, Volume 50, Issue 6, pp 2053–2073 | Cite as

Migration and Pacific Mortality: Estimating Migration Effects on Pacific Mortality Rates Using Bayesian Models

  • Ken Richardson
  • Santosh Jatrana
  • Martin Tobias
  • Tony Blakely


Pacific people living in New Zealand have higher mortality rates than New Zealand residents of European/Other ethnicity. The aim of this paper is to see whether Pacific mortality rates vary by natality and duration of residence. We used linked census-mortality information for 25- to 74-year-olds in the 2001 census followed for up to three years. Hierarchical Bayesian modeling provided a means of handling sparse data. Posterior mortality rates were directly age-standardized. We found little evidence of mortality differences between the overseas-born and the New Zealand–born for all-cause, cancer, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality. However, we found evidence for lower all-cause (and possibly cancer and CVD) mortality rates for Pacific migrants resident in New Zealand for less than 25 years relative to those resident for more than 25 years. This result may arise from a combination of processes operating over time, including health selection effects from variations in New Zealand’s immigration policy, the location of Pacific migrants within the social, political, and cultural environment of the host community, and health impacts of the host culture. We could not determine the relative importance of these processes, but identifying the (modifiable) drivers of the inferred long-term decline in health of the overseas-born Pacific population relative to more-recent Pacific migrants is important to Pacific communities and from a national health and policy perspective.


New Zealand Pacific migrants Mortality Hierarchical Bayesian model Duration of residence 


  1. Abraido-Lanza, A. F., Dohrenwend, B. P., Ng-Mak, D. S., & Turner, J. B. (1999). The Latino mortality paradox: A test of the “salmon bias” and healthy migrant hypotheses. American Journal of Public Health, 89, 1543–1548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albin, B., Hjelm, K., Ekberg, J., & Elmstahl, S. (2005). Mortality among 723,948 foreign- and native-born Swedes 1970–1999. European Journal of Public Health, 15, 511–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anson, J. (2004). The migrant mortality advantage: A 70 month follow-up of the Brussels population. Population Studies, 20, 191–218.Google Scholar
  4. Appleyard, R. T., & Stahl, C. W. (1995). South Pacific migration: New Zealand experience and implications for Australia (Report). Canberra: Australian Agency for International Development (AusAID).Google Scholar
  5. Beaglehole, A. (2007). Immigration regulation: Controlling Pacific Island immigration. In Te Ara—The Encyclopedia of New Zealand. Retrieved from
  6. Bedford, R. (2007). Pasifika mobility: Pathways, circuits and challenges in the 21st century (Report for the Pasifika Project). Wellington, New Zealand: Institute of Policy Studies, Victoria University of Wellington. Retreived from
  7. Berry, J. (1990). Acculturation and adaptation: Health consequences of culture contact among circumpolar peoples. Arctic Medical Research, 49, 142.Google Scholar
  8. Blakely, T., Richardson, K., Young, J., Callister, P., & Didham, R. (2009). Does mortality vary between Pacific groups in New Zealand? Estimating Samoan, Cook Island Mori, Tongan, and Niuean mortality rates using hierarchical Bayesian modelling. Journal of the New Zealand Medical Association, 122, 18–29.Google Scholar
  9. Christiansen, C., & Morris, C. (1997). Hierarchical Poisson regression modeling. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 92, 618–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Commission on Social Determinants of Health (CSDH). (2008). Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. Final report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
  11. Cook, L., Didham, R. A., & Khawaja, M. A. (1999). On the demography of Pacific people in New Zealand. Wellington: Statistics New Zealand.Google Scholar
  12. Daniels, M. (1999). A prior for the variance in hierarchical models. The Canadian Journal of Statistics, 27, 567–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deboosere, P., & Gadeyne, S. (2005). Adult migrant mortality advantage in Belgium: Evidence using census and register data. Population, 5, 655–698.Google Scholar
  14. Fawcett, J., Atkinson, J., & Blakely, T. (2008). Record linkage of census and mortality 2001–04 records (New Zealand Census Mortality Study Technical Report No. 5). Wellington, New Zealand: University of Otago, Wellington.Google Scholar
  15. Foliaki, S., & Pearce, N. (2003). Prevalence and causes of diabetes in Pacific people. Pacific Health Dialog, 10, 90–98.Google Scholar
  16. Franzini, L., Ribble, J. C., & Keddie, A. M. (2001). Understanding the Hispanic paradox. Ethnicity & Disease, 11, 496–518.Google Scholar
  17. Gadd, M., Johansson, S. E., Sundquist, J., & Wandell, P. (2003). Morbidity in cardiovascular diseases in immigrants in Sweden. Journal of Internal Medicine, 254, 236–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gee, G. C., Ro, A., Shariff-Marco, S., & Chae, D. (2009). Racial discrimination and health among Asian Americans: Evidence, assessment, and directions for future research. Epidemiologic Reviews, 31, 130–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gee, G. C., Ryan, A., Laflamme, D., & Holt, J. (2006). Self-reported discrimination and mental health status among African American descendants, Mexican Americans, and other Latinos in the New Hampshire REACH 2010 initiative: The added dimension of immigration. American Journal of Public Health, 96, 1821–1825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2004). Bayesian data analysis. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
  21. Greenland, S. (2008). Invited commentary: Variable selection versus shrinkage in the control of multiple confounders. American Journal of Epidemiology, 167, 523–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gushulak, B. (2007). Healthier on arrival? Further insight into the “healthy immigrant effect.” Canadian Medical Association Journal, 176, 1439–1440.Google Scholar
  23. Hajat, A., Blakely, T., Dayal, S., & Jatrana, S. (2010). Do New Zealand’s immigrants have a mortality advantage? Evidence from the New Zealand Census-Mortality Study. Ethnicity & Health, 15, 531–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Harding, S., Rosato, M., & Teyhan, A. (2008). Trends for coronary heart disease and stroke mortality among migrants in England and Wales, 1979–2003: Slow declines notable for some groups. Heart (British Cardiac Society), 94, 463–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harris, R., Tobias, M., Jeffreys, M., Waldegrave, K., Karlsen, S., & Nazroo, J. (2006). Racism and health: The relationship between experience of racial discrimination and health in New Zealand. Social Science & Medicine, 63, 1428–1441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hummer, R. A., Rogers, R. G., Nam, C. B., & LeClere, F. B. (1999). Race/ethnicity, nativity, and U.S. adult mortality. Social Science Quarterly, 80, 136–153.Google Scholar
  27. Hyman, I. (2001). Immigration and health. Ottawa: Health Canada.Google Scholar
  28. Jamrozik, K., Spencer, C. A., Lawrence-Brown, M. M., & Norman, P. E. (2001). Does the Mediterranean paradox extend to abdominal aortic aneurysm. International Journal of Epidemiology, 30, 1071–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. King, M. (2004). The Penguin history of New Zealand. Auckland, New Zealand: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  30. Kouris-Blazos, A. (2002). Morbidity mortality paradox of 1st generation Greek Australians. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 11(Suppl. 3), S569–S575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Markides, K. S., & Eschbach, K. (2005). Aging, migration, and mortality: Current status of research on the Hispanic paradox. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 60(Spec. No. 2), 68–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McKay, S., Craw, M., & Chopra, D. (2006). Migrant workers in England and Wales: An assessment of migrant worker health and safety risks. Norwich: UK Health and Safety Executive. Retrieved from
  33. Ministry of Pacific Island Affairs. (2011a). About Pacific peoples in New Zealand. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Pacific Island Affairs.Google Scholar
  34. Ministry of Pacific Island Affairs. (2011b). Demographic fact sheet. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Pacific Island Affairs.Google Scholar
  35. Morales, L. S., Lara, M., Kington, R. S., & Valdez, R. O. (2002). Socioeconomic, cultural, and behavioral factors affecting Hispanic health outcomes. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 13, 477–503.Google Scholar
  36. Richardson, K., Blakely, T., Young, J., Graham, P., & Tobias, M. (2009). Do ethnic and socio-economic inequalities in mortality vary by region in New Zealand? An application of hierarchical Bayesian modelling. Social Science & Medicine, 69, 1252–1260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Richardson, K., Jatrana, S., Dayal, S., & Blakely, T. (2012). Does mortality vary between Asian subgroups? An application of hierarchical Bayesian modeling. (Manuscript submitted for publication).Google Scholar
  38. Singh, G. K., & Siahpush, M. (2001). All-cause and cause-specific mortality of immigrants and native born in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 91, 392–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Singh, G. K., & Siahpush, M. (2002). Ethnic-immigrant differentials in health behaviors, morbidity, and cause-specific mortality in the United States: An analysis of two national data bases. Human Biology, 74, 83–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Statistics New Zealand. (2002). A report on the economic status of Pacific Peoples in New Zealand. Wellington: Statistics New Zealand.Google Scholar
  41. Statistics New Zealand. (2005). Statistical standard for ethnicity. Wellington: Statistics New Zealand.Google Scholar
  42. Statistics New Zealand. (2010). National ethnic population projections: 2006 (base)–2026 update. Wellington: Statistics New Zealand.Google Scholar
  43. Statistics New Zealand and the Ministry of Pacific Island Affairs. (2010). Demographics of New Zealand’s Pacific population. Wellington: Statistics New Zealand.Google Scholar
  44. Strong, K., Trickett, P., & Bhatia, K. (1998). The health of overseas-born Australians, 1994–1996. Australian Health Review, 21, 124–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tan, L., Blakely, T., & Atkinson, J. (2010). Ethnic counts on mortality and census data 2001–06: New Zealand Census-Mortality Study update. The New Zealand Medical Journal, 123, 37–44.Google Scholar
  46. Taylor, R., Chey, T., Bauman, A., & Webster, I. (1999). Socio-economic, migrant and geographic differentials in coronary heart disease occurrence in New South Wales. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 23, 20–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ulijaszek, S. (2005). Modernisation, migration and nutritional health of Pacific Island populations. Environmental Sciences: An International Journal of Environmental Physiology and Toxicology, 12, 167–176.Google Scholar
  48. Williams, D., & Mohammed, S. (2009). Discrimination and racial disparities in health: Evidence and needed research. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 32, 20–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Williams, R., Eley, S., Hunt, K., & Bhatt, S. (1997). Has psychological distress among UK South Asians been under-estimated? A comparison of three measures in the west of Scotland population. Ethnicity and Health, 2(1–2), 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Young, J., Graham, P., & Blakely, T. (2006). Modeling the relation between socioeconomic status and mortality in a mixture of majority and minority ethnic groups. American Journal of Epidemiology, 164, 282–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ken Richardson
    • 1
  • Santosh Jatrana
    • 2
  • Martin Tobias
    • 3
  • Tony Blakely
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Public Health, Wellington School of Medicine and Health SciencesUniversity of OtagoWellingtonNew Zealand
  2. 2.Alfred Deakin Research InstituteDeakin UniversityGeelongAustralia
  3. 3.Ministry of HealthWellingtonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations