, Volume 52, Issue 4, pp 1269–1293 | Cite as

Recovery Migration After Hurricanes Katrina and Rita: Spatial Concentration and Intensification in the Migration System

  • Katherine J. CurtisEmail author
  • Elizabeth Fussell
  • Jack DeWaard


Changes in the human migration systems of the Gulf of Mexico coastline counties affected by Hurricanes Katrina and Rita provide an example of how climate change may affect coastal populations. Crude climate change models predict a mass migration of “climate refugees,” but an emerging literature on environmental migration suggests that most migration will be short-distance and short-duration within existing migration systems, with implications for the population recovery of disaster-stricken places. In this research, we derive a series of hypotheses on recovery migration predicting how the migration system of hurricane-affected coastline counties in the Gulf of Mexico was likely to have changed between the pre-disaster and the recovery periods. We test these hypotheses using data from the Internal Revenue Service on annual county-level migration flows, comparing the recovery period migration system (2007–2009) with the pre-disaster period (1999–2004). By observing county-to-county ties and flows, we find that recovery migration was strong: the migration system of the disaster-affected coastline counties became more spatially concentrated, while flows within it intensified and became more urbanized. Our analysis demonstrates how migration systems are likely to be affected by the more intense and frequent storms anticipated by climate change scenarios, with implications for the population recovery of disaster-affected places.


Recovery migration Migration system Environment Disasters Hurricanes Katrina and Rita 



This research was supported by center Grant #R24 HD047873 and training Grant #T32HD07014 awarded to the Center for Demography and Ecology at the University of Wisconsin at Madison, center Grant #R24 HD041023 awarded to the Minnesota Population Center at the University of Minnesota–Twin Cities by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and by funds to Curtis from the Wisconsin Agricultural Experimental Station and the Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation. We thank Lori Hunter and Patricia Romero-Lankao for organizing the CUPC-NCAR Workshop on Migration, Urbanization, and Climate Change held May 7–8, 2012, in Boulder, Colorado, where Curtis and Fussell began this project; the Department of Global Health Systems and Development at the Tulane University School of Public Health, where Fussell was hosted from 2012 to 2013; Lori Hunter and the University of Colorado Population Center for organizing the summer short course, Environmental Demography, that DeWaard attended on June 13–14, 2013; Lori Hunter and the anonymous reviewers at Demography for their insightful feedback; and William R. Buckingham at the Applied Population Laboratory at the University of Wisconsin–Madison for his cartographic expertise.

Supplementary material

13524_2015_400_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (71 kb)
Table S1 (PDF 71 kb)


  1. Adamo, S. B. (2010). Environmental migration and cities in the context of global environmental change. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2, 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrienko, Y., & Guriev, S. (2004). Determinants of interregional mobility in Russia. Economics of Transition, 12, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakewell, O. (2013a). Relaunching migration systems. Migration Studies. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1093/migration/mnt023
  4. Bakewell, O. (2013b, September). Does many migrations a migration system make? Paper presented at the conference, Examining Migration Dynamics: Networks and Beyond: Theorizing the Evolution of European Migration Systems Project, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  5. Bell, M., Blake, M., Boyle, P., Duek-Williams, O., Rees, P., Stillwell, J., & Hugo, G. (2002). Cross-national comparison of internal migration: Issues and measures. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 165, 435–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bennett, R. J., & Haining, R. P. (1985). Spatial structure and spatial interaction: Modelling approaches to the statistical analysis of geographical data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 148, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bennett, R. J., Haining, R. P., & Wilson, A. G. (1985). Spatial structure, spatial interaction, and their integration: A review of alternative models. Environment & Planning A, 17, 625–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Black, R., Adger, W. N., Arnell, N. W., Dercon, S., Geddes, A., & Thomas, D. S. G. (2011). The effect of environmental change on human migration. Global Environmental Change, 21(Suppl.), S3–S11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Black, R., Arnell, N. W., Adger, W. N., Thomas, D., & Geddes, A. (2013). Migration, immobility and displacement outcomes following extreme events. Environmental Science & Policy, 27(Suppl.), S32–S43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Curtis, K. J., & Schneider, A. (2011). Understanding the demographic implications of climate change: Estimates of localized population predictions under future scenarios of sea-level rise. Population and Environment, 33, 28–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cutter, S. L., & Emrich, C. T. (2006). Moral hazard, social catastrophe: The changing face of vulnerability along the hurricane coasts. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 604, 102–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. de Haas, H. (2010). The internal dynamics of migration processes: A theoretical inquiry. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36, 1587–1617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DeWaard, J. (2013). Compositional and temporal dynamics of international migration in the EU/EFTA: A new metric for assessing countries’ immigration and integration policies. International Migration Review, 47, 249–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DeWaard, J., Kim, K., & Raymer, J. (2012). Migration systems in Europe: Evidence from harmonized flow data. Demography, 49, 1307–1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DeWaard, J., & Raymer, J. (2012). The temporal dynamics of international migration in Europe: Recent trends. Demographic Research, 26(article 21), 543–592. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2012.26.21 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ehrenfeucht, R., & Nelson, M. (2013). Young professionals as ambivalent change agents in New Orleans after the 2005 hurricanes. Urban Studies, 50, 825–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elliott, J. R., & Pais, J. (2006). Race, class, and Hurricane Katrina: Social differences in human responses to disaster. Social Science Research, 35, 295–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Engels, R. A., & Healy, M. K. (1981). Measuring interstate migration flows: An origin-destination network based on internal revenue service records. Environment & Planning A, 13, 1345–1360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fawcett, J. T. (1989). Networks, linkages, and migration systems. International Migration Review, 23, 671–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Findlay, A. M. (2011). Migrant destinations in an era of environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 21(Suppl.), S50–S58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fussell, E. (2009). Hurricane chasers in New Orleans: Latino immigrants as a source of a rapid response labor force. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 31, 375–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fussell, E., Curtis, K. J., & DeWaard, J. (2014). Recovery migration to the City of New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina: A migration systems approach. Population and Environment, 35, 305–322. doi: 10.1007/s11111-014-0204-5
  23. Fussell, E., & Elliott, J. R. (2009). Introduction: Social organization of demographic responses to disaster: Studying population-environment interactions in the case of Hurricane Katrina. Organization & Environment, 22, 379–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fussell, E., Sastry, N., & VanLandingham, M. (2010). Race, socioeconomic status, and return migration to New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. Population and Environment, 31, 20–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gemenne, F. (2011). Why the numbers don’t add up: A review of estimates and predictions of people displaced by environmental changes. Global Environmental Change, 21(Suppl.), S41–S49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goodess, C. M. (2013). How is the frequency, location and severity of extreme events likely to change up to 2060? Environmental Science & Policy, 27(Suppl.), S4–S14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Greenwood, M. J. (1969). An analysis of the determinants of geographic labor mobility in the United States. Review of Economics and Statistics, 51, 189–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Greenwood, M. J. (1997). Internal migration in developed countries. In M. Rosenzweig & O. Stark (Eds.), Handbook of population and family economics (Vol. 1A, pp. 647–740). New York, NY: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Groen, J. A., & Polivka, A. E. (2010). Going home after Hurricane Katrina: Determinants of return migration and changes in affected areas. Demography, 47, 821–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gross, E. (n.d.). U.S. population migration data: Strengths and limitations. Washington, DC: Statistics of Income Division, Internal Revenue Service. Retrieved from,,id=213802,00.html
  31. Grübler, A., O’Neill, B., Riahi, K., Chirkov, V., Goujon, A., Kolp, P., . . . Stentoe, E. (2007). Regional, national, and spatially explicit scenarios of demographic and economic change based on SRES. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74, 980–1029.Google Scholar
  32. Haney, T. J., Elliott, J. R., & Fussell, E. (2010). Families and hurricane response: Risk, roles, resources, race, and religion. In D. L. Brunsma, D. Overfelt, & J. S. Picou (Eds.), The sociology of Katrina: Perspectives on a modern catastrophe (2nd ed., pp. 77–102). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  33. Hsiang, S. M., Burke, M., & Miguel, E. (2013). Quantifying the influence of climate change on human conflict. Science, 12, 1–12.Google Scholar
  34. Hunter, L. M. (2005). Migration and environmental hazards. Population and Environment, 26, 273–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Isserman, A. M., Plane, D. A., & McMillen, D. B. (1982). Internal migration in the United States: An evaluation of federal data. Review of Public Data Use, 10, 285–311.Google Scholar
  36. Johnson, R. V., Bland, J. M., & Coleman, C. D. (2008, April). Impacts of the 2005 Gulf Coast Hurricanes on domestic migration: The U.S. Census Bureau’s response. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  37. Kates, R. W., Colten, C. E., Laska, S., & Leatherman, S. P. (2006). Reconstruction of New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina: A research perspective. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 14653–14660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kim, K., & Cohen, J. E. (2010). Determinants of international migration flows to and from industrialized countries: A panel data approach beyond gravity. International Migration Review, 44, 899–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Knabb, R., Brown, D., & Rhome, J. (2006). Tropical cyclone report: Hurricane Rita. Miami, FL: National Hurricane Center. Retrieved from
  40. Koerber, K. (2006, November). Migration patterns and mover characteristics from the 2005 ACS Gulf Coast Area Special Products. Paper presented at the Southern Demographic Association Conference, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
  41. Kritz, M. M., Lim, L. L., & Zlotnik, H. (1992). International migration systems: A global approach, international studies in demography. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  42. Laczko, F., & Aghazarm, C. (2009). Migration, environment, and climate change: Assessing the evidence. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Migration.Google Scholar
  43. Lansing, J. B., & Mueller, E. (Eds.). (1967). The geographic mobility of labor. Ann Arbor, MI: Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  44. Lee, E. S. (1966). A theory of migration. Demography, 3, 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lutz, W., Goujon, A., Samir, K. C., & Sanderson, W. (2007). Vienna yearbook of population research 2007. Vienna, Austria: Vienna Institute of Demography.Google Scholar
  46. Mabogunje, A. L. (1970). A systems approach to a theory of rural-urban migration. Geographical Analysis, 2, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Massey, D. S., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouoouci, A., Pellegrino, A., & Taylor, J. E. (1998). Worlds in motion: Understanding international migration at the end of the Millennium. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  48. McGranahan, G., Balk, D., & Anderson, B. (2007). The rising tide: Assessing the risks of climate change and human settlements in low elevation coastal zones. Environment and Urbanization, 19, 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McHugh, K. E. (1987). Black migration reversal in the United States. Geographical Review, 77, 171–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McLeman, R. A. (2011). Settlement abandonment in the context of global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 21(Suppl.), S108–S120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McLeman, R. A., & Hunter, L. M. (2010). Migration in the context of vulnerability and adaptation to climate change: Insights from analogues. Climate Change, 1, 450–461.Google Scholar
  52. McLeman, R. A., & Smit, B. (2006). Migration as an adaptation to climate change. Climatic Change, 76, 31–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Molloy, R., Smith, C. L., & Wozniak, A. (2011). Internal migration in the United States. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25, 173–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mueser, P. R. (1989). Measuring the impact of locational characteristics on migration: Interpreting cross-sectional analyses. Demography, 26, 499–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Myers, C. A., Slack, T., & Singelmann, J. (2008). Social vulnerability and migration in the wake of disaster: The case of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Population and Environment, 29, 271–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. (n.d.). NOAA’s list of coastal counties for the Bureau of the Census Statistical Abstract Series. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved from
  57. Nelson, P. (1959). Migration, real income and information. Journal of Regional Science, 1, 43–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Palloni, A. (2001). Increment-decrement life tables. In S. Preston, P. Heuveline, & M. Guillot (Eds.), Demography: Measuring and modeling population processes (pp. 256–273). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  59. Perch-Nielsen, S. L., Battig, M., & Imboden, D. (2008). Exploring the link between climate change and migration. Climatic Change, 91, 375–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Plane, D. A. (1987). The geographic components of change in a migration system. Geographical Analysis, 19, 283–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Plane, D. A. (1999). Time series perspectives and physical geography analogies in migration research. In K. Pandit & S. Davies Withers (Eds.), Migration and restructuring in the U.S.: A geographic perspective (pp. 313–335). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  62. Plane, D. A., & Rogerson, P. A. (1986). Dynamic flow modeling with interregional dependency effects: An application to structural change in the U.S. migration system. Demography, 23, 91–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ravenstein, E. G. (1885). The laws of migration. Journal of the Statistical Society of London, 48, 167–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Raymer, J., Wiśniowksi, A., Forster, J. J., Smith, P. W. F., & Bijak, J. (2013). Integrated modeling of European migration. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 108, 801–819. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2013.789435 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rogers, A. (1975). Introduction to multiregional mathematical demography. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  66. Rogers, A. (1990). Requiem for the net migrant. Geographical Analysis, 22, 283–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rogers, A. (1995). Multiregional demography: Principles, methods and extensions. London, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  68. Sastry, N. (2009). Displaced New Orleans residents in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina: Results from a pilot survey. Organization and Environment, 22, 395–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schwartz, A. (1973). Interpreting the effect of distance on migration. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 1153–1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sjaastad, L. A. (1962). The costs and returns of human migration. Journal of Political Economy, 70, 80–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Todaro, M. P. (1976). Internal migration in developing countries. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labor Office.Google Scholar
  72. U.S. Census Bureau. (2011). Table 1. Intercensal estimates of the resident population for counties of Louisiana: April 1, 2000 to July 1, 2010 (CO-EST00INT-01-22). Retrieved from
  73. U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division. (2008). New Orleans’ parishes top nation in population growth rate [Press release No. CB08–47]. Retrieved from
  74. Willekens, F. (1999). Modeling approaches to the indirect estimation of migration flows: From entropy to EM. Mathematical Population Studies, 7, 239–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wilson, S. G., & Fischetti, T. R. (2010). Coastline population trends in the United States: 1960–2008 (Current Population Reports No. P25–1139). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved from
  76. Wisner, B., Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., & Davis, I. (2004). At risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disasters (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
  77. Zipf, G. K. (1946). The P1 P2/D hypothesis: On the intercity movement of persons. American Sociological Review, 11, 677–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katherine J. Curtis
    • 1
    Email author
  • Elizabeth Fussell
    • 2
  • Jack DeWaard
    • 3
  1. 1.University of Wisconsin–MadisonMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Population Studies and Training CenterBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA
  3. 3.University of Minnesota–Twin CitiesMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations