, Volume 55, Issue 2, pp 743–768 | Cite as

If Science Had Come First: A Billion Person Fable for the Ages (A Reply to Comments)

  • Daniel Goodkind

General Background of This Exchange

I am honored to have this opportunity to reply to three comments on my article published in Demography (Goodkind 2017a), which I wrote as an independent researcher. My primary goal was to estimate the demographic impact of China’s birth planning program, the most determined attempt to control the size of the human species that the world has ever known. The central estimates were based on a 16-country comparative model of fertility decline proposed by two of the commenters themselves (Wang Feng and Yong Cai). In the absence of birth planning—which began around 1970, a decade before the one-child decree—their comparator implies that China’s population would be more than one-half billion larger as of 2015 and, given all the lost descendants of policy-averted births, nearly 1 billion larger by 2060. No rhetorical skills are required to “make” those numbers astonishing, as the title of Susan Greenhalgh’s comment suggests. The numbers simply are...


  1. Aird, J. S. (1990). Slaughter of the innocents: Coercive birth control in China. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute Press.Google Scholar
  2. Banister, J. (1987). China’s changing population. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Basten, S., & Gu, B. (2013). Childbearing preferences, reform of family planning restrictions and the low fertility trap in China (Oxford Centre for Population Research Working Paper No. 61). Oxford, UK: Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  4. Basten, S., & Jiang, Q. (2014). China’s family planning policies: Recent reforms and future prospects. Studies in Family Planning, 45, 493–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bloom, D. E., Canning, D., & Sevilla, J. (2003). The demographic dividend: A new perspective on the economic consequences of population change (Report). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bongaarts, J., & Greenhalgh, S. (1985). An alternative to the one-child policy. Population and Development Review, 11, 585–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cai, Y. (2010). China’s below replacement fertility: Government policy or socioeconomic development. Population and Development Review, 36, 419–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caldwell, J. C. (1994). New challenges for demography. Journal of the Australian Population Association, 11, 9–19.Google Scholar
  9. Congressional-Executive Commission on China. (2002). Women’s Rights and China’s New Family Planning Law: Hearing before the Congressional-Executive Commission on China, One Hundred Seventh Congress, Second Session, September 23 2002. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Publishing Office. Retrieved from
  10. Cowen, T. (2008, May 12). Hail Emily Oster! [Web log post]. Retrieved from
  11. de Sherbinin, A., Carr, D., Cassels, S., & Jiang, L. (2007). Population and environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 32, 345–373.Google Scholar
  12. Dragon Year Baby Boom Looming. (1987, June 22). Min Sheng Bao. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  13. Entwisle, B. (1989). Measuring components of family planning program effort. Demography, 26, 53–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Feeney, G., Wang, F., Zhou, M., & Xiao, B. (1989). Recent fertility dynamics in China: Results from the 1987 one percent population survey. Population and Development Review, 15, 297–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fong, M. (2016). One child: The story of China’s most radical experiment. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
  16. Friedman, J., Goodkind, D., Bui, C., & Truong, S. A. (2001). Work and retirement among the elderly in Vietnam. Research on Aging, 23, 209–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goodkind, D. (1991). Creating new traditions in modern Chinese populations: Aiming for birth in the Year of the Dragon. Population and Development Review, 17, 663–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goodkind, D. (1992a). Creating new traditions in modern Chinese societies: Aiming for birth in the Year of the Dragon (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Department of Sociology and Demography, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. Retrieved from
  19. Goodkind, D. (1992b). Estimates of averted Chinese births, 1971–1990: Comparisons of fertility decline, family planning policy, and development in six Confucian societies (Research School of Social Sciences Working Papers in Demography No. 38). Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
  20. Goodkind, D. (1993). New zodiacal influences on Chinese family formation: Taiwan, 1976. Demography, 30, 127–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goodkind, D. (1994). Abortion in Vietnam: Measurement, puzzles, and concerns. Studies in Family Planning, 25, 342–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goodkind, D. (1995a). The significance of demographic triviality: Minority status and zodiacal fertility timing among Chinese Malaysians. Population Studies, 14, 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goodkind, D. (1995b). Rising gender inequality in Vietnam since reunification. Pacific Affairs, 68, 342–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goodkind, D. (1995c). Vietnam’s one-or-two child policy in action. Population and Development Review, 21, 85–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goodkind, D. (1996a). Chinese lunar birth timing in Singapore: New concerns for child quality amidst multicultural modernity. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 784–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goodkind, D. (1996b). State agendas, local sentiments: Vietnamese wedding practices amidst socialist transformations. Social Forces, 75, 717–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goodkind, D. (1997). The Vietnamese double marriage squeeze. International Migration Review, 31, 108–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Goodkind, D. (2011). Child underreporting, fertility, and sex ratio imbalance in China. Demography, 48, 291–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Goodkind, D. (2013, September). Zodiacal birth timing cycles in East Asia: An update. Paper presented at the University of Maryland Population Research Center, College Park, MD.Google Scholar
  30. Goodkind, D. (2015). The claim that China’s fertility restrictions contributed to the use of prenatal sex selection: A sceptical reappraisal. Population Studies, 69, 263–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Goodkind, D. (2017a). The astonishing population averted by China’s birth restrictions:. Estimates, nightmares, and reprogrammed ambitions. Demography, 54, 1375–1399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Goodkind, D. (2017b, April). 540 million and growing: How demographers missed the astonishing population averted by China’s birth planning restrictions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  33. Goodkind, D. (2017c, April). The big short: Four reasons to bet on a collapse in China’s child sex ratios. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  34. Goodkind, D. (2017d). Review of “China’s hidden children: Abandonment, adoption, and the human costs of the one-child policy” by Kay Ann Johnson. China Journal, 78, 179–180.Google Scholar
  35. Goodkind, D., & Phan, T. (1997). Reasons for rising condom use in Vietnam. International Family Planning Perspectives, 23, 173–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Greenhalgh, S. (1986, July 3). Chinese abortions: Point’s been made so now ease off. Wall Street Journal.Google Scholar
  37. Greenhalgh, S. (1990). The evolution of the one-child policy in Shaanxi, 1979–88. The China Quarterly, 122, 191–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Greenhalgh, S. (2003). Science, modernity, and the making of China’s one-child policy. Population and Development Review, 29, 163–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Greenhalgh, S. (2008). Just one child: Science and policy in Deng’s China. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Greenhalgh, S. (2010). Cultivating global citizens: Population in the rise of China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Greenhalgh, S. (2012). On the crafting of population knowledge. Population and Development Review, 38, 121–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Greenhalgh, S., & Winckler, E. (2005). Governing China’s population: From Leninist to neoliberal biopolitics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Gu, B., & Wang, F. (Eds.) (2009). An experiment of eight million people: Reports from areas with a two-child policy. Beijing: China Social Sciences Academic Press. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  44. Gu, B., Wang, F., Guo, Z., & Zhang, E. (2007). China’s local and national fertility policies at the end of the twentieth century. Population and Development Review, 33, 129–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Harmsen, P. (2017, December 8). China. A scientific article about the country’s extreme way to keep population growth down has created a heated debate in academic circles. A demographic case study which straddles science, politics and ethics. Weekendavisen, 8–9. (in Danish)Google Scholar
  46. Hvistendahl, M. (2010). Has China outgrown the one-child policy? Science, 329, 1458–1461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hvistendahl, M. (2017). Analysis of China’s one-child policy sparks uproar. Science, 358, 283–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Johnson, K. A. (2016). China’s hidden children: Abandonment, adoption, and the human costs of the one-child policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kaufman, J., Zhang, E., & Xie, Z. (2006). Quality of care in China: Scaling up a pilot project into a national reform program. Studies in Family Planning, 37, 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lavely, W., & Freedman, R. (1990). The origins of the Chinese fertility decline. Demography, 27, 357–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Leo, J. (2012, February 22). A Harvard apologist for China’s one-child policy brutality [Web log post]. Retrieved from
  52. Levitt, S. (2008, May 22). An academic does the right thing [Web log post]. Retrieved from
  53. Liang, Z. (1979, December). Dui woguo jinhou jishinian renkou fazhan zhanlüe de jidian yijian [Several opinions on China’s population development strategy in the next few decades]. Paper presented at the Population Conference, Chengdu City, China.Google Scholar
  54. Liang, Z. (1985, July). Guanyu wanhun wanyu jia jiange shengyu shidian de jidian shuoming [Explanations of the “late marriage, late childbearing plus spacing” birth experiment]. Speech at the Plenary Meeting of Cadres on making arrangements for the implementation of the “late marriage and late childbearing plus spacing” birth experiment in Yicheng County, Shanxi, China.Google Scholar
  55. Liang, Z. (2007). On changing and reforming the planned birth system. Book manuscript. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  56. Malthus, T. (1965). An essay on the principle of population. New York, NY: August Kelley. (Original work published 1798)Google Scholar
  57. Merli, M. G., & Morgan, S. P. (2011). Below replacement fertility preferences in Shanghai. Population (English version), 66, 519–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Merli, M. G., & Smith, H. L. (2002). Has the Chinese family planning policy been successful in changing fertility preferences? Demography, 39, 557–572.Google Scholar
  59. Michelson, E. (2010). Family planning enforcement in rural China: Enduring state-society conflict? In J. C. Oi, S. Rozelle, & X. Zhou (Eds.), Growing pains: Tensions and opportunity in China’s transformation (pp. 189–226). Stanford, CA: Shorenstein Asia Pacific Research Center, distributed by Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  60. Ministry of the Interior (Taiwan). (2014). Statistical yearbook of the Republic of China 2014 (Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Ed.). Taipei, Taiwan: Executive Yuan, Republic of China.Google Scholar
  61. Mirsky, J. (2011, January 2). Book review: China’s dreams of superior children. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from
  62. Mosher, S. W. (1983). Broken earth: The rural Chinese. London, UK: Free Press.Google Scholar
  63. Nie, Y., & Wyman, R. J. (2005). The one-child policy in Shanghai: Acceptance and internalization. Population and Development Review, 31, 313–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Oster, E. (2009). Proximate sources of population sex imbalance in India. Demography, 46, 325–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Oster, E. (2012). HIV and sexual behavior change: Why not Africa? Journal of Health Economics, 31, 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Oster, E., & Chen, G. (2008). Hepatitis B does not explain male-biased sex ratios in China (NBER Working Paper No. 13971). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Peng, X. (1987). Demographic consequences of the great leap forward in China’s provinces. Population and Development Review, 13, 639–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Preston, S. H., Heuveline, P., & Guillot, M. (2000). Demography: Measuring and modelling population processes. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  69. Scharping, T. (2003). Birth control in China 1949–2000: Population policy and demographic development. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  70. Sen, A. (1994, September 22). Population: Delusion and reality. New York Review of Books. Retrieved from
  71. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York, NY: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  72. Short, S. E., Zhai, F., Xu, S., & Yang, M. (2001). China’s one-child policy and the care of children: An analysis of qualitative and quantitative data. Social Forces, 79, 913–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Smith, H. L., Tu, P., Merli, M. G., & Hereward, M. (1997). Implementation of a demographic and contraceptive surveillance system in four counties in North China. Population Research and Policy Review, 16, 289–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Song, J., & Li, G. (1980). Quantitative research on the problem of population development. Economic Research, 2. (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  75. Tien, H. Y. (1991). China’s strategic demographic initiative. New York, NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
  76. United Nations Population Division (UNPD). (2017). World population prospects: The 2017 revision. New York, NY: United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division.Google Scholar
  77. Wang, F. (2013, November 19). Bringing an end to a senseless policy: China’s “one-child” rule should be scrapped. New York Times. Retrieved from
  78. Wang, F., & Cai, Y. (2010). Siyi zhongguoren shi zenmo shaoshengde? [How could China have 400 million averted births?]. Zhongguo Gaige, 7, 85–88.Google Scholar
  79. Wang, F., Cai, Y., & Gu, B. (2013). Population, policy, and politics: How will history judge China’s one-child policy? Population and Development Review, 38(Suppl. 1), 115–129.Google Scholar
  80. Wang, F., Gu, B., & Cai, Y. (2016). The end of China’s one-child policy. Studies in Family Planning, 47, 83–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wei, Y., & Zhang, L. (2014). Reexamination of the Yicheng two-child policy. China Journal, 72, 98–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Whyte, M. K., Wang, F., & Cai, Y. (2015). Challenging myths about China’s one-child policy. China Journal, 74, 144–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. World Bank. (2017). World Development Indicators, 2017. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  84. Xinhua. (1991). Decision on stepping up family planning work. Translated in Foreign Broadcast Information Services (FBIS: CHI-91-119, pp. 33–36).Google Scholar
  85. Xinhua. (2017, April 18). Africa could learn from China in harnessing demographic dividend: UN official. Retrieved from
  86. Zhang, G., & Zhao, Z. (2006). Reexamining China’s fertility puzzle: Data collection and data use in the last two decades. Population and Development Review, 32, 293–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Zhang, J. (2017). The evolution of China’s one-child policy and its effects on family outcomes. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(1), 141–160.Google Scholar
  88. Zhao, Z. W. (2015). Closing a sociodemographic chapter of Chinese history. Population and Development Review, 41, 681–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Zhao, Z. W., & Chen, W. (2011). China’s far below replacement fertility and its long-term impact: Comments on the preliminary results of the 2010 census. Demographic Research, 25(article 26), 819–836. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Goodkind
    • 1
  1. 1.Independent ResearcherArlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations