, Volume 51, Issue 3, pp 753–775 | Cite as

The Location of Displaced New Orleans Residents in the Year After Hurricane Katrina

  • Narayan SastryEmail author
  • Jesse Gregory


Using individual data from the restricted version of the American Community Survey, we examined the displacement locations of pre–Hurricane Katrina adult residents of New Orleans in the year after the hurricane. More than one-half (53 %) of adults had returned to—or remained in—the New Orleans metropolitan area, with just under one-third of the total returning to the dwelling in which they resided prior to Hurricane Katrina. Among the remainder, Texas was the leading location of displaced residents, with almost 40 % of those living away from the metropolitan area (18 % of the total), followed by other locations in Louisiana (12 %), the South region of the United States other than Louisiana and Texas (12 %), and elsewhere in the United States (5 %). Black adults were considerably more likely than nonblack adults to be living elsewhere in Louisiana, in Texas, and elsewhere in the South. The observed race disparity was not accounted for by any of the demographic or socioeconomic covariates in the multinomial logistic regression models. Consistent with hypothesized effects, we found that following Hurricane Katrina, young adults (aged 25–39) were more likely to move further away from New Orleans and that adults born outside Louisiana were substantially more likely to have relocated away from the state.


Hurricane Katrina New Orleans population Migration Displacement Disaster 



The authors gratefully acknowledge support for this research from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD59087), the Russell Sage Foundation (83-08-02), and the National Science Foundation (ITR-0427889). Helpful comments were provided by Michael Rendall. Cathy Sun provided valuable programming assistance. The authors also thank Clint Carter and Maggie Levenstein of the Michigan Census Research Data Center for their help at various stages of the project, and Deborah Griffin of the Census Bureau for information on ACS field procedures. This article reports the results of research and analysis undertaken while the authors were research affiliates of the Center for Economic Studies at the U.S. Census Bureau. It has undergone a Census Bureau review more limited in scope than that given to official Census Bureau publications. Research results and conclusions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily indicate concurrence by the Census Bureau. It has been screened to ensure that no confidential information is revealed.

Supplementary material

13524_2014_284_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (166 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 165 kb)


  1. Bates, D. C. (2002). Environmental refugees? Classifying human migrations caused by environmental change. Population and Environment, 23, 465–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Briggs, X. (2006). After Katrina: Rebuilding lives and places. City and Community, 5, 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. DiNardo, J., Fortin, N. M., & Lemieux, T. (1996). Labor market institutions and the distribution of wages, 1973–1992. Econometrica, 64, 1001–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ellison, D. (2006, September 19). Katrina’s aftermath: A tale of two cities. Houston Chronicle. Retrieved from
  5. Frey, W. H., Singer, A., & Park, D. (2007). Resettling New Orleans: The first full picture from the census (Metropolitan Policy Program report). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  6. Fussell, E., Sastry, N., & VanLandingham, M. (2010). Race, socioeconomic status, and return migration to New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. Population and Environment, 31, 20–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Geist, C., & McManus, P. A. (2008). Geographical mobility over the life course: Motivations and implications. Population, Space, and Place, 14, 283–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Greenwood, M. J. (1985). Human migration: Theory, models, and empirical studies. Journal of Regional Science, 25, 521–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Greenwood, M. J. (1993). Internal migraion in developed countries. In M. Rosenzweig & O. Stark (Eds.), Handbook of population and family economics (Vol. 1A, pp. 647–740). New York, NY: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  10. Groen, J. A., & Polivka, A. E. (2010). Going home after Hurricane Katrina: Determinants of return migration and changes in affected areas. Demography, 47, 821–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gurak, D. T., & Kritz, M. M. (2000). Interstate migration of U.S. immigrants: Individual and contextual determinants. Social Forces, 78, 1017–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hori, M., Schafer, M. J., & Bowman, D. J. (2009). Displacement dynamics in southern Louisiana after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Population Research and Policy Review, 28, 45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hunter, L. M. (2005). Migration and environmental hazards. Population and Environment, 26, 273–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kamel, N. (2012). Social marginalization, federal assistance, and repopulation patterns in the New Orleans metropolitan area following Hurricane Katrina. Urban Studies, 49, 3211–3231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kritz, M. M., & Nogle, J. M. (1994). Nativity concentration and internal migration among the foreign-born. Demography, 31, 509–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Landry, C. E., Bim, O., Hindsley, P., Whitehead, J. C., & Wilson, K. (2007). Going home: Evacuation-migration decisions of Hurricane Katrina survivors. Southern Economic Journal, 74, 326–343.Google Scholar
  17. Lee, E. S. (1966). A theory of migration. Demography, 3, 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li, W., Airriess, C. A., Chen, A. C.-C., Leong, K. J., & Keith, V. (2010). Katrina and migration: Evacuation and return by African Americans and Vietnamese Americans in an eastern New Orleans suburb. Professional Geographer, 62, 103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Long, L. (1992). Changing residence: Comparative perspectives on its relationship to age, sex, and marital status. Population Studies, 46, 141–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Morrow-Jones, H. A., & Morrow-Jones, C. R. (1991). Mobility due to natural disaster: Theoretical considerations and preliminary analyses. Disasters, 15, 126–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Myers, C. A., Slack, T., & Singelmann, J. (2008). Social vulnerability and migration in the wake of a disaster: The case of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Population and Environment, 29, 271–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. National Academy of Sciences. (2007). Tools and methods for estimating populations at risk from natural disasters and complex humanitarian crises. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  23. Nigg, J. M., Barnshaw, J., & Torres, M. R. (2006). Hurricane Katrina and the flooding of New Orleans: Emergent issues in sheltering and temporary housing. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 604, 113–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Paxson, C., & Rouse, C. E. (2008). Returning to New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. American Economic Review, 98, 38–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Plyer, A., Bonaguro, J., & Hodges, K. (2010). Using administrative data to estimate population displacement and resettlement following a catastrophic U.S. disaster. Population and Environment, 31, 150–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rogers, A., & Belanger, A. (1990). The importance of place of birth in migration and population redistribution analysis. Environment and Planning A, 22, 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sastry, N., & Gregory, J. (2012). Returning to New Orleans in the year after Hurricane Katrina: Disparities by race and the effects of flooding (Working paper). Ann Arbor: Population Studies Center, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  29. Sjaastad, L. A. (1962). The costs and returns of human migration. Journal of Political Economy, 70, 80–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Smith, S. K., & McCarty, C. (1996). Demographic effects of natural disasters: A case study of Hurricane Andrew. Demography, 33, 265–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Solecki, W. D. (1999). Environmental hazards and interest group coalitions: Metropolitan Miami after Hurricane Andrew. In J. K. Mitchell (Ed.), Crucibles of hazard: Mega-cities and disasters in transition (pp. 428–472). New York, NY: United Nations University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Stallings, R. A. (2006). Methodological issues. In H. Rodríguez, E. L. Quarantelli, & R. R. Dynes (Eds.), Handbook of disaster research (pp. 55–82). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  33. Stark, O., & Bloom, D. E. (1985). The new economics of labor migration. American Economic Review, 75, 173–178.Google Scholar
  34. Tizon, T. A., & Smith, D. (2005, December 12). Evacuees of Hurricane Katrina resettle along a racial divide. Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from
  35. U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). Decennial census. Retrieved from
  36. U.S. Census Bureau. (2001). Census 2000 Summary File 1 [Louisiana]. Retrieved from
  37. U.S. Census Bureau. (2005, September 7). American factfinder. Retrieved from
  38. U.S. Census Bureau. (2006). Design and methodology: American Community Survey. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  39. Weber, L., & Peek, L. (Eds.). (2012). Displaced: Life in the Katrina diaspora. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Population Studies Center and Survey Research Center, Institute for Social ResearchUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of Wisconsin–MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations