, Volume 55, Issue 1, pp 271–294 | Cite as

The Differential Mortality of Undesired Infants in Sub-Saharan Africa

  • Martin FlatøEmail author


With high rates of infant mortality in sub-Saharan Africa, investments in infant health are subject to tough prioritizations within the household, in which maternal preferences may play a part. How these preferences will affect infant mortality as African women have ever-lower fertility is still uncertain, as increased female empowerment and increased difficulty in achieving a desired gender composition within a smaller family pull in potentially different directions. I study how being born at a parity or of a gender undesired by the mother relates to infant mortality in sub-Saharan Africa and how such differential mortality varies between women at different stages of the demographic transition. Using data from 79 Demographic and Health Surveys, I find that a child being undesired according to the mother is associated with a differential mortality that is not due to constant maternal factors, family composition, or factors that are correlated with maternal preferences and vary continuously across siblings. As a share of overall infant mortality, the excess mortality of undesired children amounts to 3.3 % of male and 4 % of female infant mortality. Undesiredness can explain a larger share of infant mortality among mothers with lower fertility desires and a larger share of female than male infant mortality for children of women who desire 1–3 children. Undesired gender composition is more important for infant mortality than undesired childbearing and may also lead couples to increase family size beyond the maternal desire, in which case infants of the surplus gender are particularly vulnerable.


Fertility desires Gender preference Infant mortality Unwanted childbearing Sub-Saharan Africa 



The article has benefited from comments by seminar participants at the Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital, Statistics Norway, and the University of Oslo. I would like to particularly thank Prashant Bharadwaj, Christophe Guilmoto, Nico Keilman, Andreas Kotsadam, Øystein Kravdal, Raya Muttarak, Martina Björkman Nyqvist, and three anonymous reviewers for helpful comments. While carrying out part of this research, I have been associated with the Centre for the Study of Equality, Social Organization, and Performance (ESOP) at the Department of Economics at the University of Oslo. ESOP is supported by the Research Council of Norway through its Centres of Excellence funding scheme, project number 179552. It has also partly been completed under the Systems Analysis Scholarship from the International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis and the South African National Research Foundation.

Supplementary material

13524_2017_638_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (254 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 254 kb)


  1. Anderson, S., & Ray, D. (2010). Missing women: Age and disease. Review of Economic Studies, 77, 1262–1300.Google Scholar
  2. Andersson, G., Hank, K., Rønsen, M., & Vikat, A. (2006). Gendering family composition: Sex preferences for children and childbearing behavior in the Nordic countries. Demography, 43, 255–267.Google Scholar
  3. Arnold, F. (1992). Sex preference and its demographic and health implications. International Family Planning Perspectives, 18, 93–101.Google Scholar
  4. Baird, S., Friedman, J., & Schady, N. (2010). Aggregate income shocks and infant mortality in the developing world. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93, 847–856.Google Scholar
  5. Belanger, D. (2002). Son preference in a rural village in north Vietnam. Studies in Family Planning, 33, 321–334.Google Scholar
  6. Bhat, P., & Zavier, A. (2003). Fertility decline and gender bias in northern India. Demography, 40, 637–657.Google Scholar
  7. Black, R. E., Allen, L. H., Bhutta, Z. A., Caulfield, L. E., de Onis, M., Ezzati, M., . . . Rivera, J. (2008). Maternal and child undernutrition: Global and regional exposures and health consequences. Lancet, 371, 243–260.Google Scholar
  8. Bongaarts, J. (1990). The measurement of wanted fertility. Population and Development Review, 16, 487–506.Google Scholar
  9. Bongaarts, J. (1992). Do reproductive intentions matter? International Family Planning Perspectives, 18, 102–108.Google Scholar
  10. Bongaarts, J. (2013). The implementation of preferences for male offspring. Population and Development Review, 39, 185–208.Google Scholar
  11. Bongaarts, J., & Casterline, J. (2013). Fertility transition: Is sub-Saharan Africa different? Population and Development Review, 38, 153–168.Google Scholar
  12. Bryant, J. (2007). Theories of fertility decline and the evidence from development indicators. Population and Development Review, 33, 101–127.Google Scholar
  13. Caldwell, J. C. (1986). Routes to low mortality in poor countries. Population and Development Review, 12, 171–220.Google Scholar
  14. Caldwell, J. C., & Caldwell, P. (1987). The cultural context of high fertility in sub-Saharan Africa. Population and Development Review, 13, 409–437.Google Scholar
  15. Casterline, J. B., & El-Zeini, L. O. (2007). The estimation of unwanted fertility. Demography, 44, 729–745.Google Scholar
  16. Casterline, J. B., & Sinding, S. W. (2000). Unmet need for family planning in developing countries and implications for population policy. Population and Development Review, 26, 691–723.Google Scholar
  17. Chalasani, S., Casterline, J. B., & Koenig, M. A. (2008). Unwanted childbearing and child survival in Bangladesh. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Sociology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.Google Scholar
  18. Chamarbagwala, R. (2011). Sibling composition and selective gender-based survival bias. Journal of Population Economics, 24, 935–955.Google Scholar
  19. Coale, A. (1973). The demographic transition reconsidered. In Proceedings of the International Population Conference (pp. 53–77). Liège, Belgium: International Union for the Scientific Study of Population.Google Scholar
  20. Croll, E. (2000). Endangered daughters: Discrimination and development in Asia. Abingdon, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  21. Das Gupta, M. (1987). Selective discrimination against female children in rural Punjab, India. Population and Development Review, 13, 77–100.Google Scholar
  22. Das Gupta, M., & Bhat, P. M. (1997). Fertility decline and increased manifestation of sex bias in India. Population Studies, 51, 307–315.Google Scholar
  23. Dewey, K. G. (2003). Nutrient composition of fortified complementary foods: Should age-specific micronutrient content and ration sizes be recommended? Journal of Nutrition, 133, 2950–2952.Google Scholar
  24. Flatø, M. (2017, October). Do mothers adjust their fertility preferences when having more children? Evidence from sub-Saharan Africa based on natural experiments. Paper presented at the International Union for the Scientific Study of Population (IUSSP) International Population Conference, Cape Town, South Africa.Google Scholar
  25. Flatø, M., & Kotsadam, A. (2014). Droughts and gender bias in infant mortality in sub-Saharan Africa (Memorandum No. 02/2014). Oslo, Norway: Department of Economics, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
  26. Garenne, M. (2003). Sex differences in health indicators among children in African DHS surveys. Journal of Biosocial Science, 35, 601–614.Google Scholar
  27. Gipson, J. D., Koenig, M. A., & Hindin, M. J. (2008). The effects of unintended pregnancy on infant, child, and parental health: A review of the literature. Studies in Family Planning, 39, 18–38.Google Scholar
  28. Grepin, K. A., & Bharadwaj, P. (2015). Maternal education and child mortality in Zimbabwe. Journal of Health Economics, 44, 97–117.Google Scholar
  29. Guilmoto, C. Z. (2009). The sex ratio transition in Asia. Population and Development Review, 35, 519–549.Google Scholar
  30. Günther, I., & Harttgen, K. (2016). Desired fertility and number of children born across time and space. Demography, 53, 55–83.Google Scholar
  31. Haig, D. (2004). The inexorable rise of gender and the decline of sex: Social change in academic titles, 1945–2001. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 33, 87–96.Google Scholar
  32. Imbens, G. W., & Lemieux, T. (2008). Regression discontinuity designs: A guide to practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142, 615–635.Google Scholar
  33. Jayachandran, S. (2017). Fertility decline and missing women. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 9, 118–139Google Scholar
  34. Jayachandran, S., & Pande, R. (2017). Why are Indian children so short? American Economic Review, 107, 2600–2629.Google Scholar
  35. Johnson-Hanks, J. (2007). Natural intentions: Fertility decline in the African demographic and health surveys. American Journal of Sociology, 112, 1008–1043.Google Scholar
  36. Jones, K. M. (2014). Growing up together: Cohort composition and child investment. Demography, 51, 229–255.Google Scholar
  37. Joshi, S., & Schultz, T. (2013). Family planning and women’s and children’s health: Long-term consequences of an outreach program in Matlab, Bangladesh. Demography, 50, 149–180.Google Scholar
  38. Khanna, R., Kumar, A., Vaghela, J. F., Sreenivas, V., & Puliyel, J. M. (2003). Community based retrospective study of sex in infant mortality in India. BMJ, 327(126).
  39. Kim, Y. S. (2010). The impact of rainfall on early child health (Job market paper). College Park, MD: University of Maryland.Google Scholar
  40. Kravdal, Ø. (2002). Education and fertility in sub-Saharan Africa: Individual and community effects. Demography, 39, 233–250.Google Scholar
  41. Kravdal, Ø., & Kodzi, I. (2011). Children’s stunting in sub-Saharan Africa: Is there an externality effect of high fertility? Demographic Research, 25(article 18), 565–594.
  42. Kravdal, Ø., Kodzi, I., & Sigle-Rushton, W. (2013). Effects of the number and age of siblings on educational transitions in sub-Saharan Africa. Studies in Family Planning, 44, 275–297.Google Scholar
  43. Lartey, A. (2008). Maternal and child nutrition in sub-Saharan Africa: Challenges and interventions. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 67, 105–108.Google Scholar
  44. Li, H., Yi, J., & Zhang, J. (2011). Estimating the effect of the one-child policy on the sex ratio imbalance in China: Identification based on the difference-in-differences. Demography, 48, 1535–1557.Google Scholar
  45. Lightbourne, R. E. (1985). Individual preferences and fertility behaviour. In J. Cleland & J. Hobcraft (Eds.), Reproductive change in developing countries: Insights from the World Fertility Survey (pp. 165–198). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Milazzo, A. (2014). Why are adult women missing? Son preference and maternal survival in India (Policy Research Working Paper No. WPS6802). Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  47. Miller, G., & Urdinola, B. P. (2010). Cyclicality, mortality, and the value of time: The case of coffee price fluctuations and child survival in Colombia. Journal of Political Economy, 118, 113–155.Google Scholar
  48. Mishra, V., Roy, T. K., & Retherford, R. D. (2004). Sex differentials in childhood feeding, health care, and nutritional status in India. Population and Development Review, 30, 269–295.Google Scholar
  49. Montgomery, M. R., & Lloyd, C. B. (1996). Fertility and maternal and child health. In D. A. Ahlburg, A. C. Kelley, & K. Oppenheim Mason (Eds.), The impact of population growth on well-being in developing countries (pp. 37–66). Berlin, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
  50. Montgomery, M. R., Lloyd, C. B., Hewett, P. C., & Heuveline, P. (1997). The consequences of imperfect fertility control for children’s survival, health, and schooling (Demographic and Health Surveys Analytical Reports No. 7). Calverton, MD: Macro International.Google Scholar
  51. Mosley, W. H., & Chen, L. C. (1984). An analytical framework for the study of child survival in developing countries. Population and Development Review, 10, 25–45.Google Scholar
  52. Papay, J. P., Willett, J. B., & Murnane, R. J. (2011). Extending the regression-discontinuity approach to multiple assignment variables. Journal of Econometrics, 161, 203–207.Google Scholar
  53. Pongou, R. (2013). Why is infant mortality higher in boys than in girls? A new hypothesis based on preconception environment and evidence from a large sample of twins. Demography, 50, 421–444.Google Scholar
  54. Pongou, R. (2015). Sex differences in early-age mortality: The preconception origins hypothesis. Demography, 52, 2053–2056.Google Scholar
  55. Reardon, S. F., & Robinson, J. P. (2012). Regression discontinuity designs with multiple rating-score variables. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 5, 83–104.Google Scholar
  56. Rossi, P., & Rouanet, L. (2015). Gender preferences in Africa: A comparative analysis of fertility choices. World Development, 72, 326–345.Google Scholar
  57. Sartorius, B., & Sartorius, K. (2014). Global infant mortality trends and attributable determinants: An ecological study using data from 192 countries for the period 1990–2011. Population Health Metrics, 12, 1–15.
  58. Sen, A. (1990, December 20). More than 100 million women are missing. New York Review of Books. Retrieved from
  59. Singh, A., Chalasani, S., Koenig, M. A., & Mahapatra, B. (2012). The consequences of unintended births for maternal and child health in India. Population Studies, 66, 223–239.Google Scholar
  60. Smith-Greenaway, E., & Sennott, C. (2016). Death and desirability: Retrospective reporting of unintended pregnancy after a child’s death. Demography, 53, 805–834.Google Scholar
  61. Timaeus, I. M., & Moultrie, T. A. (2008). On postponement and birth intervals. Population and Development Review, 34, 483–510.Google Scholar
  62. United Nations Population Division. (2011). Sex differentials in childhood mortality (United Nations Publication No. ST/ESA/SER.A/314). New York, NY: United Nations.Google Scholar
  63. United Nations Population Division. (2015). World population prospects: The 2015 revision, key findings and advance tables (Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP.241). New York, NY: United Nations.Google Scholar
  64. van de Walle, E. (1992). Fertility transition, conscious choice, and numeracy. Demography, 29, 487–502.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
  2. 2.International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)LaxenburgAustria
  3. 3.Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education (NIFU)OsloNorway

Personalised recommendations