, Volume 54, Issue 2, pp 437–458 | Cite as

Emotional Variation and Fertility Behavior

  • William G. AxinnEmail author
  • Dirgha J. Ghimire
  • Emily Smith-Greenaway


Emotional influences on fertility behaviors are an understudied topic that may offer a clear explanation of why many couples choose to have children even when childbearing is not economically rational. With setting-specific measures of the husband-wife emotional bond appropriate for large-scale population research matched with data from a long-term panel study, we have the empirical tools to provide a test of the influence of emotional factors on contraceptive use to limit fertility. This article presents those tests. We use long-term, multilevel community and family panel data to demonstrate that the variance in levels of husband-wife emotional bond is significantly associated with their subsequent use of contraception to avert births. We discuss the wide-ranging implications of this intriguing new result.


Fertility limitation Spousal emotions Contraceptive use Family change 



This research was jointly supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD32912 and R03HD055976) and the Fogarty International Center (5D43TW000657). The authors thank Cathy Sun for assistance with data management and analyses, the research staff at the Institute for Social and Environmental Research in Nepal for collecting the data reported here, and the CVFS respondents who continuously welcome us into their homes and share their invaluable experiences, opinions, and thoughts. All errors and omissions remain the responsibility of the authors. Conflict of interest: Dr. Ghimire is also the Director of the Institute for Social and Environmental Research in Nepal (ISER-N) that collected the data for the research reported here. Dr. Ghimire’s conflict of interest management plan is approved and monitored by the Regents of the University of Michigan.


  1. Ahearn, L. M. (2001). Invitations to love: Literacy, love letters, and social change in Nepal. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allendorf, K. (2009). The quality of family relationships, women’s agency, and maternal and child health in India (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  3. Allendorf, K., & Ghimire, D. J. (2013). Determinants of marital quality in an arranged marriage society. Social Science Research, 42, 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allison, P. D. (1982). Discrete-time methods for the analysis of event histories. In S. Leihardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 61–98). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  5. Allison, P. D. (1984). Event history analysis: Regression for longitudinal event data. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  6. Axinn, W. G. (1992). Family organization and fertility limitation in Nepal. Demography, 29, 503–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Axinn, W. G., & Barber, J. S. (2001). Mass education and fertility transition. American Sociological Review, 66, 481–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Axinn, W. G., Barber, J. S., & Ghimire, D. J. (1997). The neighborhood history calendar: A data collection method designed for dynamic multilevel modeling. Sociological Methodology, 27, 355–392.Google Scholar
  9. Axinn, W. G., & Pearce, L. D. (2006). Mixed method data collection strategies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Axinn, W. G., Pearce, L. D., & Ghimire, D. J. (1999). Innovations in life history calendar applications. Social Science Research, 28, 243–264.Google Scholar
  11. Axinn, W. G., & Yabiku, S. T. (2001). Social change, the social organization of families, and fertility limitation. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1219–1261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Barber, J. S. (2000). Intergenerational influences on the entry into parenthood: Mothers’ preferences for family and nonfamily behavior. Social Forces, 79, 319–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Barber, J. S. (2001). The intergenerational transmission of age at first birth among married and unmarried men and women. Social Science Research, 30, 219–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Barber, J. S., & Axinn, W. G. (2004). New ideas and fertility limitation: The role of mass media. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1180–1200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Barber, J. S., Murphy, S., Axinn, W. G., & Maples, J. (2000). Discrete-time multilevel hazard analysis. Sociological Methodology, 30, 201–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Barber, J. S., Pearce, L. D., Chaudhury, I., & Gurung, S. (2002). Voluntary associations and fertility limitation. Social Forces, 80, 1369–1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Basu, A. M. (2006). The emotions and reproductive health. Population and Development Review, 32, 107–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Becker, G. S. (1991). A treatise on the family. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Belli, R. F. (1998). The structure of autobiographical memory and the event history calendar: Potential improvements in the quality of retrospective reports in surveys. Memory, 6, 383–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bennett, L. (1976). Sex and motherhood among the Brahmins and Chhetris of East Central Nepal. Contributions to Nepalese Studies, 3(Special Issue), 1–52.Google Scholar
  21. Bennett, L. (1983). Dangerous wives and sacred sisters: Social and symbolic roles of high caste women in Nepal. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Bista, D. B. (1972). People of Nepal. Kathmandu, Nepal: Ratna Pustak Bhandar.Google Scholar
  23. Blaikie, P., Cameron, J., & Seddon, D. (1980). Nepal in crisis: Growth and stagnation at the periphery. Dehli, India: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Bongaarts, J. (1982). The fertility-inhibiting effects of the intermediate fertility variables. Studies in Family Planning, 13, 178–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Brauner-Otto, S. R. (2011). The effect of flora quality on fertility behavior. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Demographic Association, Tallahassee, FL.Google Scholar
  26. Brauner-Otto, S. R. (2012). Schools, their spatial distribution and characteristics, and fertility limitation. Rural Sociology, 77, 321–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Brauner-Otto, S., Axinn, W. G., & Ghimire, D. J. (2007). The spread of health services and fertility transition. Demography, 44, 747–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Bulatao, R. A., & Lee, R. D. (Eds.). (1983). Determinants of fertility in developing countries. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  29. Caldwell, J. C. (1982). Theory of fertility decline. London, UK: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  30. Caldwell, J. C., Reddy, P. H., & Caldwell, P. (1983). The causes of marriage change in South India. Population Studies, 37, 343–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Caldwell, J. C., Reddy, P. H., & Caldwell, P. (1988). The causes of demographic change: Experimental research in South India. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  32. Cleland, J., & Hobcraft, J. (1985). Reproductive change in developing countries: Insights from the World Fertility Survey. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Cleland, J., & Wilson, C. (1987). Demand theories of fertility transition: An iconoclastic view. Population Studies, 41, 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Coale, A. J., & Watkins, S. C. (Eds.). (1986). The decline of fertility in Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Cochrane, S. H. (1979). Fertility and education: What do we really know? Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Coontz, S. (2005). Marriage, a history from obedience to intimacy, or how love conquered marriage. New York, NY: Viking.Google Scholar
  37. Davis, K. (1955). Institutional patterns favoring high fertility in underdeveloped areas. Eugenics Quarterly, 2, 33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Degler, C. N. (1980). At odds: Women and the family in America from the Revolution to the present. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Easterlin, R. A., & Crimmins, E. N. (1985). The fertility revolution: A demand–supply analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  40. Elder, G. H., Jr. (1983). The life course perspective. In M. Gordon (Ed.), The American family in social-historical perspective (pp. 54–60). New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  41. Elder, G. H., Jr. (1985). The life course dynamics: Trajectories and transitions: 1968–1980. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Elder, G. H., Jr. (1994). Time, human agency, and social change: Perspective on the life course. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 4–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Entwisle, B., & Mason, W. M. (1985). Multilevel effects of socioeconomic development and family planning programs on children ever born. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 616–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Entwisle, B., Rindfuss, R. R., Walsh, S. J., Evans, T. P., & Curran, S. R. (1997). Geographic information systems, spatial network analysis, and contraceptive choice. Demography, 34, 171–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Freedman, D., Thornton, A., Camburn, D., Alwin, D., & Young-DeMarco, L. (1988). The life history calendar: A technique for collecting retrospective data. Sociological Methodology, 18, 37–68.Google Scholar
  46. Freedman, R. (1979). Theories of fertility decline: A reappraisal. Social Forces, 58, 1–17.Google Scholar
  47. Fricke, T. E. (1986). Himalayan households: Tamang demography and domestic processes. Ann Arbor, MI: University Microfilms Research Press.Google Scholar
  48. Fuller, C. J., & Narasimhan, H. (2008). Companionate marriage in India: The changing marriage system in a middle-class Brahman subcaste. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 14, 736–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ghimire, D. J. (2015). Wives’ and husbands’ nonfamily experiences and first-birth timing. International Journal of Sociology, 45, 4–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ghimire, D. J., & Axinn, W. G. (2006). Family change in Nepal: Evidence from Western Chitwan. Contributions to Nepalese Studies, 33, 177–201.Google Scholar
  51. Ghimire, D. J., & Axinn, W. G. (2013). Marital processes, arranged marriage, and contraception to limit fertility. Demography, 50, 1663–1686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ghimire, D. J., Axinn, W. G., Yabiku, S. T., & Thornton, A. (2006). Social change, premarital nonfamily experience, and spouse choice in an arranged marriage society. American Journal of Sociology, 111, 1181–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Glenn, N. D., & McLanahan, S. (1982). Children and marital happiness: A further specification of the relationship. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 44, 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Goode, W. (1959). The theoretical importance of love. American Sociological Review, 24, 38–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Goode, W. (1963). World revolution and family patterns. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  56. Gottman, J. M. (1979). Marital interaction: Experimental investigations. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  57. Gottman, J. M. (1998). Psychology and the study of marital processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 169–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Gottman, J. M., & Notarius, C. I. (2002). Marital research in the twentieth century and a research agenda for the twenty-first century. Family Process, 41, 159–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Guneratne, U. A. (1994). The Tharus of Chitwan: Ethnicity, class and the state in Nepal (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Department of Anthropology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  60. Gurung, H. B. (1980). Vignettes of Nepal. Kathmandu, Nepal: Sajha Prakashan.Google Scholar
  61. Hamon, R. R., & Ingoldsby, B. B. (2003). Mate selection across cultures. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  62. Hart, K. (2007). Love by arrangement: The ambiguity of “spousal choice” in a Turkish village. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 13, 345–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Hobcraft, J. (2006). The ABC of demographic behavior: How the interplays of alleles, brains, and contexts over the life course should shape research aimed at understanding population processes. Population Studies, 60, 153–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Hoelter, L. F., Axinn, W. G., & Ghimire, D. J. (2004). Social change, premarital non-family experiences, and marital dynamics. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1131–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Khandelwal, M. (2009). Arranging love: Interrogating the vantage point in cross-border feminism. Signs, 34, 583–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Knodel, J. (1987). Starting, stopping, and spacing during the early stage of fertility transition: The experiences of German village population in the 18th and 19th centuries. Demography, 24, 143–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Lasee, A., & Becker, S. (1997). Husband-wife communication about family planning and contraceptive use in Kenya. International Family Planning Perspectives, 23, 15–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Lesthaeghe, R. (1983). A century of demographic and cultural change in Western Europe: An exploration of underlying dimensions. Population and Development Review, 9, 411–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Lesthaeghe, R., & Wilson, C. (1986). Modes of production, secularization, and the pace of fertility decline in Western Europe, 1870–1930. In A. Coale & S. C. Watkins (Eds.), The decline of fertility in Europe (pp. 261–292). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Lillard, L. A., & Waite, L. J. (1993). A joint model of childbearing and marital disruption. Demography, 30, 653–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Link, C. F. (2011). Spousal communication and contraceptive use in rural Nepal: An event history analysis. Studies in Family Planning, 42, 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Macfarlane, A. (1976). Resources and population: A study of the Gurungs of Nepal. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Malhotra, A. (1991). Gender and changing generational relations: Spouse choice in Indonesia. Demography, 28, 549–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Mason, K. O., & Smith, H. L. (2000). Husbands’ versus wives’ fertility goals and use of contraception: The influence of gender context in five Asian countries. Demography, 37, 299–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Massey, D. S. (2002). A brief history of human society: The origin and role of emotions in social life. American Sociological Review, 67, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Matthews, D. J. (1989). Love and marriage in modern Nepali literature. Kailash, 15, 157–178.Google Scholar
  77. Medora, N. P. (2003). Mate selection in contemporary India. In R. R. Hamon & B. B. Ingoldsby (Eds.), Mate selection across cultures (pp. 209–230). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  78. Ministry of Health and Population (MOHP) [Nepal], New ERA, and ICF International Inc. (2012). Nepal Demographic and Health Survey 2011. Kathmandu, Nepal: Ministry of Health and Population and New ERA; Calverton, MD: ICF International.Google Scholar
  79. Morgan, S. P., & Niraula, B. B. (1995). Gender inequality and fertility in two Nepali villages. Population and Development Review, 21, 541–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Norton, R. (1983). Measuring marital quality: A critical look at the dependent variable. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Notestein, F. (1953). Economic problem of population change. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference of Agricultural Economics (pp. 13–31). London, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Pasupathi, M. (2002). Arranged marriage: What’s love got to do with it? In M. Yalom & L. L. Carstensen (Eds.), Inside the American couple: New thinking, new challenges (pp. 211–235). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  83. Patico, J. (2010). From modern loves to universal passions: Ethnographies of love, marriage, and globalization. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 17, 372–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Peters, H. E. (1986). Marriage and divorce: Informational constraints and private contracting. American Economic Review, 76, 437–454.Google Scholar
  85. Petersen, T. (1986). Estimating fully parametric hazard rate models with time-dependent covariates: Use of maximum likelihood. Sociological Methods and Research, 14, 219–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Petersen, T. (1991). The statistical analysis of event histories. Sociological Methods and Research, 19, 270–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Prasad, K. N., Ingalgeri, B. M., Poovitha, R., Sujitha, E., Sukanya, K., Singh, T. B., . . . Viswanath, V.. (2015). Study on the reproductive behavior among women of rural areas of Pondicherry. International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 4, 185–188.Google Scholar
  88. Ramachandran, R. (2010). Hinduism in the context of Manusmriti, Vedas and Bhagavat Gita. New Dehli, India: Vitasta Publishing.Google Scholar
  89. Rindfuss, R. R., & Morgan, S. P. (1983). Marriage, sex, and the first birth interval: The quiet revolution in Asia. Population and Development Review, 9, 259–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Rindfuss, R. R., Morgan, S. P., & Swicegood, G. (1988). First birth in America: Changes in the timing of parenthood. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  91. Salway, S. (1994). How attitudes toward family planning and discussion between wives and husbands affect contraceptive use in Ghana. International Family Planning Perspectives, 20(44–47), 74.Google Scholar
  92. Satayavada, A., & Adamchak, D. J. (2000). Determinants of current use of contraception and children ever born in Nepal. Social Biology, 47, 51–61.Google Scholar
  93. Shakya, K., & Gubhaju, B. (2016). Factors contributing to fertility decline in Nepal. Journal of Population and Social Studies, 24, 13–29.Google Scholar
  94. Sharan, M., & Valente, T. W. (2002). Spousal communication and family planning adoption: Effects of a radio drama serial in Nepal. International Family Planning Perspectives, 28, 16–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Skirbekk, V. (2008). Fertility trends by social status. Demographic Research, 18(article 5), 145–180. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2008.18.5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Sorenson, A. M. (1989). Husbands’ and wives’ characteristics and fertility decisions: A diagonal mobility model. Demography, 26, 125–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Stone, L. (1978). Cultural repercussion of childlessness and low fertility in Nepal. Journal of the Research Center for Nepal and Asian Studies, 5, 6–36.Google Scholar
  98. Stone, N., & Ingham, R. (2002). Factors affecting British teenagers’ contraceptive use at first intercourse: The importance of partner communication. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 34, 191–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Thompson, W. (1929). Population. American Journal of Sociology, 34, 959–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Thornton, A. (1978). Marital instability differentials and interactions: Insights from multivariate contingency table analysis. Sociology and Social Research, 62, 572–595.Google Scholar
  101. Thornton, A. (2001). The developmental paradigm, reading history sideways, and family change. Demography, 38, 449–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Thornton, A. (2005). Reading history sideways: The fallacy and enduring impact of the developmental paradigm on family life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  103. Thornton, A., Axinn, W. G., & Xie, Y. (2007). Marriage and cohabitation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  104. Thornton, A., & Lin, H.-S. (1994). Social change and the family in Taiwan. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  105. Vātsyāyana. (2009). Kamasutra: A new, complete English translation of the Sanskrit text; With excerpts from the Sanskrit Jayamangala commentary of Yashodhara Indrapada, the Hindi Jaya commentary of Devadatta Shastri, and explanatory notes by the translators (W. Doniger & S. Kakar, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  106. Waite, L. J., & Lillard, L. A. (1991). Children and marital disruption. American Journal of Sociology, 96, 930–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. White, L. K., Booth, A., & Edwards, J. N. (1986). Children and marital happiness: Why the negative correlation? Journal of Family Issues, 7, 131–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Willis, R. J. (1973). A new approach to the economic theory of fertility behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 81, S14–S64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Yabiku, S. T. (2004). Marriage timing in Nepal: Organizational effects and individual mechanisms. Social Forces, 83, 559–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Yabiku, S. T. (2005). The effect of non-family experiences on age of marriage in a setting of rapid social change. Population Studies, 59, 339–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Yabiku, S. T. (2006). Neighbors and neighborhoods: Effects on marriage timing. Population Research and Policy Review, 25, 305–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • William G. Axinn
    • 1
    Email author
  • Dirgha J. Ghimire
    • 1
  • Emily Smith-Greenaway
    • 2
  1. 1.University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations