Gender Bias in Parental Attitude: An Experimental Approach
Parental bias toward children of a particular gender has been widely observed in many societies. Such bias could be due to pure gender preference or differences in earning opportunities and concern for old-age support. We conduct a high-stakes allocation task (subjects allocate the equivalent of one day’s wages between male and female school-aged students) in rural Bangladesh to examine parental attitudes toward male and female children. Parents, either jointly or individually, allocated freely or restricted endowments for the benefit of anonymous girls or boys at a nearby school. We examine whether there is any systematic bias among fathers and mothers and, if so, whether such bias differs when they make the decision individually or jointly. The results suggest (1) bias both for and against boys or girls but no systematic bias by either parent; and (2) no significant differences in individual and joint decisions.
KeywordsParental bias Gender Allocation task Field experiment
We thank Lisa Cameron, Tim Cason, Gaurav Datt, Catherine Eckel, Lata Gangadharan, Glenn Harrison, John List, Yasuyuki Sawada, Russell Smyth, and Steven Stillman. We also thank the participants at the Australian Development Economics Workshop in Canberra, the Econometric Society Australasian Meeting in Sydney, the Asia Pacific Meeting of the Economic Science Association in Auckland, Monash University seminars, and Economic Research Group in Dhaka for their valuable comments and suggestions on earlier versions of this article.
- Barcellos, S. H., Carvalho, L. S., & Lleras-Muney, A. (2014). Child gender and parental investments in India: Are boys and girls treated differently? American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 6(1), 157–189.Google Scholar
- Bardhan, P. K. (1974). On life and death questions. Economic & Political Weekly, 9, 1293–1304.Google Scholar
- Becker, G. S. (1957). The economics of discrimination. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Becker, G. S. (1991). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Bose, S., & Bose, S. (2009, April). The role of parental perceptions in the gender bias in education in West Bengal, India: Results from a micro survey. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Detroit, MI.Google Scholar
- Delavande, A., & Zafar, B. (2013). Gender discrimination and social identity: Experimental evidence from urban Pakistan (Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Report No. 593). New York, NY: Federal Reserve Bank of New York.Google Scholar
- Derichs, C., & Fleschenberg, A. (Eds.) (2010). Religious fundamentalisms and their gendered impacts in Asia. Berlin, Germany: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.Google Scholar
- Howland, C. W. (Ed.). (2001). Religious fundamentalisms and the human rights of women. New York, NY: Palgrave.Google Scholar
- Kingdon, G. G. (2002). The gender gap in educational attainment in India: How much can be explained? Journal of Development Studies, 39(2), 25–53.Google Scholar
- Pitt, M. M., Rosenzweig, M. R., & Hassan, M. N. (1990). Productivity, health, and inequality in the intrahousehold distribution of food in low-income countries. American Economic Review, 80, 1139–1156.Google Scholar
- Rosenzweig, M. R., & Schultz, T. P. (1982). Market opportunities, genetic endowments, and intrafamily resource distribution: Child survival in rural India. American Economic Review, 72, 803–815.Google Scholar
- United Nations Development Programme. (2010). Power, voice and rights: A turning point for gender equality in Asia and the Pacific (Asia-Pacific Human Development Report). New Delhi, India: Macmillan.Google Scholar