Union Transitions and Fertility Within First Premarital Cohabitations in Canada: Diverging Patterns by Education?
Cohabitation has become increasingly accepted and normalized as part of the family system in Canada and has become the most common way to form a first union. The changing role of cohabitation in the family system is often understood as being driven by the ideational changes associated with the second demographic transition, but increasing international evidence indicates that this explanation is incomplete. Using nationally representative retrospective data from Canadians born between 1940 and 1979 from the 2011 General Social Survey, this study examines transitions out of first premarital cohabitation and fertility within these unions as two measures of the changing role of cohabitation. Across birth cohorts, Canadians are increasingly likely to use cohabitation as an alternative to marriage and less likely to use cohabitation as a short-lived prelude to marriage. These overall trends support the second demographic transition perspective. However, this study also finds that Canadians without a bachelor’s degree are far more likely to experience a birth within cohabitation and that their likelihood of transitioning to marriage has declined steeply across birth cohorts. This educational gradient in childbearing in cohabitation and the increasing educational differences in union transitions over time provide support for the diverging destinies thesis in Canada.
KeywordsCohabitation Marriage Fertility Education Canada
I thank Rachel Margolis, three anonymous reviewers, and the editors for their insightful comments and suggestions at various stages of this manuscript. A previous version of this manuscript was presented at the 2016 annual meeting of the Population Association of America.
- Allison, P. D. (1984). Event history analysis: Regression for longitudinal event data (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series No. 07-046). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Berlin, G., Furstenberg, F. F., Jr., & Waters, M. C. (2010). Introducing the issue. Future of Children, 20(1), 3–18.Google Scholar
- Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., & Jones, B. S. (2004). Event history modeling: A guide for social scientists. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Bramlett, M. D., & Mosher, W. D. (2002). Cohabitation, marriage, divorce, and remarriage in the United States (Vital Health Statistics Report, Series 23, No. 22). Hyattsville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
- Burch, T. K., & Madan, A. K. (1986). Union formation and dissolution: Results from the 1984 Family History Survey (Catalogue No. 99–963). Ottawa: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
- Goodwin, P. Y., Mosher, W. D., & Chandra, A. (2010). Marriage and cohabitation in the United States: A statistical portrait based on Cycle 6 (2002) of the National Survey of Family Growth (Vital Health Statistics Report, Series 23, No. 28). Hyattsville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
- Jenkins, S. P. (2005). Survival analysis with Stata [Data set]. Essex, UK: Institute for Social and Economic Research, University of Essex. Retrieved from http://www.iser.essex.ac.uk/survival-analysis
- Le Bourdais, C., & Marcil-Gratton, N. (1996). Family transformations across the Canadian/American border: When the laggard becomes the leader. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 27, 415–436.Google Scholar
- Lesthaeghe, R. (1995). The second demographic transition in western countries: An interpretation. In K. O. Mason & A.-M. Jensen (Eds.), Gender and family change in industrialized countries (pp. 17–62). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Lesthaeghe, R., & Surkyn, J. R. (2002). New forms of household formation in Central and Eastern Europe: Are they related to newly emerging value orientations? In UNECE (Ed.), Economic Survey of Europe, 2002 (Vol. 1, pp. 197–216). Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Commission for Europe.Google Scholar
- Lesthaeghe, R. J., & van de Kaa, D. (1986). Twee demografische transities? [Two demographic transitions?]. In R. Lesthaeghe & D. J. van de Kaa (Eds.), Mens en maatschappij: Groei of krimp [People and Society: Growth or shrinkage] (pp. 9–24). Deventer, the Netherlands: Van Loghum-Slaterus.Google Scholar
- Smock, P. J., & Gupta, S. (2002). Cohabitation in contemporary North America. In A. Booth & A. C. Crouter (Eds.), Just living together: Implications for children, families, and public policy (pp. 53–84). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence-Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Turcotte, P., & Belanger, A. (1997). The dynamics of formation and dissolution of first common-law unions in Canada. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.Google Scholar
- van de Kaa, D. (1987). Europe’s second demographic transition. Population Bulletin, 42(1), 1–59.Google Scholar
- Wu, H. (2017). Trends in births to single and cohabiting mothers, 1980–2014 (Family Profiles, No. FP-17-04). Bowling Green, OH: National Center for Family & Marriage Research.Google Scholar