, Volume 53, Issue 5, pp 1511–1534 | Cite as

Trapped in Place? Segmented Resilience to Hurricanes in the Gulf Coast, 1970–2005

  • John R. LoganEmail author
  • Sukriti Issar
  • Zengwang Xu


Hurricanes pose a continuing hazard to populations in coastal regions. This study estimates the impact of hurricanes on population change in the years 1970–2005 in the U.S. Gulf Coast region. Geophysical models are used to construct a unique data set that simulates the spatial extent and intensity of wind damage and storm surge from the 32 hurricanes that struck the region in this period. Multivariate spatial time-series models are used to estimate the impacts of hurricanes on population change. Population growth is found to be reduced significantly for up to three successive years after counties experience wind damage, particularly at higher levels of damage. Storm surge is associated with reduced population growth in the year after the hurricane. Model extensions show that change in the white and young adult population is more immediately and strongly affected than is change for blacks and elderly residents. Negative effects on population are stronger in counties with lower poverty rates. The differentiated impact of hurricanes on different population groups is interpreted as segmented withdrawal—a form of segmented resilience in which advantaged population groups are more likely to move out of or avoid moving into harm’s way while socially vulnerable groups have fewer choices.


Disaster Hurricane Resilience Migration U.S. Gulf Coast 



This research was supported by National Science Foundation through Grant CMMI-0624088 and National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development through Grant R21 HD065079. The Population Studies and Training Center at Brown University (R24 HD041020) provided general support. Rima Wahab Twibell provided research assistance on application and validation of damage models. Emory Boose provided technical advice on the application of HURRECON.


  1. Adelman, R. M., Morett, C., & Tolnay, S. E. (2000). Homeward bound: The return migration of southern-born black women, 1940 to 1990. Sociological Spectrum, 20, 433–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger, W. N., Hughes, T. P., Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., & Rockstrom, J. (2005). Social-ecological resilience to coastal disasters. Science, 309, 1036–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Albala-Bertrand, J. M. (1993). Political economy of large natural disasters. Oxford, UK: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  4. Black, R., Arnell, M. W., Adger, W. N., Thomas, D., & Geddes, A. (2013). Migration, immobility and displacement outcomes following extreme events. Environmental Science & Policy, 27(Suppl. 1), 32–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bolin, R., & Stanford, L. (1998). The Northridge earthquake: Community-based approaches to unmet recovery needs. Disasters, 22, 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boose, E. R., Foster, D. R., & Fluet, M. (1994). Hurricane impacts to tropical and temperate forest landscapes. Ecological Monographs, 64, 369–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boose, E. R., Serrano, M. I., & Foster, D. R. (2004). Landscape and regional impacts of hurricanes in Puerto Rico. Ecological Monographs, 74, 335–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brookings Institution. (2009). The New Orleans index: Tracking recovery of New Orleans and the metro area (Metropolitan Policy Program report). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program & Greater New Orleans Community Data Center. Retrieved from
  9. Burton, C. G. (2010). Social vulnerability and hurricane impact modeling. Natural Hazards Review, 11, 58–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carvajal, L., & Pereira, I. (2010). Evidence on the link between migration, climate shocks and adaptive capacity. In R. Fuentes-Nieva & P. A. Seck (Eds.), Risks, shocks and human development: On the brink (pp. 257–283). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chan, N. W. (1995). Choice and constraints in floodplain occupation: The influence of structural factors on residential location in Peninsular Malaysia. Disasters, 19, 287–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cochrane, H. C. (1975). Natural hazards and their distributive effects: A research assessment. Boulder: Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado.Google Scholar
  13. Colten, C. E. (2005). An unnatural metropolis: Wresting New Orleans from nature. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Cutter, S. L., Boruff, B. J., & Shirley, W. L. (2003). Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Social Science Quarterly, 84, 242–261.Google Scholar
  15. Cutter, S. L., & Emrich, C. (2006). Moral hazard, social catastrophe: The changing face of vulnerability along the hurricane coasts. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 604, 102–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cutter, S. L., & Finch, C. (2008). Temporal and spatial changes in social vulnerability to natural hazards. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 2301–2306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cutter, S. L., Mitchell, J. T., & Scott, M. S. (2000). Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: A case study of Georgetown County, South Carolina. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90, 713–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dash, N., Peacock, W. G., & Morrow, B. H. (1997). And the poor get poorer: A neglected black community. In W. G. Peacock, B. H. Morrow, & H. Gladwin (Eds.), Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, gender and the sociology of disaster (pp. 206–225). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Deryugina, T. (2011). The dynamic effects of hurricanes in the US: The role of non-disaster transfer payments (CEEPR Working Paper No. 2011-007). Cambridge, MA: MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research. Retrieved from
  20. Elliott, J. R., & Pais, J. (2006). Race, class and Hurricane Katrina: Social differences in human responses to disaster. Social Science Research, 35, 295–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Elliott, J. R., & Pais, J. (2010). When nature pushes back: Environmental impact and the spatial redistribution of socially vulnerable populations. Social Science Quarterly, 91, 1187–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. FEMA. (2005). By the numbers: First 100-days FEMA recovery update for Hurricane Katrina (Release No: HQ-05-386). Retrieved from
  23. Finch, C., Emrich, C. T., & Cutter, S. L. (2010). Disaster disparities and differential recovery in New Orleans. Population and Environment, 31, 179–202. doi: 10.1007/s11111-009-0099-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Findley, A. M. (2011). Migrant destinations in an era of environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 21(Suppl. 1), S50–S58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fischer, P. A., & Malmberg, G. (2001). Settled people don’t move: On life course and (im-)mobility in Sweden. International Journal of Population Geography, 7, 357–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16, 253–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Frisema, H. P., Caporaso, J., Goldstein, G., Lineberry, R., & McMcleary, R. (1977). Community impacts of natural disaster. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Fujita, T. T. (1971). Proposed characterization of tornadoes and hurricanes by area and intensity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  29. Fujita, T. T. (1987). U.S. tornadoes: Part one, 70-year statistics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  30. Fussell, E. (2015). The long-term recovery of New Orleans’ population after Hurricane Katrina. American Behavioral Scientist, 59, 1231–1245.Google Scholar
  31. Fussell, E., Hunter, L. M., & Gray, C. L. (2014). Measuring the environmental dimensions of human migration: The demographer’s toolkit. Global Environmental Change, 28, 182–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fussell, E., Sastry, N., & VanLandingham, M. (2010). Race, socioeconomic status, and return migration to New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. Population and Environment, 31, 20–42.Google Scholar
  33. Gotham, K. F., & Campanella, R. (2011). Coupled vulnerability and resilience: The dynamics of cross-scale interactions in post-Katrina New Orleans. Ecology and Society, 16(3), 12. Retrieved from 10.5751/ES-04292-160312 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gray, C. L., & Mueller, V. (2012). Natural disasters and population mobility in Bangladesh. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 6000–6005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Heaton, T., & Fuguitt, G. (1980). Dimensions of population redistribution in the United States since 1950. Social Science Quarterly, 61, 508–523.Google Scholar
  36. Herren, U. (1991). “Droughts have different tails”: Responses to crises in Mukogodo Division, North Central Kenya, 1950s–1980s. Disasters, 15, 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Holling, C. S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hunter, L. M. (2005). Migration and environmental hazards. Population and Environment, 26, 273–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jelesnianski, C. P., Chen, J., & Shaffer, W. A. (1992). SLOSH: Sea, lake, and overland surges from hurricanes (NOAA Technical Report, No. NWS 48). Silver Spring, MD: U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Weather Service. Retrieved from
  40. Logan, J. R. (2008). Unnatural disaster: Social impacts and policy choices after Katrina. In H. W. Richardson, P. Gordon, & J. E. Moore (Eds.), Natural disaster analysis after Hurricane Katrina: Risk assessment, economic impacts and social implications (pp. 279–297). London, UK: Edward Elgar Publications.Google Scholar
  41. Logan, J. R., & Xu, Z. (2015). Vulnerability to hurricane damage on the U.S. gulf coast since 1950. Geographical Review, 105, 133–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McGranahan, G., Balk, D., & Anderson, B. (2007). The rising tide: Assessing the risks of climate change and human settlements in low elevation coastal zones. Environment and Urbanization, 19, 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Myers, N. (2002). Environmental refugees: A growing phenomenon of the 21st century. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences, 357, 609–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Neumann, C. J. (1987). The National Hurricane Center risk analysis program (HURISK) (NOAA Technical Memorandum, No. NWS NHC 38). Coral Gables, FL: National Hurricane Center. Retrieved from
  45. Pais, J., & Elliott, J. R. (2008). Places as recovery machines: Vulnerability and neighborhood change after major hurricanes. Social Forces, 84, 1415–1453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Peacock, W. G., & Girard, C. (1997). Ethnic and racial inequalities in hurricane damage and insurance settlements. In W. G. Peacock, B. H. Morrow, & H. Gladwin (Eds.), Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, gender, and the sociology of disasters (pp. 171–190). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Peacock, W. G., Morrow, B. H., & Gladwin, H. (1997). Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, gender, and the sociology of disasters. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Pielke, R. A., Jr., Gratz, J., Landsea, C. W., Collins, D., Saunders, M. A., & Musulin, R. (2008). Normalized hurricane damages in the United States: 1900–2005. Natural Hazards Review, 9, 29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pielke, R. A., Jr., & Landsea, C. W. (1998). Normalized hurricane damages in the United States: 1925–1995. Weather and Forecasting, 13, 621–631.Google Scholar
  50. Robinson, I. A. (1990). The relative impact of migration type on the reversal of black outmigration from the South. Sociological Spectrum, 10, 373–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Saldaña-Zorilla, S. O., & Sandberg, K. (2009). Impact of climate related disasters on human migration in Mexico: A spatial model. Climatic Change, 96, 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schmidt, C. (2003). Immigration and Asian and Hispanic minorities in the new South: An exploration of history, attitudes, and demographic trends. Sociological Spectrum, 23, 129–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Smith, V. K., Carbone, J. C., Pope, J. C., Hallstrom, D. G., & Darden, M. E. (2006). Adjusting to natural disasters. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 33, 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stone, G., Lekht, A., Burris, N., & Williams, C. (2007). Data collection and communications in the public health response to a disaster: Rapid population estimate surveys and the daily dashboard in post-Katrina New Orleans. Journal of Public Health Management Practice, 13, 453–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tierney, K. J., Lindell, M., & Perry, R. (2001). Facing the unexpected: Disaster preparedness and response in the United States. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.Google Scholar
  56. Vickery, P. J., Skerlj, P. F., & Twisdale, L. A. (2000). Simulation of hurricane risk in the U.S. using empirical track model. Journal of Structural Engineering, 126, 1222–1237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wilbanks, T. J., Romero Lankao, P., Bao, M., Berkhout, F., Cairncross, S., Ceron, J.-P., … Zapata-Marti, R. (2007). Industry, settlement and society. Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. In M. L. Parry, O. F. Canziani, J. P. Palutikof, P. J. van der Linden, & C. E. Hanson (Eds.), Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (pp. 357–390). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Womble, J. A., Smith, D. A., Mehta, K. C., & McDonald, J. R. (2009). The enhanced Fujita Scale: For use beyond tornadoes? In S.-e. Chen, A. Diaz de Leon, A. M. Dolhon, M. J. Drerup, & M. K. Parfitt (Eds.), Forensic engineering 2009: Pathology of the built environment. Proceedings of the American Academy of Civil Engineers (pp. 699–708). Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers. doi: 10.1061/41082(362)71 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wright, J. D., Rossi, P. H., & Wright, S. R. (1979). After the clean up: Long-range effects of natural disasters. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  60. Wu, J. Y., & Lindell, M. K. (2004). Housing reconstruction after two major earthquakes: The 1994 Northridge Earthquake in the United States and the 1999 Chi-Chi Earthquake in Taiwan. Disasters, 28, 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zhang, Y., & Peacock, W. G. (2009). Planning for housing recovery? Lessons learned from Hurricane Andrew. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76, 5–24. doi: 10.1080/01944360903294556 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA
  2. 2.Observatoire Sociologique du Changement, Sciences PoParisFrance
  3. 3.Department of GeographyUniversity of Wisconsin–MilwaukeeMilwaukeeUSA

Personalised recommendations