Advertisement

Demography

pp 1–28 | Cite as

Dimensions of Reproductive Attitudes and Knowledge Related to Unintended Childbearing Among U.S. Adolescents and Young Adults

  • Karen Benjamin Guzzo
  • Sarah R. Hayford
  • Vanessa Wanner Lang
  • Hsueh-Sheng Wu
  • Jennifer Barber
  • Yasamin Kusunoki
Article

Abstract

Measures of attitudes and knowledge predict reproductive behavior, such as unintended fertility among adolescents and young adults. However, there is little consensus as to the underlying dimensions these measures represent, how to compare findings across surveys using different measures, or how to interpret the concepts captured by existing measures. To guide future research on reproductive behavior, we propose an organizing framework for existing measures. We suggest that two overarching multidimensional concepts—reproductive attitudes and reproductive knowledge—can be applied to understand existing research using various measures. We adapt psychometric analytic techniques to analyze two data sets: the National Longitudinal Survey of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health) and the Relationship Dynamics and Social Life study (RDSL). Although the specific survey measures and sample composition of the two data sets are different, the dimensionality of the concepts and the content of the items used to measure their latent factors are remarkably consistent across the two data sets, and the factors are predictive of subsequent contraceptive behavior. However, some survey items do not seem strongly related to any dimension of either construct, and some dimensions of the two concepts appear to be poorly measured with existing survey questions. Nonetheless, we argue that the concepts of reproductive attitudes and reproductive knowledge are useful for categorizing and analyzing social psychological measures related to unintended fertility. The results can be used to guide secondary data analyses to predict reproductive behavior, compare results across data sets, and structure future data collection efforts.

Keywords

Attitudes Contraception Measurement Unintended fertility 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported from a grant from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development (R01 HD078412; Guzzo and Hayford, PIs) as well as center grants to Bowling Green State University’s Center for Family and Demographic Research (P2C-HD050959), Ohio State University’s Institute for Population Research (P2C-HD058484), and the University of Michigan’s Population Studies Center (R24 HD041028). This research uses data from Add Health, a program project directed by Kathleen Mullan Harris and designed by J. Richard Udry, Peter S. Bearman, and Kathleen Mullan Harris at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and funded by Grant No. P01-HD31921 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, with cooperative funding from 23 federal agencies and foundations. Special acknowledgment is due Ronald R. Rindfuss and Barbara Entwisle for assistance in the original design. Information on how to obtain the Add Health data files is available on the Add Health website (http://www.cpc.unc.edu/addhealth). No direct support was received from Grant P01-HD31921 for this analysis. This research also uses data from the Relationship Dynamics and Social Life project, which was funded by two grants from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01 HD050329, R01 HD050329-S1, PI Barber) and a grant from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (R21 DA024186, PI Axinn). We gratefully acknowledge the Survey Research Operations (SRO) unit at the Survey Research Center of the Institute for Social Research for their help with the data collection, the intellectual contributions of the other members of the original RDSL project team (William Axinn, Mick Couper, Steven Heeringa, and Heather Gatny), as well as the National Advisory Committee for the project: Larry Bumpass, Elizabeth Cooksey, Kathleen Mullan Harris, and Linda Waite.

Supplementary material

13524_2018_747_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (164 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 163 kb)

References

  1. Adams Hillard, P. J. (2014). Menstruation in adolescents: What do we know? And what do we do with that information? Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, 27, 309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aiken, A. R., & Trussell, J. (2017). Anticipated emotions about unintended pregnancy in relationship context: Are Latinas really happier? Journal of Marriage and Family, 79, 356–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bachrach, C. A., & Morgan, S. P. (2013). A cognitive–social model of fertility intentions. Population and Development Review, 39, 459–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barber, J. S., Kusunoki, Y., & Gatny, H. H. (2011). Design and implementation of an online weekly journal to study unintended pregnancies. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 9, 327–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borrero, S., Farkas, A., Dehlendorf, C., & Rocca, C. H. (2013). Racial and ethnic differences in men's knowledge and attitudes about contraception. Contraception, 88, 532–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, M., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21, 230–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, T. A. (2006). CFA of multitrait-multimethod matrices. In Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research (pp. 212–235). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brückner, H., Martin, A., & Bearman, P. S. (2004). Ambivalence and pregnancy: Adolescents’ attitudes, contraceptive use and pregnancy. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 36, 248–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chantala, K. (2001). Constructing weights to use in analyzing pairs of individuals from Add Health data (Report). Chapel Hill: Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina.  https://doi.org/10.17615/C6GM23
  10. Coale, A. J. (1973). The demographic transition reconsidered. In Proceedings of the International Population Conference, Liege (pp. 53–72). Liege, Belgium: International Union for Scientific Study of Population.Google Scholar
  11. Craig, A. D., Dehlendorf, C., Borrero, S., Harper, C. C., & Rocca, C. H. (2014). Exploring young adults’ contraceptive knowledge and attitudes: Disparities by race/ethnicity and age. Women’s Health Issues, 24(3), e281–e289.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2014.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crosby, R. A., & Yarber, W. L. (2001). Perceived versus actual knowledge about correct condom use among US adolescents: results from a national study. Journal of Adolescent Health, 28, 415–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deptula, D. P., Henry, D. B., Shoeny, M. E., & Slavick, J. T. (2006). Adolescent sexual behavior and attitudes: A costs and benefits approach. Journal of Adolescent Health, 38, 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DeVellis, R. F. (2012). Scale development: Theory and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Driscoll, A. K., Sugland, B. W., Manlove, J., & Papillo, A. R. (2005). Community opportunity, perceptions of opportunity, and the odds of an adolescent birth. Youth & Society, 37, 33–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  17. Frost, J. J., Lindberg, L. D., & Finer, L. B. (2012). Young adults’ contraceptive knowledge, norms and attitudes: Associations with risk of unintended pregnancy. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 44, 107–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Garbers, S., Scheinmann, R., Gold, M. A., Catallozzi, M., House, L., Koumans, E. H., & Bell, D. L. (2017). Males’ ability to report their partner’s contraceptive use at last sex in a nationally representative sample: Implications unintended pregnancy prevention evaluations. American Journal of Men’s Health, 11, 711–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Garfield, C. F., Duncan, G., Peters, S., Rutsohn, J., McDade, T. W., Adam, E. K., & Chase-Lansdale, P. L. (2016). Adolescent reproductive knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs and future fatherhood. Journal of Adolescent Health, 58, 497–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Green, L. W. (1969). East Pakistan: Knowledge and use of contraceptives. Studies in Family Planning, 1(39), 9–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grice, J. W. (2001). Computing and evaluating factor scores. Psychological Methods, 6, 430–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Guzzo, K. B., & Hayford, S. (2012). Race-ethnic differences in sexual health knowledge. Race and Social Problems, 4, 158–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harris, K. M., Halpern, C. T., Whitsel, E., Hussey, J., Tabor, J., Entzel, P., & Udry, J. R. (2009). The National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health: Research design. Chapel Hill: Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Retrieved from http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/addhealth/design
  24. Hayford, S. R., & Guzzo, K. B. (2013). Racial and ethnic variation in unmarried young adults’ motivation to avoid pregnancy. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 45, 41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hayford, S. R., Guzzo, K. B., Kusunoki, Y., & Barber, J. S. (2016). Perceived costs and benefits of early childbearing: New dimensions and predictive power. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 48, 83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Heisel, D. F. (1968). Attitudes and practice of contraception in Kenya. Demography, 5, 632–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hockenberry-Eaton, M., Richman, M. J., DiIorio, C., Rivero, T., & Maibach, E. (1996). Mother and adolescent knowledge of sexual development: The effects of gender, age, and sexual experience. Adolescence, 31(121), 35–47.Google Scholar
  28. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jaccard, J., Dodge, T., & Dittus, P. (2003). Do adolescents want to avoid pregnancy? Attitudes toward pregnancy as predictors of pregnancy. Journal of Adolescent Health, 33(2), 79–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kaye, K., Suellentrop, K., & Sloup, C. (2009). The fog zone: How misperceptions, magical thinking, and ambivalence put young adults at risk for unplanned pregnancy. Washington, DC: Power to Decide (formerly The National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy).Google Scholar
  31. Kusunoki, Y., Barber, J. S., Ela, E. J., & Bucek, A. (2016). Black-white differences in sex and contraceptive use among young women. Demography, 53, 1399–1428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lee, R. D., & Bulatao, R. A. (1983). The demand for children: A critical essay. In R. A. Bulatao & R. D. Lee (Eds.), Determinants of fertility in developing countries: A summary of knowledge (Part A, pp. 233–287). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  33. Liefbroer, A. C. (2005). The impact of perceived costs and rewards of childbearing on entry into parenthood: Evidence from a panel study. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie, 21, 367–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lindberg, L., Santelli, J., & Desai, S. (2016). Understanding the decline in adolescent fertility in the United States, 2007–2012. Journal of Adolescent Health, 59, 577–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Miller, W. B. (1986). Proception: An important fertility behavior. Demography, 23, 579–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Miller, W. B. (1994). Childbearing motivations, desires, and intentions: A theoretical framework. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 120, 223–258.Google Scholar
  38. Miller, W. B. (1995). Childbearing motivation and its measurement. Journal of Biosocial Science, 27, 473–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Miller, W. B., Barber, J. S., & Schulz, P. (2017). Do perceptions of their partners’ childbearing desires affect young women’s pregnancy risk? Further study of ambivalence. Population Studies, 71, 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Miller, W. B., Severy, L., & Pasta, D. (2004). A framework for modelling fertility motivation in couples. Population Studies, 58, 193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Philipov, D., Thévenon, O., Klobas, J., Bernardi, L., & Liefbroer, A. C. (2009). Reproductive decision-making in a macro-micro perspective (REPRO): State-of-the-art review (European Demographic Research Paper). Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences/Vienna Institute of Demography. Retrieved from https://www.oeaw.ac.at/fileadmin/subsites/Institute/VID/PDF/Publications/EDRP/edrp_2009_01.pdf. Accessed 1/22/18.
  42. Rocca, C. H., & Harper, C. C. (2012). Do racial and ethnic differences in contraceptive attitudes and knowledge explain disparities in method use? Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 44, 150–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ryan, S., Franzetta, K., & Manlove, J. (2007). Knowledge, perceptions, and motivations for contraception: influence on teens' contraceptive consistency. Youth & Society, 39, 182–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Santelli, J. S., Abma, J., Ventura, S., Lindberg, L., Morrow, B., Anderson, J. E., & Hamilton, B. E. (2004). Can changes in sexual behaviors among high school students explain the decline in teen pregnancy rates in the 1990s? Journal of Adolescent Health, 35, 80–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Santelli, J. S., Lindberg, L. D., Abma, J., McNeely, C. S., & Resnick, M. (2000). Adolescent sexual behavior: estimates and trends from four nationally representative surveys. Family Planning Perspectives, 32, 156–165, 194.Google Scholar
  46. Santelli, J. S., Lindberg, L. D., Finer, L. B., & Singh, S. (2007). Explaining recent declines in adolescent pregnancy in the United States: The contribution of abstinence and improved contraceptive use. American Journal of Public Health, 97, 150–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sieving, R. E., Bearinger, L. H., Resnick, M. D., Pettingell, S., & Skay, C. (2007). Adolescent dual method use: Relevant attitudes, normative beliefs and self-efficacy. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40, 275.e15–275.e22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.10.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shneyderman, Y., & Schwartz, S. J. (2013). Contextual and intrapersonal predictors of adolescent risky sexual behavior and outcomes. Health Education & Behavior, 40, 400–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sweeney, M. M., & Raley, R. K. (2014). Race, ethnicity, and the changing context of childbearing in the United States. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 539–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  51. Trussell, J. (2011). Contraceptive failure in the United States. Contraception, 83, 397–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 806–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wynn, L. L., Foster, A. M., & Trussell, J. (2009). Can I get pregnant from oral sex? Sexual health misconceptions in e-mails to a reproductive health website. Contraception, 79, 91–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karen Benjamin Guzzo
    • 1
  • Sarah R. Hayford
    • 2
  • Vanessa Wanner Lang
    • 1
  • Hsueh-Sheng Wu
    • 3
  • Jennifer Barber
    • 4
  • Yasamin Kusunoki
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of SociologyBowling Green State UniversityBowling GreenUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyOhio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  3. 3.Center for Family and Demographic ResearchBowling Green State UniversityBowling GreenUSA
  4. 4.Department of SociologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  5. 5.Department of Systems, Populations and Leadership, School of NursingUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations