Advertisement

Demography

, Volume 55, Issue 3, pp 1147–1193 | Cite as

Beyond the Border and Into the Heartland: Spatial Patterning of U.S. Immigration Detention

Article

Abstract

The expansion of U.S. immigration enforcement from the borders into the interior of the country and the fivefold increase in immigration detentions and deportations since 1995 raise important questions about how the enforcement of immigration law is spatially patterned across American communities. Focusing on the practice of immigration detention, the present study analyzes the records of all 717,160 noncitizens detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in 2008 and 2009—a period when interior enforcement was at its peak—to estimate states’ detention rates and examine geographic variation in detention outcomes, net of individual characteristics. Findings reveal substantial state heterogeneity in immigration detention rates, which range from approximately 350 detentions per 100,000 noncitizens in Connecticut to more than 6,700 detentions per 100,000 noncitizens in Wyoming. After detainment, individuals’ detention outcomes are geographically stratified, especially for detainees eligible for pretrial release. These disparities indicate the important role that geography plays in shaping individuals’ chances of experiencing immigration detention and deportation.

Keywords

Immigration detention Interior enforcement Deportation Immigration policy Spatial inequality 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Inequality and Social Policy Program and the Weatherhead Center for International Affairs at Harvard University and completed while I was a fellow at the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) at Syracuse University. I thank TRAC for sharing their immigration detention data and Arjen Leerkes for sharing data on interior immigration enforcement programs and immigration policies across U.S. states. I also thank Jason Beckfield, Brielle Bryan, Kareem Carr, Filiz Garip, Simo Goshev, Sasha Killewald, Barbara Kiviat, Charlotte Lloyd, Collin Payne, Jessica Simes, Philip Torrey, Mary Waters, Bruce Western; and seminar participants at the Harvard University Migration and Immigrant Incorporation Workshop; Weatherhead Center Graduate Student Associates program; Kennedy School Proseminar on Inequality and Social Policy; the III CINETS Conference; and the 2016 Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association.

Supplementary material

13524_2018_679_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (2 mb)
Online Resource 1 (PDF 2.02 MB)

References

  1. Amuedo-Dorantes, C., Puttitanun, T., & Martinez-Donate, A. (2013). How do tougher immigration measures affect unauthorized immigrants? Demography, 50, 1067–1091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armenta, A. (2012). From sheriff’s deputies to immigration officers: Screening immigrant status in a Tennessee jail. Law & Policy, 34, 191–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baum, J., Jones, R., & Berry, C. (2010). In the child’s best interest? The consequences of losing a lawful immigrant parent to deportation. Berkeley and Davis: International Human Rights Law Clinic and Chief Justice Earl Warren Institute on Race, Ethnicity and Diversity, University of California, Berkeley; School of Law & Immigration Law Clinic, University of California, Davis, School of Law.Google Scholar
  4. Bernstein, N. (2009, January 15). U.S. issues scathing report on immigrant who died in detention. The New York Times. Retrieved from. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/16/us/16detain.html
  5. Brayne, S. (2014). Surveillance and system avoidance criminal justice contact and institutional attachment. American Sociological Review, 79, 367–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brotherton, D. C., & Barrios, L. (2011). Banished to the homeland: Dominican deportees and their stories of exile. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Capps, R., Castañeda, R. M., Chaudry, A., & Santos, R. (2007). Paying the price: The impact of immigration raids on America’s children (NCLR report). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Retrieved from http://publications.nclr.org/handle/123456789/1163
  8. Capps, R., Rosenblum, M. R., Chishti, M., & Rodriguez, C. (2011). Delegation and divergence: A study of 287(g) state and local immigration enforcement (MPI report). Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute Retrieved from. http://www.migrationpolicy.org/research/delegation-and-divergence-287g-state-and-local-immigration-enforcement
  9. Champlin, D., & Hake, E. (2006). Immigration as industrial strategy in American meatpacking. Review of Political Economy, 18, 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen, M. H. (2016). Trust in immigration enforcement: State noncooperation and sanctuary cities after secure communities. Chicago-Kent Law Review, 91, 13–57.Google Scholar
  11. Coleman, M. (2007). Immigration geopolitics beyond the Mexico–US border. Antipode, 39, 54–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coleman, M. (2012). The “local” migration state: The site-specific devolution of immigration enforcement in the U.S. South. Law & Policy, 34, 159–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cooper, B. (2000). INS exercise of prosecutorial discretion (Memorandum). Retrieved from http://library.niwap.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/IMM-Gov-ProsDisc-07.11.00.pdf
  14. Department of Homeland Security (DHS). (2006). Treatment of immigration detainees housed at immigration and customs enforcement facilities (Report No. OIG-07-01). Washington, DC: Office of Inspector General, U.S. Office of Homeland Security. Retrieved from https://www.oig.dhs.gov/assets/Mgmt/OIG_07-01_Dec06.pdf
  15. Department of Homeland Security (DHS). (2015). ICE enforcement and removal operations report: Fiscal year 2015 (Report). Washington, DC: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Retrieved from https://www.ice.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Report/2016/fy2015removalStats.pdf
  16. Dow, M. (2005). American gulag: Inside U.S. immigration prisons (New ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  17. Eagly, I. V. (2011). Local immigration prosecution: A study of Arizona before SB 1070. UCLA Law Review, 58, 1749–1817.Google Scholar
  18. Eagly, I. V., & Shafer, S. (2015). A national study of access to counsel in immigration court. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 164, 1–92.Google Scholar
  19. Ellermann, A. (2005). Coercive capacity and the politics of implementation: Deportation in Germany and the United States. Comparative Political Studies, 38, 1219–1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ellermann, A. (2009). States against migrants: Deportation in Germany and the United States (1st ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Executive Office of Immigration Review (EOIR). (2017). Immigration judge benchbook. Washington, DC: Executive Office for Immigration Review, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  22. Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR). (2017). Sanctuary policies across the U.S. (Report). Washington, DC: Federation for American Immigration Reform. Retrieved from http://www.fairus.org/DocServer/state_local/Sanctuary_Policies_Across_America_Report.pdf
  23. Gavett, G. (2011, October 18). Map: The U.S. immigration detention boom. Frontline. Retrieved from https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/map-the-u-s-immigration-detention-boom/
  24. Golash-Boza, T. M. (2015). Deported: Immigrant policing, disposable labor and global capitalism. New York: NYU Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Government Accountability Office (GAO). (2008). U.S. asylum system: Significant variation existed in asylum outcomes across immigration courts and judges (Report No. GAO-08-940). Washington, DC: U. S. Government Accountability Office. Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/assets/290/281794.pdf
  26. Government Accountability Office (GAO). (2009). Immigration enforcement: Better controls needed over program authorizing state and local enforcement of federal immigration laws (Report No. GAO-09-109). Washington, DC: U. S. Government Accountability Office. Retrieved from http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d09109.pdf
  27. Government Accountability Office (GAO). (2016). Asylum: Variation exists in outcomes of applications across immigration courts and judges (Report No. GAO-17-72). Washington, DC: U. S. Government Accountability Office. Retrieved from https://www.gao.gov/assets/690/680976.pdf
  28. Gozdziak, E. M., & Martin, S. F. (Eds.). (2005). Beyond the gateway: Immigrants in a changing America. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  29. Gulasekaram, P., & Ramakrishnan, S. K. (2015). The new immigration federalism. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hagan, J., Castro, B., & Rodriguez, N. (2009). The effects of U.S. deportation policies on immigrant families and communities: Cross-border perspectives. North Carolina Law Review, 88, 1799–1824.Google Scholar
  31. Hagan, J. M., Rodriguez, N., & Castro, B. (2011). Social effects of mass deportations by the United States government, 2000–10. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34, 1374–1391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Howard, W. J. (2005). Prosecutorial discretion (Memorandum). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Retrieved from http://www.asistahelp.org/documents/resources/DHS_NTA_discretion_7076BC4F57842.pdf
  33. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). (n.d.). Enforcement and removal operations field offices. Retrieved from https://www.ice.gov/contact/ero
  34. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). (2013). Activated jurisdictions (Secure Communities report). Washington, DC: U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20141212161302/http://www.ice.gov/doclib/secure-communities/pdf/sc-activated.pdf
  35. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). (2017). Fiscal Year 2017 (ICE Enforcement and Removal Operations Report). Retrieved from https://www.ice.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Report/2017/iceEndOfYearFY2017.pdf
  36. Johnson, J. C. (2014). Policies for the apprehension, detention and removal of undocumented immigrants (Memorandum). Washington, DC: Department of Homeland Security. Retrieved from https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/14_1120_memo_prosecutorial_discretion.pdf
  37. Johnston, A., & Morse, A. (2013). 2012 immigration-related laws and resolutions in the states (NCSL report). Washington, DC: National Conference of State Legislatures. Retrieved from http://www.ncsl.org/research/immigration/2012-immigration-related-laws-jan-december-2012.aspx
  38. Kanstroom, D. (2010). Deportation nation: Outsiders in American history. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Kanstroom, D. (2012). Aftermath: Deportation law and the new American diaspora. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Leerkes, A., Bachmeier, J. D., & Leach, M. A. (2013). When the border is “everywhere”: State-level variation in migration control and changing settlement patterns of the unauthorized immigrant population in the United States. International Migration Review, 47, 910–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Leerkes, A., Leach, M., & Bachmeier, J. (2012). Borders behind the border: An exploration of state-level differences in migration control and their effects on US migration patterns. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38, 111–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Massey, D. S., & Capoferro, C. (2008). The geographic diversification of American immigration. In D. S. Massey (Ed.), New faces in new places: The changing geography of American immigration (pp. 25–50). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  43. Meissner, D. (2000). Exercising prosecutorial discretion (Memorandum). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Immigration and Naturalization Service. Retrieved from http://library.niwap.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/IMM-Memo-ProsDiscretion.pdf
  44. Meissner, D., Kerwin, D. M., Chishti, M., & Bergeron, C. (2013). Immigration enforcement in the United States: The rise of a formidable machinery (MPI report). Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  45. Miles, T. J., & Cox, A. B. (2014). Does immigration enforcement reduce crime? Evidence from Secure Communities. Journal of Law & Economics, 57, 937–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Miller, B., Keith, L. C., & Holmes, J. S. (2014). Immigration judges and U.S. asylum policy. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  47. Morton, J. (2011). Civil immigration enforcement: Priorities for the apprehension, detention, and removal of aliens (Memorandum). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Retrieved from https://www.ice.gov/doclib/news/releases/2011/110302washingtondc.pdf
  48. Motomura, H. (2011). The discretion that matters: Federal immigration enforcement, state and local arrests, and the civil-criminal line. UCLA Law Review, 58, 1819–1858.Google Scholar
  49. Myers, J. L. (2007). Prosecutorial and custody discretion (Memorandum). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Retrieved from https://www.ice.gov/doclib/foia/prosecutorial-discretion/custody-pd.pdf
  50. Nossiter, A. (2008, August 26). Nearly 600 were arrested in factory raid, officials say. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/27/us/27raid.html
  51. Parker, A. (2011). A costly move: Far and frequent transfers impede hearings for immigrant detainees in the United States (Report). New York, NY: Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar
  52. Passel, J. S. (2005). Estimates of the size and characteristics of the undocumented population (Report). Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center. Retrieved from http://music-editor.com/mns.morris.com/Special_Pages/Immigration/Hispanic-Estimate%20of%20Undocumented.pdf
  53. Passel, J. S., & Cohn, D. (2016). Size of U.S. unauthorized immigrant workforce stable after the great recession (Hispanic Trends report). Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewhispanic.org/2016/11/03/industries-of-unauthorized-immigrant-workers/
  54. Pew Charitable Trusts. (2015). Immigrant employment by state and industry (Immigration and the States Project report). Washington, DC: The Pew Charitable Trusts. Retrieved from http://www.pewtrusts.org/en/multimedia/data-visualizations/2015/immigrant-employment-by-state-and-industry
  55. Ramji-Nogales, J., Schoenholtz, A. I., & Schrag, P. G. (2007). Refugee roulette: Disparities in asylum adjudication. Stanford Law Review, 60, 295–411.Google Scholar
  56. Rosenbloom, R. E. (2013). The citizenship line: Rethinking immigration exceptionalism. Boston College Law Review, 54, 1965–2024.Google Scholar
  57. Rugh, J. S., & Hall, M. (2016). Deporting the American dream: Immigration enforcement and Latino foreclosures. Sociological Science, 3, 1053–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ryo, E. (2016). Detained: A study of immigration bond hearings. Law & Society Review, 50, 117–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sacchetti, M. (2017, April 16). ICE immigration arrests of noncriminals double under Trump. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/immigration-arrests-of-noncriminals-double-under-trump/2017/04/16/98a2f1e2-2096-11e7-be2a-3a1fb24d4671_story.html
  60. Satinsky, S., Hu, A., Heller, J., & Farhang, L. (2013). Family unity, family health: How family-focused immigration reform will mean better health for children and families (Report). Oakland, CA: Human Impact Partners. Retrieved from http://www.familyunityfamilyhealth.org/uploads/images/FamilyUnityFamilyHealth.pdf
  61. Schmalzbauer, L. (2014). The last best place? Gender, family, and migration in the new West (1st ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Schriro, D. B. (2009). Immigration detention overview and recommendations (Report). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Retrieved from http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/images/nytint/docs/immigration-detention-overview-and-recommendations/original.pdf
  63. Seghetti, L. M., Vina, S. R., & Ester, K. (2006). Enforcing immigration law: The role of state and local law enforcement (Report). Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. Retrieved from http://oai.dtic.mil/oai/oai?verb=getRecord&metadataPrefix=html&identifier=ADA473029
  64. Singer, A. (2004). The rise of new immigrant gateways (Report). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/research/the-rise-of-new-immigrant-gateways/
  65. Smith, A. M. (2005). Summary of state laws on the issuance of driver’s license (Report). Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. Retrieved from https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metacrs8240/m1/1/high_res_d/RL32127_2005Sep13.pdf
  66. Stevens, J. (2010). U.S. government unlawfully detaining and deporting U.S. citizens as aliens. Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law, 18, 606–720.Google Scholar
  67. Stevens, J. (2015). One dollar per day: The slaving wages of immigration jail, 1943–Present. Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 29, 391–500.Google Scholar
  68. Thompson, C. (2016, December 12). America’s toughest immigration court. The Marshall Project. Retrieved from https://www.themarshallproject.org/2016/12/12/america-s-toughest-immigration-court
  69. Torrey, P. L. (2015). Rethinking immigration’s mandatory detention regime: Politics, profit, and the meaning of “custody.” University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 48, 879–913.Google Scholar
  70. Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC). (2017a). Immigration court cases closed based on prosecutorial discretion (as of February 28, 2017) [Data set]. Available from http://trac.syr.edu/immigration/prosdiscretion/compbacklog_latest.html
  71. Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC). (2017b). U.S. deportation outcomes by charge [Data set]. Available from http://trac.syr.edu/phptools/immigration/court_backlog/deport_outcome_charge.php
  72. Treyger, E., Chalfin, A., & Loeffler, C. (2014). Immigration enforcement, policing, and crime. Criminology & Public Policy, 13, 285–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Varsanyi, M. (Ed.). (2010). Taking local control: Immigration policy activism in U.S. cities and states. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Venters, H., Dasch-Goldberg, D., Rasmussen, A., & Keller, A. S. (2009). Into the abyss: Mortality and morbidity among detained immigrants. Human Rights Quarterly, 31, 474–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wadhia, S. S. (2012). My great FOIA adventure and discoveries of deferred action cases at ICE. Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 27, 345–386.Google Scholar
  76. Walker, K. E., & Leitner, H. (2011). The variegated landscape of local immigration policies in the United States. Urban Geography, 32, 156–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Warren, R., & Warren, J. R. (2013). Unauthorized immigration to the United States: Annual estimates and components of change, by state, 1990 to 2010. International Migration Review, 47, 296–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. West, H. C., Sabol, W. J., & Greenman, S. J. (2010). Prisoners in 2009 (BJS Bulletin No. NCJ 231675). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved from https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/p09.pdf

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.American Bar FoundationChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations