Advertisement

Demography

, Volume 50, Issue 4, pp 1499–1520 | Cite as

The Educational Gradient in Marriage: A Comparison of 25 European Countries

  • Matthijs KalmijnEmail author
Article

Abstract

Previous research has suggested that a new marriage gradient has emerged in the United States, with marriage becoming increasingly the privilege of the better-educated. This article examines whether this is true for Europe and explores differences in the marriage gradient among 25 European countries, using multilevel models. The focus is on the chances of living in a marital (or cohabiting) union during midlife (ages 40–49). Multilevel analyses show that the direction and strength of the gradient depend on the societal context. In countries where gender roles are traditional, better-educated women are less likely to be married than less-educated women; in gender-egalitarian countries, better-educated women are more likely to be married. For men, the educational effect on marriage is absent in traditional countries but becomes positive as gender roles become more equal. Inequality in a society also modifies the gradient: if the degree of economic inequality between educational groups in a society is strong, better-educated men are more likely to be married than less-educated men. In general, the results suggest that there may be an accumulation of social and economic disadvantages for the less well educated in more-developed countries.

Keywords

Marriage Divorce Education Gender roles Inequality 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Earlier versions of this article were presented at the Center for Demographic and Social Analysis, University of California, Irvine (May 2012); and at the Center for the Study of Poverty and Inequality at Stanford University (May 2012). Thanks to Paula England and the anonymous reviewers for helpful comments and to David Grusky for his hospitality during my stay at the Center for the Study of Poverty, where I wrote this article.

Supplementary material

13524_2013_229_MOESM1_ESM.docx (94 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 93 kb)

References

  1. Becker, G. S., Landes, E. M., & Michael, R. T. (1977). An economic analysis of marital instability. Journal of Political Economy, 85, 1141–1187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berkman, L., Glass, T., Brisette, I., & Seeman, T. (2000). From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millenium. Social Science & Medicine, 51, 843–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernardi, F., & Martínez-Pastor, J.-I. (2011). Female education and marriage dissolution: Is it a selection effect? European Sociological Review, 27, 693–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Billari, F., & Philipov, D. (2004). Education and the transition to motherhood: A comparative analysis of Western Europe (European Demographic Research Paper 3). Vienna, Austria: Vienna Institute of Demography.Google Scholar
  5. Blossfeld, H.-P., De Rose, A., Hoem, J. M., & Rohwer, G. (1995). Education, modernization, and the risk of marriage disruption in Sweden, West Germany, and Italy. In K. O. Mason & A. M. Jensen (Eds.), Gender and family change in industrialized countries (pp. 200–222). Oxford, UK: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  6. Blossfeld, H. P., & Huinink, J. (1991). Human capital investments or norms of role transition: How women’s schooling and career affect the process of family formation. The American Journal of Sociology, 97, 143–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blossfeld, H.-P., Klijzing, E., Mills, M., & Kurz, K. (Eds.). (2005). Globalization, uncertainty, and youth in society. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Cherlin, A. J. (1979). Work life and marital dissolution. In G. Levinger & O. C. Moles (Eds.), Divorce and separation: Context, causes and consequences (pp. 151–166). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  9. Cherlin, A. J. (2009). The marriage-go-round: The state of marriage and the family in America today. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  10. Cherlin, A. J. (2010). Demographic trends in the United States: A review of research in the 2000s. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72, 403–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cunningham, M., Beutel, A. M., Barber, J. S., & Thornton, A. (2005). Reciprocal relationships between attitudes about gender and social contexts during young adulthood. Social Science Research, 34, 862–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Graaf, P. M., & Kalmijn, M. (2006). Change and stability in the social determinants of divorce: A comparison of marriage cohorts in the Netherlands. European Sociological Review, 22, 561–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dykstra, P. A., & De Jong-Gierveld, J. (2004). Gender and marital-history differences in emotional and social loneliness among Dutch older adults. Canadian Journal on Aging, 23, 141–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dykstra, P. A., & Poortman, A.-R. (2010). Economic resources and remaining single: Trends over time. European Sociological Review, 26, 277–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Edin, K., & Kefalas, M. (2005). Promises I can keep: Why poor women put motherhood before marriage. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  16. England, P., & Farkas, G. (1986). Households, employment, and gender: A social, economic, and demographic view. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  17. Fan, P. L., & Marini, M. M. (2000). Influences on gender-role attitudes during the transition to adulthood. Social Science Research, 29, 258–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fischer, C. S., & Hout, M. (2006). Century of difference: How Americans changed in the last one hundred years. New York: Russel Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Fuwa, M. (2004). Macro-level gender inequality and the division of household labor in 22 countries. American Sociological Review, 69, 751–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gangl, M. (2002). Changing labor markets and early career outcomes: Labour market entry in Europe over the past decade. Work, Employment & Society, 16, 67–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goldstein, J. R., & Kenney, C. T. (2001). Marriage delayed or marriage forgone? New cohort forecasts of first marriage for U.S. women. American Sociological Review, 66, 506–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goode, W. J. (1951). Economic factors and marital stability. American Sociological Review, 16, 802–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goode, W. J. (1962). Marital satisfaction and instability: A cross-cultural class analysis of divorce rates. International Social Science Journal, 14, 507–526.Google Scholar
  24. Hansen, H.-T. (2005). Unemployment and marital dissolution: A panel study of Norway. European Sociological Review, 21, 135–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harkness, S. (2010). The contribution of women’s employment and earnings to household income inequality: A cross-country analysis (Luxembourg Income Survey Working Paper No. 531). Luxembourg: LIS.Google Scholar
  26. Härkönen, J., & Dronkers, J. (2006). Stability and change in the educational gradient of divorce: A comparison of seventeen countries. European Sociological Review, 22, 501–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harmon, C., Walker, I., & Westergaard-Nielsen, N. (Eds.). (2001). Education and earnings in Europe: A cross-country analysis of the returns to education. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  28. Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  29. Heyns, B. (2005). Emerging inequalities in Central and Eastern Europe. Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 163–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hoem, J. M. (1997). Educational gradients in divorce risks in Sweden in recent decades. Population Studies, 51, 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hook, J. L. (2006). Care in context: Men’s unpaid work in 20 countries. American Sociological Review, 71, 639–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Jalovaara, M. (2003). The joint effects of marriage partners’ socioeconomic positions on the risk of divorce. Demography, 40, 67–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kalmijn, M. (1999). Father involvement in childrearing and the perceived stability of marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kalmijn, M. (2007). Gender differences in the effects of divorce, widowhood and remarriage on intergenerational support: Does marriage protect fathers? Social Forces, 85, 1079–1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kalmijn, M. (2011). The influence of men’s income and employment on marriage and cohabitation: Testing Oppenheimer’s theory in Europe. European Journal of Population, 27, 269–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kalmijn, M., & Kraaykamp, G. (2007). Social stratification and attitudes: A comparative analysis of the effects of class and education in Europe. The British Journal of Sociology, 58, 547–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kiernan, K. (2002). Cohabitation in Western Europe: Trends, issues, and implications. In A. Booth & A. C. Crouter (Eds.), Just living together: Implications of cohabitation on families, children, and social policy (pp. 3–32). University Park: The Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
  39. Knudsen, K., & Waerness, K. (2008). National context and spouses’ housework in 34 countries. European Sociological Review, 24, 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kraaykamp, G., van Gils, W., & Ultee, W. (2008). Cultural participation and time restrictions: Explaining the frequency of individual and joint cultural visits. Poetics, 36, 316–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kravdal, Ø. (1999). Does marriage require a stronger economic underpinning than informal cohabitation? Population Studies, 53, 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lesthaeghe, R. (Ed.). (2002). Meaning and choice: Value orientations and life course decisions. The Hague, The Netherlands: NIDI/CBGS Publications.Google Scholar
  43. Lillard, L. A., & Waite, L. J. (1995). ‘Til death do us part: Marital disruption and mortality. The American Journal of Sociology, 100, 1131–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lye, D. N., & Biblarz, T. J. (1993). The effects of attitudes toward family life and gender roles on marital satisfaction. Journal of Family Issues, 14, 157–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Martin, S. P. (2004). Women’s education and family timing: Outcomes associated with age at marriage and first birth. In K. M. Neckerman (Ed.), Social inequality (pp. 79–118). New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
  46. Martin, S. P. (2006). Trends in marital dissolution by women’s education in the United States. Demographic Research, 15(20), 537–560. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2006.15.20 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McIntosh, S. (2008). Education and employment in OECD countries. Paris, France: UNESCO: International Institute for Educational Planning.Google Scholar
  48. Müller, W., & Gangl, M. (Eds.). (2003). Transitions from education to work in Europe: The integration of youth into EU labour markets. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Ono, H. (2003). Women's economic standing, marriage timing, and cross-national contexts of gender. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 275–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Oppenheimer, V. K. (1997). Women’s employment and the gain to marriage: The specialization and trading model of marriage. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 431–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Oppenheimer, V. K. (2003). Cohabiting and marriage during young men’s career-development process. Demography, 40, 127–149.Google Scholar
  52. Parsons, T. (1949). The social structure of the family. In R. Anshen (Ed.), The family: Its function and destiny (pp. 173–201). New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  53. Perelli-Harris, B., & Gerber, T. P. (2011). Nonmarital childbearing in Russia: Second demographic transition or pattern of disadvantage? Demography, 48, 317–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pinquart, M., & Sorensen, S. (2011). Spouses, adult children, and children-in-law as caregivers of older adults: A meta-analytic comparison. Psychology and Aging, 26, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Poortman, A. R. (2005). How work affects divorce: The mediating role of financial and time pressures. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 168–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Poortman, A. R., & Kalmijn, M. (2002). Women’s labour market position and divorce in the Netherlands: Evaluating economic interpretations of the work effect. European Journal of Population, 18, 175–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Raley, R. K., & Bumpass, L. L. (2003). The topography of the divorce plateau: Levels and trends in union stability in the United States after 1980. Demographic Research, 8(article 8), 245–260. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2003.8.8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sayer, L. C., Gauthier, A. H., & Furstenberg, F. F. (2004). Educational differences in parents’ time with children: Cross-national variations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1152–1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schoen, R., & Cheng, Y. H. A. (2006). Partner choice and the differential retreat from marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 68, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schwartz, C. R. (2010). Earnings inequality and the changing association between spouses’ earnings. The American Journal of Sociology, 115, 1524–1557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Soons, J. P. M., Liefbroer, A. C., & Kalmijn, M. (2009). The long-term consequences of relationship formation for subjective well-being. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 1254–1270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. South, S. J. (2001). Time-dependent effects of wives’ employment on marital dissolution. American Sociological Review, 66, 226–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sweeney, M. M. (2002). Two decades of family change: The shifting economic foundations of marriage. American Sociological Review, 67, 132–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Thornton, A. (2001). The developmental paradigm, reading history sideways, and family change. Demography, 38, 449–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Thornton, A., Axinn, W. G., & Xie, Y. (2007). Marriage and cohabitation. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Torr, B. M. (2011). The changing relationship between education and marriage in the United States, 1940–2000. Journal of Family History, 36, 483–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Van Damme, M. (2010). Beyond marriage: Women’s economic independence and separation in comparative perspective (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Department of Sociology, Tilburg University, Tilberg, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  68. Van de Werfhorst, H. G., & De Graaf, N. D. (2004). The sources of political orientations in post-industrial society: Social class and education revisited. The British Journal of Sociology, 55, 211–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Waite, L. J. (1995). Does marriage matter? Demography, 32, 483–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. White, L., & Rogers, S. (2000). Economic circumstances and family outcomes: A review of the 1990s. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1035–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Xie, Y., Raymo, J. M., Goyette, K., & Thornton, A. (2003). Economic potential and entry into marriage and cohabitation. Demography, 40, 351–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Population Association of America 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and AnthropologyUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamNetherlands

Personalised recommendations