Demography

pp 1–30 | Cite as

Women’s Progress for Men’s Gain? Gender-Specific Changes in the Return to Education as Measured by Family Standard of Living, 1990 to 2009–2011

Article

Abstract

This study investigates gender-specific changes in the total financial return to education among persons of prime working ages (35–44 years) using U.S. Census data from 1990 and 2000, and the 2009–2011 American Community Survey. We define the total financial return to education as the family standard of living as measured by family income adjusted for family size. Our results indicate that women experienced significant progress in educational attainment and labor market outcomes over this time period. Ironically, married women’s progress in education and personal earnings has led to greater improvement in the family standard of living for married men than for women themselves. Gender-specific changes in assortative mating are mostly responsible for this paradoxical trend. Because the number of highly educated women exceeds the number of highly educated men in the marriage market, the likelihood of educational marrying up has substantially increased for men over time while women’s likelihood has decreased. Sensitivity analyses show that the greater improvement in the family standard of living for men than for women is not limited to prime working-age persons but is also evident in the general population. Consequently, women’s return to education through marriage declined while men’s financial gain through marriage increased considerably.

Keywords

Gender Return to education Standard of living Equivalized income Assortative mating 

References

  1. Agarwal, B. (1997). “Bargaining” and gender relations: Within and beyond household. Feminist Economics, 3(1), 1–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aughinbaugh, A., Robles, O., & Sun, H. (2013). Marriage and divorce: Patterns by gender, race, and educational attainment. Monthly Labor Review, October, 1–16.Google Scholar
  3. Bailey, M. J. (2006). More power to the pill: The impact of contraceptive freedom on women’s life cycle labor supply. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121, 289–320.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, G. S. (1991). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bergstrom, T. C. (1996). Economics in a family way. Journal of Economic Literature, 34, 1903–1934.Google Scholar
  6. Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2006). The U.S. gender pay gap in the 1990s: Slowing convergence. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 60, 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brand, J. E., & Davis, D. (2011). The impact of college education on fertility: Evidence for heterogeneous effects. Demography, 48, 863–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Breen, R., & Salazar, L. (2011). Educational assortative mating and earnings inequality in the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 117, 808–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buchmann, C., & DiPrete, T. A. (2006). The growing female advantage in college completion: The role of family background and academic achievement. American Sociological Review, 71, 515–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Larsen, R. J. (2001). A half century of mate preferences: The cultural evolution of values. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 491–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Card, D., & DiNardo, J. E. (2002). Skill–biased technological change and rising wage inequality: Some problems and puzzles. Journal of Labor Economics, 20, 733–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Charles, K. K., & Luoh, M. C. (2003). Gender differences in completed schooling. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85, 559–577.Google Scholar
  13. Cherlin, A. J. (2004). The deinstitutionalization of American marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 848–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cherlin, A. J. (2005). American marriage in the early twenty-first century. Future of Children, 15(2), 33–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DiPrete, T. A., & Buchmann, C. (2006). Gender-specific trends in the value of education and the emerging gender gap in college completion. Demography, 43, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. DiPrete, T. A., & Buchmann, C. (2013). The rise of women: The growing gender gap in eduation and what it means for American schools. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  17. Dougherty, C. (2005). Why are the returns to schooling higher for women than for men? Journal of Human Resources, XL, 969–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. England, P. (2010). The gender revolution: Uneven and stalled. Gender and Society, 24, 149–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. England, P., & Farkas, G. (1986). Households, employment, and gender: A social, economic, and demographic view. New York, NY: Aldine Pub. Co.Google Scholar
  20. Fernandez, R., Guner, N., & Knowles, J. (2005). Love and money: A theoretical and empirical analysis of household sorting and inequality. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120, 273–344.Google Scholar
  21. Goldin, C. (1997). Career and family: College women look to the past. In F. D. Blau & R. G. Ehrenberg (Eds.), Gender and family issues in the workplace (pp. 20–58). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation Press.Google Scholar
  22. Goldin, C. (2006). The quiet revolution that transformed women’s employment, education, and family. American Economic Review, 96, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goldin, C., Katz, L. F., & Kuziemko, I. (2006). The homecoming of American college women: The reversal of the college gender gap. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(4), 133–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grogger, J., & Eide, E. (1995). Changes in college skills and the rise in the college wage premium. Journal of Human Resources, 30, 280–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hubbard, W. H. (2011). The phantom gender difference in the college wage premium. Journal of Human Resources, 46, 568–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kim, C., & Sakamoto, A. (2008). The rise of intra-occupational wage inequality in the United States, 1983 to 2002. American Sociological Review, 73, 129–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lehrer, E., & Nerlove, M. (1986). Female labor force behavior and fertility in the United States. Annual Review of Sociology, 12, 181–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Leicht, K. T. (2008). Broken down by race and gender? Sociological explanations of new sources of earnings inequality. Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 237–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Long, M. C. (2010). Changes in the returns to education and college quality. Economics of Education Review, 29, 338–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lundberg, S. J., Pollak, R. A., & Wales, T. J. (1997). Do husbands and wives pool their resources? Evidence from the United Kingdom Child Benefit. Journal of Human Resources, 32, 463–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mandel, H., & Semyonov, M. (2014). Gender pay gap and employment sector: Sources of earnings disparities in the United States, 1970–2010. Demography, 51, 1597–1618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mare, R. D. (1991). Five decades of educational assortative mating. American Sociological Review, 56, 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McCall, L. (2000). Explaining levels of within-group wage inequality in U.S. labor markets. Demography, 37, 415–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McKinnish, T. (2008). Spousal mobility and earnings. Demography, 45, 829–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Morris, M., & Western, B. (1999). Inequality in earnings at the close of the twentieth century. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 623–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Murphy, K. M., & Welch, F. (1992). The structure of wages. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 285–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Musick, K., England, P., Edgington, S., & Kangas, N. (2009). Education differences in intended and unintended fertility. Social Forces, 88, 543–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Oppenheimer, V. K. (1994). Women’s rising employment and the future of the family in industrial societies. Population and Development Review, 20, 293–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Oppenheimer, V. K. (1997). Women’s employment and the gain to marriage: The specialization and trading model. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 431–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Parker, K., Horowitz, J. M., & Rohal, M. (2015). Parenting in America: Outlook, worries, aspirations are strongly linked to financial situation (Pew Research Center report). Retrieved from http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2015/12/17/parenting-in-america/
  41. Ruggles, S., Genadek, K., Goeken, R., Grover, J., & Sobek, M. (2015). Integrated Public Use Microdata Series: Version 6.0 [Data set]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  42. Schwartz, C. R. (2013). Trends and variation in assortative mating: Causes and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology, 39, 451–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schwartz, C. R., & Han, H. (2014). The reversal of the gender gap in education and trends in marital dissolution. American Sociological Review, 79, 605–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schwartz, C. R., & Mare, R. D. (2005). Trends in educational assortative marriage from 1940 to 2003. Demography, 42, 621–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Snyder, T. D., Dillow, S. A., & Hoffman, C. M. (2008). Digest of education statistics, 2007 (NCES Report No. 2008-022). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  46. Stiglitz, J., Sen, A., & Fitoussi, J.-P. (2009). The measurement of economic performance and social progress revisited: Reflections and overview (OFCE Report No. 2009-33). Paris, France: Centre de Recherche en Économie de Sciences Po.Google Scholar
  47. Sullivan, O. (2006). Changing gender relations, changing families: Tracing the pace of change over time. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  48. Sweeney, M. M. (2002). Two decades of family change: The shifting economic foundations of marriage. American Sociological Review, 67, 132–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sweeney, M. M., & Cancian, M. (2004). The changing importance of white women’s economic prospects for assortative mating. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1015–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tomaskovic-Devey, D., Zimmer, C., Stainback, K., Robinson, C., Taylor, T., & McTague, T. (2006). Documenting desegregation: Segregation in American workplaces by race, ethnicity, and sex 1966–2000. American Sociological Review, 71, 565–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wang, W. (2014). Record share of wives are more educated than their husbands. Pew Research Center Fact Tank. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/02/12/record-share-of-wives-are-more-educated-than-their-husbands/

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations