Demography

pp 1–30 | Cite as

Family Trajectories Across Time and Space: Increasing Complexity in Family Life Courses in Europe?

Article

Abstract

Family life courses are thought to have become more complex in Europe. This study uses SHARELIFE data from 14 European countries to analyze the family life courses of individuals born in 1924–1956 from ages 15 to 50. A new methodological approach, combining complexity metrics developed in sequence analysis with cross-classified multilevel modeling, is used to simultaneously quantify the proportions of variance attributable to birth cohort and country differences. This approach allows the direct comparison of changing levels of family trajectory differentiation across birth cohorts with cross-national variation, which provides a benchmark against which temporal change may be evaluated. The results demonstrate that family trajectories have indeed become more differentiated but that change over time is minor compared with substantial cross-national variation. Further, cross-national differences in family trajectory differentiation correspond with differences in dominant family life course patterns. With regard to debates surrounding the second demographic transition thesis and the comparative life course literature, the results indicate that the degree of change over time tends to be overstated relative to large cross-national differences.

Keywords

Family Sequence analysis Multilevel modeling Comparative Life course 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I thank Anette Fasang, Markus Schrenker, Jan Van Bavel, Brienna Perelli-Harris, Marcel Raab, Elizebeth Thomson, the participants of the Social Policy and Inequality writing workshop at the WZB, the participants of the Colloquium for Quantitative Research at the Institute for Social Sciences of the Humboldt University Berlin, and the editors and reviewers of Demography for insightful and constructive comments at various stages of the manuscript.

Supplementary material

13524_2017_628_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.3 mb)
ESM 1 (PDF 1378 kb)

References

  1. Abbott, A. (2005). Process and temporality in sociology: The idea of outcome in U.S. sociology. In G. Steinmetz (Ed.), The politics of method in the human sciences: Positivism and its epistemological others (pp. 393–426). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Abramson, P. R., & Inglehart, R. (1986). Generational replacement and value change in six west European societies. American Journal of Political Science, 30, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aidukaite, J. (2009). Old welfare state theories and new welfare regimes in eastern Europe: Challenges and implications. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 42, 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aisenbrey, S., & Fasang, A. E. (2010). New life for old ideas: The “second wave” of sequence analysis bringing the “course” back into the life course. Sociological Methods & Research, 38, 420–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Antonova, L., Aranda, L., Pasini, G., & Trevisan, E. (2014). Migration, family history and pension: The second release of the SHARE Job Episodes Panel (Share Working Paper No. 18-2014). Munich, Germany: SHARE-ERIC.Google Scholar
  6. Arts, W., & Gelissen, J. (2002). Three worlds of welfare capitalism or more? A state-of-the-art report. Journal of European Social Policy, 12, 137–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baizan, P., Michielin, F., & Billari, F. (2002). Political economy and life course patterns: The heterogeneity of occupational, family and household trajectories of young Spaniards. Demographic Research, 6(article 8), 191–240.  https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2002.6.8
  8. Beck, U., & Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1994). Riskante freiheiten: Zur individualisierung der lebensformen in der moderne [Risky freedoms: Individualization of life forms in modern societies]. Frankfurt/Main, Germany: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  9. Biemann, T., Fasang, A. E., & Grunow, D. (2011). Do economic globalization and industry growth destabilize careers? An analysis of career complexity and career patterns over time. Organization Studies, 32, 1639–1663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Billari, F. (2004). Becoming an adult in Europe: A macro(/micro)-demographic perspective. Demographic Research, Special Collection 3(article 2), 15–44.  https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2004.S3.2
  11. Billari, F., & Liefbroer, A. (2010). Towards a new pattern of transition to adulthood? Advances in Life Course Research, 15, 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Billari, F., & Wilson, C. (2001). Convergence towards diversity? Cohort dynamics in the transition to adulthood in contemporary western Europe (MPIDR Working Paper No. 2001–03). Rostock, Germany: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research.Google Scholar
  13. Blossfeld, H.-P., Klijzing, E., Mills, M., & Kurz, K. (Eds.). (2005). Globalization, uncertainty and youth in society. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Borsch-Supan, A. (2017a). Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) Wave 1. Release version: 6.0.0. SHARE-ERIC [Data set].  https://doi.org/10.6103/SHARE.w1.600
  15. Borsch-Supan, A. (2017b). Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) Wave 2. Release version: 6.0.0. SHARE-ERIC [Data set].  https://doi.org/10.6103/SHARE.w2.600
  16. Borsch-Supan, A. (2017c). Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) Wave 3— SHARELIFE. Release version: 6.0.0. SHARE-ERIC [Data set].  https://doi.org/10.6103/SHARE.w3.600
  17. Borsch-Supan, A., Brandt, M., Hunkler, C., Kneip, T., Korbmacher, J., Malter, F., . . . Zuber, S. (2013). Data resource profile: The Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE). International Journal of Epidemiology, 42, 992–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bras, H., Liefbroer, A. C., & Elzinga, C. H. (2010). Standardization of pathways to adulthood? An Analysis of Dutch cohorts born between 1850 and 1900. Demography, 47, 1013–1034.Google Scholar
  19. Breen, R., & Buchmann, M. C. (2002). Institutional variation and the position of young people: a comparative perspective. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 580, 288–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Brückner, H., & Mayer, K. U. (2005). The de-standardization of the life course: What it might mean and if it means anything whether it actually took place. In R. Macmillan (Ed.), The structure of the life course. Standardized? Individualized? Differentiated? (pp. 27–54). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  21. Brüderl, J. (2004). Die pluralisierung partnerschaftlicher lebensformen in Westdeutschland und Europa [The pluralization of partnership life forms in West Germany and Europe]. Aus Politik Und Zeitgeschichte, 19, 3–10.Google Scholar
  22. Brugiavini, A., Cavapozzi, D., Pasini, G., & Trevisan, E. (2013). Working life histories from SHARELIFE: A retrospective panel (Working Paper No. 11–2013). Munich, Germany: SHARE-ERIC.Google Scholar
  23. Bryan, M. L., & Jenkins, S. P. (2016). Multilevel modelling of country effects: A cautionary tale. European Sociological Review, 32, 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Buchmann, M. C. (1989). The script of life in modern society: Entry into adulthood in a changing world. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  25. Buchmann, M. C., & Kriesi, I. (2011). Transition to adulthood in Europe. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 481–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Chaloupková, J. (2010). The de-standardization of early family trajectories in the Czech Republic: A cross-cohort comparison. Czech Sociological Review, 46, 427–451.Google Scholar
  27. Coleman, M., Ganong, L., & Fine, M. (2000). Reinvestigating remarriage: Another decade of progress. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 1288–1307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Corijn, M., & Klijzing, E. (Eds.). (2001). Transitions to adulthood in Europe. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  29. DiPrete, T. (2002). Life course risks, mobility regimes, and mobility consequences: A comparison of Sweden, Germany, and the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 108, 267–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. DiPrete, T., DeGraaf, P., Luijkx, R., Tahlin, M., & Blossfeld, H.-P. (1997). Collectivist versus individualist mobility regimes? Structural change and job mobility in four countries. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 318–358.Google Scholar
  31. Elzinga, C. H., & Liefbroer, A. C. (2007). De-standardization of family-life trajectories of young adults: A cross-national comparison using sequence analysis. European Journal of Population, 23, 225–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Emmenegger, P., Kvist, J., Marx, P., & Petersen, K. (2015). Three worlds of welfare capitalism: The making of a classic. Journal of European Social Policy, 25, 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fasang, A. E., & Liao, T. F. (2014). Visualizing sequences in the social sciences: Relative frequency sequence plots. Sociological Methods & Research, 43, 643–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Fasang, A. E., & Raab, M. (2014). Beyond transmission: Intergenerational patterns of family formation among middle-class American families. Demography, 51, 1703–1728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ferrera, M. (1996). The “southern model” of welfare in social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 6, 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Flaquer, L. (2000). Is there a southern European model of family policy? In A. Pfenning & T. Bahle (Eds.), Families and family policies in Europe: Comparative perspectives (pp. 15–33). Frankfurt/Main, Germany: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  39. Fodor, E., Glass, C., Kawachi, J., & Popescu, L. (2002). Family policies and gender in Hungary, Poland, and Romania. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 35, 475–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Fokkema, T., & Liefbroer, A. C. (2008). Trends in living arrangements in Europe: Convergence or divergence? Demographic Research, 19(article 36), 1351–1418.  https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.36
  41. Fowler, C. S., Lee, B. A., & Matthews, S. A. (2016). The contributions of places to metropolitan ethnoracial diversity and segregation: Decomposing change across space and time. Demography, 53, 1955–1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gabadinho, A., Ritschard, G., Müller, N. S., & Studer, M. (2011). Analyzing and visualizing state sequences in R with TraMineR. Journal of Statistical Software, 40(4), 1–37.Google Scholar
  43. Gabadinho, A., Ritschard, G., Studer, M., & Müller, N. S. (2010). Indice de complexité pour le tri et la comparaison de séquences catégorielles [Complexity index for the sorting and comparison of categorical sequences]. Revue Des Nouvelles Technologies de L’information, RNTI-E-19, 61–66.Google Scholar
  44. Garrouste, C. (2010). 100 years of educational reforms in Europe: A contextual database (JRC Scientific and Technical Report). Luxembourg City, Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union. Retrieved from http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:31853
  45. Gauthier, A. (2007). Becoming a young adult: An international perspective on the transitions to adulthood. European Journal of Population, 23, 217–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gauthier, A., & Monna, B. (2004). Family allowances in industrialized countries: Historical landmarks (Version 1). Available from http://www.demogr.mpg.de/cgi-bin/databases/FamPolDB/index.plx
  47. Goldscheider, F. (1997). Recent changes in U.S. young adult living arrangements in comparative perspective. Journal of Family Issues, 18, 708–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Gottschall, K., & Bird, K. (2003). Family leave policies and labor market segregation in Germany: Reinvention or reform of the male breadwinner model? Review of Policy Research, 20, 115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Günther, I., & Harttgen, K. (2016). Desired fertility and children born across time and space. Demography, 53, 55–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Havari, E., & Mazzonna, F. (2015). Can we trust older people’s statements on their childhood circumstances? Evidence from SHARELIFE. European Journal of Population, 31, 233–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Heuveline, P., & Timberlake, J. M. (2004). The role of cohabitation in family formation: The United States in comparative perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1214–1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Heuveline, P., Timberlake, J. M., & Furstenberg, F. F., Jr. (2003). Shifting childrearing to single mothers: Results from 17 Western countries. Population and Development Review, 29, 47–71.Google Scholar
  53. Hofäcker, D., & Chaloupková, J. (2014). Patterns of family life courses in Europe—Between standardisation and diversity a cross-national comparison of family trajectories and life course norms in European countries. Comparative Population Studies, 39, 559–586.Google Scholar
  54. ifo Insitute. (2015). Parental leave entitlements: Historical perspective (around 1870–2014). Munich, Germany: ifo Institute.Google Scholar
  55. Inglehart, R. (1990). Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Inglehart, R. (2008). Changing values among western publics from 1970 to 2006. West European Politics, 31, 130–146.Google Scholar
  57. Inglehart, R., & Abramson, P. R. (1994). Economic security and value change. American Political Science Review, 88, 336–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P. J. (1990). Finding groups in data. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kohli, M. (1997). Die institutionalisierung des lebenslaufs [The institutionalization of the life course]. Soziologische Theorie und Empirie, 37, 284–312.Google Scholar
  60. Kreyenfeld, M. (2004). Fertility decisions in the FRG and GDR: An analysis with data from the German Fertility and Family Survey. Demographic Research, Special Collection 3(article 11), 275–318.  https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2004.S3.11
  61. Lesthaeghe, R. (1995). The second demographic transition: An interpretation. In K. O. Mason & A.-M. Jensen (Eds.), Gender and family change in industrialized countries (pp. 17–62). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Lesthaeghe, R. (2010). The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. Population and Development Review, 36, 211–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lesthaeghe, R., & Surkyn, J. (1988). Cultural dynamics and economic theories of fertility change. Population and Development Review, 14, 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lesthaeghe, R., & Van de Kaa, D. J. (1986). Twee demografische transities? [Two demographic transitions?]. In R. Lesthaeghe & D. J. Van de Kaa (Eds.), Bevolking: Groei en krimp (pp. 9–24). Deventer, the Netherlands: Van Loghum Slaterus.Google Scholar
  65. Lohmann, H., & Zagel, H. (2016). Family policy in comparative perspective: The concepts and measurement of familization and defamilization. Journal of European Social Policy, 26, 48–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Maul, K., Boehnke, M., Tophoven, S., Feldhaus, M., & Huinink, J. (2009). Female employment and childbearing plans in Germany (Preliminary national report for the RECWOWE task “Fertility, female employment and reconciliation policies”). Bremen, Germany: Institute for Empirical and Applied Sociology, University of Bremen. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Michael_Feldhaus/publication/253713157_Female_employment_and_childbearing_plans_in_Germany/links/53fc4a9b0cf2dca8ffff02ea.pdf
  67. Mayer, K. U. (1991). Soziale ungleichheit und die differenzierung von lebensverläufen [Social inequality and the differentiation of life courses]. In W. Zapf (Ed.), Die modernisierung moderner gesellschaften (pp. 667–687). Frankfurt, Germany: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
  68. Mayer, K. U. (1997). Notes on a comparative political economy of life courses. Comparative Social Research, 16, 203–226.Google Scholar
  69. Mayer, K. U. (2004). Whose lives? How history, societies, and institutions define and shape life courses. Research in Human Development, 1, 161–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Mayer, K. U. (2005). Life courses and life chances in a comparative perspective. In S. Svallfors (Ed.), Analyzing inequality: Life chances and social mobility in comparative perspective (pp. 17–55). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Mayer, K. U. (2009). New directions in life course research. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 413–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Mayer, K. U., & Müller, W. (1986). The state and the structure of the life course. In A. B. Sorensen, F. E. Weinert, & L. R. Sherrod (Eds.), Human development and the life course: Multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 217–245). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  73. Mayer, K. U., & Schoepflin, U. (1989). The state and the life course. Annual Review of Sociology, 15, 187–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Modell, J., Furstenberg, F. F., Jr., & Hershberg, T. (1976). Social change and transitions to adulthood in historical perspective. Journal of Family History, 1, 7–32.Google Scholar
  75. Morel, N. (2007). From subsidiarity to “free choice”: Child- and elder-care policy reforms in France, Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands. Social Policy & Administration, 41, 618–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Orso, C. E., Brugiavini, A., Cavapozzi, D., & Pasini, G. (2016). SHARE Job Episodes Panel. Release version: 5.0.0 SHARE-ERIC [Dataset].  https://doi.org/10.6103/SHARE.jep.500
  77. Perelli-Harris, B., Kreyenfeld, M., & Kubisch, K. (2010). Harmonized histories manual for the preparation of comparative fertility and union histories (MPIDR Working Paper No. 2010-011). Rostock, Germany: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research.Google Scholar
  78. Potârcă, G., Mills, M., & Lesnard, L. (2013). Family formation trajectories in Romania, the Russian Federation and France: Towards the second demographic transition? European Journal of Population, 29, 69–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Raab, M., Fasang, A. E., Karhula, A., & Erola, J. (2014). Sibling similarity in family formation. Demography, 51, 2127–2154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Skrondal, A. (2012). Multilevel modeling with Stata (Revised ed.). College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
  81. Robette, N. (2010). The diversity of pathways to adulthood in France: Evidence from a holistic approach. Advances in Life Course Research, 15, 89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Rowland, D. T. (2007). Historical trends in childlessness. Journal of Family Issues, 28, 1311–1337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Ryder, N. B. (1965). The cohort as a concept in the study of social change. American Sociological Review, 30, 843–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Schoen, R., & Canudas-Romo, V. (2006). Timing effects on divorce: 20th century experience in the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 749–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Schröder, M. (Ed.). (2011). Retrospective data collection in the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe. SHARELIFE Methodology. Mannheim, Germany: Mannheim Research Institute for the Economics of Ageing.Google Scholar
  86. Settersten, R. A., Jr. (2007). Passages to adulthood: Linking demographic change and human development. European Journal of Population, 23, 251–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Shi, Y., Leite, W., & Algina, J. (2010). The impact of omitting the interaction between crossed factors in cross-classified random effects modeling. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 63, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  89. Sobotka, T. (2008). Overview chapter 6: The diverse faces of the second demographic transition in Europe. Demographic Research, 19(article 8), 171–224.  https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.8
  90. Sobotka, T., & Toulemon, L. (2008). Overview chapter 4: Changing family and partnership behaviour. Demographic Research, 19(article 6), 85–138.  https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2008.19.6
  91. Studer, M. (2013). WeightedCluster library manual: A practical guide to creating typologies of trajectories in the social sciences with R (LIVES Working Paper No. 24). Lausanne, Switzerland: Swiss National Centre of competence in Research LIVES.  https://doi.org/10.12682/lives.2296-1658.2013.24
  92. Thomson, E. (2014). Family complexity in Europe. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 654, 245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. (2005). Generations and Gender Programme: Survey instruments. New York, NY: United Nations.Google Scholar
  94. Van de Kaa, D. J. (1987). Europe’s second demographic transition. Population Bulletin, 42(1), 1–59.Google Scholar
  95. Van de Kaa, D. J. (2001). Postmodern fertility preferences: From changing value orientation to new behavior. Population and Development Review, 290–331.Google Scholar
  96. Van Winkle, Z., & Fasang, A. (2017). Complexity in employment life courses in Europe in the 20th century—Large cross-national differences but little change across birth cohorts. Social Forces, 96, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Institute for Social SciencesHumboldt University BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.WZB Berlin Social Science CenterBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations