Demography

, Volume 54, Issue 6, pp 2331–2349 | Cite as

Educational Pairings, Motherhood, and Women’s Relative Earnings in Europe

Article

Abstract

As a consequence of the reversal of the gender gap in education, the female partner in a couple now typically has as much as or more education compared with the male partner in most Western countries. This study addresses the implications for the earnings of women relative to their male partners in 16 European countries. Using the 2007 and 2011 rounds of the European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (N = 58,292), we investigate the extent to which international differences in women’s relative earnings can be explained by educational pairings and their interaction with the motherhood penalty on women’s earnings, by international differences in male unemployment, or by cultural gender norms. We find that the newly emerged pattern of hypogamy is associated with higher relative earnings for women in all countries and that the motherhood penalty on relative earnings is considerably lower in hypogamous couples, but neither of these findings can explain away international country differences. Similarly, male unemployment is associated with higher relative earnings for women but cannot explain away the country differences. Against expectations, we find that the hypogamy bonus on women’s relative earnings, if anything, tends to be stronger rather than weaker in countries that exhibit more conservative gender norms.

Keywords

Marriage Educational assortative mating Income Gender roles Educational inequality 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007-2013)/ERC Grant Agreement no. 312290 for the GENDERBALL project. The authors thank Gray Swicegood as well as the anonymous reviewers for many useful comments and suggestions.

Supplementary material

13524_2017_621_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (429 kb)
ESM 1(PDF 429 kb)

References

  1. Anderson, D. J., Binder, M., & Krause, K. (2002). The motherhood wage penalty: Which mothers pay it and why? American Economic Review, 92, 354–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson, A. B., & Marlier, E. (Eds.). (2010). Income and living conditions in Europe. Luxembourg City, Luxembourg: European Union.Google Scholar
  3. Becker, G. S. (1993). A treatise on the family (Enlarged ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bettio, F., Corsi, M., D’Ippoliti, C., Lyberaki, A., Lodovici, M. S., & Verashchagina, A. (2013). The impact of the economic crisis on the situation of women and men and on gender equality policies. Luxembourg City, Luxembourg: European Commission.Google Scholar
  5. Blossfeld, H.-P. (2009). Educational assortative marriage in comparative perspective. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 513–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blossfeld, H.-P., & Timm, A. (2003). Educational systems as marriage markets in modern societies: A conceptual framework. In H.-P. Blossfeld & A. Timm (Eds.), Who marries whom? Educational systems as marriage markets in modern societies (pp. 1–18). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  7. Buchmann, C., & DiPrete, T. A. (2006). The growing female advantage in college completion: The role of family background and academic achievement. American Sociological Review, 71, 515–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Budig, M. J., & England, P. (2001). The wage penalty for motherhood. American Sociological Review, 66, 204–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Budig, M. J., Misra, J., & Boeckmann, I. (2012). The motherhood penalty in cross-national perspective: The importance of work-family policies and cultural attitudes. Social Politics, 19, 163–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Larsen, R. J. (2001). A half century of mate preferences: The cultural evolution of values. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 491–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chesley, N. (2011). Stay-at-home fathers and breadwinning mothers: Gender, couple dynamics, and social change. Gender & Society, 25, 642–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chevalier, A. (2007). Education, occupation and career expectations: Determinants of the gender pay gap for UK graduates. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 69, 819–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Craig, L., & Mullan, K. (2010). Parenthood, gender and work family time in the United States, Australia, Italy, France, and Denmark. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 1344–1361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Creighton, C. (1999). The rise and decline of the male breadwinner family in Britain. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23, 519–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davies, R., & Pierre, G. (2005). The family gap in pay in Europe: A cross-country study. Labour Economics, 12, 469–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Hauw, Y., Grow, A., & Van Bavel, J. (2017). The reversed gender gap in education and assortative mating in Europe. European Journal of Population. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-016-9407-z
  17. Dotti Sani, G. M. (2015). Within-couple inequality in earnings and the relative motherhood penalty. A cross-national study of European countries. European Sociological Review, 31, 667–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dribe, M., & Nystedt, P. (2013). Educational homogamy and gender-specific earnings: Sweden 1990–2009. Demography, 50, 1197–1216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. England, P. (2010). The gender revolution: Uneven and stalled. Gender & Society, 24, 149–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Esping-Andersen, G. (2009). The incomplete revolution. Adapting to women’s new roles. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  21. Esping-Andersen, G., & Billari, F. C. (2015). Re-theorizing family demographics. Population and Development Review, 41, 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Esteve, A., García-Román, J., & Permanyer, I. (2012). The gender-gap reversal in education and its effect on union formation: The end of hypergamy? Population and Development Review, 38, 535–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Esteve, A., Schwartz, C., Van Bavel, J., Permanyer, I., Klesment, M., & Garcia, J. (2016). The end of hypergamy: Global trends and implications. Population and Development Review, 42, 615–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gangl, M., & Ziefle, A. (2009). Motherhood, labor force behavior, and women’s careers: An empirical assessment of the wage penalty for motherhood in Britain, Germany, and the United States. Demography, 46, 341–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goldscheider, F., Bernhardt, E., & Lappegård, T. (2015). The gender revolution: A framework for understanding changing family and demographic behavior. Population and Development Review, 41, 207–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grow, A., & Van Bavel, J. (2015). Assortative mating and the reversal of gender inequality in education in Europe: An agent-based model. PLoS ONE, 10(6), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127806 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hakim, C. (2003). A new approach to explaining fertility patterns: Preference theory. Population and Development Review, 29, 349–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harkness, S., & Waldfogel, J. (2003). The family gap in pay: Evidence from seven industrialized countries. Research in Labor Economics, 22, 369–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Janssens, A. (1997). The rise and decline of the male breadwinner family? An overview of the debate. International Review of Social History, 42(Suppl. 5), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jowell, R., Roberts, C., Fitzgerald, R., & Gillian, E. (2007). Measuring attitudes cross-nationally: Lessons from the European Social Survey. London, UK: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Kalmijn, M. (1991). Shifting boundaries: Trends in religious and educational homogamy. American Sociological Review, 56, 786–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Klesment, M., & Van Bavel, J. (2015). The reversal of the gender gap in education and female breadwinners in Europe (FamiliesAndSocieties Working Paper Series 26). Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm University Department of Sociology.Google Scholar
  33. Klesment, M., & Van Bavel, J. (2017). The reversal of the gender gap in education, motherhood, and women as main earners in Europe. European Sociological Review, 33, 465–481.Google Scholar
  34. Lewis, J. (1992). Gender and the development of welfare regimes. Journal of European Social Policy, 2, 159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lewis, J. (2001). The decline of the male breadwinner model: Implications for work and care. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 8, 152–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lück, D., & Hofäcker, D. (2008). The values of work and care among women in modern societies. In W. van Oorschot, M. Opielka, & B. Pfau-Effinger (Eds.), Culture and welfare state: Values and social policy in comparative perspective (pp. 289–313). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  37. Lundberg, S., & Rose, E. (2000). Parenthood and the earnings of married men and women. Labour Economics, 7, 689–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mare, R. D. (1991). Five decades of educational assortative mating. American Sociological Review, 56, 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mincer, J. (1963). Market prices, opportunity costs, and income effects. In C. Christ (Ed.), Measurement in economics (pp. 67–82). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Molina, J. A., & Montuenga, V. M. (2009). The motherhood wage penalty in Spain. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 30, 237–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Neyer, G., & Andersson, G. (2008). Consequences of family policies on childbearing behavior: Effects or artifacts? Population and Development Review, 34, 699–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nock, S. L. (2001). The marriages of equally dependent spouses. Journal of Family Issues, 22, 755–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2011). Doing better for families. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  44. Pascall, G., & Lewis, J. (2004). Emerging gender regimes and policies for gender equality in a wider Europe. Journal of Social Policy, 33, 373–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Petersen, T., Penner, A. M., & Høgsnes, G. (2010). The within-job motherhood wage penalty in Norway, 1979–1996. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 1274–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pfau-Effinger, B. (1998). Gender cultures and the gender arrangement—A theoretical framework for cross-national gender research. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 11, 147–166.Google Scholar
  47. Raley, S. B., Mattingly, M. J., & Bianchi, S. M. (2006). How dual are dual-income couples? Documenting change from 1970 to 2001. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 11–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schwartz, C. R. (2013). Trends and variation in assortative mating: Causes and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology, 39, 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schwartz, C. R., & Han, H. (2014). The reversal of the gender gap in education and trends in marital dissolution. American Sociological Review, 79, 605–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schwartz, C. R., & Mare, R. D. (2005). Trends in educational assortative marriage from 1940 to 2003. Demography, 42, 621–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sigle-Rushton, W., & Waldfogel, J. (2007). Motherhood and women’s earnings in Anglo-American, continental European, and Nordic countries. Feminist Economics, 13(2), 55–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stier, H., Lewin-Epstein, N., & Braun, M. (2001). Welfare regimes, family-supportive policies, and women’s employment along the life-course. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1731–1760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Thévenon, O. (2011). Family policies in OECD countries: A comparative analysis. Population and Development Review, 37, 57–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2003). International standard classification of education, ISCED 1997. In J. H. P. Hoffmeyer-Slotnik & C. Wolf (Eds.), Advances in cross-national comparison. A European working book for demographic and socio-economic variables (pp. 195–220). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.Google Scholar
  55. Van Bavel, J. (2010). Choice of study discipline and the postponement of motherhood in Europe: The impact of expected earnings, gender composition and family attitudes. Demography, 47, 439–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Van Bavel, J. (2012). The reversal of gender inequality in education, union formation and fertility in Europe. Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 10, 127–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vitali, A., & Arpino, B. (2016). Who brings home the bacon? The influence of context on partners’ contributions to the household income. Demographic Research, 35(41), 1213–1244. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2016.35.41 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vitali, A., & Mendola, D. (2014). Women as main earners in Europe (Centre for Population Change Working Paper No. 56). Southampton, UK: Economic & Social Research Council Centre for Population Change.Google Scholar
  59. Waldfogel, J. (1998). Understanding the “family gap” in pay for women with children. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(1), 137–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wang, W., Parker, K., & Taylor, P. (2013). Breadwinner moms. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
  61. Winkler, A. E. (1998). Earnings of husbands and wives in dual-earner families. Monthly Labor Review, 121(4), 42–48.Google Scholar
  62. Winkler, A. E., McBride, T. D., & Andrews, C. (2005). Wives who outearn their husbands: A transitory or persistent phenomenon for couples? Demography, 42, 523–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Winslow-Bowe, S. (2006). The persistence of wives’ income advantage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68, 824–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Sociological ResearchUniversity of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations