Advertisement

Demography

, Volume 56, Issue 2, pp 573–594 | Cite as

Spacing, Stopping, or Postponing? Fertility Desires in a Sub-Saharan Setting

  • Sarah R. HayfordEmail author
  • Victor Agadjanian
Article

Abstract

A growing body of research has argued that the traditional categories of stopping and spacing are insufficient to understand why individuals want to control fertility. In a series of articles, Timæus, Moultrie, and colleagues defined a third type of fertility motivation—postponement—that reflects a desire to avoid childbearing in the short term without clear goals for long-term fertility. Although postponement is fundamentally a description of fertility desires, existing quantitative research has primarily studied fertility behavior in an effort to find evidence for the model. In this study, we use longitudinal survey data to consider whether postponement can be identified in standard measures of fertility desires among reproductive-age women in rural Mozambique. Findings show strong evidence for a postponement mindset in this population, but postponement coexists with stopping and spacing goals. We reflect on the difference between birth spacing and postponement and consider whether and how postponement is a distinctive sub-Saharan phenomenon.

Keywords

Fertility Fertility intentions Fertility transition Postponement Sub-Saharan Africa 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The data used in this analysis were collected with support from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development (Grants R21HD048257, R01HD058365; Agadjanian, PI). This research was also supported in part by Ohio State University’s Institute for Population Research (P2C-HD058484). Earlier versions of this article were presented at the Carolina Population Center, the Institut national d’études démographiques, and the Institute for Population Research at Ohio State University. The authors thank participants and discussants at these seminars for helpful comments.

Supplementary material

13524_2018_754_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (317 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 317 kb)

References

  1. Agadjanian, V. (2005). Fraught with ambivalence: Reproductive intentions and contraceptive choices in a sub-Saharan fertility transition. Population Research and Policy Review, 24, 617–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agadjanian, V., & Hayford, S. R. (2009). PMTCT, HAART, and childbearing in Mozambique: An institutional perspective. AIDS and Behavior, 13(Suppl. 1), 103–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agadjanian, V., & Hayford, S. R. (2018a). Men’s migration, women’s autonomy, and union dissolution in rural Mozambique. Journal of Family Issues, 39, 1236–1257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Agadjanian, V., & Hayford, S. R. (2018b). HIV status, fertility intentions, and contraception in the era of expanded access to antiretroviral therapy: A case study of rural Mozambique. Global Public Health, 13, 582–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Agadjanian, V., & Prata, N. (2002). War, peace, and fertility in Angola. Demography, 39, 215–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Agadjanian, V., Yabiku, S. T., & Cau, B. (2011). Men’s migration and women’s fertility in rural Mozambique. Demography, 43, 1029–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berrington, A. (2004). Perpetual postponers? Women’s, men’s and couple’s fertility intentions and subsequent fertility behavior. Population Trends, 117, 9–19.Google Scholar
  8. Bledsoe, C. H. (2002). Contingent lives: Fertility, time, and aging in West Africa. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bledsoe, C. H., Banja, F., & Hill, A. G. (1998). Reproductive mishaps and Western contraception: An African challenge to fertility theory. Population and Development Review, 24, 15–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bledsoe, C. H., Hill, A. G., D’Alessandro, U., & Langerock, P. (1994). Constructing natural fertility: The use of Western contraceptive technologies in rural Gambia. Population and Development Review, 20, 81–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bongaarts, J. (2006). The causes of stalling fertility transitions. Studies in Family Planning, 37, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bongaarts, J., & Casterline, J. (2013). Fertility transition: Is sub-Saharan Africa different? Population and Development Review, 38(Suppl. 1), 153–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Caldwell, J. C. (1976). Toward a restatement of demographic transition theory. Population and Development Review, 2, 321–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Caldwell, J. C., Orubuloye, I. O., & Caldwell, P. (1992). Fertility decline in Africa: A new type of transition? Population and Development Review, 18, 211–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Casterline, J. B., & Odden, C. (2016). Trends in inter-birth intervals in developing countries 1965–2014. Population and Development Review, 42, 173–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cherlin, A., Cumberworth, E., Morgan, S. P., & Wimer, C. (2013). The effects of the Great Recession on family structure and fertility. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 650, 214–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clifford, D., Falkingham, J., & Hinde, A. (2010). Through civil war, food crisis and drought: Trends in fertility and nuptiality in post-Soviet Tajikistan. European Journal of Population, 26, 325–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Coale, A. J. (1973). The demographic transition reconsidered. In International Union for the Scientific Study of Population (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Population Conference (pp. 53–57). Liège, Belgium: Editions Ordina.Google Scholar
  19. de Vletter, F. (2007). Migration and development in Mozambique: Poverty, inequality and survival. Development Southern Africa, 24, 137–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Easterlin, R. A. (1975). An economic framework for fertility analysis. Studies in Family Planning, 6, 54–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Garver, S. (2018). Navigating livelihood uncertainty: Prevailing wisdoms guiding fertility preferences in rural Malawi. African Population Studies, 32, 3964–3973.Google Scholar
  22. Hayford, S. R., & Agadjanian, V. (2010). Providers’ views on family planning service delivery to HIV+ women in Mozambique. Studies in Family Planning, 41, 291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hayford, S. R., & Agadjanian, V. (2017). Determined to stop? Longitudinal analysis of the desire to have no more children in rural Mozambique. Population Studies, 71, 329–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hayford, S. R., Agadjanian, V., & Luz, L. (2012). Now or never: Perceived HIV status and fertility intentions in rural Mozambique. Studies in Family Planning, 43, 191–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Iacovou, M., & Tavares, L. P. (2011). Yearning, learning, and conceding: Reasons men and women change their childbearing intentions. Population and Development Review, 37, 89–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Johnson-Hanks, J. (2004). Uncertainty and the second space: Modern birth timing and the dilemma of education. European Journal of Population, 20, 351–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnson-Hanks, J. (2005). When the future decides: Uncertainty and intentional action in contemporary Cameroon. Current Anthropology, 46, 363–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnson-Hanks, J. (2006). Uncertain honor: Modern motherhood in an African crisis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  29. Kodzi, I. A., Casterline, J. B., & Aglobitse, P. (2010). The time dynamics of individual fertility preferences among rural Ghanaian women. Studies in Family Planning, 41, 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lindstrom, D. P., & Berhanu, B. (1999). The impact of war, famine, and economic decline on marital fertility in Ethiopia. Demography, 36, 247–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Machiyama, K., Casterline, J. B., Mumah, J. N., Huda, F. A., Obare, F., Odwe, G., . . . Cleland, J. (2017). Reasons for unmet need for family planning, with attention to the measurement of fertility preferences: Protocol for a multi-site cohort study. Reproductive Health, 14, 23.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-016-0268-z
  32. Mercandilli, S., & Anseeuw, W. (2017). Migration and resilience of rural households’ livelihoods in the face of changing political and economic contexts: The case of South Mozambique (1900–2010). African Studies, 76, 221–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ministry of Health. (2010). Inquérito Nacional de Prevalência, Riscos Comportamentais e Informação sobre o HIV e SIDA (INSIDA), 2009: Relatório final [National Survey of Prevalence, Behavioral Risks and Information on HIV and AIDS (INSIDA), 2009: Final report]. Maputo, Mozambique: Ministry of Health.Google Scholar
  34. Ministry of Health, National Institute for Statistics, and ICF International. (2011). Mozambique Demographic and Health Survey, 2011. Calverton, MD: Ministry of Health, National Institute of Statistics, and ICF International.Google Scholar
  35. Moultrie, T. A., Sayi, T. S., & Timæus, I. M. (2012). Birth intervals, postponement, and fertility decline in Africa: A new type of transition? Population Studies, 66, 241–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moultrie, T. A., & Timæus, I. M. (2017). Institutions, insecurity, and uncertainty: The role of the state in African fertility transitions. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  37. National Institute for Statistics and Ministry of Health. (2005). Mozambique Demographic and Health Survey, 2003. Calverton, MD: ORC Macro, Measure DHS+/ORC Macro.Google Scholar
  38. Notestein, F. W. (1953). Economic problems of population change. In G. Cumberlege (Ed.), Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference of Agricultural Economics (pp. 13–31). London, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Population Reference Bureau. (2018). World population data sheet 2018 (Report). Washington, DC: Population Reference Bureau.Google Scholar
  40. Rackin, H. M., & Bachrach, C. A. (2016). Assessing the predictive value of fertility expectations through a cognitive–social model. Population Research and Policy Review, 35, 527–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rangel, M., Nobles, J., & Hamoudi, A. (2018). Brazil’s missing infants: Zika risk causes changes in reproductive behavior (CDE Working Paper No. 2018-5). Madison, WI: Center for Demography and Ecology.Google Scholar
  42. Ryder, N. B. (1973). A critique of the National Fertility Study. Demography, 10, 495–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ryder, N. B. (1980). Components of temporal variations in American fertility. In R. W. Hiorns (Ed.), Demographic patterns in developed societies (pp. 15–54). London, UK: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  44. Schneider, D. (2015). The Great Recession, fertility, and uncertainty: Evidence from the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77, 1144–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sennott, C., & Yeatman, S. (2012). Stability and change in fertility preferences among young women in Malawi. International Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 38, 34–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shapiro, D., & Gebreselassie, T. (2008). Fertility transition in sub-Saharan Africa: Falling and stalling. African Population Studies, 23(1), 3–23.Google Scholar
  47. Sobotka, T. (2004). Is lowest-low fertility in Europe explained by the postponement of childbearing? Population and Development Review, 30, 195–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sobotka, T., Skirbekk, V., & Philipov, D. (2011). Economic recession and fertility in the developed world. Population and Development Review, 37, 267–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Timæus, I. M., & Moultrie, T. A. (2008). On postponement and birth intervals. Population and Development Review, 34, 483–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Timæus, I. M., & Moultrie, T. A. (2013). Distinguishing the impact of postponement, spacing and stopping on birth intervals: Evidence from a model with heterogeneous fecundity. Journal of Biosocial Science, 45, 311–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Trinitapoli, J., & Yeatman, S. (2011). Uncertainty and fertility in a generalized AIDS epidemic. American Sociological Review, 76, 935–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Trinitapoli, J., & Yeatman, S. (2018). The flexibility of fertility preferences in a context of uncertainty. Population and Development Review, 44, 87–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. World Bank. (2018). World Development Indicators [Data set]. Retrieved from http://wdi.worldbank.org/tables
  54. Yabiku, S. T., Agadjanian, V., & Cau, B. (2012). Labor migration and child mortality in Mozambique. Social Science & Medicine, 75, 2530–2539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yeatman, S., Sennott, C., & Culpepper, S. (2013). Young women’s dynamic family size preferences in the context of transitioning fertility. Demography, 50, 1715–1737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyOhio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyUniversity of California–Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations