Advertisement

Demography

, Volume 55, Issue 4, pp 1423–1446 | Cite as

Same-Sex Married Tax Filers After Windsor and Obergefell

  • Robin Fisher
  • Geof Gee
  • Adam Looney
Article

Abstract

This article provides new estimates of the number and characteristics of same-sex married couples after U.S. Supreme Court rulings in 2013 and 2015 established rights to same-sex marriage. The U.S. Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service subsequently ruled that same-sex spouses would be treated as married for federal tax purposes. Because almost all married taxpayers file joint tax returns, administrative tax records provide new information on the demographic characteristics of married same-sex couples. This study provides estimates of the population of same-sex tax filers drawn from returns filed in 2013, 2014, and 2015, using methods developed by the U.S. Census Bureau to address measurement error in gender classification. We estimate that approximately 0.48 % of all joint filers in 2015 were same-sex couples, or approximately 250,450 couples.

Keywords

Tax law Same-sex marriage 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Gary Gates, Rose Kreider, Zach Liscow, Gui Woolston, and anonymous referees for their helpful suggestions. All opinions and any errors are our own.

Supplementary material

13524_2018_684_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (325 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 324 kb)

References

  1. Autor, D., & Dorn, D. (2013). The growth of low skill service jobs and the polarization of the U.S. labor market. American Economic Review, 103, 1553–1597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bates, J., & Granger, C. (1969). The combination of forecasts. Operations Research Quarterly, 20, 451–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bishop-Henchman, J., & Stephens, C. (2014). States provide income tax filing guidance to same-sex couples (Tax Foundation Special Report No. 213). Retrieved from http://taxfoundation.org/article/states-provide-income-tax-filing-guidance-same-sex-couples
  4. Black, D., Gates, G., Sanders, S., & Taylor, L. (2000). Demographics of the gay and lesbian population in the United States: Evidence from available systematic data sources. Demography, 37, 139–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Black, D., Gates, G., Sanders, S., & Taylor, L. (2007a). The measurement of same-sex unmarried partner couples in the 2000 U.S. census (Working Paper No. CCPR-023-07). Los Angeles: UCLA California Center for Population Research.Google Scholar
  6. Black, D. A., Sanders, S. G., & Taylor, L. J. (2007b). The economics of lesbian and gay families. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(2), 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Card, D., Chetty, R., Feldstein, M., & Saez, E. (2010). Expanding access to administrative data for research in the United States: An open letter (NSF White Paper, No. 10-069). Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/sbe/sbe_2020/2020_pdfs/Card_David_112.pdf
  8. Carpenter, C., & Gates, G. J. (2008). Gay and lesbian partnership: Evidence from California. Demography, 45, 573–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cilke, J. (1998). A profile of non-filers (Office of Tax Analysis Working Paper No. 78). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Treasury.Google Scholar
  10. Gates, G. J. (2010). Same-sex couples in US Census Bureau Data: Who gets counted and why (Williams Institute working paper). Los Angeles: UCLA School of Law.Google Scholar
  11. Internal Revenue Service (IRS). (2013). Revenue ruling 2013-17. Retrieved from https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/rr-13-17.pdf
  12. Internal Revenue Service (IRS). (2016). Federal tax compliance research: Tax gap estimates for tax years 2008–2010 (Publication No. 1415: Rev. 5-2016). Washington, DC: IRS Research, Analysis & Statistics.Google Scholar
  13. Kreider, R., Bates, N., & Mayol-García, Y. (2017). Improving measurement of same-sex couple households in Census Bureau surveys: Results from recent tests (SEHSD Working Paper 2017-28). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  14. Kreider, R., & Lofquist, D. (2015). Matching survey data with administrative records to evaluate reports of same-sex married couple households (SEHSD Working Paper 2014-36). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  15. Lofquist, D., & Lewis, J. (2015). Improving measurement of same-sex couples (SEHSD Working Paper No. 2015-13). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  16. Obergefell v. Hodges, 135 S. Ct. 2071, 576 U.S., 191 L. Ed. 2d 953 (2015).Google Scholar
  17. O’Connell, M., & Feliz, S. (2011). Same-sex couple household statistics from the 2010 census (SEHSD Working Paper No. 2011-26). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  18. O’Connell, M., & Gooding, G. (2007). Editing unmarried couples in census bureau data (Housing and Household Economic Statistics Division working paper). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  19. Social Security Administration (SSA). (2016). Beyond the top 1000 names [Data file]. Retrieved from https://www.ssa.gov/oact/babynames/names.zip
  20. United States v. Windsor, 133 S. Ct. 2675, 570 U.S. 12, 186 L. Ed. 2d 808 (2013).Google Scholar
  21. U.S. Census Bureau. (2016). Characteristics of Same-sex Couple Households: 2005 to Present [Data files]. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/demo/same-sex-couples/ssc-house-characteristics.html
  22. U.S. Department of the Treasury (DOT). (2015). The income tax treatment of married couples (Report). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Treasury, Office of Tax Analysis Retrieved from https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/tax-policy/tax-analysis/Documents/Two-Earner-Penalty-and-Marginal-Tax-Rates.pdf

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. government work and its text is not subject to copyright protection in the United States; however, its text may be subject to foreign copyright protection  2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Office of Tax Analysis, U.S. Department of the TreasuryWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.The Brookings InstitutionWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations