, Volume 55, Issue 2, pp 617–642 | Cite as

Subsidized Housing and the Transition to Adulthood

  • Yana KuchevaEmail author


Despite abundant evidence about the effect of children’s socioeconomic circumstances on their transition to adulthood, we know much less about the effect of social policy programs aimed at poor families with children in facilitating how and when children become adults. This issue is particularly important for the U.S. federal subsidized housing program given its long history of placing subsidized units in some of the poorest and most racially segregated neighborhoods. Using counterfactual causal methods that adjust for the length of receipt of subsidized housing, I estimate the effect of subsidized housing on teenage parenthood, household formation, and educational attainment. I find that the subsidized housing program has either null or positive effects on the transition to adulthood and that these effects vary by both race and gender. These results underscore the importance of considering whether social programs have differential effects on the life chances of individuals based on both race and gender.


Transition to adulthood Subsidized housing Inverse probability of treatment weighting 



The author wishes to acknowledge Jennie Brand, David Grusky, Robert Mare, Judith Seltzer, members of the UCLA Demography, Family and Stratification Research Group, members of the Stanford Workshop on Inequality, four anonymous reviewers, and the journal Editors for helpful comments on previous drafts of this manuscript. This research was supported by a grant from The Horowitz Foundation for Social Policy.

Supplementary material

13524_2018_656_MOESM1_ESM.docx (161 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 161 kb)


  1. An, C., Haveman, R., & Wolfe, B. (1993). Teen out-of-wedlock births and welfare receipt: The role of childhood events and economic circumstances. Review of Economics and Statistics, 75, 195–208.Google Scholar
  2. Andersson, F., Haltiwanger, J. C., Kutzbach, M. J., Palloni, G. E., Pollakowski, H. O., & Weinberg, D. H. (2016). Childhood housing and adult earnings: A between-siblings analysis of housing vouchers and public housing (National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 22721). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from
  3. Aratani, Y. (2010). Public housing revisited: Racial differences, housing assistance, and socioeconomic attainment among low-income families. Social Science Research, 39, 1108–1125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnett, J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Avery, R., Goldscheider, F., & Speare, A., Jr. (1992). Feathered nest/gilded cage: Parental income and leaving home in the transition to adulthood. Demography, 29, 375–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bacak, V., & Kennedy, E. H. (2015). Marginal structural models: An application to incarceration and marriage during young adulthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 77, 112–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blau, F. D., Kahn, L. M., & Waldfogel, J. (2004). The impact of welfare benefits on single motherhood and headship of young women: Evidence from the census. Journal of Human Resources, 39, 382–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. (2013). Federal rental assistance (Policy Basics report). Retrieved from
  9. Chassin, L., Proessen, C., Sherman, S., & Edwards, D. (1992). The natural history of cigarette smoking and young adult social roles. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 33, 328–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chetty, R., Hendren, N., & Katz, L. F. (2016). The effects of exposure to better neighborhoods on children: New evidence from the Moving to Opportunity experiment. American Economic Review, 106, 855–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chyn, E. (2016). Moved to opportunity: The long-run effect of public housing demolition on labor market outcomes of children. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Economics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA. Retrieved from
  12. Cole, S. R., & Hernán, M. A. (2008). Constructing inverse probability weights for marginal structural models. American Journal of Epidemiology, 168, 656–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Conley, D. (2001). A room with a view or a room of one’s own? Housing and social stratification. Sociological Forum, 16, 263–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cunningham, M., Harwood, R., & Hall, S. (2010). Residential instability and the McKinney-Vento Homeless Children and Education Program: What we know, plus gaps in research (Metropolitan Housing and Communities Center brief). Washington, DC: Urban Institute. Retrieved from
  15. Currie, J., & Yelowitz, A. (2000). Are public housing projects good for kids? Journal of Public Economics, 75, 99–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Curtis, M. A., Garlington, S., & Schottenfeld, L. S. (2013). Alcohol, drug, and criminal history restrictions in public housing. Cityscape, 15(3), 37–52.Google Scholar
  17. Danziger, S., Jakubson, G., Schwartz, S., & Smolensky, E. (1982). Work and welfare as determinants of female poverty and household headship. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 97, 519–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ellwood, D., & Bane, M. J. (1985). The impact of AFDC on family structure and living arrangements. In R. G. Ehrenberg (Ed.), Research in labor economics (Vol. 7, pp. 137–207). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  19. Fertig, A. R., & Reingold, D. A. (2007). Public housing, health, and health behaviors: Is there a connection? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26, 831–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fewell, Z., Hernán, M. A., Wolfe, F., Tilling, K., Choi, H., & Sterne, J. A. C. (2004). Controlling for time-dependent confounding using marginal structural models. Stata Journal, 4, 402–420.Google Scholar
  21. Freeman, L. (2005). Does housing assistance lead to dependency? Evidence from HUD administrative data. Cityscape, 8(2), 115–133.Google Scholar
  22. Furstenberg, F. F., Jr. (2010). On a new schedule: Transitions to adulthood and family change. Future of Children, 20(1), 67–87.Google Scholar
  23. Garriss-Hardy, B., & Vrooman, C. (2005). School stability and school performance: A review of the literature (Report). Greensboro: University of North Carolina, National Center for Homeless Education, SERVE Center. Retrieved from
  24. Goldscheider, F., & Goldscheider, C. (1998). The effects of childhood family structure on leaving and returning home. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 745–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Greenland, S. (2003). Quantifying biases in causal models: Classical confounding vs. collider-stratification bias. Epidemiology, 14, 300–306.Google Scholar
  26. Harding, D. J. (2003). Counterfactual models of neighborhood effects: The effect of neighborhood poverty on dropping out and teenage pregnancy. American Journal of Sociology, 109, 676–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hernán, M. A., Brumback, B., & Robins, J. M. (2000). Marginal structural models to estimate the causal effect of zidovudine on the survival of HIV-positive men. Epidemiology, 11, 561–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Horn, K. M., Ellen, I. G., & Schwartz, A. E. (2014). Do housing choice voucher holders live near good schools? Journal of Housing Economics, 23, 28–40.Google Scholar
  29. Hoynes, H. W. (1997). Does welfare play any role in female headship decisions? Journal of Public Economics, 65, 89–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hutchens, R., Jakubson, G., & Schwartz, S. (1989). AFDC and the formation of subfamilies. Journal of Human Resources, 24, 599–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jacob, B. A. (2004). Public housing, housing vouchers, and student achievement: Evidence from public housing demolitions in Chicago. American Economic Review, 94, 233–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jacob, B. A., Kapustin, M., & Ludwig, J. (2015). The impact of housing assistance on child outcomes: Evidence from a randomized housing lottery. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130, 465–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jacob, B. A., & Ludwig, J. (2012). The effects of housing assistance on labor supply: Evidence from a voucher lottery. American Economic Review, 102, 272–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Keller, T., Cusick, G. R., & Courtney, M. E. (2007). Approaching the transition to adulthood: Distinctive profiles of adolescents aging out of the child welfare system. Social Service Review, 81, 455–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Khadduri, J., Buron, L., & Lam, K. (2004, October). LIHTC and mixed income housing: Enabling families with children to live in low poverty neighborhoods? Paper presented at the 26th Annual Research Conference of the Association of Public Policy and Management, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  36. Kling, J. R., Liebman, J. B., & Katz, L. F. (2007). Experimental analysis of neighborhood effects. Econometrica, 75, 83–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kneale, D., & Sigle-Rushton, W. (2010, April). Transition to adulthood by housing status: A cross cohort comparison. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Dallas, TX.Google Scholar
  38. Leopold, J. (2012). The housing needs of rental assistance applicants. Cityscape, 14(2), 275–298.Google Scholar
  39. Lubell, J., Shroder, M., & Steffen, B. (2003). Work participation and length of stay in HUD-assisted housing. Cityscape, 6(2), 207–223.Google Scholar
  40. Mayer, S. E. (1997). What money can’t buy: Family income and children’s life chances. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Mills, G., Gubits, D., Orr, L., Long, D., Feins, J., Kaul, K., . . . QED Group. (2006). Effects of housing vouchers on welfare families: Final report (Report prepared for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Office of Policy Development and Research). Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates.Google Scholar
  42. Moffitt, R. A. (1994). Welfare effects on female headship with area effects. Journal of Human Resources, 29, 621–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Moffitt, R. A., Reville, R., & Winkler, A. E. (1998). Beyond single mothers: Cohabitation and marriage in the AFDC program. Demography, 35, 259–278.Google Scholar
  44. Newman, S., & Harkness, J. (2000). Assisted housing and the educational attainment of children. Journal of Housing Economics, 9, 40–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Newman, S., & Harkness, J. (2002). The long-term effects of public housing on self-sufficiency. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 21, 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Newman, S., Holupka, C. S., & Harkness, J. (2009). The long-term effects of housing assistance on work and welfare. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 28, 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Oreopoulos, P. (2003). The long-run consequences of living in a poor neighborhood. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 1533–1575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Osgood, D. W., Foster, E. M., & Courtney, M. E. (2010). Vulnerable populations and the transition to adulthood. Future of Children, 20(1), 209–229.Google Scholar
  49. Pearl, J. (1995). Causal diagrams for empirical research. Biometrika, 82, 669–710.Google Scholar
  50. Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Rank, M., & Cheng, L. (1995). Welfare use across generations: How important are the ties that bind? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 673–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Robins, J. M. (1999). Marginal structural models versus structural nested models as tools for causal inference. In M. E. Halloran & D. Berry (Eds.), Statistical models in epidemiology, the environment, and clinical trials (pp. 95–134). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  53. Robins, J. M., Hernán, M. A., & Brumback, B. (2000). Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11, 550–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ruggles, S. (1997). The effects of AFDC on American family structure, 1940–1990. Journal of Family History, 22, 307–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sampson, R. J., Laub, J. H., & Wimer, C. (2006). Does marriage reduce crime? A counterfactual approach to within-individual causal effects. Criminology, 44, 465–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sanbonmatsu, L., Ludwig, J., Katz, L. F., Gennetian, L. A., Duncan, G. J., Kessler, R. C., . . . Lindau, S. T. (2011). Moving to Opportunity for Fair Housing Demonstration Program: Final impacts evaluation (U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development report). Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from
  58. Sard, B., & Fisher, W. (2008). Preserving safe, high quality public housing should be a priority of federal housing policy (Report). Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Retrieved from
  59. Sard, B., & Rice, D. (2014). Creating opportunity for children: How housing location can make a difference (Report). Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Retrieved from
  60. Schoeni, R. F., & Ross, K. E. (2005). Material assistance from families during the transition to adulthood. In R. A. Settersten, F. F. Furstenberg, Jr., & R. G. Rumbaut (Eds.), On the frontier of adulthood: Theory, research, and public policy (pp. 396–416). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schwartz, A. F. (2015). Housing policy in the United States. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  62. Shroder, M. (2002). Does housing assistance perversely affect self-sufficiency? A review essay. Journal of Housing Economics, 11, 381–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. South, S. J., & Crowder, K. D. (1999). Neighborhood effects on family formation: Concentrated poverty and beyond. American Sociological Review, 64, 113–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. South, S. J., & Crowder, K. D. (2010). Neighborhood poverty and nonmarital fertility: Spatial and temporal dimensions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sucoff, C. A., & Upchurch, D. M. (1998). Neighborhood context and the risk of childbearing among metropolitan-area black adolescents. American Sociological Review, 63, 571–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). (2003). Public housing occupancy guidebook. Retrieved from
  67. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). (2008). Characteristics of HUD-assisted renters and their units in 2003 (Report). Retrieved from
  68. Vale, L. (2000). From the puritans to the projects: Public housing and public neighbors. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  69. White, L., & Lacy, N. (1997). The effects of age at home leaving and pathways from home on educational attainment. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 982–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  71. Wilson, W. J. (1996). When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor. New York, NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  72. Wodtke, G. T. (2013). Duration and timing of exposure to neighborhood poverty and the risk of adolescent parenthood. Demography, 50, 1765–1788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Wodtke, G. T., Harding, D. J., & Elwert, F. (2011). Neighborhood effects in temporal perspective: The impact of long-term exposure to concentrated disadvantage on high school graduation. American Sociological Review, 76, 713–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyThe City College of New YorkNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations