Advertisement

Demography

, Volume 54, Issue 4, pp 1425–1449 | Cite as

Postmarital Living Arrangements in Historically Patrilocal Settings: Integrating Household Fission and Migration Perspectives

  • Jessica PearlmanEmail author
  • Lisa D. Pearce
  • Dirgha J. Ghimire
  • Prem Bhandari
  • Taylor Hargrove
Article

Abstract

This study integrates theory and research on household fission (or partition) and migration to better understand living arrangements following marriage, especially in historically patrilocal and primarily agricultural settings. Using panel data from the Chitwan Valley Family Study to analyze the sequential decision-making process that influences men’s living arrangements subsequent to first marriage, we demonstrate the importance of distinguishing among extended family living, temporary migration, and the establishment of an independent household. We find that community economic characteristics, such as access to markets or employment, as well as household wealth affect the initial decision to leave the natal home. Household resources and use of farmland, along with the young men’s own education, media exposure, travel, and marital behavior, influence the decision to make the departure from the natal home permanent. Our findings explain why previous results regarding household fission and those focused on migration have provided such mixed results, and we establish a new framework for thinking about how families and individuals manage living situations.

Keywords

Living arrangements Household fission Migration Family structure Nepal 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank two anonymous Demography reviewers for helpful comments and suggestions. This research was supported by generous grants from the National Science Foundation, Partnerships in International Research and Education (OISE 0729709), and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P2C HD050924 and T32 HD007168).

References

  1. Allendorf, K. (2013). Schemas of marital change: From arranged marriages to eloping for love. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75, 453–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amin, S. (1998). Family structure and change in rural Bangladesh. Population Studies, 52, 201–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Axinn, W. G., Ghimire, D. J., & Barber, J. S. (2008). The influence of ideational dimensions of social change on family formation in Nepal. In R. Jayakody, A. Thornton, & W. Axinn (Eds.), International family change: Ideational perspectives (pp. 251–280). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  4. Axinn, W. G., & Yakibu, S. T. (2001). Social change, the social organization of families, and fertility limitation. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1219–1261.Google Scholar
  5. Barber, J. S., & Axinn, W. G. (2004). New ideas and fertility limitation: The role of mass media. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1180–1200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhandari, P. (2004). Relative deprivation and migration in an agricultural setting of Nepal. Population and Environment, 25, 475–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bilsborrow, R. E., McDevitt, T. M., Kossoudji, S., & Fuller, R. (1987). The impact of origin community characteristics on rural-urban out-migration in a developing country. Demography, 24, 191–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bista, D. B. (1991). Fatalism and development: Nepal’s struggle for modernization. Mumbai, India: Orient Blackswan.Google Scholar
  9. Bohra, P., & Massey, D. S. (2009). Processes of internal and international migration from Chitwan, Nepal. International Migration Review, 43, 621–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brauner-Otto, S. R. (2009). Schools, schooling and children’s support of their aging parents in rural Nepal. Ageing & Society, 29, 1015–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen, K.-P., Chiang, S.-H., & Leung, S. F. (2003). Migration, family, and risk diversification. Journal of Labor Economics, 21, 353–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Conklin, G. H. (1976). The household in urban India. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 771–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Conklin, G. H. (1988). The influence of economic development on patterns of conjugal power and extended family residence in India. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 19, 187–205.Google Scholar
  14. DaVanzo, J., & Chan, A. (1994). Living arrangements of older Malaysians: Who coresides with their adult children? Demography, 31, 95–113.Google Scholar
  15. Davis, K., & Blake, J. (1956). Social structure and fertility: An analytic framework. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 4, 211–235.Google Scholar
  16. DeVos, S. (1989). Leaving the parental home: Patterns in six Latin American countries. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 615–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dubin, J. A., & Rivers, D. (1989). Selection bias in linear regression, logit and probit models. Sociological Methods & Research, 18, 360–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Foster, A. D. (1993). Household partition in rural Bangladesh. Population Studies, 47, 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ghimire, D. J., Axinn, W. G., Yabiku, S. T., & Thornton, A. (2006). Social change, premarital nonfamily experience, and spouse choice in an arranged marriage society. American Journal of Sociology, 111, 1181–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Glick, P. C. (1947). The family life cycle. American Sociological Review, 12, 164–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Glick, P. C. (1989). The family life cycle and social change. Family Relations, 38, 123–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Government of Nepal. (2014). Labour migration for employment: A status report for Nepal: 2013/2014. Kathmandu, Nepal: Government of Nepal, Ministry of Labour and Employment, Department of Foreign Employment.Google Scholar
  23. Hajnal, J. (1982). Two kinds of preindustrial household formation system. Population and Development Review, 8, 449–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hsiao, C. (2003). Analysis of panel data (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Johnson, R. W., & DaVanzo, J. (1998). Economic and cultural influences on the decision to leave home in peninsular Malaysia. Demography, 35, 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jones, G. (2012). Changing family sizes, structures and functions in Asia. Asia-Pacific Population Journal, 27(1), 83–102.Google Scholar
  27. Kollmair, M., Manandhar, S., Subedi, B. P., & Thieme, S. (2006). New figures for old stories: Migration and remittance in Nepal. Migration Letters, 3, 151–160.Google Scholar
  28. Krishnaji, N. (1995). Family size and wealth—Standing Chayanov on his head in the Indian context. Journal of Peasant Studies, 22, 261–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lavely, W., & Ren, X. (1992). Patrilocality and early marital co-residence in rural China, 1955–85. China Quarterly, 130, 378–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Liu, J., An, L., Batie, S. S., Bearer, S. L., Chen, X., Groop, R. E., . . . Zhou, S. (2005). Beyond population size: Examining intricate interactions among population structure, land use, and environment in Wolong Nature Reserve, China. In B. Entwisle & P. C. Stern (Eds.), Population, land use, and environment: Research directions (pp. 217–237). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  31. Liu, J., Daily, G. C., Ehrlich, P. R., & Luck, G. W. (2003). Effects of household dynamics on resource consumption and biodiversity. Nature, 421, 530–533.Google Scholar
  32. Macht, C. (2008, April). Spousal emotional nucleation and fertility limitation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  33. Massey, D. S., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A., & Taylor, J. E. (1993). Theories of international migration: A review and appraisal. Population and Development Review, 19, 431–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Massey, D. S., Axinn, W. G., & Ghimire, D. J. (2010b). Environmental change and out-migration: Evidence from Nepal. Population and Environment, 32, 109–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Massey, D. S., Williams, N., Axinn, W. G., & Ghimire, D. J. (2010a). Community services and outmigration. International Migration, 48(3), 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mir-Hosseini, Z. (1987). Impact of wage labour on household fission in rural Iran. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 18, 445–461.Google Scholar
  37. Moran, E. F., Brondízio, E. S., & VanWey, L. K. (2005). Population and environment in Amazônia: Landscape and household dynamics. In B. Entwisle & P. C. Stern (Eds.), Population, land use and the environment: Research directions (pp. 106–134). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  38. Niranjan, S., Nair, S., & Roy, T. K. (2005). A socio-demographic analysis of the size and structure of the family in India. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 36, 623–648.Google Scholar
  39. Pattisson, P. (2014, December 15). For aspiring Nepali migrants, the risks start at home. AlJazeera America. Retrieved from http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2014/12/15/for-aspiring-nepalimigrantstherisksstartathome.html
  40. Pienta, A., Barber, J. S., & Axinn, W. G. (2001). Social change and adult children’s attitudes toward support of elderly parents: Evidence from Nepal. Hallym International Journal of Aging, 3, 211–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Piotrowski, M. (2008). Migrant remittances and household division: The case of Nang Rong, Thailand. Journal of Marriage and Family, 70, 1074–1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Piotrowski, M. (2013). Mass media and rural out-migration in the context of social change: Evidence from Nepal. International Migration, 51(3), 169–193.Google Scholar
  43. Piotrowski, M., Ghimire, D., & Rindfuss, R. R. (2013). Farming systems and rural out-migration in Nang Rong, Thailand, and Chitwan Valley, Nepal. Rural Sociology, 78, 75–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Roberts, K. D. (1997). China’s “tidal wave” of migrant labor: What can we learn from Mexican undocumented migration to the United States? International Migration Review, 31, 249–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ruggles, S. (2009). Reconsidering the northwest European family system: Living arrangements of the aged in comparative historical perspective. Population and Development Review, 35, 249–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sana, M., & Massey, D. S. (2005). Household composition, family migration, and community context: Migrant remittances in four countries. Social Science Quarterly, 86, 509–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sereny, M. (2011). Living arrangements of older adults in China: The interplay among preferences, realities, and health. Research on Aging, 33, 172–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shrestha, B. (2008). Contribution of foreign employment and remittances to Nepalese economy. NRB Economic Review, 20, 1–15.Google Scholar
  49. Shrestha, S. S., & Bhandari, P. (2007). Environmental security and labor migration in Nepal. Population and Environment, 29, 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Smith, D. S. (1993). The curious history of theorizing about the history of the western nuclear family. Social Science History, 17, 325–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stark, O. (1991). The migration of labor. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell Inc.Google Scholar
  52. Stevenson, T. B. (1997). Migration, family and household in highland Yemen: The impact of socio-economic and political change and cultural ideals on domestic organization. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 28(2), 14–53.Google Scholar
  53. Sung, L. S. (1971). Household scale, wealth and modernization in a Puyuma village in Taiwan. Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology, 32, 287–296.Google Scholar
  54. Thieme, S., & Wyss, S. (2005). Migration patterns and remittance transfer in Nepal: A case study of Sainik Basti in western Nepal. International Migration, 43(5), 59–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Thornton, A. (2004). Reading history sideways: The fallacy and enduring impact of the developmental paradigm on family life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  56. Thornton, A., Fricke, T., Yang, L.-S., & Chang, J.-S. (1994). Theoretical mechanisms of family change. In A. Thornton & H.-S. Lin (Eds.), Social change and the family in Taiwan (pp. 88–115). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  57. VanWey, L. K. (2003). Land ownership as a determinant of temporary migration in Nang Rong, Thailand. European Journal of Population, 19, 121–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. VanWey, L. K. (2005). Land ownership as a determinant of international and internal migration in Mexico and internal migration in Thailand. International Migration Review, 39, 141–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. VanWey, L. K., & Cebulko, K. B. (2007). Intergenerational coresidence among small farmers in Brazilian Amazonia. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 1257–1270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Williams, N. (2009). Education, gender, and migration in the context of social change. Social Science Research, 38, 883–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Winters, P., Stecklov, G., & Todd, J. (2009). Household structure and short-run change in Nicaragua. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 708–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wong, F.-M. (1975). Industrialization and family structure in Hong Kong. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 37, 985–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Yabiku, S. T. (2005). The effect of non-family experiences on age of marriage in a setting of rapid social change. Population Studies, 59, 339–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yadava, J. S. (1966). Changing family structure in a Delhi village. Anthropologist, 13, 21–31.Google Scholar
  65. Yi, Z. (1986). Changes in family structure in China: A simulation study. Population and Development Review, 12, 675–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zhang, W. (2002). Changing nature of family relations in a Hebei village in China. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 32, 147–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jessica Pearlman
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lisa D. Pearce
    • 2
  • Dirgha J. Ghimire
    • 3
  • Prem Bhandari
    • 3
  • Taylor Hargrove
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for Social Science ResearchUniversity of MassachusettsAmherstUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillChapel HillUSA
  3. 3.Population Studies CenterUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations