Demography

, Volume 51, Issue 5, pp 1667–1676 | Cite as

The Prevalence and Economic Value of Doubling Up

  • Natasha V. Pilkauskas
  • Irwin Garfinkel
  • Sara S. McLanahan
Article

Abstract

“Doubling up” (living with relatives or nonkin) is a common source of support for low-income families, yet no study to date has estimated its economic value relative to other types of public and private support. Using longitudinal data from the Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study, we examine the prevalence and economic value of doubling up among families with young children living in large American cities. We find that doubling up is a very important part of the private safety net in the first few years of a child’s life, with nearly 50 % of mothers reporting at least one instance of doubling up by the time their child is 9 years old. The estimated rental savings from doubling up is significant and comparable in magnitude to other public and private transfers.

Keywords

Doubling up Private support Private safety nets Fragile families Household extension 

References

  1. Edin, K., & Lein, L. (1997). Making ends meet: How single mothers survive welfare and low-wage work. New York, NY: Russell Sage Press.Google Scholar
  2. Hofferth, S. L. (1984). Kin networks, race, and family structure. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46, 791–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Mykyta, L., & Macartney, S. (2012). Sharing a household: Household composition and economic well-being (Current Population Reports P60-242). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  4. Schwartz, M., & Wilson, E. (2007). Who can afford to live in a home?: A look at data from the 2006 American Community Survey (Report). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.Google Scholar
  5. Setlzer, J., Lau, C. Q., & Bianchi, S. (2012). Doubling up when times are tough: A study of obligations to share a home in response to economic hardship. Social Science Research, 41, 1307–1319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Stack, C. (1974). All our kin: Strategies for survival in a black community. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  7. Tienda, M., & Angel, R. (1982). Headship and household composition among blacks, Hispanics, and other whites. Social Forces, 61, 508–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Natasha V. Pilkauskas
    • 1
  • Irwin Garfinkel
    • 1
  • Sara S. McLanahan
    • 2
  1. 1.Columbia Population Research CenterColumbia University School of Social WorkNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.The Center for Research on Child WellbeingPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations