Demography

, Volume 54, Issue 3, pp 1073–1095

Optimizing the Lee-Carter Approach in the Presence of Structural Changes in Time and Age Patterns of Mortality Improvements

Article

Abstract

Researchers using the Lee-Carter approach have often assumed that the time-varying index evolves linearly and that the parameters describing the age pattern of mortality decline are time-invariant. However, as several empirical studies suggest, the two assumptions do not seem to hold when the calibration window begins too early. This problem gives rise to the question of identifying the longest calibration window for which the two assumptions hold true. To address this question, we contribute a likelihood ratio–based sequential test to jointly test whether the two assumptions are satisfied. Consistent with the mortality structural changes observed in previous studies, our testing procedure indicates that the starting points of the optimal calibration windows for most populations fall between 1960 and 1990. Using an out-of-sample analysis, we demonstrate that in most cases, models that are estimated to the optimized calibration windows result in more accurate forecasts than models that are fitted to all available data or data beyond 1950. We further apply the proposed testing procedure to data over different age ranges. We find that the optimal calibration windows for age group 0–49 are generally shorter than those for age group 50–89, indicating that mortality at younger ages might have undergone (another) structural change in recent years.

Keywords

Mortality trend changes Age pattern of mortality decline Mortality forecasting Lee-Carter model 

Supplementary material

13524_2017_579_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (113 kb)
ESM 1(PDF 112 kb)

References

  1. Anderson, C. M., Burns, D. M., Dodd, K. W., & Feuer, E. J. (2012). Birth-cohort-specific estimates of smoking behaviors for the US population. Risk Analysis, 32(Suppl. 1), S14–S24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong, G. L., Conn, L. A., & Pinner, R. W. (1999). Trends in infectious disease mortality in the United States during the 20th century. JAMA, 281, 61–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnes, R. F., Moore, M. L., Garfein, R. S., Brodine, S., Strathdee, S. A., & Rodwell, T. C. (2011). Trends in mortality of tuberculosis patients in the United States: The long-term perspective. Annals of Epidemiology, 21, 791–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Booth, H., Hyndman, R., Tickle, L., & De Jong, P. (2006). Lee-Carter mortality forecasting: A multi-country comparison of variants and extensions. Demographic Research, 15(article 9), 289–310. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2006.15.9
  5. Booth, H., Maindonald, J., & Smith, L. (2002). Applying Lee-Carter under conditions of variable mortality decline. Population Studies, 56, 325–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Booth, H., & Tickle, L. (2008). Mortality modelling and forecasting: A review of methods. Annals of Actuarial Science, 3, 3–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brouhns, N., Denuit, M., Vermunt, J. K. (2002). A Poisson log-bilinear regression approach to the construction of projected lifetables. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 31, 373–393.Google Scholar
  8. Case, A., & Deaton, A. (2015). Rising morbidity and mortality in midlife among white non-Hispanic Americans in the 21st century. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 15078–15083.Google Scholar
  9. Chen, Y., Härdle, W. K., & Pigorsch, U. (2010). Localized realized volatility modeling. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105, 1376–1393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen, Y., & Niu, L. (2014). Adaptive dynamic Nelson–Siegel term structure model with applications. Journal of Econometrics, 180, 98–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coelho, E., & Nunes, L. C. (2011). Forecasting mortality in the event of a structural change. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A: Statistics in Society, 174, 713–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hatzopoulos, P., & Haberman, S. (2009). A parameterized approach to modeling and forecasting mortality. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 44, 103–123.Google Scholar
  13. Horiuchi, S., & Wilmoth, J. (1995, April). Aging of mortality decline. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  14. Hyndman, R. J., & Booth, H. (2008). Stochastic population forecasts using functional data models for mortality, fertility and migration. International Journal of Forecasting, 24, 323–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hyndman, R. J., Booth, H., & Yasmeen, F. (2013). Coherent mortality forecasting: The product-ratio method with functional time series models. Demography, 50, 261–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hyndman, R. J., & Ullah, M. S. (2007). Robust forecasting of mortality and fertility rates: A functional data approach. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 51, 4942–4956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Japan International Cooperation Agency. (2005). Japan’s experiences in public health and medical systems (Technical report). Tokyo, Japan: Institute for International Cooperation.Google Scholar
  18. Kannisto, V., Lauritsen, J., Thatcher, A. R., & Vaupel, J. W. (1994). Reductions in mortality at advanced ages: Several decades of evidence from 27 countries. Population and Development Review, 20, 793–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee, R., & Miller, T. (2001). Evaluating the performance of the Lee-Carter method for forecasting mortality. Demography, 38, 537–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee, R. D., & Carter, L. R. (1992). Modeling and forecasting US mortality. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87, 659–671.Google Scholar
  21. Li, H., De Waegenaere, A., & Melenberg, B. (2015). The choice of sample size for mortality forecasting: A Bayesian learning approach. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 63, 153–168.Google Scholar
  22. Li, J. S.-H., Chan, W.-S., & Cheung, S.-H. (2011). Structural changes in the Lee-Carter mortality indexes: Detection and implications. North American Actuarial Journal, 15, 13–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Li, N., & Lee, R. (2005). Coherent mortality forecasts for a group of populations: An extension of the Lee-Carter method. Demography, 42, 575–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Li, N., Lee, R., & Gerland, P. (2013). Extending the Lee-Carter method to model the rotation of age patterns of mortality decline for long-term projections. Demography, 50, 2037–2051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lundström, H., & Qvist, J. (2004). Mortality forecasting and trend shifts: An application of the Lee–Carter model to Swedish mortality data. International Statistical Review, 72, 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mori, T. (2000). Recent trends in tuberculosis, Japan. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 6, 566–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pitacco, E., Denuit, M., Haberman, S., & Olivieri, A. (2009). Modelling longevity dynamics for pensions and annuity business. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Sweeting, P. (2011). A trend-change extension of the Cairns-Blake-Dowd model. Annals of Actuarial Science, 5, 143–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tuljapurkar, S., Li, N., & Boe, C. (2000). A universal pattern of mortality decline in the G7 countries. Nature, 405, 789–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1991). Strategies to control tobacco use in the United States: A blueprint for public health action in the 1990’s (Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph No. 1). Bethesda, MD: Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Cancer Institute.Google Scholar
  31. Van Berkum, F., Antonio, K., & Vellekoop, M. (2016). The impact of multiple structural changes on mortality predictions. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 7, 581–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wilmoth, J. R. (1993). Computational methods for fitting and extrapolating the Lee-Carter model of mortality change (Technical report). Berkeley: Department of Demography, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  33. World Health Organization (WHO). (n.d.). Tuberculosis (Fact sheet). Geneva, Switzerland: WHO. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs104/en/

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of FinanceNankai UniversityTianjinPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Department of Statistics and Actuarial ScienceUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations