (Eds.), Advances in econometrics: Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic panels (Vol. 15, pp. 179–222). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing LimitedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lehrer, E. L. (1996). Religion as a determinant of marital fertility. Journal of Population Economics, 9, 173–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McGregor, P., & McKee, P. (2016). Religion and fertility in contemporary Northern Ireland. European Journal of Population, 32, 599–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mitchell, B. R. (2007). International historical statistics. 1750–2005: Europe; Americas; Africa, Asia and Oceania (Vols. 1, 2, 3). Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Mosher, W. D., & Hendershot, G. E. (1984). Religion and fertility: A replication. Demography, 21, 185–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2004). Sacred and secular: Religion and politics worldwide. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels (CESifo Working Paper Series No. 1229). Munich, Germany: CESifo Group.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsHelmut-Schmidt-UniversityHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations