pp 1–25 | Cite as

Interior Immigration Enforcement and Political Participation of U.S. Citizens in Mixed-Status Households



The 2000s have witnessed an expansion of interior immigration enforcement in the United States. At the same time, the country has experienced a major demographic transformation, with the number of U.S. citizens living in mixed-status households—that is, households where at least one family member is an unauthorized migrant—reaching 16 million. U.S. citizens living in mixed-status households are personally connected to the struggles experienced by their unauthorized family members. For them, immigration policy is likely to shape their current and future voting behavior. Using data from the 2002–2014 Current Population Survey Voting and Registration Supplements, we examine whether intensified immigration enforcement has affected the political engagement of U.S. citizens living in mixed-status households. We find that immigration enforcement has chilled their electoral participation by lowering their propensity to register by 5 %; however, it has not visibly affected their voting propensity among those registered. Importantly, their lower voting registration likelihood does not seem to reflect indifference for community and public matters, given that it has been accompanied by greater involvement in civic forms of political participation, such as volunteering. Understanding how immigration policy affects the political participation of a fast-growing segment of the electorate is imperative because they will inevitably constitute a rapidly rising political force in future elections.


Immigration enforcement Mixed-status households Civic engagement 

Supplementary material

13524_2017_627_MOESM1_ESM.docx (65 kb)
ESM 1(DOCX 65.2 KB)


  1. Acosta, Y. D., Larsen, L. J., & Grieco, E. M. (2014). Noncitizens under age 35: 2010–2012 (American Community Survey Briefs). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  2. Aguilasocho, E., Rodwin, D., & Ashar, S. (2012). Misplaced priorities: The failure of secure communities in Los Angeles County (Report). Irvine: Immigrant Rights Clinic, University of California, Irvine School of Law.Google Scholar
  3. Amuedo-Dorantes, C., & Arenas-Arroyo, E. (2017). The changing family structure of American children with unauthorized parents (GLO Working Paper). Retrieved from
  4. Amuedo-Dorantes, C., & Bansak, C. (2012). The labor market impact of mandated employment. American Economic Review, 102, 543–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amuedo-Dorantes, C., & Bansak, C. (2014). Employment verification mandates and the labor market of likely unauthorized and native workers. Contemporary Economic Policy, 32, 671–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Amuedo-Dorantes, C., & Lopez, M. J. (2015). Falling through the cracks? Grade retention and school dropout among children of likely unauthorized immigrants. American Economic Review, 105, 598–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Amuedo-Dorantes, C., & Pozo, S. (2014). On the intended and unintended consequences of enhanced border and interior immigration enforcement: Evidence from deportees. Demography, 51, 2255–2279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baker, B., & Rytin, N. (2013). Estimates of unauthorized immigrant population residing in the United States: 2012 (Population Estimates, March 2013 Report). Washington, DC: Office of Immigration Statistics.Google Scholar
  9. Barreto, M., Ramirez, R., & Woods, N. (2005). Are naturalized voters driving the California Latino electorate? Measuring the effect of IRCA citizens on Latino voting. Social Science Quarterly, 86, 792–811.Google Scholar
  10. Barreto, M., & Woods, N. (2005). Latino voting behavior in an anti-Latino political context: The case of Los Angeles County. In G. Segura & S. Bowler (Eds.), Diversity if democracy: Minority representation in the United States (pp. 148–169). Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
  11. Barreto, M. A., & Muñoz, J. A. (2003). Reexamining the politics of in-between: Political participation among Mexican immigrants in the United States. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 25, 427–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bloemraad, I., & Trost, C. (2008). It’s a family affair: Intergenerational mobilization in the spring 2006 protests. American Behavioral Scientist, 52, 507–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bohn, S., & Lofstrom, M. (2013). Employment effects of state legislation. In D. Card & S. Raphael (Eds.), Immigration, poverty, and socioeconomic inequality (pp. 282–314). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  14. Bohn, S., & Pugatch, T. (2013). U.S. border enforcement and Mexican immigrant location choice. Demography, 52, 1543–1570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DeSipio, L. (2013). From naturalized citizen to voter: The context of naturalization and electoral participation in Latino communities. In D. L. Leal & J. E. Limón (Eds.), Immigration and the border politics and policy in the New Latino century (pp. 149–181). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  16. Ewing, W. A., & Cantor, G. (2014). New Americans in the voting booth: The growing electoral power of immigrant communities (Special Report). Washington, DC: American Immigration Council.Google Scholar
  17. Holbrook, A., Sterrett, D., Johnson, T., & Krysan, M. (2016). Racial disparities in political participation across issues: The role of issue-specific motivators. Political Behavior, 38, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Humphries, M., Muller, C., & Schiller, K. S. (2013). The political socialization of adolescent children of immigrants. Social Science Quarterly, 94, 1261–1282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Imbens, G. W., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2007) What’s new in econometrics? [Lecture notes]. Retrieved from
  20. Kostandini, G., Mykerezi, E., & Escalante, C. (2014). The impact of immigration enforcement on the U.S. farming sector. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 96, 172–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Krogstad, J. M., & Lopez, M. H. (2014, November 10). 5 takeaways about the 2014 Latino vote (Fact Tank: News in the Numbers report). Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from
  22. Landale, N. S., Thomas, K. J. A., & Van Hook, J. (2011). The living arrangements of children of immigrants. Future of Children, 21(1), 43–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Levin-Waldman, O. M. (2013). Income, civic participation and achieving a greater democracy. Journal of Socio-Economics, 43, 89–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lopez, M. H., & Gonzalez-Barrera, A. (2013). Inside the 2012 Latino electorate (Report). Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
  25. Lopez, M. H., & Livingston, G. (2009). Hispanics and the criminal justice system: Low confidence, high exposure (Report). Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
  26. Lopez, M. H., & Marcelo, K. B. (2008). The civic engagement of immigrant youth: New evidence from the 2006 Civic and Political Health of the Nation Survey. Applied Developmental Science, 12, 66–73.Google Scholar
  27. Nguyen, M. T., & Gill, H. (2016). Interior immigration enforcement: The impacts of expanding local law enforcement authority. Urban Studies, 53, 302–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Orrenius, P. M., & Zavodny, M. (2016). Do state work eligibility verification laws reduce unauthorized immigration? IZA Journal of Migration, 5(5).
  29. Pantoja, A. D., Ramirez, R., & Segura, G. M. (2001). Citizens by choice, voters by necessity: Patterns in political mobilization by naturalized Latinos. Political Research Quarterly, 54, 729–750.Google Scholar
  30. Passel, J. S., & Cohn, D. V. (2009). A portrait of unauthorized immigrants in the United States (Report). Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
  31. Passel, J. S., & Cohn, D. V. (2010). U.S. unauthorized immigration flows are down sharply since mid-decade (Report). Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
  32. Passel, J. S., & Cohn, D. V. (2011). Unauthorized immigrant population: National and state trends, 2010 (Report). Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
  33. Passel, J. S., & Taylor, P. (2010). Unauthorized immigrants and their U.S.-born children (Report). Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
  34. Pastor, M., Sanchez, J., & Carter, V. (2015). The kids aren’t alright–but they could be: The impact of Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA) on children (Research brief). Los Angeles, CA: Center for the Study of Immigrant Integration.Google Scholar
  35. Pastor, M., Scoggins, J., Carter, V., & Sanchez, J. (2014). Citizenship matters: How children of immigrants will sway the future of politics (Report). Los Angeles, CA: Center for the Study of Immigrant Integration.Google Scholar
  36. Pew Research Center. (2006). Regular voters, intermittent voters, and those who don’t: Who votes, who doesn’t, and why (Report). Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
  37. Pew Research Center. (2012). Nonvoters: Who they are, what they think (Report). Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
  38. Pope, N. G. (2016). The effects of DACAmentation: The impact of deferred action for childhood arrivals on unauthorized immigrants. Journal of Public Economics, 143, 98–114.Google Scholar
  39. Preston, J. (2011, December 13). Immigration crackdown also snares Americans. New York Times. Retrieved from
  40. Rocha, R., Knoll, B., & Wrinkle, R. (2015). Immigration enforcement and the redistribution of political trust. Journal of Politics, 77, 901–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schlozman, K. L., Burns, N., Verba, S., & Donahue, J. (1995). Gender and citizen participation: Is there a different voice? American Journal of Political Science, 39, 267–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sherr, S., Levine, J., & Rapp, A. (2014). The college student voter in 2004: Obstacles, outreach, and electoral engagement. New Brunswick: Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers, State University of New Jersey.Google Scholar
  43. Sief, H. (2011). Unapologetic and unafraid: Immigrant youth come out from the shadows. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2011(134), 59–75.Google Scholar
  44. Simanski, J. F. (2014). Immigration enforcement actions: 2013 (Annual Report). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Homeland Security.Google Scholar
  45. Taylor, P., Lopez, M. H., Passel, J. S., & Motel, S. (2011). Unauthorized immigrants: Length of residency, patterns of parenthood (Report). Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
  46. Tran, V. C. (2016). Beyond the ballot box: Age-at-arrival, civic institutions and political participation among Latinos. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 43, 766–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). (2012a). Activated jurisdictions (Report). Washington, DC: ICE. Retrieved from
  48. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). (2012b). Fact sheet: Delegation of Immigration Authority Section 287(g) Immigration and Nationality Act (Report). Washington, DC: ICE. Retrieved from
  49. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). (2012c). IDENT/IAFIS interoperability statistics (Report). Washington, DC: ICE. Retrieved from
  50. Van Hook, J., Bachmeier, J. D., Coffman, D. L., & Harel, O. (2015). Can we spin straw into gold? An evaluation of immigrant legal status imputation approaches. Demography, 52, 329–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Verba, S., & Nie, N. H. (1972). Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  52. Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Watson, T. (2013). Enforcement and immigrant location choice (NBER Working Paper No. 19626). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  54. Watson, T. (2014). Inside the refrigerator: Immigration enforcement and chilling effects in Medicaid participation. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 6(3), 313–338.Google Scholar
  55. Whitaker, L. D. (2008). Voting the gender gap. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  56. White, A. (2016). When threat mobilizes: Immigration enforcement and Latino voter turnout. Political Behavior, 38, 355–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wong, T. K. (2012). 287(g) and the politics of interior immigration control in the United States: Explaining local cooperation with federal immigration authorities. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38, 737–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsSan Diego State UniversitySan DiegoUSA
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsOccidental CollegeLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations